Gräsrotsbyråkraten och den motvillige brukaren:
Erfarenheter från en tidig insats med förebyggande skuldrådgivning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64098/SVT.2025.32.54869Nyckelord:
debt counseling, early interventions, ethics, focus group interviews, law, preventive work, street-level bureaucracyAbstract
Over-indebtedness is a societal problem affecting nearly half a million individuals in Sweden, placing them at risk of deteriorating health and well-being. Municipal budget and debt counselling services constitute the only welfare actors that offer preventive support to individuals at risk. Despite this, regulations governing preventive debt counselling in the new Social Services Act remain vague, and there is a lack of methodological guidance for how such work should be carried out. This study aims to investigate the conditions for preventive debt counselling within social services by examining a one-year early intervention targeting young adults aged 18–30 with rent arrears. As part of the intervention, attempts were made to contact individuals and offer debt counselling. The debt counsellors who implemented the intervention were interviewed to explore the conditions that shaped their discretion and coping strategies. The results show that the early intervention was affected by resource shortages in relation to the labour-intensive nature of the work, while the regular operations still had to be maintained. Additional challenges included difficulties in establishing contact with the target group, as well as ethical considerations concerning the balance between the intervention’s potential benefits and its risks for participants—particularly the risk of intrusion of the individual’s autonomy. To manage the discrepancy between available resources and the intervention’s objectives, the debt counsellors employed the coping strategies of creaming—prioritising the regular client group who were motivated and accessible—and rationalisation—simplifying the legal framework regulating preventive debt counselling. The conclusions discuss the preconditions for preventive debt counselling in light of the study’s findings.
Referenser
Alexius, K. (2021). The Principle of Proportionality, Article 8 of the ECHR and Swedish Care Orders in Cases of Neglect. A Sketch of a Theoretical Framework. Review of European Administrative Law, 14(4), s. 7–22. doi: 10.7590/187479821X16364535488019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7590/187479821X16364535488019
Angelin, A. (2009). Den dubbla vanmaktens logik—En studie om långvarig arbetslöshet och socialbidragstagande bland unga vuxna. Diss. Lunds universitet.
Beauchamp, T.L. & Childress, J.F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press.
Beauchamp, T.L. & Rauprich, O. (2016). Principlism. I ten Have, H. (red.) Encyclopedia of Global Bio Ethics. Springer, s. 2282–2293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_348
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), s. 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Buffat, A. (2016). When and why discretion is weak or strong: the case of taxing officers in a Public Unemployment Fund. I Hupe, P., Hill, M. & Buffat, A. (red.) Understanding street-level bureaucracy. Policy Press, s. 79–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56687/9781447313281-007
Callegari, J., Liedgren, P. & Kullberg, C. (2022). The making of the indebted wo/man: Gendered constructions of fiscal identities and help-giving technologies in Swedish budget and debt counselling. Nordic Social Work Research, 12(1), s. 122–142. doi: 10.1080/2156857X.2020.1786713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2020.1786713
Eriksson, M. (2024). En folkhälsovetenskaplig preventionsapproach: – ett sätt att stärka kunskapsbasen om förebyggande socialt arbete och en förebyggande socialtjänst? Socialmedicinsk tidskrift, 101(4-6), s. 511–530. doi: 10.62607/smt.v101i4-6.32869 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62607/smt.v101i4-6.32869
Eriksson, E. & Davidsson, T. (2024). Fattigdomsfällan—överskuldsättning som socialt problem. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 31(3–4), s. 337–359. doi: 10.3384/SVT.2024.31.3-4.5627 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/SVT.2024.31.3-4.5627
Evans, T. (2011). Professionals, Managers and Discretion: Critiquing Street-Level Bureaucracy. The British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), s. 368–386. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq074
Ferreira, M.B., Almeida, F., Soro, J.C., Hereter, M.M., Pinto, D.C. & Silva, C.S. (2021). On the Relation Between Over-Indebtedness and Well-Being: An Analysis of the Mechanisms Influencing Health, Sleep, Life Satisfaction, and Emotional Well-Being. Frontiers in Psychology, 12: 591875. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.591875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.591875
Harrits, G. S. (2014). Street level bureaucrats' role perceptions and decisions in preventive welfare policies. A case study from Denmark. I Law and Society Association Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, USA, 29 maj-1 juni 2014.
Harrits, G.S. & Møller, M.Ø. (2014). Prevention at the Front Line: How Home Nurses, Pedagogues, and Teachers Transform Public Worry into Decisions on Special Efforts. Public Management Review, 16(4), s. 447–480. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.841980 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841980
Hermerén, G. (2018). Utgångspunkter för etisk analys i socialt arbete. I Pettersson, U. (red.) Etik och socialtjänst: Om förutsättningarna för det sociala arbetets etik. 5 uppl., Gleerups, s. 13–44.
Hunter, C., Bretherton, J., Halliday, S. & Johnsen, S. (2016). Legal Compliance in Street-Level Bureaucracy: A Study of UK Housing Officers. Law & Policy, 38(1), s. 81–95. doi: 10.1111/lapo.12049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12049
Hupe, P. & Buffat, A. (2014). A Public Service Gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 16(4), s. 548–569. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.854401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.854401
Hupe, P. & Hill, M. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), s. 279–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x
Janebová, R. (2023). The Application of the Legal Principle of Proportionality in the Practice of Social Work. European Journal of Social Work, 26(3), s. 589–600. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2022.2063800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2063800
Johansson, N. (2025). Exploring the feasibility of screening and preventive financial counselling for families with young children in Sweden. Diss. Uppsala universitet.
Johansson, N., Warner, G., Avogadri, N. & Sarkadi, A. (2024). Screening for economic hardship at Child Health Care Centres: A qualitative study of stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of the Healthier Wealthier Families model in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 53(4), s. 406–412. doi: 10.1177/14034948241252227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948241252227
Konsumentverket. (2015). Med väntan växer skulden: En fördjupad studie av den kommunala budget- och skuldrådgivningen (Rapport 2015:8).
Konsumentverket. (2023). Läget i landet 2023, kommunernas budget- och skuldrådgivning. https://publikationer.konsumentverket.se/produkter-och-tjanster/bus-och-kvl/laget-i-landet-budget-och-skuldradgivning
Kronofogden. (2026). Statistik. https://kronofogden.se/om-kronofogden/statistik [2026-01-12].
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Modern politisk filosofi: en introduktion. Nya Doxa.
Levinsson, H., Probert-Lindström, S., Holmgren, R., Nilsson Sundström, E. & Ahlström, R. (2023). Suicidal behaviour in over-indebted individuals: a cross-sectional study in Sweden. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 77(7), s. 669–675. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2023.2218349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2023.2218349
Liedgren, P. & Kullberg, C. (2021). Getting better? – Interventions to reduce over-indebtedness among individuals and families. Insolvensrättslig tidskrift, (2), s. 27–48.
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. 30th anniversary expanded edition. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Morgan, D. (1996). Focus Groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, s. 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
Pettersson, U. (red.). (2018). Etik och socialtjänst: Om förutsättningarna för det sociala arbetets etik. 5 uppl., Gleerups.
Preston-Shoot, M. & Cornish, S. (2014). Paternalism or Proportionality? Experiences and Outcomes of the Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act 2007. The Journal of Adult Protection, 16(1), 5–16. doi: 10.1108/JAP-02-2013-0006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAP-02-2013-0006
Proposition 2024/25:89. En förebyggande socialtjänstlag—för ökade rättigheter, skyldigheter och möjligheter.
Riksrevisionen. (2015). Överskuldsättning - hur fungerar samhällets stöd och insatser? (RiR 2015:14).
Sanandaji, N. (2023). Förebyggande insatser för social hållbarhet. I Blom, B., Eriksson, M. & Snellman, M-L. (red.) Socialtjänstens arbete med social hållbarhet—Insatser på individ-, grupp- och samhällsnivå. Studentlitteratur, s. 93–104.
SFS 2017:900. Förvaltningslag.
SFS 2025:400. Socialtjänstlag.
Socialstyrelsen. (2023). Satsa tidigt, tänk långsiktigt. Stöd för sociala investeringar i arbetet med barn och unga. https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/contentassets/4f49a60654c84c8f8d5205190acef394/2023-12-8866.pdf
SOU 2018:32. Ju förr desto bättre—vägar till en förebyggande socialtjänst. Delbetänkande av Utredningen Framtidens socialtjänst.
Statskontoret. (2025). Hjälp till självhjälp - En analys av den kommunala budget- och skuldrådgivningen (Rapport 2025:5).
Stepney, P. (2014). Prevention in Social Work: The Final Frontier? Critical and Radical Social Work, 2(3), s. 305–320. doi: 10.1332/204986014X14102610760936 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/204986014X14102610760936
Svensson, K. & Plantin, L. (red.). (2024). Kunskap i socialtjänsten (Research reports in social work, vol. 2024, nr. 1). Socialhögskolan, Lunds universitet.
Trappenburg, M., Kampen, T. & Tonkens, E. (2020). Social Workers in a Modernising Welfare State: Professionals or Street-Level Bureaucrats? The British Journal of Social Work, 50(6), s. 1669–1687. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcz120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz120
Trygged, S. (2012). Embedded counselling in advisory work with clients in debt. Journal of Social Work Practice, 26(2), s. 245–258. doi: 10.1080/02650533.2011.610594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2011.610594
Vedung, E. (2015). Autonomy and street-level bureaucrats’ coping strategies. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, (2), Artikel 28643. doi: 10.3402/nstep.v1.28643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.28643
Vuleta, D. (2022). Law and Social Exclusion: The functions and dysfunctions of the Swedish legal system in light of overindebtedness among immigrants. Diss. Lunds universitet.
Wenander, H. (2018). Proportionalitetsprincipen i 2017 års förvaltningslag. Förvaltningsrättslig tidskrift, 3, s. 443-456.
Wibeck, V. (2010). Fokusgrupper: om fokuserade gruppintervjuer som undersökningsmetod. 2 uppl., Studentlitteratur.
Östergren, P-O., Bodin, T., Canivet, C., Moghaddassi, M. & Vilhelmsson, A. (2022). Selling one’s future: over-indebtedness and the risk of poor mental health and the role of precarious employment – results from the Scania Public Health Cohort, Sweden. BMJ Open, 12: e061797. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061797 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061797
Downloads
Publicerad
Referera så här
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2026 Mikael Lundholm, William Bülow O'Nils, Anna Angelin

Det här verket är licensierat under en Creative Commons Erkännande 4.0 Internationell-licens.

