Stök, ungdomsbus och oro
- om spänningar mellan kontroll och omsorg i samverkanspraktiken områdesbaserad SSPF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64098/SVT.2025.32.54685Keywords:
SSPF, samverkan, förebyggande socialt arbete, barn och ungaAbstract
This article explores the trend of using complex collaborative practices to prevent problems among young people, by analyzing so-called SSPF (collaboration between school, social services, police, and the leisure sector) from the perspective of social control. SSPF aims to prevent criminality and substance use among young people, and can be targeted at individuals, groups, or geographical areas. As previous research has primarily focused on the individual-based SSPF, this article shifts the focus to area-based SSPF, and how this type of SSPF work actualizes tensions between care and control. The analysis is based on empirical material collected during an ethnographic study at a social services office located near a larger city in southern Sweden, and consists of data concerning area-based SSPF. The analysis shows that area-based SSPF involves three processes in which tensions between care and control are prominent: information-sharing, problem-description, and intervention-initiation.Within these processes, SSPF work can identify and describe perceived problems at a general area level, which to some extent are assumed to cause concern for children and young people in the area, and initiate interventions. The analysis shows how these processes relies on blurred boundaries, concerning area-based SSPF’s aim, target group, professions and other collaborative groups, contributing to contionusly manifesting interweavings, conflicts and boundaries between care and control, and, in turn, enable an expansion of social control. The article thereby shows different ways that tensions can be manifested when preventive social work is carried out through complex collaborative practices and cooperation between different professional groups.
References
Alfandari, R., Taylor, B. J., Baginsky, M., Campbell, J., Helm, D., Killick, C., Mccafferty, P., Mullineux, J., Shears, J. & Sicora, A. (2023). Making sense of risk: Social work at the boundary between care and control. Health, Risk & Society, 25(1–2), s. 75–92. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2022.2147904 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2022.2147904
Blaustein, J. (2016). Exporting criminological innovation abroad: Discursive representation, ‘evidence-based crime prevention’and the post-neoliberal development agenda in Latin America. Theoretical Criminology, 20(2), s. 165–184. doi: 10.1177/1362480615604892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480615604892
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), s. 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cohen, S. (1979). The punitive city: Notes on the dispersal of social control. Contemporary Crises, 3, s. 339–363. doi: 10.1007/BF00729115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00729115
Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control: Crime, punishment and classification. Blackwell.
Crawford, A. & Evans, K. (2017). Crime Prevention and Community Safety. I A. Leibling, S. Maruna, & L. McAra (red.) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. 6 uppl, Oxford University Press, s. 797–824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198719441.003.0036
Donzelot, J. (1997). The policing of families. Pantheon Books.
Fong, K. (2020). Getting eyes in the home: Child protective services investigations and state surveillance of family life. American Sociological Review, 85(4), s. 610–638. doi: 10.1177/0003122420938460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420938460
Forkby, T. & Johansson, A. (2016). Konsten att hänga i luften så länge som möjligt: om mobiliserande trygghetsarbete kring ungdom och social oro i Angered. FoU i Väst/GR.
Forkby, T. & Turner, R. (2016). Collaboration as Usual? The Swedish Approach to Prevention and Intervention with Troublesome Youth Groups. I C. L. Maxson & F.-A. Esbensen (red.) Gang Transitions and Transformations in an International Context. Springer International Publishing, s. 255–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29602-9_14
Garland, D. (2018). Punishment and welfare: A history of penal strategies. Quid Pro Books.
Gundhus, H. I., Egge, M., Strype, J. & Myhrer, T-G. (2008). Modell for forebygging av kriminalitet?: evaluering av Samordning av av Lokale kriminalitetsforebyggende tiltak (SLT). Politihøgskolen.
Hardy, M. (2015). Governing risk: Care and control in contemporary social work. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137313515
Healy, K. (2022). Social work theories in context: Creating frameworks for practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Hughes, G. (2017). The politics of crime and community. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Pedersen, J. & Stothard, B. (2015). The Danish SSP model – prevention through support and co-operation. Drugs and alcohol today, 15(4), s. 231–242. doi: 10.1108/DAT-03-2015-0011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/DAT-03-2015-0011
Prop. 2024/25:89. En förebyggande socialtjänstlag – för ökade rättigheter, skyldigheter och möjligheter.
Rodger, J. (2012). Criminalising social policy: Anti-social behaviour and welfare in a de-civilised society. Willan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843925408
Socialstyrelsen. (2025). SSPF (skola socialtjänst polis fritid) – exempel. https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/kunskapsstod-och-regler/omraden/barn-och-unga/unga-som-begar-brott/exempel-brottsforebyggande-metoder/sspf-skola-socialtjanst-polis-fritid/ [2025-03-27].
Socialstyrelsen, Polisen, Brottsförebyggande rådet, Skolverket, Myndigheten för ungdoms- och civilsamhällesfrågor, & Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner. (2022). SSPF - Samverkansformen skola, socialtjänst, polis och fritid. https://bra.se/download/18.366598ab19270941a1c2d1d/1729182116051/2022_SSPF_Samverkansformen.pdf
Sveriges Radio. (2024). Så kan dansk modell motverka gängrekrytering av barn och unga. https://www.sverigesradio.se/artikel/sa-kan-dansk-modell-motverka-gangrekrytering-av-barn-och-unga [2025-09-01].
Söderberg, C. (2016). Individriktad brottsprevention–om SSPF och viljan att samverka, Licentiatuppsats, Institutionen för samhälls- och välfärdsstudier. Linköpings Universitet.
Söderberg, C. (2023). Att skapa mening i en komplex praktik–Föreställningar om brottspreventiva samverkansformer mellan omsorg och kontroll. Doktorsavhandling, Institutionen för kultur och samhälle, Avdelningen för socialt arbete. Linköpings Universitet. doi: 10.3384/9789180752633 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/9789180752633
Turner, R., Jidetoft, N. & Nilsson, Å. (2015). SSPF–Ett fokus på ungdomar i riskzon. En implementeringsutvärdering av samverkan mellan skola, socialtjänst, polis och fritid för att motverka kriminalitet och missbruk. FoU i Väst/GR.
Wahlgren, P. (2019). Brottsprevention i straffvälfärdspolitikens tid–Samverkanstankens historiska rötter. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab, 106(1), s. 82–92. doi: 10.7146/ntfk.v106i1.124731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/ntfk.v106i1.124731
Ylvisaker, S. & Rugkåsa, M. (2022). Dilemmas and conflicting pressures in social work practice. European Journal of Social Work, 25(4), s. 643–654. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2021.1954884 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1954884
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tobias Jansson, Kajsa Nolbeck

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

