Winning Arguments about Rights: An Empirical Analysis of Argument Construction at the European Court of Human Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62355/ejels.19069Keywords:
legal interpretation, European Court of Human Rights, logistic regression, judicial interpretive choicesAbstract
This study examines the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) use of the canonical interpretation techniques (textual, systematic, historical, teleological) based on a novel comprehensive dataset of 8,436 judgments. We show that while interpretation techniques are used in about one-third of cases, the ECtHR often employs multiple methods simultaneously. Textual and teleological interpretation techniques emerged as the most commonly used, with systematic interpretation also being prevalent. Our findings indicate a discernible relationship between the type of rights being considered and the interpretation techniques employed by the ECtHR to construct arguments about rights. Additionally, the study sheds light on the Court’s interpretive choices: in general, the use of interpretation techniques does not enhance the likelihood of a Convention rights violation being found. Textual interpretation may overlook broader social or policy implications and thus make judges less likely to recognize violations. On the other hand, systematic interpretation is negatively associated with the finding of a violation in justice-related rights but is positively associated with the finding of a violation in Convention articles related to ‘life and limb’. This suggests that the Court interprets the justice-related rights more narrowly when applying a systematic approach. The study forms a substantial foundation for further research into the nuanced dynamics of the ECtHR’s use of canonical interpretative techniques.
References
Alexander, Larry, and Emily Sherwin. 2008. "Demystifying Legal Reasoning." Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167420
Alexy, Robert. 1995. "Recht, Vernunft, Diskurs – Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie." Suhrkamp.
Alleweldt, Ralf. 2022. "Kapitel 10 - Recht auf Leben." In EMRK/GG Konkordanz-Kommentar (3rd edition), edited by Oliver Dörr, Rainer Grote and Thilo Marauhn. Mohr Siebeck.
Altwicker-Hámori, Szilvia, Tilmann Altwicker and Anne Peters. 2016. "Measuring Violations of Human Rights: An Empirical Analysis of Awards in Respect of Non-Pecuniary Damage Under the European Convention on Human Rights." Heidelberg Journal of International Law 76 : 1–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2631404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2631404
Ammann, Odile. 2020. "Domestic Courts and the Interpretation of International Law: Methods and Reasoning Based on the Swiss Example." Brill, Nijhoff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004409873
Artico v. Italy, app. no. 6694/74, ECHR, 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37.
Bogdandy, Armin von, and Ingo Venzke. 2014. "In Whose Name? A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication (International Courts and Tribunals Series)." Oxford University Press.
Braman, Eileen. 2009. "Law, Politics, and Perception: How Policy Preferences Influence Legal Reasoning." University of Virginia Press.
Brunozzi, Kathrin. 2023. "Art. 45 Begründung der Urteile und Entscheidungen." In Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, edited by Jens Meyer-Ladewig, Stefan von Raumer, Martin Nettesheim. Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag.
Buchanan, Allen, and Keohane Robert O. 2006. "The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions." Ethics and International Affairs 20 (4) : 405–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00043.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00043.x
Buishvili v. Czech Republic, app. no. 30241/11 ECHR, 25 October 2012.
Choi, Jonathan H. 2020. "An Empirical Study of Statutory Interpretation in Tax Law." New York University Law Review 95 (2) : 363–441. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3460962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3460962
Costa, Jean-Paul. 2011. “On the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights’ Judgments.” European Constitutional Law Review 7 (2) : 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019611200026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019611200026
Cremer, Hans-Joachim. 2022. "Kapitel 4 - Regeln der Konventionsinterpretation." In EMRK/GG Konkordanz-Kommentar, edited by Oliver Dörr, Rainer Grote and Thilo Marauhn. Mohr Siebeck.
Czarnezki, Jason J., and William K. Ford. 2006. "The Phantom Philosophy? An Empirical Investigation of Legal Interpretation." Maryland Law Review 65 : 841-906. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.773865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.773865
Dağli v. Turkey, app. no. 28888/02, ECHR, 27 November 2007.
De Sloovère, Frederick J. 1934. "Textual Interpretation of Statutes." New York University Law Quarterly Review 11 : 538.
Demir and Baykara v. Turkey, app. no. 34503/97, ECHR 2008–V.
Djeffal, Christian. 2015. "Static and Evolutive Treaty Interpretation: A Functional Reconstruction." Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316339558
Dothan, Shai. 2018. “The Three Traditional Approaches to Treaty Interpretation: A Current Application to the European Court of Human Rights.” Fordham International Law Journal 42 (3) : 765–794. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3241331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3241331
Dothan, Shai. 2014. "In Defence of Expansive Interpretation in the European Court of Human Rights." Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 3 (2) : 508–531. https://doi.org/10.7574/cjicl.03.02.149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7574/cjicl.03.02.149
Dörr, Oliver, and Kirsten Schmalenbach. 2012. "Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary." (1st edition). Springer-Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19291-3
Dörr, Oliver. 2012. "Article 31: General Rule of Interpretation." In Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (1st edition), edited by Oliver Dörr and Kirsten Schmalenbach, 521–570. Springer-Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19291-3_34
Dörr, Oliver. 2018. "Article 32 – Supplementary means of interpretation." In Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd edition), edited by Oliver Dörr and Kirsten Schmalenbach, 617–633. Springer-Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55160-8_35
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. "Law’s Empire." Harvard University Press.
Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin. 2011. “European Consensus and the Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights.” German Law Journal 12 (10) : 1730–1745. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200017533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200017533
Fauchald, Ole Kristian. 2008. "The Legal Reasoning of ICSID Tribunals – An Empirical Analysis." European Journal of International Law 19 (2) : 301–364. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn011
Fayed v. United Kingdom, app. no. 17101/90, ECHR 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B.
Feteris, Eveline, and Harm Kloosterhuis. 2009. "The Analysis and Evaluation of Leal Argumentation: Approaches from Legal Theory and Argumentation Theory." Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 16 (29) : 307–331.
Fleiss, Joseph. 1971. "Measuring Nominal Scale Agreement Among Many Raters." Psychological Bulletin 76 (5) : 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619
Folgerø and others v. Norway, app. no. 15472/02, ECHR 2007–III.
Frank, Jerome. 1947. "Words and Music: Some Remarks on Statutory Interpretation". Columbia Law Review 47 (8) : 1259-1279. https://doi.org/10.2307/1118098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1118098
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1993. "Vom Zirkel des Verstehens." In Gesammelte Werke Band 2: Hermeneutik II Wahrheit und Methode: Ergänzungen, Register, edited by Hans-Georg Gadamer. Mohr Siebeck.
Glöckner, Andreas and Christoph Engel. 2013. "Can We Trust Intuitive Jurors? Standards of Proof and the Probative Value of Evidence in Coherence-Based Reasoning." Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10 (2) : 230–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12009
Golder v. United Kingdom, app. no. 4451/70, Commission decision of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18.
Goss, Ryan. 2023. "The Disappearing ‘Minimum Rights’ of Article 6 ECHR: the Unfortunate Legacy of Ibrahim and Beuze." Human Rights Law Review 23 (4) : 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngad024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngad024
Grabenwarter, Christoph and Katharina Pabel. 2021. "Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention." Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406759673
Greenawalt, Kent. 2018. "Realms of Legal Interpretation: Core Elements and Critical Variations." Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190882860.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190882860.001.0001
Greenhill, Brian, Michael D. Ward and Audrey Sacks. 2011. "The separation plot: A new visual method for evaluating the fit of binary models" American Journal of Political Science 55 (4) : 991–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00525.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00525.x
Habernal, Ivan, Daniel Faber, Nicola Recchia, Sebastian Bretthauer, Iryna Gurevych, Indra Spiecker gen. Döhmann, and Christoph Burchard. 2023. "Mining Legal Arguments in Court Decisions." forthcoming in Artificial Intelligence and Law. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.06178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-023-09361-y
Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus. 1997. "The Concept of Law." Oxford University Press.
Herdegen, Matthias. 2020. "Interpretation in International Law." In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, edited by Anne Peters and Rüdiger Wolfrum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/e723
Huang, Kuo-Chang. 2009. "Does Discovery Promote Settlement? An Empirical Answer." Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 6 (2) : 241–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01143.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01143.x
Jacobs, Francis G. 1969. "Varieties of Approach to Treaty Interpretation: With Special Reference to the Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties Before the Vienna Diplomatic Conference." International Law and Comparative Law Quarterly 18 (2) : 318–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/18.2.318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/18.2.318
Jennings, Robert Yewdall. 1967. "General Course on Principles of International Law." In Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law Volume 121 : 323–619.
King, Nancy J., and Michael Heise. 2018. "Appeals by the Prosecution." Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 15 (3) : 482–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12190
Landis, J. Richard, and Gary G. Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33 (1) : 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
MacCormick, Neil. 1998. "Legal reasoning and interpretation." Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. DOI 10.4324/9780415249126-T010-1.
MacCormick, Neil. 1978. "Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory." Clarendon Press.
Madsen, Mikael Rask, Pola Cebulak, and Micha Wiebusch. 2018. "Backlash against International Courts: Explaining the Forms and Patterns of Resistance to International Courts." International Journal of Law in Context 14 (2) : 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552318000034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552318000034
Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary, app. no. 18030/11, ECHR, 8 November 2016.
Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey, app nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, ECHR 2005-I.
Manley, Stewart, Pardis Moslemzadeh Tehrani, and Rajah Rasiah. 2023. “Mapping Interpretation by the International Criminal Court.” Leiden Journal of International Law 36 (3) : 771–806. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156523000225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156523000225
Mayer, Franz C. 2022. "Art. 6 - Recht auf ein faires Verfahren." In EMRK: Konvention zum Schutze der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten – Kommentar, edited by Ulrich Karpenstein and Franz C. Mayer. Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag.
Orakhelashvili, Alexander. 2008. "The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law." Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546220.001.0001
Peat, Daniel. 2021. "The Tyranny of Choice and the Interpretation of Standards: Why the European Court of Human Rights uses Consensus.” New York University of International Law and Politics 53 (2) : 381–432.
Popa, Liliana E. 2018. "Patterns of Treaty Interpretation as Anti-Fragmentation Tools, A Comparative Analysis with a Special Focus on the ECtHR, WTO and ICJ." Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65488-1_5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65488-1_5
Raz, Joseph. 1996. "Ethics in the Public Domain." Clarendon Press.
Semet, Amy. 2019. "An Empirical Examination of Agency Statutory Interpretation." Minnesota Law Review 103 (5) : 2255–2341.
Slapin, Jonathan B. 2022. "SNIS Final Report: A Quantitative Textual Approach of the European Consensus Method of Interpretation in the European Court of Human Rights." available at: https://snis.ch/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/2020-Slapin_Complete-Final-Report_21-09-22.pdf (last visited July 18, 2024).
Stappert, Nora. 2020. "Practice Theory and Change in International Law: Theorizing the Development of Legal Meaning through the Interpretive Practices of International Criminal Courts." International Theory 12 (1) : 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971919000150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971919000150
Sur, Serge. 1974. "L’interprétation en Droit International Public." Paris : Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.
Sweet, Alec Stone, and Helen Keller. 2008. "A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems." Oxford University Press.
Tiersma, Peter M. 1999. "Legal Language." University of Chicago Press.
Tyler, Tom R. 2006. "Why do People Obey the Law." Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828609
Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, app. no. 5856/72, ECHR, 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26.
Velkhiyev and others v. Russia, app. no. 34085/06, ECHR, 8 March 2012.
Zarpli, Omer and Huseyin Zengin. 2022. "Shame, endorse, or remain silent?: State response to human rights violations in other countries." Research & Politics 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680211070344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680211070344
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tilmann Altwicker, Florian Geering, Daniel Gerber, Zhivko Taushanov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
