Transforming the Nordic Welfare Regime – Tracing Friction in Introducing Welfare Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.51277Keywords:
technologisation of care, welfare technology, care of older people, policy analysis, country comparisonAbstract
Based on a thematic content analysis of 63 key policy documents from the five Nordic countries, we discuss national strategies about introducing welfare technology to care for older persons. We argue that the Nordic care regime is a central research context in two senses: 1) the tradition of strong states and extensive social rights, and 2) the transformation of welfare states through marketisation and digitalisation, which also underpin welfare technology policies. We contribute to care policy research by contrasting the Nordic strategies and definitions and by identifying friction emerging within and across them. Our analysis shows that, while the overall image of WT policy is rather similar between the Nordic countries, the Danish, Finnish and Norwegian policy documents show signs of the earliest implementation. While the rest of the countries have implemented pilot-based, regional approaches, Denmark has seen a more centrally driven development. Our analysis also identifies friction in the welfare technology policies, portrayed as overly optimistic expectations; contested national rollouts; and financial resources designated for pilots and acquisition but not for maintenance costs. We argue that the notion of friction may support inter-stakeholder communication by providing cues to and making sense of the complexity of welfare technology innovation.
Downloads
References
Aaen J, Nielsen, J A & Elmholdt K T (2018). 10 år med velfærdsteknologi: Strategi og praksis. Samfundslederskab i Skandinavien 33(3), 236–259. https://doi.org/10.22439/sis.v33i3.5552
Ahern D K, Kreslake J M & Phalen J M (2006). What is eHealth (6): perspectives on the evolution of eHealth research. Journal of medical Internet research 8(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.1.e4
Aidukaite J, Hort S & Ainsaar M (2022). Current trends in social welfare policies toward the older people in the Baltic and Nordic countries: an explorative study. Journal of Baltic Studies 53(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2021.1998166
Anttonen, A & Karsio O (2017) How marketisation is changing the Nordic model of care for older people. In Martinelli F, Anttonen A and Mätzke M (eds), Social Services Disrupted. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 219–238. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786432117.00020
Anttonen A & Meagher G (2013) Mapping marketisation: concepts and goals. In Meagher G and Szebehely M (eds), Marketisation in Nordic Eldercare. Stockholm: Stockholm University, 13–22.
Bettio F & Plantenga J (2004) Comparing care regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics 10(1), 85–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570042000198245
Braun V & Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brennan D, Cass B, Himmelweit S & Szebehely M (2012) The marketisation of care: Rationales and consequences in Nordic and liberal care regimes. Journal of European social policy 22(4), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928712449772
Bryant B R, Bryant D P, Shih M & Seok S (2010) Assistive technology and supports provision: A selective review of the literature and proposed areas of application. Exceptionality 18(4), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2010.513925
Chang F, Kuoppamäki S & Östlund B (2022) Technology scripts in care practice: A case study of assistant nurses’ use of a social alarm system in Swedish nursing homes. Digital Health 8, 20552076221089077. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221089077
Chevallier, M (2023) Staging Paro: The care of making robot(s) care. Social Studies of Science 53(5), 635–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221126148
Christensen, J K B (2018) The emergence and unfolding of telemonitoring practices in different healthcare organizations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010061
Dahl H M (2012) Neo-liberalism meets the Nordic welfare state—Gaps and silences. NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 20(4), 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2012.747790
Dahler A M (2018) Welfare technologies and ageing bodies: Various ways of practising autonomy. Rehabilitation Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3096405
Doughty K, Monk A, Bayliss C, Brown S, Dewsbury L, Dunk B, Gallagher V, Grafham K, Jones M & Lowe C (2007) Telecare, telehealth and assistive technologies—do we know what we're talking about? Journal of Assistive Technologies 1(2), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1108/17549450200700012
DigiFinland (2025) Tekoäly hyvinvointialueilla: sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon käyttötapaukset ja kansallinen edistäminen. Esiselvitystyön loppuraportti, maaliskuu 2024. https://digifinland.fi/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/DigiFinland_tekoaly_loppuraportti_210324.pdf, accessed 9.10.2025
Directorate of Health (Helsedirektoratet), 2020. «Omsorg 2020. Årsrapport».
https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/rapporter/omsorg-2020--arsrapport-2020/statistikk/bruk-av-velferdsteknologi, accessed 10.10.2025
Downey G L & Zuiderent-Jerak T (2017) Making and doing: Engagement and reflexive learning in STS. In Felt U, Fouché R, Miller C A & Smith-Doerr L (eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge: MIT Press, 223–250.
European Commission (2022) Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2022. Available at https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/digital-economy-and-society-index-desi-2022 (accessed 28 January 2025).
Era S (2021) Equality according to whom? Debating an age-related restriction in the upcoming disability legislation reform in Finland. Journal of Aging Studies 58, 100953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100953
Fredskild, T U & Dalkjær D (2017) Velfærdsteknologi i sundhedsvæsnet (2. udgave. 1. oplag. ed.). Gad.
Frennert S (2018) Lost in digitalization? Municipality employment of welfare technologies. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 14(6), 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1496362
Frennert S & Baudin K (2021) The concept of welfare technology in Swedish municipal eldercare. Disability and Rehabilitation 43, 1220–1227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1661035
Frennert S, Petersson L & Erlingsdottir G (2023) “More” work for nurses: the ironies of eHealth. BMC Health Services Research 23(1), 411. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09418-3
Frennert S & Östlund B (2018) Narrative Review: Technologies in Eldercare. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies 6(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v6i1.2518
Gaedt L (2013) Spiserobot til borgere med fysisk handikap. Velfærdsteknologi vurdering i Socialstyrelsens ABT projekt.
Greubel C, Moors E H & Peine A (2021) From mattering to mattering more: ‘Goods’ and ‘bads’ in ageing and innovation policy discourses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(14), 7596. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147596
Gudmundsson H and Thorarinsson T (2015) Innovation and welfare [Nýsköpun og velferð]. https://www.visir.is/g/2015151008750/nyskopun-og-velferdartaekniisir
Hammar T, Alastalo H & Mielikäinen L (2018). Teknologia tukee kotihoidon asiakkaan omatoimisuutta ja turvallisuutta-eroja käyttöönotossa maakuntien välillä. Helsinki: Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos.
Hasselblad A (2021) Values behind welfare technology and their possible realization: Creation of a technology evaluation method for care practices. Mid Sweden University.
Helsedirektoratet (2022) Omsorg 2022. Årsrapport - velferdsteknologi i omsorgstjenesten. Available at https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/rapporter/omsorg-2022--arsrapport-velferdsteknologi-i-omsorgstjenesten/statistikk-for-bruk-av-velferdsteknologi-i-den-kommunale-helse-og-omsorgstjenesten (accessed 28 January 2025).
Hämäläinen, A. (2024). Encountering the other – care ethics and the technologisation of care of older persons [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Jyväskylä. JYU Dissertations, 782.
Hämäläinen A, Leinonen E & Era S (2024) Attunement as a practice of encountering dementia time in long-term eldercare work. Time & Society 33(2), 170–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463x231215945
Hæsum L K E (2015) Health literacy and the use of telehomecare technology – An exploration of both sides of the interaction. Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
Højland N (2007). Teknologi afløser menneskelig pleje. Jyllands-Posten, 13. september 2007.
Iceland´s Parliament (2023). Tillaga til þingsályktunar um aðgerðaáætlun um þjónustu við eldra fólk fyrir árin 2023–2 027 [Action plan related to services for older people in the years 2023- 2027]. https://www.althingi.is/altext/153/s/1761.html
Jaakola J (2023) Welfare Technologies in Finland: An Ethico-politics of Hype, Hope and Experimentation. Turku: University of Turku.
Kamp A, Obstfelder A & Andersson K (2019) Welfare technologies in care work. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 9(S5), 1. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v9is5.112692
Karhinen J, Oinas T, Tammelin M, Hämäläinen A, Hirvonen H, Mustola V, Rantala E & Taipale S (2021) Vanhustyö ja teknologia. Jyväskylän yliopiston vanhustyön kyselytutkimus 2021: Katsaus tutkimusaineistoon. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
Kohlen H (2011) Care transformations: Attentiveness, professional ethics and thoughts towards differentiation. Nursing Ethics 18(2), 258–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733010396818
Kommunernes Landsforening (2018) Center for Velfærdsteknologi. Statusrapport 2018. Afsluttende rapport. https://www.kl.dk/media/17891/statusrapport-2018.pdf
Kommunernes Landsforening (2020) Velfærdsteknologi i kommunerne - status på anvendelsen af velfærdsteknologier på socialområdet og sundheds- og ældreområdet.
Nasjonal kommunikasjonsmyndighet (2023) Digital inkludering - ekomtjenester for alle. Rambøll.
la Cour A & Højlund H (2019) Untimely welfare technologies. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 9(S5), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v9is5.112688
Lilholt P H (2016) Evaluation of a Telehealthcare Intervention for Patients with COPD: health-and patient-related evaluation of the Danish telecare north trial. Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
Lindberg D (2023) Välfärdsteknologi i de nordiska länderna: En kartläggning av statliga satsningar(978-91-89787-02-5(ISBN)). http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:norden:org:diva-12932
Lipp B M (2019) Interfacing RobotCare - On the Techno-Politics of Innovation. Munich: Technische Universität München.
Lunde A, Drachmann A L & Christiansen K (2017) Sygeplejerskers arbejde med telemedicin i en tværsektoriel kontekst. Klinisk Sygepleje 31(2), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1903-2285-2017-02-02
Lydahl D (2023) Good care and adverse effects: Exploring the use of social alarms in care for older people in Sweden. Health 28(4), 559–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593231185260
Lydahl D & Davidsson A (2024) Values of welfare technologies: a qualitative study of how employees in Swedish care for older adults understand and justify the use of new technology. BMC Health Services Research 24(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-12053-1
Ministry of Health (2019) Heilbrigðisstefna Stefna fyrir íslenska heilbrigðisþjónustu til ársins 2030 [Health Policy: A policy for Iceland's health services until 2030]. https://www.stjornarradid.is/library/04-Raduneytin/Heilbrigdisraduneytid/ymsar-skrar/Heilbrigdisstefna_4.juli.pdf.
Ministry of Health (2020). Aðgerðaáætlun um þjónustu við einstaklinga með heilabilun [Action plan for services for people with dementia]. https://www.stjornarradid.is/library/04-Raduneytin/Heilbrigdisraduneytid/ymsar-skrar/A%C3%B0ger%C3%B0a%C3%A1%C3%A6tlun%20um%20%C3%BEj%C3%B3nustu%20vi%C3%B0%20einstaklinga%20me%C3%B0%20heilabilun.pdf
Ministry of Health (2021). Virðing og reisn. Samþætt heilbrigðis- og félagsþjónusta fyrir eldra folk [Dignity and respect: Integrated health and social services for the care of older people – A strategic plan]. https://www.stjornarradid.is/gogn/rit-og-skyrslur/stakt-rit/2021/06/30/Virding-og-reisn.-Samthaett-heilbrigdis-og-felagsthjonusta-fyrir-eldra-folk/
Ministry of Health and Care Services (2011). NOU 2011: 11 Innovasjon i omsorg.
Ministry of Health and Ministry of Social Affairs (2023). Gott að eldast: Aðgerðaáætlun um þjónustu við eldra fólk 2023–2027 [It is good to grow old: Policy plan in relation to services for older people]. https://www.stjornarradid.is/library/02-Rit--skyrslur-og-skrar/Gottadeldast_Adgerdaaetlun.pdf.
Ministry of Welfare (2015). Policy around innovation and technology in welfare services. [Stefna í nýsköpun og tækni á sviði velferðarþjónustu]. https://www. stjornarradid.is/media/velferdarraduneytimedia/media/rit-og-skyrslur-2015/Stefna_i_ nyskopun_og_taekni_28092015.pdf
Ministry of Welfare (2016). E-health services [Fjarheilbrigðisþjónusta - Efling fjarheilbrigðisþjónustu Skýrsla starfshóps]. Ministry of Welfare. https://www.stjornarradid.is/gogn/rit-og-skyrslur/stakt-rit/2016/10/27/Efling-fjarheilbrigdisthjonustu-skyrsla-starfshops/
Ministry of Welfare (2018). E-health services [Fjarheilbrigðisþjónusta - Í takt við nýja tíma]. Ministry of Welfare. https://www.stjornarradid.is/gogn/rit-og-skyrslur/stakt-rit/2018/09/19/Fjarheilbrigdisthjonusta-i-takt-vid-nyja-tima/
Moberg L (2017) Marketization in Swedish eldercare: Implications for users, professionals, and the state. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Mort M, May C R & Tracy W (2003) Remote doctors and absent patients; acting at a distance in telemedicine? Science, Technology and Human Values 28(2), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243902250907
Neven L & Peine A (2017) From triple win to triple sin: How a problematic future discourse is shaping the way people age with technology. Societies 7(3), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc7030026
Nickelsen, N. C. M. (2013) Criteria of implementing feeding assistance robots in disability care: a sociomaterial perspective. Journal of comparative social work,8(2), 1–29.
Nickelsen, N. C. M. (2019a) Imagining and tinkering with assistive robotics in care for the disabled. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 10(1), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2019-0009
Nickelsen, N. C. M. (2019b). Active citizenship and feeding assistive robotics – a crumbling story? In C. Hasse & D. M. Sondergaard (eds.) Designing Robots – Designing Humans (pp. 73–87). Abingdon: Routledge.
Nickelsen N C M & Pols J (2024) Enacting different stories - what does telemonitoring become in chronic ill persons lives? STS Encounters - Research papers from DASTS 16(3), 20.
Nickelsen N C M & Simonsen Abildgaard J (2022) The entwinement of policy, design and care scripts: Providing alternative choice‐dependency situations with care robots. Sociology of Health & Illness 44(2), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13434
Nielsen A J & Jensen C B (2013) Travelling frictions: Global disease self-management, local comparisons and emergent patients. Science & Technology Studies 26(2), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.55299
Nielsen J A, Andersen K N & Sigh A (2016) Robots conquering local government services: A case study of eldercare in Denmark. Information polity 21(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-160381
Nordic Welfare Centre (2024). Welfare Technology. Available at https://nordicwelfare.org/en/welfare-policy/welfaretech/ (accessed January 28, 2025).
Olsson T & Viscovi D (2023) Digitalised welfare: Access, usage, and outcomes among older adults. Media and Communication 11(3), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i3.6694
Oudshoorn N (2009) Physical and digital proximity: emerging ways of health care in face-to-face and telemonitoring of heart-failure patients. Sociology of Health and Illness 31(3), 390– 405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01141.x
Pols J (2012). Care at a Distance: On the Closeness of Technology. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.26530/oapen_413032
Procter R, Wherton J, Greenhalgh T, Sugarhood P, Rouncefield M & Hinder S (2016) Telecare call centre work and ageing in place. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 25, 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-015-9242-5
Pekkarinen S & Melkas H (2019) Welfare state transition in the making: Focus on the niche-regime interaction in Finnish elderly care services. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 145, 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.015
Regeringen (2011) Et Danmark der står sammen, Regeringsgrundlaget.
Regeringen & KL (2013) Aftale om kommunernes økonomi for 2014.
Regeringen, KL & Regioner D (2022) Digitalisering der løfter samfundet - Den fællesoffentlige digitaliseringsstrategi 2022–2025.
Reykjavik Welfare Services (2022). Stefna velferðarsviðs Reykjavíkurborgar á sviði velferðartækni 2022-2026 [City of Reykjavik Policy ein relation to Welfare Technology 2022-2026]. https://reykjavik.is/sites/default/files/2022-04/Dr%C3%B6g-Stefna-Velfer%C3%B0arsvi%C3%B0s-um-velfer%C3%B0art%C3%A6kni-2022-2026.pdf
Rostad H M & Stokke R (2021) Integrating Welfare Technology in Long-term Care Services: Nationwide Cross-sectional Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 23(8), e22316-e22316. https://doi.org/10.2196/22316
Rytkönen A (2018) Hoivatyöntekijöiden työn kuormittavuus ja teknologian käyttö vanhustyössä. Tampere: Tampere University.
Schou J & Pors A S (2019) Digital by default? A qualitative study of exclusion in digitalised welfare. Social policy & administration 53(3), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12470
Sjögren H, Niemistö C, Hearn J & Viallon M (2023) What’s the problem with older people? A policy analysis of selected Finnish reports and documents on ageing, care and digitalisation. Hanken School of Economics Working Papers: 567. Helsinki: Hanken School of Economics.
Socialstyrelsen (2021) E-hälsa och välfärdsteknik i kommunerna 2021: uppföljning av den digitala utvecklingen i socialtjänsten och den kommunala hälso- och sjukvården.
Socialstyrelsen (2023) E-hälsa och välfärdsteknik i kommunerna 2023: uppföljning av den digitala utvecklingen i socialtjänsten och den kommunala hälso- och sjukvården. Socialstyrelsen.
Socialstyrelsen (2024) E-hälsa och välfärdsteknik i kommunerna 2024. Uppföljning av den digitala utvecklingen i socialtjänst och kommunal hälso- och sjukvård.
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö (STM) (2008) Ikäihmisten palvelujen laatusuositus [Quality recommendation on services of older persons.] Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön julkaisuja 2008:3.
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö (STM) (2015) Information to support well-being and service renewal: eHealth and eSocial Strategy 2020. Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö.
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö (STM) (2017) Laatusuositus hyvän ikääntymisen turvaamiseksi ja palvelujen parantamiseksi 2017–2019 [Quality recommendation to guarantee a good quality of life and improved services for older persons 2017–2019.] Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön julkaisuja 2017:6.
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö (STM) (2018) Hyvinvoinnin AiRo-ohjelma #hyteairo. [AiRo program for Welfare #hyteairo.] Helsinki: Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö.
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö (STM) (2020) Laatusuositus hyvän ikääntymisen turvaamiseksi ja palvelujen parantamiseksi 2020–2023. [Quality recommendation to guarantee a good quality of life and improved services for older persons 2020–2023.] Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön julkaisuja 2020:29.
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö (STM) (2024) Laatusuositus aktiivisen ja toimintakykyisen ikääntymisen ja kestävien palvelujen turvaamiseksi 2024–2027 [Quality recommendation to guarantee a active and capable ageing and sustainable services 2024–2027]. Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön julkaisuja 2024: 4.
Szebehely M & Meagher G (2018) Nordic eldercare–weak universalism becoming weaker? Journal of European social policy 28(3), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928717735062
Teknologisk Institut (2023) Velfærdsteknologi i de danske kommuner 2023. Undersøgelse af danske kommuners anvendelse af velfærdsteknologi.
Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos (THL) (2023) Kotihoidon uudet ratkaisut – kotona asumisen teknologiat ikäihmisille – KATI-ohjelman 2020–2023 loppuraportti. [Technology Supporting Smart Ageing and Care at Home Programme 2020–2023, final report].
Thygesen H (2019) Velferdsteknologi og nye tjenesteløsninger: definisjoner, kategorier, bakgrunn og etikk. In Moser I (ed), Velferdsteknologi - en ressursbok. Cappelen Damm akademisk.
Tsing A L (2005) Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691263526
Tupasela A, Snell K & Tarkkala H (2020) The Nordic data imaginary. Big Data & Society 7(1), 2053951720907107. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720907107
Udsen F W (2016) Health Economic Evaluation of Telehealthcare : Can we include “why” and “under what circumstances” telehealthcare is cost-effective in health economic evaluation? Aalborg Universitetsforlag. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5278/VBN.PHD.SOCSCI.00064
Valokivi H, Carlo S, Kvist E & Outila M (2023) Digital ageing in Europe: A comparative analysis of Italian, Finnish and Swedish national policies on eHealth. Ageing & Society 43, 835–856. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x21000945
Van Aerschot L & Parviainen J (2020) Robots responding to care needs? A multitasking care robot pursued for 25 years, available products offer simple entertainment and instrumental assistance. Ethics and Information Technology 22(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09536-0
Wright J (2023) Robots Won't Save Japan: An Ethnography of Eldercare Automation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501768040.001.0001
Zechner M, Näre L, Karsio O, Olakivi A, Sointu L, Hoppania H-K & Vaittinen T (2022) The Politics of Ailment: A New Approach to Care. Bristol: Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2rh2c16
Åkerlind C (2017) eHomecare–For Safety and Communication in Everyday Life: The Perspectives of Older Users, Relatives and Care Managers. Mälardalen: Mälardalen University.
Östlund B (2015) The benefits of involving older people in the design process. In Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for Aging: First International Conference, ITAP 2015, Held as Part of HCI International 2015, Los Angeles, CA, USA, August 2-7, 2015. Proceedings, Part I 1 (pp. 3-14). Springer International Publishing.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Antti Hämäläinen, Joni Jaakola, Doris Lydahl, Hilde Thygesen, Kristín Bjornsdottir, Niels Christian Mossfeldt Nickelsen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration agree to publish their articles under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This means means articles are free for anybody to read and download, and to copy and disseminate for non-commercial purposes as long as appropriate credit is given, a link is provided to the license, and any changes made are clearly indicated. Authors retain copyright of their work.
