"But are the children really the Prison Service's matter?" On children's rights and the Swedish Prison and Probation Service's responsibilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/SVT.2023.30.2.4169Keywords:
Prison and Probation Services, Children, CRC, Incarcerated parentsAbstract
AbstractChildren belonging to incarcerated parents are typically an unseen group within society and are often devoid of efficient support (Socialstyrelsen, 2018). This article discusses how the rights of children are realised within the Swedish Prison and Probation Service, what efforts are actioned within these authorities in taking advantage of children’s rights and whether staff members believe there is a need for additional support. The study is qualitative and has employed data collection through thematic interviews with staff at five institutions. In this article, the following five themes have been discussed: differences in the rights of children dependent on their parents’ gender, a child’s right to contact their incarcerated parents, cooperation, children’s participation within the Swedish Prison and Probation Service, and staff perspectives on how the authorities could incite The Convention on the Rights of the Child. The results display that traditional gender norms steer the work within the Swedish Prison and Probation Service, which partly creates differences in how children’s rights are realised, resulting in the fathers’ parenting remaining largely invisible. In addition, there exist good examples of how children’s rights are realised, however the degree of children’s perspectives is largely determined by staff’s commitment and individual interests. The personnel’s idea of better implementing The Convention on the Rights of the Child is that accompanying children be placed in a central unit with their parents to provide the families with the necessary support from educated staff. Furthermore, there is an additional desire for improved cooperation with social services.
References
Barnombudsmannen (2004). Straffa inte barnen! En studie av barnperspektivet inom kriminalvården. Barnombudsmannen.
Barnombudsmannen (2020). Dom tror att dom vet bättre. Barnet som rättighetsbärare. Rapport Barnombudsmannen 2020
Björkhagen Turesson, A. (2009). Mor i fängelse – mödrar och barn berättar: en analys av ungdomars resiliensprocess. Göteborgs universitet.
Bowlby, J. (2005). A secure base: clinical applications of attachment theory. Routledge.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Broberg, A., Risholm Mothander, P., Granqvist, P. & Ivarsson, T. (2020). Anknytning i praktiken: tillämpningar av anknytningsteorin. Natur & Kultur.
Bryant, R., Creamer, M., O'donnell, M., Forbes, D., Felmingham, K., Silove, D., . . . Nickerson, A. (2017). Separation from parents during childhood trauma predicts adult attachment security and post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychological medicine, 47(11), 2028–2035.
Bryman. A (2018). Samhällsvetenskapliga metoder. Liber.
Brå (2001). Kriminell utveckling: tidiga riskfaktorer och förebyggande insatser. (Brå-rapport 2001:15). Brottsförebyggande rådet.
Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
David, M. & Sutton, C. D. (2016). Samhällsvetenskaplig metod. Studentlitteratur.
Dobbie, W., Grönqvist, H., Niknami, S., Palme, M. & Priks, M. (2018). The intergenerational effects of parental incarceration (No. w24186). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Englundh, E. (2009). Barnets bästa i främsta rummet: en pedagogisk utmaning? En guide till konventionen om barnets rättigheter. Liber.
FN:s kommitté för barnets rättigheter (2015). Sammanfattande slutsatser och rekommendationer avseende Sveriges femte periodiska rapport CRS/c/SWE/CO/5.
FN:s konvention om barnets rättigheter (barnkonventionen) (1989).
Forkby, T., Kuosmanen, J. & Örnlind, H. (2020). Bland bröder och fiender: om gäng, manligheter och avhopp. Daidalos.
Gifford, E. J., Kozecke, L. E., Golonka, M., Hill, S. N., Costello, E. J., Shanahan, L. & Copeland, W. E. (2019). Association of parental incarceration with psychiatric and functional outcomes of young adults. JAMA network open, 2(8), e1910005–e1910005.
Hagen, K. A., Myers, B. J. & Mackintosh, V. H. (2005). Hope, social support, and behavioral problems in at‐risk children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75(2), 211–219.
Heimer, M., Näsman, E. & Palme, J. (2018). Vulnerable children's rights to participation, protection, and provision: the process of defining the problem in Swedish child and family welfare. Child & Family Social Work, 23(2), 316–323.
Justitieombudsmannen (2017). JO:s beslut 2017-11-17, dnr 1086–16.
Kleinert, S. & Wager, E. (2010). Responsible research publication: international standards for editors. Paper presented at the A position statement developed at the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity.
KOS (2021). Kriminalvård och statistik. Kriminalvården.
Kriminalvården (2013). Barn med frihetsberövade föräldrar: resultat från EU-studien COPING med fokus på Sverige. Kriminalvården.
Kriminalvården (2016). Kriminalvårdens handbok för arbetet med barnrättsperspektivet. (Rapport 2016:4). Kriminalvården.
Kriminalvården (2018). Kriminalvårdens handbok om medföljande barn och gravida klienter i anstalt och häkte (Rapport 2018:5).
Kriminalvården.
Kriminalvården (2021). Till föräldrar. https://www.kriminalvarden.se/for-familj-och-vanner/till-foraldrar/
Kriminalvården(2023). Våra anstalter. https://www.kriminalvarden.se/fangelse-frivard-och-hakte/fangelse/vara-anstalter/
KVFS 2011:1. Kriminalvårdens föreskrifter och allmänna råd för fängelse (FARK fängelse).
Källström, Å., Hellfeldt, K. & Nylander, P. Å. (2019). Parental imprisonment, child victimization and adult problems. European Journal of Criminology, 16(6), 671–688.
Leeson, C. (2007). My life in care: experiences of non‐participation in decision‐making processes. Child & Family Social Work, 12(3), 268–277.
Lindholm, J. (2014). FN:s konvention om barnets rättigheter. I: A. Cederborg (red.), Barnperspektivet i socialtjänstens arbete. Gleerups förlag.
Marmot, M., Allen, J. & Goldblatt, P. (2010). A social movement, based on evidence, to reduce inequalities in health: "Fair Society, Healthy Lives" (The Marmot Review). Social Science & Medicine (1982), 71(7), 1254–1258.
Murray, J. & Farrington, D. P. (2008). The effects of parental imprisonment on children. Crime and Justice, 37(1), 133–206.
Nylander, P.-Å., Källström, Å. & Hellfeldt, K. (2018). After a childhood with a parent in prison: relationships and well-being as a child and young adult. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 14(1), 34–45.
Prop. 2009/10:135. En ny fängelse- och häkteslagstiftning. Regeringen.
Prop. 2009/10:232. Strategi för att stärka barnets rättigheter i Sverige. Regeringen.
Prop. 2017/18:186. Inkorporering av FN:s konvention om barnets rättigheter. Regeringen.
Rubenstein, B. Y., Toman, E. L. & Cochran, J. C. (2021). Socioeconomic barriers to child contact with incarcerated parents. Justice Quarterly, 38(4), 725–751.
SFS 2001:453. Socialtjänstlagen. Socialdepartementet.
SFS 2010:610. Fängelselagen. Justitiedepartementet.
Socialstyrelsen (2018). Barn med frihetsberövade föräldrar: kartlägggning och analys. Socialstyrelsen.
Sveriges Radio (2022, 1 juni). Platsbrist i fängelserna: ”Läget är jättetufft”. https://sverigesradio.se/artikel/platsbrist-i-fangelserna-laget-ar-jattetufft
UNICEF (2017). Hur ska barn få upprättelse i Sverige när deras rättigheter kränkts? För- och nackdelar med en ratificering av barnkonventionens tilläggsprotokoll om individuell klagorätt. UNICEF.
Walters, G. D. (1995). Factor structure of the lifestyle criminality screening form. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 39(2), 99–108.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Annika Staaf, Annelie Björkhagen Turesson

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

