Digitalt stöd och kunskapsutbyte mellan socialarbetare i glesbygd - ett sätt att överbrygga tid och rum?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64098/SVT.2026.33.66376Keywords:
rural social services, challenges, collegial support and knowledge exchange, collaborative solutions, digital solutionsAbstract
Small rural municipalities face major challenges in social services. One challenge concern social workers’ opportunity for support and knowledge exchange. Social services in small rural municipalities often have limited resources and few employees who are expected to work with a wide range of social problems. Therefore, it can be difficult to stay up to date on the state of knowledge in all areas. One possibility for support and knowledge exchange is collegial collaboration, but because of few colleagues in one’s own municipality and long distances to other municipalities, alternative forms are needed. This article reports on a project with the ambition to develop a digital collaboration solution for collegial support and knowledge exchange through written communication between social workers in a rural area in northern Sweden. The purpose of the study was to investigate the possibilities and limitations of a digital collaboration solution to mediate support and knowledge exchange between social workers in a rural area, but also how contextual conditions had significance for the knowledge exchange. The data collection took place through group interviews with social workers and documentation at a workshop. The results show that the digital solution was considered valuable for finding solutions that needed to be adapted to the rural context. The main obstacle was written communication, which could make it difficult to communicate regarding cases with complex problems. It was also considered to contribute to social workers not answering questions that were asked as there could be uncertainty about how the answers were received due to the lack of immediate response. The results also show that the context, in the form of the framing of the interaction, was important in both defining what the knowledge exchange was about and in creating meaning in the knowledge exchange.
References
Abbas, Y., Martinetti, A., Rajabalinejad, M., Schuberth, F. & van Dongen, L. A. (2022). Facilitating digital collaboration through knowledge management: A case study. Knowledge management research & practice, 20(6), s. 797-813. doi:10.1080/14778238.2022.2029597
Adam, A., Gluch, P. & Julin, J. (2014) Using actor-network theory to understand knowledge sharing in an architecture firm. I: Raiden, A. & Aboagye-Nimo, E. (Red.). Procs 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014, Portsmouth, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 1235-1244.
Afrouz, R. & Lucas, J. (2024). A systematic review of technology-mediated social work practice: Benefits, uncertainties, and future directions. Journal of Social Work, 23(5), s. 953-974. doi: 10.1177/14680173231165926
Baron, L. & Gomez, R. (2016). The associations between technologies and societies: the utility of Actor-Network Theory. Science, Technology & Society, 21(2), s. 129-148. doi: 10.1177/0971721816640615
Birk, R.H. (2017). The materiality and materials of social work: on socio-material theories and social work research. I: K. Høgsbro & I. Shaw (red.) Social Work and Research in Advanced Welfare States, 104-116. Routledge.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), s. 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brownlee, K., Graham, J., Doucette, E., Hotson, N. & Halverson, G. (2010). Have Communication Technologies Influenced Rural Social Work Practice? The British Journal of Social Work, 40(2), s. 622-637. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp010
Callon, M. (1998). An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology. Sociological Review, 1998-05, 46(1_suppl), s. 244-269. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1998.tb03477.x
Callon, M. (2001). Actor network theory. I: N. Smelser & P. Baltes (red.). International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 1, s. 62-66. Elsevier.
Chiari, A., Senna, M., Gomes, V., Freire, M., Soares, A.; Alves, C., Cury, G. & Ferreira, R. (2023) Intersectoral Collaboration to Promote Child Development: The Contributions of the Actor-Network Theory. Qualitative Health Research, 33(5), s. 451-467. doi: 10.1177/10497323231153534
Fjuk, A., Smørdal, O. & Nurminen, M. (1998). Taking articulation work seriously: an activity theoretical approach. NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives.
Goodchild, B. & Ferrari, E. (2024). Intermediaries and mediators: an actor-network understanding of online property platforms. Housing studies, 39(1), s. 102-123. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2021.2015297
Green, R. (2003). Social work in rural areas: A personal and professional challenge. Australian Social Work, 56(3), s. 209-219. doi: 10.1046/j.0312-407x.2003.00082.x
Grell, P., Ahmadi, N. & Blom, B. (2013). Hur inverkar organisationsstrukturen på socialtjänstens klientarbete? – en sammanfattning av kunskapsläget. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift 20(3-4), s. 222-240. doi: 10.3384/svt.2013.20.3-4.2431
Grell, P., Blom, B. & Ahmadi, N. (2022). Perspectives on organizational structure and social services´ work with clients - a narrative review of 25 years research on social services. European Journal of Social Work. 25(2), s. 289-302. doi: 0.1080/13691457.2021.1954891
Hansson, K. (2021). Att hålla ihop det sociala arbetet – Hur covid-19-pandemin påverkade tre olika civilsamhällesorganisationer. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 28(4), s. 499-516. doi: 10.3384/SVT.2021.28.4.4371
Hansson, K. & Petersson, C. (2024). Digitala plattformar för att motverka våld i nära relationer – kvinnojourers digitalisering av sin verksamhet under covid-19-pandemin. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 31(1), s. 49-67. doi: 10.3384/SVT.2024.31.1.4876
Hjelte, J., Höög, E. & Nordström, A. (2023). Kunskap och expertis i små glesbygdskommuners socialtjänst – synen på utmaningar och lösningar. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 30(1), s. 457-476. doi: 10.3384/SVT.2023.30.1.4116
Jang, K. (2013). An understanding of optimal knowledge management for social work practice: Based on a process-oriented conceptualisation of knowledge integration. British Journal of Social Work, 43(7), s. 1364-1383. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs053
Jang, K. (2015). Technology could be harmful rather than beneficial: An empirical investigation of caseworkers’ perceptions using a knowledge management framework. Journal of Social Service Research, 41(2), s. 246-268. doi: 10.1080/01488376.2014.983260
Kindle, P. A. (2016). Book Review: Rural Social Work: An International Perspective. Contemporary Rural Social Work Journal 8(1), s. 97-99. doi: 10.61611/2165-4611.1114
Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. The sociological review, 47(1_suppl), s. 15-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03480.x
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. University Press.
Lee, M. (2017). Social Workers’ Evidence-Based Practice Use and Challenges in Rural Environments: A Systematic Review. Contemporary Rural Social Work Journal 9(1), s. 1-14. doi: 10.61611/2165-4611.1150
Leung, Z. C. S. (2007). Knowledge Management in Social Work–Towards a Conceptual Framework. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 25(1-2), s. 181–198. doi: 10.1300/J017v25n01_13
Leung, Z. C. S. (2009). Knowledge management in social work: Types and processes of knowledge sharing in social service organizations. British Journal of Social Work, 39(4), s. 693-709. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp034
Mathias, C. & Benton, A. (2011). Social Justice Through the Education of a Rural and Tribal Child Welfare Workforce. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 5(2-3), s. 282-296. doi: 10.1080/15548732.2011.573756
Morgan, D. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage.
Myndigheten för vård- och omsorgsanalys (2019). Social kompetens – Om kompetensförsörjning av handläggare i socialtjänsten. Rapport 2019:7. Myndigheten för vårdanalys.
[https://www.vardanalys.se/rapporter/social-kompetens/ Hämtat: 2024-08-19].
Parker, E. (2017). An actor-network theory reading of change for children in public care. British Educational Research Journal, 43(1), s. 151-167. doi: 10.1002/berj.3257
Rice, K. (2017). Use of Evidence-based Practice to Enhance Decision-Making in Rural Child Welfare Practice. Contemporary Rural Social Work Journal, 9(1), s.1-12. doi: 10.61611/2165-4611.1151
Riebschleger, J. (2007). Social Workers’ Suggestions for Effective Rural Practice. Families in society, 88(2), s. 203-213. doi: 10.1606/1044-3894.3618
Roschelle, J. & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. Computer supported collaborative learning (129: 69-97). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-85098-15
Sage, M., Hitchcock, L. I., Bakk, L., Young, J., Michaeli, D., Jones, A. S. & Smyth, N. J. (2021). Professional collaboration networks as a social work research practice innovation: Preparing DSW students for knowledge dissemination roles in a digital society. Research on Social Work Practice, 31(1), s. 42-52. doi: 10.1177/1049731520961163
SCB (2024) Befolkningsstatistik [Folkmängd i riket, län och kommuner 31 december 2023 och befolkningsförändringar 2023 (scb.se) ] Hämtat: 2024-08-30
Seyyedeh, N., Daneshgar, F., & Aurum, A. (2009). Investigating inter-organizational knowledge sharing intention in supply chain partnership. ACIS 2009 Proceedings, 18.
[https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2009/18. Hämtat 20240819].
SOU 2020:8. Starkare kommuner – med kapacitet att klara välfärdsuppdraget. [https://data.riksdagen.se/fil/9607E747-AC33-4028-975F-033CFF314868. Hämtat: 2024-08-19].
Steiner, O. (2021). Social work in the digital era: theoretical, ethical and practical considerations, The British Journal of Social Work, 51(8), s. 3358-3374. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcaa160
Tillväxtverket (2024). Statistik och analys. [https://tillvaxtverket.se/tillvaxtverket/statistikochanalys/statistikomregionalutveckling/regionalaindelningar/staderochlandsbygder.1844.html. Hämtat: 2024-05-10]
Wall, J. & Dunne, T. (2012). Mediation Research: A Current Review. Negotiation journal, 28(2), s. 217-244. doi: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2012.00336.x
Wang, S., Noe, R. A. & Wang, Z. M. (2014). Motivating knowledge sharing in knowledge management systems: A quasi–field experiment. Journal of Management, 40(4), s. 978-1009. doi: 10.1177/0149206311412192
Wickramasinghe, N., Tatnall, A. & Bali, R. K. (2010). Using actor-network theory to facilitate a superior understanding of knowledge creation and knowledge transfer. International Journal of Actor-Network Theory and Technological Innovation (IJANTTI), 2(4), s. 30-42. doi: 10.4018/jantti.2010100104
Wihlborg, E. (2022). Det kommunala självstyret i en digital tid. I Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner (Red.). Självstyrelse – värd att värna? 100-117. Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner.
Zuppo, C. (2012). Defining ICT in a boundaryless world: The development of a working hierarchy. International Journal of Managing Information Technology, 4(3), s. 13-22. doi: 10.5121/IJMIT.2012.4302


