What is left unshared: using a third space lens to explore information sharing behaviour within scrum in agile software development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31ISIC65225Keywords:
Information sharing, Information withholding, Scrum, Third Space, Agile software developmentAbstract
Introduction. Examines information sharing and withholding within the scrum framework (an agile software development methodology) through a third space lens. Transparency is vital within scrum. However, in practice, transparency is limited; team members frequently negotiate what information to share and what to withhold. A third space lens can explore transparency according to rigid, formal scrum framework requirements versus how transparency is practised in real-world teamwork. It forms a middle zone (third space) where rigid structures (first space) and informal, lived realities (second space) intersect. Here, different viewpoints, discourse styles, knowledges are created. A third space lens can reveal how culture, context and relationships shape what information is shared, withheld, or negotiated.
Method. Scoping literature review on information sharing in agile, scrum and software development literature and use of a third space lens, combined with findings from individual interviews from a use case to exemplify information withholding in scrum.
Analysis. Thematic analysis of literature and interview data.
Results. Information sharing and withholding are negotiated practices in scrum. Information withholding is often conscious, intentional personal or strategic decisions, indicating agency, power dynamics.
Conclusion. Further research on practical implementations might inform information behaviour research in other contexts and information sharing practices in scrum.
References
Almehmadi, F., Hepworth, M. & Maynard, S. (2014). A framework for understanding information sharing: an exploration of the information sharing experiences of female academics in Saudi Arabia. Information Research, 21(4), paper isic01. http://InformationR.net/ir/19-4/isic/isic01.html (Archived by WebCite® at https://www.webcitation.org/http://www.webcitation.org/6U4qtxJ53)
Balloo, K., Ramos, F., Crank, R., Crane, D., Hopkins, S., McGovern, M., Parkes, F., Penno, J., Singh, N., Todd, N., Wilson, V., Windsor, A. & Worsley, S. (2024). Exploring the identities of pathways educators through the lens of Third Space Theory. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 32(5), 1549-1571. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2230986
Bartmes, N. & Shukla, S. (2020). Re-envisioning land-based pedagogies as a transformative third space: perspectives from university academics, students, and Indigenous knowledge holders from Manitoba, Canada. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 14(3), 146-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/15595692.2020.1719062
Bates, M.J. (2010). Information behaviour. In M.J. Bates & M.N. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences (3rd. ed.) (pp. 2381-2391). CRC Press. https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/bates/articles/information-behavior.html (Archived by the Internet Archive at https://web.archive.org/web/20170312062414/https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/bates/articles/information-behavior.html)
Baxter, D. & Turner, N. (2021). Why scrum works in new product development: The role of social capital in managing complexity. Production Planning and Control, 34(13), 1248-1260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1997291
Beck, J.S. (2024). On the whitewashing of third space in teacher education, or don't cite this article. Teaching and Teacher Education, 152, 104786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104786
Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., Kern, J., Marick, B., Martin, R.C., Mellor, S., Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J. & Thomas, D. (2001). Manifesto for agile software development. https://agilemanifesto.org/iso/en/manifesto.html (Archived by the Internet Archive at https://web.archive.org/web/20170426234434/http://agilemanifesto.org/iso/en/manifesto.html)
Benson, S. (2010). "I don’t know if that’d be English or not": Third space theory and literacy instruction. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 53(7), 555-563. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.53.7.3
Bhabha, H.K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203820551
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H.E. Cooper, P.M. Camic, D.L. Long, A.T. Panter, D.E. Rindskopf & K.J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57-71). American Psychological Association. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Bryant, C.L. (2013). Seeking peace: The application of Third Space Theory in Toni Morrison's Sula. CLA Journal-College Language Association, 56(3), 251-266. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44329588
Bussert-Webb, K. & Lewis, K. (2021). Familismo and nontraditional educational possibilities in third space. In J. Keengwe (Ed.), Handbook of research on innovations in non-traditional educational practices (pp. 197-222). IGI Global. https://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4360-3.ch010
Case, D.O. (2012). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs and behaviour (3rd. ed.). (Series editor: Amanda Spink). Emerald Group Publishing.
Cho, S.S. & Song, M. (2023). Programming model for information sharing among IoT devices: Software engineering perspective. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/ACIS 21st International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA) (pp. 116-121). IEEE. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SERA57763.2023.10197720
Collignon, S.E., Nazir, S. & Surendra, N.C. (2022). Agile systems development: Privacy theoretical lens to challenge the full information disclosure paradigm. Information and Management, 59(6), 103679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2022.103679
Dada, O.A. & Sanusi, I.T. (2022). The adoption of software engineering practices in a scrum environment. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 14(6), 1429-1446. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2021.1955431
Diebold, P., Ostberg, J.P., Wagner, S. & Zendler, U. (2015). What do practitioners vary in using scrum? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Agile Software Development (pp. 40-51). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.10361
Dixit, R. & Bhushan, B. (2019). Scrum: An agile software development process and metrics. Journal on Today's Ideas-Tomorrow's Technologies, 7(1), 73-87.
Downey, S. & Sutherland, J. (2013). Scrum metrics for hyperproductive teams: How they fly like fighter aircraft. In Proceedings of the 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4870-4878). IEEE. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.471
Du, J.T. (2014). The information journey of marketing professionals: Incorporating work task-driven information seeking, information judgments, information use, and information sharing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(9), 1850-1869. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23085
Elmborg, J., Jacobs, H.L., McElroy, K. & Nelson, R. (2015). Making a third space for student voices in two academic libraries. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 55(2), 144-155. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.55n2.144
Fisher, K., Naumer, C., Durrance, J., Stromski, L. & Christiansen, T. (2005). Something old, something new: Preliminary findings from an exploratory study about people’s informa¬tion habits and information grounds. Information Research, 10(2), paper 223. http://in¬formationr.net/ir/10-2/paper223.html (Archived by the Internet Archive at https://web.archive.org/web/20201125060244/http://informationr.net/ir/10-2/paper223.html)
Fisher, K.E., Landry, C.F. & Naumer, C. (2007). Social spaces, casual interactions, meaningful exchanges: “Information ground” characteristics based on the college student experience. Information Research, 12(2), paper 291. http://informationr.net/ir/12-2/paper291.html (Archived by the Internet Archive at https://web.archive.org/web/20201124185558/ https://informationr.net/ir/12-2/paper291.html)
Fourie, I. & Julien, H. (2014). Ending the dance: A research agenda for affect and emotion in studies of information behaviour. Information Research, 19(4), paper isic09. http://InformationR.net/ir/19-4/isic/isic09.html
Gholami, S., Sharifabadi, S.R., Shahrivar, A.A. & Farrokhzad, S. (2022). Analysis of the collaborative information seeking behavior’s model among clinical units employees through educational intervention. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 37(3), 953-978. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2022.790
Goyal, S., Gupta, A. & Jha, H. (2023). Current trends in methodology for software development process. In V. Bhateja, J.R. Mohanty, W.F. Fuentes & K. Maharatna (Eds.), Communication, Software and Networks (pp. 621-629). Springer. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4990-6_58
Grubb, A.M. & Begel, A. (2012). On the perceived interdependence and information sharing inhibitions of enterprise software engineers. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1337-1346). Association for Computing Machinery. https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145403
Haas, M.R. & Park, S. (2010). To share or not to share? Professional norms, reference groups, and information withholding among life scientists. Organization Science, 21(4), 873-891. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0500
Hansen, P., Fourie, I. & Meyer, A. (2021). Third space, information sharing, and participatory design. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02327-9
Hinderks, A., Mayo, F.J.D., Thomaschewski, J. & Escalona, M.J. (2022). Approaches to manage the user experience process in agile software development: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 150(2022), 106957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.106957
Hite, R., Midobuche, E., Benavides, A. & Dwyer, J. (2018). Third space theory: A theoretical model for designing informal STEM experiences for rural Latina youth. In T.T. Yuen, E.P. Bonner & M.G. Arreguín-Anderson (Eds.), (Under)represented Latin@s in STEM: increasing participation throughout education and the workplace (pp. 189-202). Peter Lang Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3726/b13022
Hosseini, M., Shahri, A., Phalp, K. & Ali, R. (2016). Foundations for transparency requirements engineering. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (pp. 225-231). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30282-9_15
Huisman, M., Joye, S. & Biltereyst, D. (2020). To share or not to share: An explorative study of health information non-sharing behaviour among Flemish adults aged fifty and over. Information Research, 25(3), paper 870. http://InformationR.net/ir/25-3/paper870.html (Archived by the Internet Archive at https://bit.ly/2QA1lhU)
Idrus, F. (2015). Examining classroom transformational spaces using the third space theory in developing students' sense of shared identity. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0501.04
Ingwersen, P. & Järvelin, K. (2005). The turn: integration of information seeking and retrieval in context. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3851-8
Jordan, K. & Elsden-Clifton, J. (2014). Through the lens of third space theory: Possibilities for research methodologies in educational technologies. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, CSEDU (pp. 220-224). Science and Technology Publications. https://doi.org/10.5220/0004792402200224
Kadenic, M.D., Koumaditis, K. & Junker-Jensen, L. (2023). Mastering scrum with a focus on team maturity and key components of scrum. Information and Software Technology, 153(2023), 107079. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107079
Källén, C.B. (2021). Binary oppositions and third spaces: Perspectives on the interplay between gender, genre practice, instrument and cultural capital in upper secondary schools in Sweden. In S.V. Onsrud, H.S. Blix & I.L. Vestad (Eds.), Gender issues in Scandinavian music education (pp. 74-94). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003038207
Kang, J. (2017). The study of east wind-west wind from the perspective of the third space theory. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Humanities Science, Management and Education Technology (HSMET 2017) (pp. 250-253). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/hsmet-17.2017.51
Kaur, K. & Jajoo, A. (2015). Applying agile methodologies in industry projects: Benefits and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Computing Communication Control and Automation (pp. 832-836). IEEE. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCUBEA.2015.166
Kendall, K.E., Kendall, J.E., Germonprez, M. & Mathiassen, L. (2020). The third design space: A postcolonial perspective on corporate engagement with open source software communities. Information Systems Journal, 30(2), 369-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12270
Klein, M., Moreno, G.A., Parkes, D.C. & Wallnau, K. (2010). Designing for incentives: Better information sharing for better software engineering. In Proceedings of the FSE/SDP workshop on Future of software engineering research (pp. 195-200). Association for Computing Machinery. https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1882362.1882404
Kuhlthau, C.C. & Cole, C. (2012). Third space as an information system and services intervention methodology for engaging the user's deepest levels of information need. In Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504901074
Laanti, M., Similä, J. & Abrahamsson, P. (2013). Definitions of agile software development and agility. In F. McCaffery, R.V. O’Connor & R. Messnarz (Eds.), Systems, software and services process improvement (pp. 247-258). Springer. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39179-8_22
Lee, P.T.Y., Lee, A.J., Chau, M. & Deng, B. (2024). How perceived transparency in information system development processes improves project quality in agile IT enterprises. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 124(6), 2284-2311. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2023-0493
Levy, R. (2008). ‘Third spaces’ are interesting places: Applying 'third space theory' to nursery-aged children's constructions of themselves as readers. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 8(1), 43-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798407087161
Lutze, R. (2020). Digital twin based software design in eHealth-a new development approach for health/medical software products. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) (pp. 1-9). IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.9198546
Maaß, S. & Buchmüller, S. (2018). The crucial role of cultural probes in participatory design for and with older adults. i-com, 17(2), 119-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/icom-2018-0015
Maddamsetti, J. (2023). Elementary ESL teachers’ advocacy for emerging bilinguals: A third space perspective. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 18(2), 153-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2021.1975541
Maniotes, L.K. (2005). The transformative power of literary third space. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Colorado, Boulder, USA.
Masood, Z., Hoda, R. & Blincoe, K. (2020). Real world scrum a grounded theory of variations in practice. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 48(5), 1579-1591. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.3025317
Mombeshora, I.M. & Dekoninck, E. (2013). Supply chain eco-information sharing in the product development process through computer aided design software. In U. Lindemann, V. Srinivasan, Y.S. Kim, S.W. Lee, J. Clarkson & G. Cascini (Eds.), DS 75-6: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13), Design for Harmonies, Vol. 6: Design Information and Knowledge, Seoul, Korea (pp. 73-82). The Design Society.
Muller, M. & Druin, A. (2012). Participatory design: the third space in HCI. In J. Jacko (Ed.), The human-computer interaction handbook (3rd. ed.) (pp. 1125-1154). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Muthucumaru, A. (2021). The future of collaborative technology within scrum/agile practices. The IJournal: Student Journal of the Faculty of Information, 7(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.33137/ijournal.v7i1.37897
Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place: Cafés, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day. Paragon House Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.9561417
Pardo, C., Ortega, W. & Gómez, O.S. (2021). A reference model based on agile values, principles and aspects of scrum, XP and kanban to foster the adoption of agility in industry. International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering and Information Technology, 11(6), 2393-2399. https://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.11.6.13667
Petter, S. (2018). If you can’t say something nice: Factors contributing to team member silence in distributed software project teams. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMIS-CPR '18 (pp. 43-49). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209626.3209718
Phuwanartnurak, A.J. & Hendry, D.G. (2009). Understanding information sharing in software development through wiki log analysis. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (pp. 1-2). Association for Computing Machinery. https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1641309.1641356
Pilerot, O. (2012). LIS research on information sharing activities – people, places, or information. Journal of Documentation, 68(4), 559-581. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220411211239110
Ramkellawan-Arteaga, R. (2020). Just because we look alike doesn’t mean we are the same: Using an examination of Indo-Caribbean identity to inform a third space lens. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 42(2), 104-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2020.1757958
Roundtree, S.V. & Shirzadian, M. (2020). Third space: A keyword essay. Community Literacy Journal, 14(2), 173-184. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/clj.2020.a772130
Savolainen, R. (2007). Information behavior and information practice: Reviewing the “umbrella concepts” of information-seeking studies. The Library Quarterly, 77(2), 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1086/517840
Savolainen, R. (2017). Information sharing and knowledge sharing as communicative activities. Information Research, 22(3), paper 767. http://InformationR.net/ir/22-3/paper767.html (Archived by WebCite® at https://www.webcitation.org/6tTRz0IcS)
Savolainen, R. (2019). Modeling the interplay of information seeking and information sharing: A conceptual analysis. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 71(4), 518-534. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-10-2018-0266
Sedawi, W., Ben Zvi Assaraf, O. & Reiss, M.J. (2023). Fostering Bedouin students’ sense of place in the light of place-based education and third-space theory. In P.G. Patrick (Eds.), How people learn in informal science environments (pp. 373-396). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13291-9_19
Singh, D. & Kender, K. (2023). Ecofeminist design for digital third spaces. Interactions, 30(4), 40-43. https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3600060
Soja, E.W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981689806400112
Sonnenwald, D.H. (2006). Challenges in sharing information effectively: Examples from com-mand and control. Information Research, 11(4), paper 270. https://informationr.net/ir/11-4/paper270.html (Archived by the Internet Archive at https://web.archive.org/web/20260119194854/https://informationr.net/ir/11-4/paper270.html)
Talja, S. (2002). Information sharing in academic communities: Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. New Review of Information Behavior Research, 3(1), 143-159.
Tatham, C. (2023). A systematic literature review of third space theory in research with children (aged 4-12) in multicultural educational settings. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 33(3), 867-886. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2283798
Tshabalala, M.M. & Marnewick, C. (2021). Agile as an enabler towards innovation-based organisational transformations. South African Journal of Information Management, 23(1), 1-10. https://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v23i1.1309
van der Valk, R., Pelliccione, P., Lago, P., Heldal, R., Knauss, E. & Juul, J. (2018). Transparency and contracts: Continuous integration and delivery in the automotive ecosystem. In Proceedings of the ICSE-SEIP ’18: 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice Track (pp. 23–32). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183519.3183543
van Engelenburg, S., Janssen, M. & Klievink, B. (2019). Design of a software architecture supporting business-to-government information sharing to improve public safety and security. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 52(3), 595-618. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10844-017-0478-z
Veles, N. (2022). Optimising the third space in higher education: Case studies of intercultural and cross-boundary collaboration. Taylor & Francis. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003259527
Verbaan, E. & Cox, A.M. (2014). Occupational sub-cultures, jurisdictional struggle and third space: Theorising professional service responses to research data management. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(3), 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.02.008
White, S., White, S. & Borthwick, K. (2021). Blended professionals, technology and online learning: Identifying a socio‐technical third space in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 75(1), 161-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12252
Widén, G. & Hansen, P. (2012). Managing collaborative information sharing: Bridging research on information culture and collaborative information behaviour. Information Research, 17(4), paper 538. https://informationr.net/ir/17-4/paper538.html (Archived by the Internet Archive at https://web.archive.org/web/20251111194416/https://www.informationr.net/ir/17-4/paper538.html)
Wilson, T.D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-270. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007145
Witenstein, M.A. & Cervantes, A. (2020). Unhinging the machismo binary through a third space lens: Reframing Latinx males postsecondary academic decision-making. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies, 1(3), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.29252/johepal.1.3.27
Zhang, H. & Yuan, R. (2019). Uncertain identities of non-higher-education-based EFL teacher educators: A third space theory perspective. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 25(7), 874-889. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1689491
Zhu, G., Mena, J. & Johnson, C. (2020). Chinese student teachers’ teaching practicum experiences: Insights from transformative learning, third space, and dialogical-self theory. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101638. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101638
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anika Meyer, Ina Fourie, Preben Hansen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
