Training the Mind to go Visiting

Reply keynote

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2021.09

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahlgren, H. 2021. Prehistoric human impact on wild mammalian populations in Scandinavia. Theses and Papers in Scientific Archaeology 21. Stockholm: Stockholm University.

Armstrong Oma, K. 2021. The View from the Cheap Seats: An Archaeologist Grappling with Multispecies Entanglements. Current Swedish Archaeology. Vol. 29 pp. 72-77. https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2021.08.

Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe halfways. Durham: Duke University Press.

Bartosiewicz, L. 2021. Herding Cats. Current Swedish Archaeology. Vol. 29 pp. 56-71. https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2021.07.

Bradley, R. 2021. More Than. Current Swedish Archaeology. Vol. 29 pp. 48-51. https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2021.05.

Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Brück, J. 2019. Personifying Prehistory: Relational Ontologies in Bronze Age Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cohen, J.J. 1996. Monster Culture (Seven Theses). In: Cohen, J.J. (ed). Monster Theory, pp.3–25. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Despret, V. 2013. From Secret Agents to Interagency. History and Theory. Vol. 52 pp. 29-44

Despret, V. 2015. Why “I Had not Read Derrida”: Often Too Close, Always Too Far Away. In: Mackenzie, L. & S. Posthumus (eds). French Thinking about Animals, pp. 91-104. Michigan. Michigan State University Press.

Fredengren, C. 2013. Posthumanism, the Transcorporeal and Biomolecular Archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology. Vol. 21 pp.53-71.

Fredengren, C. 2018. Archaeological Posthumanities: Feminist Re-invention of Humanities, Science and Material Pasts. In: Braidotti, R. & Åsberg, C. (eds). A Feminist Companion to the Posthumanities. pp. 129-40. New York: Springer.

Frei, A.C. 2021. Multispecies Futures. Current Swedish Archaeology. Vol. 29 pp. 34-37. https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2021.02.

Haraway, D. 1994. The Promise of Monster: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others. In: Grossberg, L., Nelson, C. & Treichler, P. (eds). Cultural Studies, pp 295-337. London: Routledge.

Haraway, D. 2008. When Species Meet. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Hayward, E. 2010. Fingereyes: Impressions of Cup Corals. Cultural Anthropology. Vol. 25(4) pp. 577‑599.

Hodder, I. 2016. Studies in Human–thing Entanglement. www.ian-hodder.com/books/studies-human-thing-entanglement. [Accessed 21 June 2021].

Jaque, A., Otero Verzier, M. & Pietroiusti, L. (eds) 2020. The More-than-Human. Rotterdam: Het Nieuwe Instituut.

Jennbert, K. 2021. Post-Humnanistic Approaches in Archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology. Vol. 29 pp. 43-47. https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2021.04.

Jones, A.M. 2021. Disentangling Entanglement: Archaeological Encounters with the Concept of Entanglement. Current Swedish Archaeology. Vol. 29 pp. 38-42. https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2021.03.

Tronto, J. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethics of Care. New York: Routledge.

Mylius, B. 2018. Three Types of Anthropocentrism. Environmental Philosophy. Vol. 15(2) pp. 159–194.

Russell, N. 2021. Power and Othering. Current Swedish Archaeology. Vol. 29 pp. 52-55. https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2021.06.

Tsing, A. 2013. More-than-Human Sociality. A Call for Critical Description. In: Hastrup, K. (ed). Anthropology and Nature, pp. 27-42. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

Tsing, A., Swanson, H., Gan, E., & Bubandt, N. 2017. Arts of Living on a Damage Planet. Monsters. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.

Tronto, J. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethics of Care. New York: Routledge.

Zedeño, M.N. 2009. Animating by Association. Index Objects and Relational Taxonomies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. Vol. 19(3) pp. 407–417.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-09

How to Cite

Fredengren, C. (2021) “Training the Mind to go Visiting: Reply keynote”, Current Swedish Archaeology, 29(1), pp. 78–87. doi: 10.37718/CSA.2021.09.

Issue

Section

Keynote Comment