Winning Arguments about Rights: An Empirical Analysis of Argument Construction at the European Court of Human Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62355/ejels.19069Keywords:
legal interpretation, European Court of Human Rights, logistic regression, judicial interpretive choicesAbstract
This study examines the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) use of the canonical interpretation techniques (textual, systematic, historical, teleological) based on a novel comprehensive dataset of 8,436 judgments. We show that while interpretation techniques are used in about one-third of cases, the ECtHR often employs multiple methods simultaneously. Textual and teleological interpretation techniques emerged as the most commonly used, with systematic interpretation also being prevalent. Our findings indicate a discernible relationship between the type of rights being considered and the interpretation techniques employed by the ECtHR to construct arguments about rights. Additionally, the study sheds light on the Court’s interpretive choices: in general, the use of interpretation techniques does not enhance the likelihood of a Convention rights violation being found. Textual interpretation may overlook broader social or policy implications and thus make judges less likely to recognize violations. On the other hand, systematic interpretation is negatively associated with the finding of a violation in justice-related rights but is positively associated with the finding of a violation in Convention articles related to ‘life and limb’. This suggests that the Court interprets the justice-related rights more narrowly when applying a systematic approach. The study forms a substantial foundation for further research into the nuanced dynamics of the ECtHR’s use of canonical interpretative techniques.
References
Alexander, Larry, and Emily Sherwin. 2008. "Demystifying Legal Reasoning." Cambridge University Press.
Alexy, Robert. 1995. "Recht, Vernunft, Diskurs – Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie." Suhrkamp.
Alleweldt, Ralf. 2022. "Kapitel 10 - Recht auf Leben." In EMRK/GG Konkordanz-Kommentar (3rd edition), edited by Oliver Dörr, Rainer Grote and Thilo Marauhn. Mohr Siebeck.
Altwicker-Hámori, Szilvia, Tilmann Altwicker and Anne Peters. 2016. "Measuring Violations of Human Rights: An Empirical Analysis of Awards in Respect of Non-Pecuniary Damage Under the European Convention on Human Rights." Heidelberg Journal of International Law 76 : 1–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2631404.
Ammann, Odile. 2020. "Domestic Courts and the Interpretation of International Law: Methods and Reasoning Based on the Swiss Example." Brill, Nijhoff.
Artico v. Italy, app. no. 6694/74, ECHR, 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37.
Bogdandy, Armin von, and Ingo Venzke. 2014. "In Whose Name? A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication (International Courts and Tribunals Series)." Oxford University Press.
Braman, Eileen. 2009. "Law, Politics, and Perception: How Policy Preferences Influence Legal Reasoning." University of Virginia Press.
Brunozzi, Kathrin. 2023. "Art. 45 Begründung der Urteile und Entscheidungen." In Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, edited by Jens Meyer-Ladewig, Stefan von Raumer, Martin Nettesheim. Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag.
Buchanan, Allen, and Keohane Robert O. 2006. "The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions." Ethics and International Affairs 20 (4) : 405–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00043.x.
Buishvili v. Czech Republic, app. no. 30241/11 ECHR, 25 October 2012.
Choi, Jonathan H. 2020. "An Empirical Study of Statutory Interpretation in Tax Law." New York University Law Review 95 (2) : 363–441. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3460962.
Costa, Jean-Paul. 2011. “On the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights’ Judgments.” European Constitutional Law Review 7 (2) : 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019611200026.
Cremer, Hans-Joachim. 2022. "Kapitel 4 - Regeln der Konventionsinterpretation." In EMRK/GG Konkordanz-Kommentar, edited by Oliver Dörr, Rainer Grote and Thilo Marauhn. Mohr Siebeck.
Czarnezki, Jason J., and William K. Ford. 2006. "The Phantom Philosophy? An Empirical Investigation of Legal Interpretation." Maryland Law Review 65 : 841-906. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.773865.
Dağli v. Turkey, app. no. 28888/02, ECHR, 27 November 2007.
De Sloovère, Frederick J. 1934. "Textual Interpretation of Statutes." New York University Law Quarterly Review 11 : 538.
Demir and Baykara v. Turkey, app. no. 34503/97, ECHR 2008–V.
Djeffal, Christian. 2015. "Static and Evolutive Treaty Interpretation: A Functional Reconstruction." Oxford University Press.
Dothan, Shai. 2018. “The Three Traditional Approaches to Treaty Interpretation: A Current Application to the European Court of Human Rights.” Fordham International Law Journal 42 (3) : 765–794. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3241331.
Dothan, Shai. 2014. "In Defence of Expansive Interpretation in the European Court of Human Rights." Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 3 (2) : 508–531. https://doi.org/10.7574/cjicl.03.02.149.
Dörr, Oliver, and Kirsten Schmalenbach. 2012. "Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary." (1st edition). Springer-Verlag.
Dörr, Oliver. 2012. "Article 31: General Rule of Interpretation." In Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (1st edition), edited by Oliver Dörr and Kirsten Schmalenbach, 521–570. Springer-Verlag.
Dörr, Oliver. 2018. "Article 32 – Supplementary means of interpretation." In Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd edition), edited by Oliver Dörr and Kirsten Schmalenbach, 617–633. Springer-Verlag.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. "Law’s Empire." Harvard University Press.
Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin. 2011. “European Consensus and the Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights.” German Law Journal 12 (10) : 1730–1745. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200017533.
Fauchald, Ole Kristian. 2008. "The Legal Reasoning of ICSID Tribunals – An Empirical Analysis." European Journal of International Law 19 (2) : 301–364. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn011.
Fayed v. United Kingdom, app. no. 17101/90, ECHR 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B.
Feteris, Eveline, and Harm Kloosterhuis. 2009. "The Analysis and Evaluation of Leal Argumentation: Approaches from Legal Theory and Argumentation Theory." Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 16 (29) : 307–331.
Fleiss, Joseph. 1971. "Measuring Nominal Scale Agreement Among Many Raters." Psychological Bulletin 76 (5) : 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619.
Folgerø and others v. Norway, app. no. 15472/02, ECHR 2007–III.
Frank, Jerome. 1947. "Words and Music: Some Remarks on Statutory Interpretation". Columbia Law Review 47 (8) : 1259-1279. https://doi.org/10.2307/1118098.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1993. "Vom Zirkel des Verstehens." In Gesammelte Werke Band 2: Hermeneutik II Wahrheit und Methode: Ergänzungen, Register, edited by Hans-Georg Gadamer. Mohr Siebeck.
Glöckner, Andreas and Christoph Engel. 2013. "Can We Trust Intuitive Jurors? Standards of Proof and the Probative Value of Evidence in Coherence-Based Reasoning." Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10 (2) : 230–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12009.
Golder v. United Kingdom, app. no. 4451/70, Commission decision of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18.
Goss, Ryan. 2023. "The Disappearing ‘Minimum Rights’ of Article 6 ECHR: the Unfortunate Legacy of Ibrahim and Beuze." Human Rights Law Review 23 (4) : 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngad024.
Grabenwarter, Christoph and Katharina Pabel. 2021. "Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention." Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag.
Greenawalt, Kent. 2018. "Realms of Legal Interpretation: Core Elements and Critical Variations." Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190882860.001.0001.
Greenhill, Brian, Michael D. Ward and Audrey Sacks. 2011. "The separation plot: A new visual method for evaluating the fit of binary models" American Journal of Political Science 55 (4) : 991–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00525.x.
Habernal, Ivan, Daniel Faber, Nicola Recchia, Sebastian Bretthauer, Iryna Gurevych, Indra Spiecker gen. Döhmann, and Christoph Burchard. 2023. "Mining Legal Arguments in Court Decisions." forthcoming in Artificial Intelligence and Law. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.06178.
Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus. 1997. "The Concept of Law." Oxford University Press.
Herdegen, Matthias. 2020. "Interpretation in International Law." In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, edited by Anne Peters and Rüdiger Wolfrum.
Huang, Kuo-Chang. 2009. "Does Discovery Promote Settlement? An Empirical Answer." Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 6 (2) : 241–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01143.x.
Jacobs, Francis G. 1969. "Varieties of Approach to Treaty Interpretation: With Special Reference to the Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties Before the Vienna Diplomatic Conference." International Law and Comparative Law Quarterly 18 (2) : 318–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/18.2.318.
Jennings, Robert Yewdall. 1967. "General Course on Principles of International Law." In Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law Volume 121 : 323–619.
King, Nancy J., and Michael Heise. 2018. "Appeals by the Prosecution." Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 15 (3) : 482–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12190.
Landis, J. Richard, and Gary G. Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33 (1) : 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310.
MacCormick, Neil. 1998. "Legal reasoning and interpretation." Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. DOI 10.4324/9780415249126-T010-1.
MacCormick, Neil. 1978. "Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory." Clarendon Press.
Madsen, Mikael Rask, Pola Cebulak, and Micha Wiebusch. 2018. "Backlash against International Courts: Explaining the Forms and Patterns of Resistance to International Courts." International Journal of Law in Context 14 (2) : 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552318000034.
Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary, app. no. 18030/11, ECHR, 8 November 2016.
Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey, app nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, ECHR 2005-I.
Manley, Stewart, Pardis Moslemzadeh Tehrani, and Rajah Rasiah. 2023. “Mapping Interpretation by the International Criminal Court.” Leiden Journal of International Law 36 (3) : 771–806. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156523000225.
Mayer, Franz C. 2022. "Art. 6 - Recht auf ein faires Verfahren." In EMRK: Konvention zum Schutze der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten – Kommentar, edited by Ulrich Karpenstein and Franz C. Mayer. Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag.
Orakhelashvili, Alexander. 2008. "The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law." Oxford University Press.
Peat, Daniel. 2021. "The Tyranny of Choice and the Interpretation of Standards: Why the European Court of Human Rights uses Consensus.” New York University of International Law and Politics 53 (2) : 381–432.
Popa, Liliana E. 2018. "Patterns of Treaty Interpretation as Anti-Fragmentation Tools, A Comparative Analysis with a Special Focus on the ECtHR, WTO and ICJ." Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65488-1_5.
Raz, Joseph. 1996. "Ethics in the Public Domain." Clarendon Press.
Semet, Amy. 2019. "An Empirical Examination of Agency Statutory Interpretation." Minnesota Law Review 103 (5) : 2255–2341.
Slapin, Jonathan B. 2022. "SNIS Final Report: A Quantitative Textual Approach of the European Consensus Method of Interpretation in the European Court of Human Rights." available at: https://snis.ch/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/2020-Slapin_Complete-Final-Report_21-09-22.pdf (last visited July 18, 2024).
Stappert, Nora. 2020. "Practice Theory and Change in International Law: Theorizing the Development of Legal Meaning through the Interpretive Practices of International Criminal Courts." International Theory 12 (1) : 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971919000150.
Sur, Serge. 1974. "L’interprétation en Droit International Public." Paris : Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.
Sweet, Alec Stone, and Helen Keller. 2008. "A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems." Oxford University Press.
Tiersma, Peter M. 1999. "Legal Language." University of Chicago Press.
Tyler, Tom R. 2006. "Why do People Obey the Law." Princeton University Press.
Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, app. no. 5856/72, ECHR, 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26.
Velkhiyev and others v. Russia, app. no. 34085/06, ECHR, 8 March 2012.
Zarpli, Omer and Huseyin Zengin. 2022. "Shame, endorse, or remain silent?: State response to human rights violations in other countries." Research & Politics 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680211070344.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tilmann Altwicker, Florian Geering, Daniel Gerber, Zhivko Taushanov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
