Praktikforskning med förhinder
– om konsten att implementera ett frågeformulär i socialtjänsten för att identifiera unga omsorgsgivare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64098/SVT.2025.32.1.61073Keywords:
Child protection, Children, Implementation, Young carers, Social work practiceAbstract
- Children are at risk of becoming young carers if their family does not receive adequate support in a situation where they are living with serious difficulties, such as a parent’s disability, illness or substance use problem. Young carers are children under the age of eighteen who provide care, assistance or support to a family member. They carry out, often on a regular basis, significant or substantial caring tasks and assume a level of responsibility that would usually be associated with adults. This can have negative consequences for their health, well-being and transition to adulthood. The aim of this study is to analyse the factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of an assessment questionnaire in the social services investigations used to assess the extent and consequences of children’s care activities. The data on which the analysis is based are responses from managers to requests to participate in the research project, answers to questionnaires from social workers and children aged 10–18, and interviews with social workers. The results show that the assessment questionnaire was found useful by both the children and the social workers, as they gained a better understanding of the problems the child was living with. Despite these positive results, there were many barriers to implementation and to carrying out the research project. In many cases, the findings suggest that these barriers are related to contextual conditions within the social services, such as reorganisation, staff shortages, and high workloads. Other barriers can be linked to resistance and lack of knowledge about the current problem, which contrasts with the responsibility of social services to identify and support children who are young carers.
References
Aarons, G. & Palinkas, L. (2007). Implementation of evidence-based practice in child welfare: Service provider perspectives. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 34(4), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-007-0121-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-007-0121-3
Abrahamsson, M. & Tryggvesson, K. (2009). Socialtjänstens användning av standardiserade klientbedömningsinstrument – ASI som retorik och praktik i två svenska kommuner. Nordisk alkohol- och narkotikatidskrift, 26(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/145507250902600103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/145507250902600103
Agevall, L., Jonnergård, K. & Krantz, J. (2017). Frihet under ansvar eller ansvar under tillsyn? Om dokumentstyrning av professioner. Växjö: Linnaeus University Press.
Alexander, C. (2021). Affects of policy design: The case of young carers in the care act 2014 and the children and families act 2014. Social Policy & Administration, 55(5), 968–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12692 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12692
Alexandersson, K. (2006). Vilja Kunna Förstå – om implementering av systematisk dokumentation för verksamhetsutveckling i socialtjänsten. Diss. Örebro universitet.
Batty, M.J., Moldavsky, M., Foroushani, P.S., Pass, S., Marriott, M., Sayal, K. & Hollis, C. (2013). Implementing routine outcome measures in child and adolescent mental health services: from present to future practice. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 18(2), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2012.00658.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2012.00658.x
Becker, S. (2007). Global perspectives on children’s unpaid caregiving in the family: Research and policy on young carers in the UK, Australia, the USA and sub-Saharan Africa. Global Social Policy, 7(1), 23–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018107073892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018107073892
Bergman, A. & Järkestig Berggren, U. (2022). Records of personal assistance applications reveal young carers: Viewed from the rights of the child. Children & Society, 37(2), 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12607 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12607
Bergman, A., Arnesson, K. & Järkestig Berggren, U. (2023a). Child protection investigations by private consultants or municipally employed social workers: What are the differences for children? Journal of Social Work, 23(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173221109710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173221109710
Bergman, A., Arnesson, K. & Järkestig Berggren, U. (2023b). ”Andra ögon idag?”: Socialtjänstens hantering av barnavårdsutredningar om våldsutsatthet. Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 30(3), 739–758. https://doi.org/10.3384/SVT.2023.30.3.4580 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/SVT.2023.30.3.4580
Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science, 5 uppl. London: Verso.
Björck-Åkesson, E., Wilder, J., Granlund, M., Pless, M., Simeonsson, R., Adolfsson, M., Almqvist, L., Augustine, L., Klang, N. & Lillvist, A. (2010). The international classification of functioning, disability and health and the version for children and youth as a tool in child habilitation/early childhood intervention – feasibility and usefulness as a common language and frame of reference for practice. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(1), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.516787 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.516787
Blom, B., Morén, S., & Nygren, L. (2013). Kunskap i socialt arbete: om villkor, processer och användning. Natur & Kultur.
Broadhurst, K., Wastell, D., White, S., Hall, C., Peckover, S., Thompson, K., Pithouse, A. & Davey, D. (2010). Performing ‘initial assessment’: Identifying the latent conditions for error at the front-door of local authority children’s services. The British Journal of Social Work, 40(2), 352–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcn162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcn162
Bromark, K. (2024). The user as a key actor in user participation: Exploring knowledge production in personal social services with participatory approach. Diss. Stockholms universitet.
Bruheim Jensen, I., Studsrød, I. & Ellingsen, I.T. (2020). Child protection social workers’ constructions of children and childhood: An integrative review. Child & Family Social Work, 25(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12720 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12720
Cleaver, H. & Walker, S. (2004). From policy to practice: the implementation of a new framework for social work assessments of children and families. Child & Family Social Work, 9(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2004.00314.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2004.00314.x
Denvall, V. & Johansson, K. (2012). Kejsarens nya kläder: Implementering av evidensbaserad praktik i socialt arbete. Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 19(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.3384/SVT.2012.19.1.2453 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/SVT.2012.19.1.2453
Durlak, J.A. & DuPre, E.P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
Friedman, A.S. & Granick, S. (1994). Assessing drug abuse among adolescents and adults: Standardized instruments. Rockville: National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).
Friedman, A.S. & Utada, A. (1989). A method for diagnosing and planning the treatment of adolescent drug abusers. The adolescent drug abuse diagnosis (ADAD) Instrument. Journal of Drug Education, 19(4), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.2190/xbu5-9mab-c2r5-0m96 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/XBU5-9MAB-C2R5-0M96
Gould, A. (1995). Young carers in Sweden. I S. Becker (red.), Young carers in Europe: An exploratory cross-national study in Britain, France, Sweden and Germany. Loughborough University. s. 57–69.
Greenhalgh, T., Kyriakidou, O. & Peacock, R. (2004). How to spread good ideas. A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability of innovations in health service delivery and organisation. London: NHS Service Delivery and Organisation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470987407
Grefve, C. (2017). Barnets och ungdomens reform: Förslag för en hållbar framtid. Slutrapport från den nationella samordnaren för den sociala barn- och ungdomsvården. Stockholm: Socialdepartementet, Regeringskansliet.
Grimshaw, J.M., Eccles, M.P., Lavis, J.N., Hill, S.J. & Squires, J.E. (2012). Knowledge translation of research findings. Implementation Science, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-50 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-50
Hasenfeld, Y. (2010). Human services as complex organizations. Los Angeles: Sage.
Heimer, M. & Pettersson, C. (2023). Barnets resa i socialtjänsten. Det svenska familjeorienterade systemet och barnet som rättighetsbärare. Örebro: Region Örebro län.
Jernbro, C. & Janson, S. (2017). Våld mot barn 2016: En nationell kartläggning. Stiftelsen Allmänna Barnhuset.
Johansson, S. (2010). Implementing evidence-based practice and programmes in the human services:lessons from research in public administration. European Journal of Social Work, 13(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450903135691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450903135691
Joseph, S., Becker, S., Becker, F. & Regel, S. (2009). Assessment of caring and its effects in young people: Development of the Multidimensional Assessment of Caring Activities checklist (MACA-YC18) and the Positive and Negative Outcomes of Caring questionnaire (PANOC-YC20) for young carers. Child: Care, Health and Development, 35(4), 510–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.00959.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.00959.x
Joseph, S., Sempik, J., Leu, A. & Becker, S. (2020). Young carers research, practice and policy: An overview and critical perspective on possible future directions. Adolescent Research Review, 5(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00119-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00119-9
Järkestig Berggren, U., Bergman, A., Eriksson, M. & Priebe, G. (2019). Young carers in Sweden: A pilot study of care activities, view of caring, and psychological well-being. Child & Family Social Work, 24(2), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12614
Leu, A. & Becker, S. (2017). A cross-national and comparative classification of in-country awareness and policy responses to young carers. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(6), 750–762. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1260698 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1260698
Léveillé, S. & Chamberland, C. (2010). Toward a general model for child welfare and protection services: A meta-evaluation of international experiences regarding the adoption of the Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their Families (FACNF). Children and Youth Services Review, 32(7), 929–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.03.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.03.009
Logan, J. & Graham, I.D. (2010). The Ottawa model of research use. I Rycroft-Malone, J. & Bucknall, T. (red.) Models and frameworks for implementing evidence-based practice: Linking evidence to action. Blackwell Publishing: Oxford. s. 83–108.
Lundström, T. & Shanks, E. (2013). Hård yta men mjukt innanmäte. Om hur chefer inom den sociala barnavården översätter evidensbaserat socialt arbete till lokal praktik. Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 20(2), 108–126. https://doi.org/10.3384/SVT.2013.20.2.2436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/SVT.2013.20.2.2436
Madon, T., Hofman, K.J., Kupfer, L. & Glass, R.I. (2007). Implementation science. Science, 318(5857), 1728–1729. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150009
Marsden, J., Farrell, M., Bradbury, C., Dale-Perera, A., Eastwood, B., Roxburgh, M. & Taylor, S. (2008). Development of the treatment outcomes profile. Addiction, 103(9), 1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02284.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02284.x
Matscheck, D. & Berg Eklundh, L. (2014). Does BBIC make a difference? Structured assessment of child protection and support. Nordic Social Work Research, 5(3), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2014.986749 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2014.986749
Metzing-Blau, S. & Schnepp, W. (2008). Young carers in Germany: To live on as normal as possible: A grounded theory study. BMC Nursing, 7(15), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-7-15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-7-15
Meyers, D.C., Durlak, J.A. & Wandersman, A. (2012). The quality implementation framework: A synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(3–4), 462–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x
Mitchell, P.F. (2011). Evidence-based practice in real-world services for young people with complex needs: New opportunities suggested by recent implementation science. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(2), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.10.003
Nordenfors, M., Melander, C. & Daneback, C. (2014). Unga omsorgsgivare i Sverige. Nationellt Kompetenscentrum Anhöriga.
Nutley, S.M., Walter, I. & Davies, H.T.O. (2007). Using evidence. How research can inform public services. Bristol: The Policy press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56687/9781847422323
Peckover, S., Hall, C. & White, S. (2009). From policy to practice: The implementation and negotiation of technologies in everyday child welfare. Children & Society, 23(2), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00143.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00143.x
Ponnert, L. & Svensson, K. (2011). När förpackade idéer möter organisatoriska villkor. Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 18, 168–186. https://doi.org/10.3384/SVT.2011.18.3.2510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/SVT.2011.18.3.2510
Rasmusson, B. (2004). Barnavårdsutredningar på nya grunder. Lund: Socialhögskolan.
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. 5 uppl. New York, London: Free press.
Rose, H. & Cohen, K. (2010). The experiences of young carers: A meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Journal of Youth Studies, 13(4), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261003801739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261003801739
Roselius, M. & Sundell, K. (2008). Att förändra socialt arbete. Forskare och praktiker om implementering. Stockholm: IMS, Socialstyrelsen & Gothia Förlag.
Skillmark, M. & Oscarsson, L. (2020). Applying standardisation tools in social work practice from the perspectives of social workers, managers, and politicians: A Swedish case study. European Journal of Social Work, 23(2), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1540409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1540409
Socialstyrelsen & Skolverket (2023). TSI-boken. Stöd i arbetet med tidiga och samordnade insatser för barn och unga. Stockholm: Elanders.
SOU (2020:47). Hållbar socialtjänst. En ny socialtjänstlag. Slutbetänkande av utredningen Framtidens socialtjänst. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.
Van de Ven, A.H. & Johnson, P.E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–820. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20159252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527385
White, S., Hall, C. & Peckover, S. (2009). The descriptive tyranny of the common assessment framework: Technologies of categorization and professional practice in child welfare. British Journal of Social Work, 39(7), 1197–1217. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcn053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcn053
White, S., Wastell, D., Broadhurst, K. & Hall, C. (2010). When policy o’erleaps itself: The ‘tragic tale’of the integrated children’s system. Critical Social Policy, 30(3), 405–429. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/28229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018310367675
Willging, C., Green, A., Gunderson, L., Chaffin, M. & Aarons, G. (2015). From a “Perfect Storm” to “Smooth Sailing”: Policymaker perspectives on implementation and sustainment of an evidence-based practice in two states. Child Maltreatment, 20(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559514547384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559514547384
