Var kommer barnen in?
Barns kollektiva delaktighet i främjande insatser
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64098/SVT.2025.32.55235Keywords:
children’s rights, child rights governance, GIRFEC, participation, preventionAbstract
This article explores children’s collective participation in universal preventive initiatives aimed at promoting supportive social environments and favourable conditions for children’s upbringing. In several municipalities and regions, such initiatives are being developed inspired by the “Scottish model,” a child rights–based framework for social services, preschool, school, health care and the police, focusing on coordinated early interventions. These ambitions align with the new Social Services Act’s emphasis on knowledge-based collaboration and preventive work for children in accordance with human rights. Within the field of children’s rights, participation is central and includes involvement in collective matters affecting groups of children, such as universal preventive initiatives. Professionals’ understanding and agency are crucial for children’s collective participation. Previous research, however, points to uncertainty among professionals regarding how to work with participation in this context. Drawing on critical children’s rights perspectives and two research activities conducted in close collaboration and dialogue with professionals, this article examines children’s collective participation at the intersection of practice, research and child rights ambitions. It contributes knowledge about how professionals understand opportunities and obstacles related to collective participation in universal preventive initiatives. The analysis shows that professionals understood collective participation differently depending on whether they relied on established practices or scientific definitions. When remaining within existing structures, participation was primarily framed as indirect involvement, whereas engaging with scientific definitions opened up space for more direct forms that challenge established practices. In the discussion, these approaches are interpreted as positioning children either as knowledge holders or knowledge actors, raising questions of power and scope for action. Overall, collective participation emerges as a complex terrain shaped by uncertainty, high demands and inherent tensions, where strengthened knowledge, organisational support and a clarified purpose are essential to reinforcing children’s position in universal preventive initiatives.
References
Aldgate, J. & Rose, W. (2008). Assessing and Managing Risk in Getting it right for every child. Edinburgh: Scottish Government, Getting it right for every child team, Children Young People and Social Care.
Anderberg, M. & Forkby, T. (2021). Planer för samverkan kring barn och unga i Skottland och Sverige: ett jämförande perspektiv. Paedagogisk Psykologisk Tidskrift, 2, 39–51.
Anderberg, M., Jess, K. & Forkby, T. (2025). Reinventing the wheel? Children’s wellbeing in the journey along the GIRFEC stream. Nordic Social Work Research, 15(1), s. 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2023.2207087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2023.2207087
Barnombudsmannen. (2019). FN:s barnrättskommitté allmänna kommentar nr 12 Barnets rätt att bli hörd, nr 14 Barnets rätt att i första hand få beaktat vad som bedöms vara barnets bästa.
Bromark, K. (2024). The user as a key actor in user participation: Exploring knowledge production in personal social services with a participatory approach. Doktorsavhandling, Stockholms universitet.
CELISIS. (2024). Children's Services Reform Research: Concluding report. University of Strathclyde.
Coles, E., Cheyne, H., Rankin, J. & Daniel, B. (2016). Getting It Right for Every Child: A National Policy Framework to Promote Children's Wellbeing in Scotland, United Kingdom. The Milbank Quarterly, 94(2), s. 334–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12195
Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2009). General Comments No.12: The Rights of the Child to be Heard. UN/crc/c/gc/12.
Daniels, N., Gillen, P., Casson, K. & Wilson, I. (2019). STEER: Factors to Consider When Designing Online Focus Groups Using Audiovisual Technology in Health Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, s. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919885786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919885786
Drisko, J.W. & Maschi, T. (2015). Content analysis. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190215491.001.0001
Dunlop, A.-W. (2015). Aspirations and actions: early childhood from policy to practice in Scotland. International Journal of Early Years Education, 23(3), s. 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2015.1074559 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2015.1074559
Forbes, J. (2011). Interprofessional capital in children's services transformations. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(5): 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903183995 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903183995
Forbes, J. (2018). Multi-agency working. I: Bryce, T., Humes, W., Gillies, D. & Kennedy, A. (red.). Scottish Education. Edinburgh University Press.
Forkby, T., Enell, S. & Thulin, J. (2023). Det förebyggande projektet. I: T. Forkby, S. Enell, & J. Thulin. (red.). Prevention med barn och unga – teori och praktik för socialt och pedagogiskt arbete. Studentlitteratur.
Hart, R.A. (1992). Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship. UNICEF, International Child Development Center.
Holzscheiter, A., Josefsson, J. & Sandin, B. (2019). Child rights governance: An introduction. Childhood, 26(3), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568219854518 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568219854518
Landsverk Hagen, A. & Andersen, B. (2021). Ung medvirkning. Kreativitet og konflikt i planlegging. Cappelen Damm AS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.150.ch1
Lundy, L. (2007). ‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), s. 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033
Lundy, L. (2018). In defence of tokenism? Implementing children’s right to participate in collective decision-making. Childhood, 25(3), s. 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568218777292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568218777292
McMellon, C. & Tisdall, K. (2020). Children and young people’s participation rights: Looking backwards and moving forwards. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 28(1), s. 157–182. doi: 10.1163/15718182-02801002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02801002
Mattsson, T. (2008). Ungas delaktighet, exemplet institutionsvård. Statens institutionsstyrelse.
Nylén, H. (2024). Children’s rights organizations in Sweden and their relation to public child welfare. Nordic Social Work Research, s. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2024.2341740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2024.2341740
Percy-Smith, B. (2009). Evaluating the Development of Young People’s Participation in Two Children’s Trusts: Year Two report. National Youth Agency.
Percy-Smith, B. & Thomas, N. (2010). A handbook of children and young people’s participation: perspectives from theory and practice. Routledge.
Proposition 2024/25:89. En förebyggande socialtjänstlag.
Reynaert, D., Bouverne-De Bie, M. & Vandevelde, S. (2012). Between 'believers' and 'opponents': Critical discussions on children's rights. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 20(1), s. 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181812X626417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157181812X626417
Sandin, B., Josefsson, J., Hanson, K. & Balagopalan, S. (2023). The politics of children’s rights and representation. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04480-9
Seim, S. & Slettebø, T. (2011). Collective participation in child protection services: partnership or tokenism? European Journal of Social Work, 14(4), s. 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2010.500477 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2010.500477
SFS 2025:400. Socialtjänstlag.
Shier, H. (2001). Pathways to Participation: Openings, Opportunities and Obligations. Children and Society, 15(2): 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.617
Skauge, B., Storhaug, A.S. & Marthinsen, E. (2021). The What, Why and How of Child Participation—A Review of the Conceptualization of “Child Participation” in Child Welfare. Social Sciences, 10(2): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10020054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10020054
Socialstyrelsen. (u.å.). Tidiga och samordnade insatser. https://kunskapsguiden.se/omraden-och-teman/barn-och-unga/tidiga-och-samordnade-insatser-tsi/ (Hämtad: 23 november 2025).
SOU 2020:63. Barnkonventionen och svensk rätt.
Thomas, N. & Percy-Smith, B. (2012). “It’s about changing services and building relationships”: evaluating the development of Children in Care Councils. Child & Family Social Work, 17(4), s. 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00806.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00806.x
Tunestveit, M., Njös, B.-M. & Seim, S. (2023). Collective participation of children and young people in child welfare services – opportunities and challenges. European Journal of Social Work, 26(2), s. 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2092073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2092073
UNICEF. (1989). Barnkonventionen. https://www.unicef.se/barnkonventionen (Hämtad: 23 november 2025).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Angelika Thelin, Sofia Enell

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

