The Triviality of the New Innovation and Impact in Archaeology and Beyond


  • Tim Flohr Sørensen University of Copenhagen, The Saxo Institute



archaeological theory, novelty, impact, borrowing, Object-Oriented Ontology


What drives archaeology? Is it new empirical discoveries, new methods or new theory? These factors combined are the fuel of the discipline, is the obvious answer. However, debates and research articles frequently reveal how a perceived need for novelty, originality and impact tends to disentangle this triumvirate of archaeological virtues, giving precedence to one asset over others as the supposed driving force. Focusing on archaeological theory, this article taps into current discussions of the nature of archaeological change, reviewing debates on the formation of archaeological theory, its legitimisation and usefulness. Specifically, I address a recent claim that archaeological theory too readily undermines itself by adopting immature ideas and concepts from other disciplines in an uncritical pursuit of novelty. Finally, I discuss how archaeology may contribute more generally to the formation of theory in the humanities by returning so-called borrowed theory.


Download data is not yet available.


Adorno, T. 2000. Metaphysics: Concepts and Problems. First published 1965. Translated by Jephcott, E. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Bailey, D. 2018. Breaking the Surface: An Art/archaeology of Prehistoric Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barrett, J.C. 2016. The New Antiquarianism? Antiquity. Vol. 90 pp. 1681-1686.

Benjamin, J. 2018. Human-Plant Mutualism in the Built Environment. Pinsapo Journal. Vol. 2 pp. 32-40.

Bennett, J. 2010. A Vitalist Stopover on the Way to a New Materialism. In: Coole, D. H. & Frost, S. (eds). New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. pp. 47-69. Duke University Press: Durham, NC.

Binford, L.R. 1962. Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity. Vol. 28 pp. 217-225.

Binford, L.R. 1988. Review of Reading the past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology by Ian Hodder. American Antiquity. Vol. 53 pp. 875-876.

Bogost, I. 2012. Alien Phenomenology, Or, What It's Like to be a Thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Bradley, R. 1993. Archaeology: the Loss of Nerve. In: Yoffee, N. & Sherratt, A. (eds). Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda?, pp. 131-133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clarke, D.L. 1973. Archaeology: The Loss of Innocence. Antiquity. Vol. 47 pp. 6-18.

Clarke, D.L. 1978. Analytical Archaeology. London: Methuen.

Dibley, B. 2018. The Technofossil: A Memento Mori. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology. Vol. 5 pp. 44-52.

Edgeworth, M. 2012. Follow the Cut, Follow the Rhythm, Follow the Material. Norwegian Archaeological Review. Vol. 45 pp. 76-92.

Edgeworth, M. 2016. Grounded objects. Archaeology and speculative realism. Archaeological Dialogues. Vol. 23 pp. 93-113.

Finn, C. 2014. Home: An Installation for Living In. In: Russell, A.I. & Cochrane, M.A. (eds). Art and Archaeology: Collaborations, Conversations, Criticisms. pp. 115-127. New York: Springer.

Flannery, K. 1982. The Golden Marshalltown: A Parable for the Archeology of the 1980s. American Anthropologist. Vol. 84 pp. 265-278.

Garcia-Rovira, I. 2015. What About Us? On Archaeological Objects (or the Objects of Archaeology). Current Swedish Archaeology. Vol. 23 pp. 85-108.

Ginzburg, C. 1989. Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method. Translated by Tedeschi, A. C. & Tedeschi, J. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Gramsch, A. 2011. Theory in Central European Archaeology. Dead or alive? In: Bintliff, J. & Pearce, M. (eds). The Death of Archaeological Theory?, pp. 49-71. Oxford: Oxbow Books.

Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.

Harman, G. 2002. Tool-Being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects. Peru, IL: Open Court.

Harman, G. 2011. The Quadruple Object. Winchester: Zero Books.

Harman, G. 2012. The Third Table. In: Christov-Bakargiev, C. (eds). The Book of Books, pp. 4-15. Ostfildern: Hatja Cantz.

Harman, G. 2013. Undermining, Overmining, and Duomining: A Critique. In: Sutela, J. (eds). Add Metaphysics, pp. 40-51. Espoo: Aalto University.

Harman, G. 2016. Immaterialism: Objects and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Harman, G. 2018a. Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. London: Pelican Books.

Harman, G. 2018b. Speculative Realism: An introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Harman, G. Forthcoming. Art and Objects. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Harris, O.J.T. & Cipolla, C. 2017. Archaeological Theory in the New Millennium: Introducing Current Perspectives. London: Routledge.

Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and Time. First published 1927. Translated by Macquarrie, J. & Robinson, E. New York: Harper and Row.

Heidegger, M. 1966. Discourse on Thinking. Translated by Anderson, J. M. & Freund, E. H. New York: Harper & Row.

Henare, A., Holbraad, M. & Wastell, S. 2007. Introduction: Thinking Through Things. In: Henare, A., Holbraad, M. & Wastell, S. (eds). Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically, pp. 1-31. London: Routledge.

Hodder, I. 1992. Theory and Practice in Archaeology. London: Routledge.

Hodder, I. 2012. Introduction: Contemporary Theoretical Debate. In: Hodder, I. (eds). Archaeological Theory Today. pp. 1-14. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Ingold, T. 2007. Materials against Materiality. Archaeological Dialogues. Vol. 14 pp. 1-16.

Ion, A. 2017. How Interdisciplinary is Interdisciplinarity? Revisiting the Impact of aDNA Research for the Archaeology of Human Remains. Current Swedish Archaeology. Vol. 25 pp. 177-198.

Ion, A. 2018. A Taphonomy of a Dark Anthropocene: A Response to Þóra Pétursdóttir’s OOO Inspired ‘Archaeology and Anthropocene’. Archaeological Dialogues. Vol. 25 pp. 191-203.

Johnson, M.H. 2010. Archaeological Theory. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

Kristiansen, K. 1996. Old Boundaries and New Frontiers: Reflections on the Identity of Archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology. Vol. 4 pp. 103-122.

Kristiansen, K. 2008. Do we need the ‘archaeology of Europe’? Archaeological Dialogues. Vol. 15 pp. 5-25.

Kristiansen, K. 2011. Theory does not Die it Changes Direction. In: Bintliff, J. & Pearce, M. (eds). The Death of Archaeological Theory?, pp. 72-80. Oxford: Oxbow.

Kristiansen, K. 2014. Towards a New Paradigm? The Third Science Revolution and its Possible Consequences in Archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology. Vol. 22 pp. 11-34.

Kristiansen, K. 2017. The Nature of Archaeological Knowledge and Its Ontological Turns. Norwegian Archaeological Review. Vol. 50 pp. 120-123.

Last, A. 2018. Of Interdisciplinarity. In: Lury, C., Fensham, R., Heller-Nicholas, A., Lammes, S., Last, A., Michael, M. & Uprichard, E. (eds). Routledge Handbook of Interdisciplinary Research Methods, pp. 197-208. London: Routledge.

Latour, B. & Weibel, P. 2005. Making Things Public. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Lee, D. 2018. Experimental Mapping in Archaeology: Process, Practice and Archaeologies of the Moment. In: Gillings, M., Haciguzeller, P. & Lock, G. (eds). Re-Mapping Archaeology: Critical Perspectives, Alternative Mappings, pp. 143-176. Oxon: Routledge.

Lindstrøm, T.C. 2015. Agency ‘in itself’. A Discussion of Inanimate, Animal and Human Agency. Archaeological Dialogues. Vol. 22 pp. 207-238.

Lindstrøm, T.C. 2017. Agency. A Response to Sørensen and Ribeiro. Archaeological Dialogues. Vol. 24 pp. 109-116.

Lucas, G. 2012. Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lucas, G. 2015. The Mobility of Theory. Current Swedish Archaeology. Vol. 23 pp. 13-32.

Lucas, G. 2017. The Paradigm Concept in Archaeology. World Archaeology. Vol. 49 pp. 260-270.

Malmer, M.P. 1997. On Objectivity and Actualism in Archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology. Vol. 5 pp. 7-18.

Nilsson Stutz, L. 2018. A Future for Archaeology: In Defense of an Intellectually Engaged, Collaborative and Confident Archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review. Vol. 51 pp. 48-56.

Olsen, B. 2012ba. The Return of Things and the Savagery of the Archaeological Object. In: Pereira, G. (eds). Savage Objects, pp. 71-83. Lissabon: Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda.

Olsen, B. 2012b. Archaeological Theory, Christmas Pork and Red Herrings: Reply to Comments. Current Swedish Archaeology. Vol. 20 pp. 95-106.

Olsen, B., Shanks, M., Webmoor, T. & Witmore, C.L. 2012. Archaeology: The Discipline of Things. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Pearson, M. & Shanks, M. 2001. Theatre/Archaeology. London: Routledge.

Pétursdóttir, Þ. 2017. Climate change? Archaeology and Anthropocene. Archaeological Dialogues. Vol. 24 pp. 175-205.

Pétursdóttir, Þ. 2018a. Drift. In: Birch, S.E.P. (ed). Multispecies archaeology, pp. 85-101. London: Routledge.

Pétursdóttir, Þ. 2018b. Lyrics for a Duskier Enlightenment. In Response to Alexandra Ion. Archaeological Dialogues. Vol. 25 pp. 205-213.

Pétursdóttir, Þ. & Olsen, B. 2018. Theory Adrift: The Matter of Archaeological Theorizing. Journal of Social Archaeology. Vol. 18 pp. 97-117.

Ribeiro, A. 2016a. Archaeology will be just Fine. Archaeological Dialogues. Vol. 23 pp. 146-151.

Ribeiro, A. 2016b. Against Object Agency. A Counterreaction to Sørensen's ‘Hammers and Nails’. Archaeological Dialogues. Vol. 23 pp. 229-235.

Serres, M. 2007. The Parasite. First published 1980. Translated by Schehr, L.R. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Shanks, M. 1990. Conclusion: Reading the Signs: Responses to Archaeology after Structuralism. In: Bapty, I. & Yates, T. (eds). Archaeology After Structuralism: Post-structuralism and the Practice of Archaeology, pp. 294-310. London: Routledge.

Sherratt, A. 1989. V. Gordon Childe: Archaeology and Intellectual History. Past & Present. Vol. 125 pp. 151-185.

Sherratt, A. 1993. The Relativity of Theory. In: Yoffee, N. & Sherratt, A. (eds). Archaeological Theory: Who sets the Agenda?, pp. 119-130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Solnit, R. 2007. Storming the Gates of Paradise: Landscapes for Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Stewart, K. 1996. A Space on the Side of the Road: Cultural Poetics in an "Other" America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Stewart, K. 2008. Weak Theory in an Unfinished World. Journal of Folklore Research. Vol. 45 pp. 71-82.

Sørensen, M.L.S. 1984. Changing Images of Archaeology: South Scandinavian Archaeology 1818 to 1978. Archaeological Review from Cambridge. Vol. 3 pp. 38-47.

Tilley, C. 1994. A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths and Monuments. Oxford: Berg.

Trigger, B.G. 2006. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vander Linden, M. 2017. Reaction to a Reactionary Text. Norwegian Archaeological Review. Vol. 50 pp. 127-129.

Witmore, C.L. 2014. Archaeology and the New Materialisms. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology. Vol. 1 pp. 203-224.

Wylie, A. 2017. Representational and Experimental Modeling in Archaeology. In: Magnani, L. & Bertolotti, T. (eds). Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science, pp. 989-1002. New York: Springer.




How to Cite

Sørensen, T. F. . (2018) “The Triviality of the New Innovation and Impact in Archaeology and Beyond”, Current Swedish Archaeology, 26(1), pp. 93–117. doi: 10.37718/CSA.2018.09.



Research Articles