Posthumanism, the Transcorporeal and Biomolecular Archaeology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2013.08Keywords:
anthropocentrism, osteology, DNA, isotope, human-animal relations, hauntolog, environmental humanismAbstract
This paper will discuss the tensions between the humanities and sciences within archaeology and examine how these tensions exist, both in how identity and personhood are understood, and in different views of epistemology and ontology. From a basis in critical posthumanism it is argued that unnecessary boundaries have been set up between the body and the envi- ronment. The concept of the transcorporeal allows for rethinking the connection between bodies and land- scape, enabling us to discuss the environment inside. This approach can provide an alternative framing for the use of the sciences in archaeology, particularly for osteology and DNA and isotope analysis. Biomolecular mapping of body networks allows for a better understanding of the configuration of specific historic bodies as well as for discussing ethics. Furthermore, there may be a case for describing analysed bodies as figurations, rather than as identities.
Downloads
References
Adler, C. J., Dobney, K., Weyrich, L. S., Kaidoinis, J., Walker, A. W., Haak, W., Brad- shaw, C. J. A., Townsend, G., Soltysiak, A., Alt, K. W., Parkhill, J. & Cooper, A. 2013. Sequencing ancient calcified dental plaque shows changes in oral microbiota with dietary shifts of the Neolithic and Industrial revolutions. Nature Genetics 45. Pp. 450–455.
Alaimo, S. 2010. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Alaimo, S. 2013. Thinking as the Stuff of the World. O-Zone: A Journal of Object- Oriented Studies. Issue 1: Object/Ecology. Pp. 13–21.
Argent, G. 2010. Do the clothes make the horse? Relationality, roles and statuses in Iron Age Inner Asia. World Archaeology. Vol. 42. Pp. 151–174.
Armstrong Oma, K. 2010. Between trust and domination. World Archaeology. Vol. 42. Pp. 175–187.
Barad, K. 1998. Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialisation of real- ity. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 10(2). Pp. 87–128.
Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the universe halfways. Durham: Duke University Press. Barad, K. 2010. Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance:
Dis/continuities, Space Time Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come. Derrida Today 3:2. Pp. 240–268.
Barad, K. 2012. Nature’s Queer Performativity. Kvinder, Køn & Forskning. Vol. 1–2. Pp. 25–53.
Bogost, I. 2012. Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Braidotti, R. 1994. Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contem- porary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Braidotti, R. 2002. Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cam- bridge: Polity Press.
Braidotti, R. 2011. Nomadic Theory: The Portable Rosi Braidotti. New York & Chich- ester: Columbia University Press.
Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Buckley, L. 2011. General survey of the osteoarchaeology. In: Cahill, M. & Sikora, M. (Eds). Breaking ground, finding graves – reports on the excavations of burials by the National Museum of Ireland, 1927–2006. National Museum of Ireland. Mon- ograph Series 4, vol. 2. Pp. 527–578. Bray: Wordwell.
Butler, J. 1999 (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
Butler, J. 2010. Frames of War: When is Life Grievable? London: Verso.
Cassel, K. 2011. I genernas spår. Globala nätverk eller lokala isolat? In: Andrén, A. (Ed.). Förmodern Globalitet: Essäer om rörelse, möten och fjärran ting under 10 000 år. Lund: Nordic Academic Press. Pp. 229–244.
Damm, C. 2012. Interactions Within and Between Collectives: Networking in North- ern Fennoscandia. In: Damm, C. & Saarikivi, J. (Eds). Networks, Interaction and Emerging Identities in Fennoscandia and Beyond. Proceedings from the Interna- tional and multidisciplinary conference in Tromsø 13–16 Oct. 2009. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 265. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Pp. 125–138.
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. 1988. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophre- nia. London: the Athlone Press.
Derrida, J. 1994. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, & the New International. New York: Routledge.
Dommasnes, L. H., Hjørungdal, T., Montón-Subías, S., Sánchez Romero, M. & Wicker N. L. (Eds). 2010. Situating Gender in European Archaeologies. Budapest: Ar- chaeolingua.
Draus-Barini, J., Walsh, S., Pospiech, E., Kupiec, T., Glab, H., Branicki, W. & Kayser, M. 2013. Bona fide colour: DNA prediction of human eye and hair colour from an- cient and contemporary skeletal remains. Investigative Genetics 2013, 4:3.
Eriksson, G. 2013. Stable Isotope Analysis of Humans. In: Tarlow, S. & Nilsson Stutz, L. (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 123–146.
Fahlander, F. 2012. Facing Gender. Corporeality, Materiality, Intersectionality and Resurrection. In: Back Danielsson, I.-M. & Thedén, S. (Eds). To Tender Gender. The Pasts and Futures of Gender Research in Archaeology. Stockholm Studies in Archaeology 58. Stockholm. Pp. 137–152.
Fausto-Sterling, A. 2005. The Bare Bones of Sex: Part 1 – Sex and Gender. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. Vol. 30. No. 2. Pp. 1491–1527.
Fornander, E. 2011. Consuming and Communicating Identities: Dietary Diversity and Interaction in Middle Neolithic Sweden. Stockholm: Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Stockholm University.
Fowler, C. 2010. From Identity and Material Culture to Personhood and Materiality. In: Beaudry, M. & Hicks, D. (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 352–385.
Fredengren, C. 2002. Crannogs: A Study of People’s Interaction with Lakes. Bray: Wordwell.
Gilchrist, R. 2009. Rethinking later medieval masculinity: The male body in death. In: Sayer, D. & Williams, H. (Eds). Mortuary Practices and Social Identities in the Middle Ages: Essays in Burial Archaeology in Honour of Heinrich Härke. Exeter: University of Exeter Press. Pp. 236–252.
Grosz, E. 2004. The Nick of Time: Politics, Evolution, and the Untimely. Durham: Duke University Press.
Haraway, D. 1991. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. In: Haraway, D. (Ed.). Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books. Pp. 183–201.
Haraway, D. 2008. When Species Meet. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. Harris, O. J. T. & Robb. J. 2012. Multiple Ontologies and the Problem of the Body in History. American Anthropologist 114(4). Pp. 668–679.
Hebsgaard, M. B., Gilbert, T. P., Arneborg, J., Heyn, P., Allentoft, M. E., Bunce, M., Munch, K., Schweger, C. & Willerslev, E. 2009. The Farm Beneath the Sand – an archaeological case study on ancient ‘dirt’ DNA. Antiquity 83 (320). Pp. 430–444.
Hillson, S. 1986. Teeth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hjørungdal, T. 2012. “Møder i Mosen” – Metodmöten i Maglemoses forskningshisto- ria. In: Nicklasson, P. & Peterson, R. (Eds). Att återupptäcka det glömda: Aktuell forskning om forntidens förflutna i Norden. Acta Archaeologica Lundensia. Series Prima in 4. No. 32. Pp. 325–336.
Howards, R. 2013. Weaned Upon A Time: Studies of the Infant Diet in Prehistory. Theses and Papers in Scientific Archaeology. Vol. 14. Stockholm: Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Stockholm University.
Insoll, T. 2006. Reader in the Archaeology of Identities. London: Routledge.
Jones, S. 1997. The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and in the Present. London & New York: Routledge.
Joyce, R. M. 2000. Gender and Power in Prehispanic Mesoamerica. Austin: Univer- sity of Texas Press.
Kjellström, A. 2005. The Urban Farmer: Osteoarchaeological Analysis of Skeletons From Medieval Sigtuna Interpreted in a Socioeconomic Perspective. Stockholm: Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Stockholm University.
Kristiansen, K. 2004. Genes versus agents: A discussion on the widening theoretical gap in archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues 11 (2). Pp. 77–99.
Latour, B. 1993. We have never been modern. London & New York: Harvester Wheat- sheaf.
Lykke, N. 2010. Feminist Studies: A Guide to Intersectional Theory, Methodology and Writing. New York: Routledge.
McClintock, A. 1995. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. London: Routledge.
M’charek, A. A. 2000. Technologies of Population: Forensic DNA testing practices and the making of differences and similarities. Configurations 8. Pp. 121–159.
M’charek, A. 2010. Fragile differences, relational effects; stories about the materiality of race and sex. European Journal of Women’s Studies 17(4). Pp. 307–322.
Meillassoux, Q. 2008. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Trans. Ray Brassier. New York: Continuum.
Meindl, R. S., Lovejoy, C. O., Mensforth, R. P. & Don Carlos, L. 1985. Accuracy and Determination of Error in the Sexing of the Skeleton: Implications for Paleodemog- raphy. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 68. Pp. 79–85.
Meskell, L. & Joyce, R. (Eds). 2003. Embodied Lives: Figuring Ancient Maya and Egyptian Experience. New York: Routledge.
Nilsson, T., Sjövold, T. & Welinder, S. 1979. The Mesolithic Skeleton from Store Mosse, Scania. Acta Archaeologica. Vol. 49. Pp. 220–238.
Nordbladh, J. & Yates, T. 1990. This Perfect Body, This Virgin Text: Between Sex and Gender in Archaeology. In: Yates, T. & Bapty, I. (Eds). Archaeology after structur- alism. London: Routledge. Pp. 222–239.
Normark, J. 2012. The road of life. Bodies-politic in the Maya area. In: Back Daniels- son, I.-M., & Thedén, S. (Eds). To Tender Gender: The Pasts and Futures of Gen- der Research in Archaeology. Stockholm Studies in Archaeology 58. Stockholm: Stockholm University. Pp. 117–136.
Oliveira, H. 2008. Molecular Biology and the Human Past. A Theory of Archaeogenet- ics. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 23. 1. Pp. 109–126.
Renfrew, C. (Ed.). 2000. Archaeogenetics: DNA and the Population Prehistory of Eu- rope. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Schuenemann, V. J., Singh, P., Mendum, T. A., Krause-Kyora, B., Jäger, G., Bos, K. I., Herbig, A., Economou, C., Bengak, A., Busso, P., Nebel, A., Boldsen, J. L., Kjell- ström, A., Wu, H., Stewart, G. R., Taylor, G. M., Bauer, P., Lee, O. Y. C., Wu, H.
H. T., Minnikin, D. E., Besra, G. S., Tucker, K., Roffey, S., Sow, S. O., Cole. S. T., Nieselt, K. & Krause, J. 2013. Genome-wide comparison of medieval and mod- ern mycobacterium leprae. Science 12 July 2013. Vol. 341. No. 6142. Pp. 179–183.
Schulting, R. J. & Richards, M. P. 2002. The wet, the wild and the domesticated: The Mesolithic-Neolithic transition on the west coast of Scotland. European Journal of Archaeology 5. Pp. 147–189.
Shennan, S. 2002. Genes, Memes and Human History: Darwinian Archaeology and Cultural Evolution. London: Thames and Hudson.
Siebers, T. 2001. Disability in Theory: From Social Constructionism to the New Re- alism of the Body, American Literary History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 737–754.
Skoglund, P., Storå, J., Götherström, A. & Jakobsson, M. 2013. Accurate sex identi- fication of ancient human remains using DNA shotgun sequencing. Journal of Ar- chaeological Science 40. Pp. 4477–4482.
Sofaer, J. R. 2006. The Body as Material Culture: A Theoretical Osteoarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sørensen, M. L. S. 1995. Reading Dress. The Construction of Social Categories and Identities in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European Archaeology 5. Pp. 93–114.
Sørensen, T. F. 2013. We Have Never Been Latourian: Archaeological Ethics and the Posthuman Condition. Norwegian Archaeological Review. Vol. 46. No. 1. Pp. 1–18.
Webmoor, T. 2007. What about ”one more turn after the social” in archaeological rea- soning? Taking things seriously. World Archaeology 39(4). Pp. 546–562.
Webmoor, T. & Witmore, C. L. 2008. Things are us! A commentary on human/things relations under the banner of a “social archaeology”. Norwegian Archaeological Review 41 (1). Pp. 1–18.
Welinder, S. 2003. DNA, etnicitet, folk och folkvandringar. Göteborg: Bricoleur Press. Åsberg, C. 2005. Genetiska föreställningar: Mellan genus och gener i populär/vetenskapens visuella kulturer. Linköping: Linköpings Universitet
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors contributing to Current Swedish Archaeology retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to the Swedish Archaeological Society. Read the journal's full Copyright- and Licensing Policy.
