Unity for quality – Collaboration for skills supply in small sparsely populated municipalities social services
– synen på utmaningar och lösningar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/SVT.2023.30.1.4116Keywords:
rural social services, challenges, knowledge and expertise, collaborative solutions, digital solutionsAbstract
Skills supply is a major challenge for social services in sparsely populated municipalities in Sweden. This affects their ability to fulfil their welfare mission to offer a good quality social service. This article reports and problematizes how the social services in eight sparsely populated municipalities view the possibilities of dealing with the challenges of completing that task. The data collection had an action-oriented approach, where different activities and data collection (mainly documentation) took place in parallel.
The results show that skills supply is a prioritized challenge. First, since social workers were generalists rather than specialists, which is the case in many larger and more densely populated areas, it was difficult to build up specialist knowledge in defined areas in the social services. Second, it was difficult to maintain skills in practice because in certain parts of the social services' area of responsibility, cases were brought up relatively rarely (“rare cases”). Therefore, there were limited opportunities to be able to develop skills in practice.
Digitization was seen as a potential solution, for example through web-based education and guidance to obtain updated knowledge and to gain access to expertise. A further potential solution was collaboration between the municipalities, where one or a couple of municipalities could be given responsibility for all municipality’s affairs in one area of rare cases. This was assumed to contribute to increased opportunities to develop skills in the area of responsibility concerned. An overall interpretation is that the sparsely populated area context contributes to the social services having partly different challenges in terms of competence and expertise than the social services in larger and more densely populated areas. Therefore, the possible solutions are also different.
References
Axelsson, R. & Bihari Axelsson, S. (2007). Folkhälsa i samverkan: mellan professioner, organisationer och samhällssektorer. Studentlitteratur.
Blomquist, C. (1996). I marknadens namn: mångtydiga reformer i svenska kommuner. Avhandling för doktorsexamen. Nerenius & Santérus förlag.
Bergmark, Å. (1998). Nyckelbegrepp i socialt arbete. Studentlitteratur.
Bergmark, Å. & Lundström, T. (2005). En sak i taget? Om specialisering inom socialtjänstens individ- och familjeomsorg. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 12(2–3), 125–148. doi:10.3384/SVT.2005.12.2-3.2618
Daley, M. R. (2010). A conceptual model for rural social work. Contemporary Rural Social Work Journal, 2(1), 1–7. Hämtad 1 november 2021 från: [https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/crsw/vol2/iss1/2]
Danermark, B. & Kullberg, C. (1999). Samverkan: välfärdsstatens nya arbetsform. Studentlitteratur.
Denscombe, M. (2014). The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. Open University Press. Ds 2014:9. En samlad kunskapsstyrning för hälso- och sjukvård och socialtjänst. Fritzes.
Green, R. (2003). Social work in rural areas: a personal and professional challenge. Australian Social Work, 56(3), 209–219. doi:10.1046/j.0312-407x.2003.00082.x
Grell, P., Ahmadi, N. & Blom, B. (2013). Hur inverkar organisations-strukturen på socialtjänstens klientarbete? En sammanfattning av kunskapsläget. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 20(3–4), 222–240. doi:10.3384/svt.2013.20.3-4.2431
Grell, P., Blom, B. & Ahmadi, N. (2021). Perspectives on organizational structure and social services’ work with clients: a narrative review of 25 years research on social services. European Journal of Social Work, 25(2), 289–302. doi:10.1080/13691457.2021.1954891
Hansson, J., Höög, E. & Nyström, M. E. (2017). Action research for multi-level facilitation of improvement in health and social care: development of a change facilitation approach for a local R&D unit. Action Research, 15(4), 339–356. doi:10.1177/1476750316650928
Hasenfeld, Y. (1992). The nature of human service Oorganizations. I: Y. Hasenfeld (red.), Human services as complex organizations (s. 3–23). Sage.
Hjelte, J. (2005). Samarbete i gränsland: om relation och kommunikation i samarbete mellan skola och barnomsorg. Avhandling för doktorsexamen. Umeå universitet.
Hsieh, H. F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
Ioakimidis, V. & Sookraj, D. (2021). Global standards for social work education and training. International Social Work, 64(2), 161–174. doi:10.1177/0020872821989799
Jacobsson, K. & Meeuwisse, A. (2020). ”State governing of knowledge”: constraining social work research and practice. European Journal of Social Work, 23(2), 277–289. doi:10.1080/13691457.2018.1530642
Jordbruksverket (2021). Vår definition av landsbygd. Hämtad 2 november 2021 från: https://jordbruksverket.se/stod/programmen-som-finansierar-stoden/var-definition-av-landsbygd#h-Beskrivningavkategorierna
Kindle, P. A. (2016). Book review: Rural social work: an International perspective. Contemporary Rural Social Work Journal, 8(1), 97–99. Hämtad 2 november 2021 från: https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/crsw/vol8/iss1/10
Kraatz, M. & Block, E. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. I: R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Sahlin (red.). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. (s. 243–275). Sage.
Lee, M. (2017). Social workers’ evidence-based practice use and challenges in rural environments: a systematic review. Contemporary Rural Social Work Journal, 9(1), 1–13. Hämtad 2 november 2021 från: https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/crsw/vol9/iss1/14
Lindqvist, R. (2000). Att sätta gränser. Boréa.
Lundgren, M., Blom, B., Morén, S. & Perlinski, M. (2009). Från integrering till specialisering: om organisering av socialtjänstens individ- och familjeomsorg 1988–2008. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 16(2), 162–183. doi:10.3384/svt.2009.16.2.2503
Meyer, J. & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. I: W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (red.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. (s. 41–62). The University of Chicago Press.
Morén, S., Blom, B., Lundgren, M. & Perlinski, M. (2010). Specialisering eller integration? En studie av socialarbetares syn på arbetsvillkor och insatser i tre organisationsformer. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 17(2), 189–209. doi:10.3384/SVT.2010.17.2.2484
Myndigheten för vård- och omsorgsanalys (2019). Social kompetens: om kompetensförsörjning av handläggare i socialtjänsten. Rapport 2019:7. Myndigheten för vårdanalys. Hämtad 2 november 2021 från: [https://www.vardanalys.se/rapporter/social-kompetens/
Nordström, A., Höög, E. & Hjelte, J. (2020). Innovationskraft i små glesbygdskommuner: för en kunskapsbaserad socialtjänst. FoU Välfärd, Region Västerbotten. Hämtad 2 november 2021 från: http://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1436787/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. doi:10.2307/258610
Pache, A-C. & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: the internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476.
Pugh, R. & Cheers, B. (2010). Rural social work: an international perspective. The Policy Press. Hämtad 2 november 2021 från: https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/14856/2/14856_Pugh_%26_Cheers_2010_front_pages.pdf
Rice, K. (2017). Use of evidence-based practice to enhance decision-making in rural child welfare practice. Contemporary Rural Social Work Journal, 9(1), 1–12. Hämtad 2 november 2021 från: https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/crsw/vol9/iss1/15
Riebschleger, J., Norris, D., Pierce, B., Pond, D. L. & Cummings, C. (2015). Preparing social work students for rural child welfare practice: emerging curriculum competencies. Journal of Social Work Education, 51(Suppl. 2), 209–224. doi:10.1080/10437797.2015.1072422
SCB (2021). Statistikdatabasen. Hämtad 2 november 2021 från: https://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se
Scott, W. (2003). Organizations: rational, natural, and open systems (5 uppl.). Prentice Hall.
SKR 2018. Automatisering av arbete. Möjlighet och utmaningar för kommuner, landsting och regioner. Stockholm: Sveriges kommuner och regioner. [https://webbutik.skr.se/bilder/artiklar/pdf/5408.pdf?issuusl=ignore Hämtat: 2021-11-02].
Steiner, O. (2021). Social work in the digital era: theoretical, ethical and practical considerations, The British Journal of Social Work, 51(8), 3358–3374. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcaa160
Socialstyrelsen & SKL (2011). På väg mot en evidensbaserad praktik inom socialtjänsten: kartläggning, analys och förslag för att förbättra kunskapsstyrningen. Socialstyrelsen.
SOU 2008:18. Evidensbaserad praktik inom socialtjänsten: till nytta för brukaren. Fritzes.
SOU 2020:8. Starkare kommuner: med kapacitet att klara välfärdsuppdraget. Kommunutredningens slutbetänkande.
Svensson, L. (2019). Automatisering – till nytta eller fördärv? Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 26(3–4), 341–362. doi:10.3384/svt.2019.26.3 4.3094
Wihlborg, E. (2022). Det kommunala självstyret i en digital tid. I: Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner (red.), Självstyrelse – värd att värna? (s. 100–117). Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jan Hjelte, Elisabet Höög, Annika Nordström
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
