Stök, ungdomsbus och oro

- om spänningar mellan kontroll och omsorg i samverkanspraktiken områdesbaserad SSPF

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64098/SVT.2025.32.54685

Keywords:

SSPF, samverkan, förebyggande socialt arbete, barn och unga

Abstract

This article explores the trend of using complex collaborative practices to prevent problems among young people, by analyzing so-called SSPF (collaboration between school, social ser­vices, police, and the leisure sector) from the perspective of social control. SSPF aims to prevent criminality and substance use among young people, and can be targeted at individuals, groups, or geographical areas. As previous research has primarily focused on the individual-based SSPF, this article shifts the focus to area-based SSPF, and how this type of SSPF work actualizes ten­sions between care and control. The analysis is based on empirical material collected during an ethnographic study at a social services office located near a larger city in southern Sweden, and consists of data concerning area-based SSPF. The analysis shows that area-based SSPF involves three processes in which tensions between care and control are prominent: information-sharing, problem-description, and intervention-initiation.Within these processes, SSPF work can identi­fy and describe perceived problems at a general area level, which to some extent are assumed to cause concern for children and young people in the area, and initiate interventions. The analysis shows how these processes relies on blurred boundaries, concerning area-based SSPF’s aim, target group, professions and other collaborative groups, contributing to contionusly manifesting interweavings, conflicts and boundaries between care and control, and, in turn, enable an ex­pansion of social control. The article thereby shows different ways that tensions can be manifes­ted when preventive social work is carried out through complex collaborative practices and coope­ration between different professional groups.

References

Alfandari, R., Taylor, B. J., Baginsky, M., Campbell, J., Helm, D., Killick, C., Mccaf­ferty, P., Mullineux, J., Shears, J. & Sicora, A. (2023). Making sense of risk: So­cial work at the boundary between care and control. Health, Risk & Society, 25(1–2), s. 75–92. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2022.2147904 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2022.2147904

Blaustein, J. (2016). Exporting criminological innovation abroad: Discursive repre­sentation, ‘evidence-based crime prevention’and the post-neoliberal development agenda in Latin America. Theoretical Criminology, 20(2), s. 165–184. doi: 10.1177/1362480615604892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480615604892

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), s. 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cohen, S. (1979). The punitive city: Notes on the dispersal of social control. Con­temporary Crises, 3, s. 339–363. doi: 10.1007/BF00729115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00729115

Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control: Crime, punishment and classification. Blackwell.

Crawford, A. & Evans, K. (2017). Crime Prevention and Community Safety. I A. Le­ibling, S. Maruna, & L. McAra (red.) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. 6 uppl, Oxford University Press, s. 797–824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198719441.003.0036

Donzelot, J. (1997). The policing of families. Pantheon Books.

Fong, K. (2020). Getting eyes in the home: Child protective services investigations and state surveillance of family life. American Sociological Review, 85(4), s. 610–638. doi: 10.1177/0003122420938460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420938460

Forkby, T. & Johansson, A. (2016). Konsten att hänga i luften så länge som möjligt: om mobiliserande trygghetsarbete kring ungdom och social oro i Angered. FoU i Väst/GR.

Forkby, T. & Turner, R. (2016). Collaboration as Usual? The Swedish Approach to Prevention and Intervention with Troublesome Youth Groups. I C. L. Maxson & F.-A. Esbensen (red.) Gang Transitions and Transformations in an International Context. Springer International Publishing, s. 255–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29602-9_14

Garland, D. (2018). Punishment and welfare: A history of penal strategies. Quid Pro Books.

Gundhus, H. I., Egge, M., Strype, J. & Myhrer, T-G. (2008). Modell for forebygging av kriminalitet?: evaluering av Samordning av av Lokale kriminalitetsforebyg­gende tiltak (SLT). Politihøgskolen.

Hardy, M. (2015). Governing risk: Care and control in contemporary social work. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137313515

Healy, K. (2022). Social work theories in context: Creating frameworks for practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Hughes, G. (2017). The politics of crime and community. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Pedersen, J. & Stothard, B. (2015). The Danish SSP model – prevention through sup­port and co-operation. Drugs and alcohol today, 15(4), s. 231–242. doi: 10.1108/DAT-03-2015-0011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/DAT-03-2015-0011

Prop. 2024/25:89. En förebyggande socialtjänstlag – för ökade rättigheter, skyldighe­ter och möjligheter.

Rodger, J. (2012). Criminalising social policy: Anti-social behaviour and welfare in a de-civilised society. Willan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843925408

Socialstyrelsen. (2025). SSPF (skola socialtjänst polis fritid) – exempel. https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/kunskapsstod-och-regler/omraden/barn-och-unga/unga-som-begar-brott/exempel-brottsforebyggande-metoder/sspf-skola-socialtjanst-polis-fritid/ [2025-03-27].

Socialstyrelsen, Polisen, Brottsförebyggande rådet, Skolverket, Myndigheten för ungdoms- och civilsamhällesfrågor, & Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner. (2022). SSPF - Samverkansformen skola, socialtjänst, polis och fritid. https://bra.se/download/18.366598ab19270941a1c2d1d/1729182116051/2022_SSPF_Samverkansformen.pdf

Sveriges Radio. (2024). Så kan dansk modell motverka gängrekrytering av barn och unga. https://www.sverigesradio.se/artikel/sa-kan-dansk-modell-motverka-gangrekrytering-av-barn-och-unga [2025-09-01].

Söderberg, C. (2016). Individriktad brottsprevention–om SSPF och viljan att samver­ka, Licentiatuppsats, Institutionen för samhälls- och välfärdsstudier. Linköpings Universitet.

Söderberg, C. (2023). Att skapa mening i en komplex praktik–Föreställningar om brottspreventiva samverkansformer mellan omsorg och kontroll. Doktorsavhand­ling, Institutionen för kultur och samhälle, Avdelningen för socialt arbete. Linkö­pings Universitet. doi: 10.3384/9789180752633 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/9789180752633

Turner, R., Jidetoft, N. & Nilsson, Å. (2015). SSPF–Ett fokus på ungdomar i riskzon. En implementeringsutvärdering av samverkan mellan skola, socialtjänst, polis och fritid för att motverka kriminalitet och missbruk. FoU i Väst/GR.

Wahlgren, P. (2019). Brottsprevention i straffvälfärdspolitikens tid–Samverkanstan­kens historiska rötter. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab, 106(1), s. 82–92. doi: 10.7146/ntfk.v106i1.124731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/ntfk.v106i1.124731

Ylvisaker, S. & Rugkåsa, M. (2022). Dilemmas and conflicting pressures in social work practice. European Journal of Social Work, 25(4), s. 643–654. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2021.1954884 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1954884

Published

2026-05-20

How to Cite

Jansson, T., & Nolbeck, K. (2026). Stök, ungdomsbus och oro: - om spänningar mellan kontroll och omsorg i samverkanspraktiken områdesbaserad SSPF. Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 32(3-4). https://doi.org/10.64098/SVT.2025.32.54685

Issue

Section

Temanummer förebyggande arbete