After Interpretation: Remembering Archaeology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2012.01Keywords:
archaeological theory, things, material turnAbstract
In the light of some significant anniversaries, this pa- per discusses the fate of archaeological theory after the heyday of postprocessualism. While once considered a radical and revolutionary alternative, post- processual or interpretative archaeology remarkably soon became normalized, mainstream and hegem- onic, leading to the theoretical lull that has charac- terized its aftermath. Recently, however, this consen- sual pause has been disrupted by new materialist per- spectives that radically depart from the postproces- sual orthodoxy. Some outcomes of these perspectives are proposed and discussed, the most significant be- ing a return to archaeology – an archaeology that sacrifices the imperatives of historical narratives, so- ciologies, and hermeneutics in favour of a trust in the soiled and ruined things themselves and the memo- ries they afford.
Downloads
References
Alberti, B. & T. L. Bray (Eds). 2009. Animating Archaeology. Of subjects, objects and alternative ontologies. A Special Section for Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19(3): 337–441.
Alberti, B., Fowles, S., Holbraad, M., Marshall, Y. & Witmore, C. 2011. Worlds Other- wise. Archaeology, Anthropology and Ontological Difference. Current Anthropo logy 52(6): 896–912.
Andreassen, E., Bjerck, H. & Olsen, B. 2010. Persistent Memories. Pyramiden – a So viet Mining Town in the High Arctic. Trondheim: Tapir.
Andrén, A. 1997. Mellan ting och text. En introduktion till de historiska arkeologierna. Stockholm: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag Symposium
Bailey, D., Cochrane, A. & Zambelli, J. 2010. UNEARTHED. A Comparative Study of Jomon Dogu and Neolithic Figurines. Norwich: Sainsbury Centre for Visual Arts.
Becker, C. J. 1979. Arkeologien i Danmark – i går, i dag og i morgen. Fortid og Nutid XXVIII:3–11.
Bender, B., Hamilton, S. & Tilley, C. 2007. Stone Worlds. Narrativity and Reflexivity in Landscape Archaeology. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Benjamin, W. 1996. Central Park. In Selected Writings, vol. 1: 1913–1926. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.
Benso, S. 2000. The Face of Things. A Different Side of Ethics. Albany: State Univer- sity of New York Press.
Bertelsen, R., Lillehammer, A. & Næss, J. R. (Eds). 1982. Were They All Men? An Ex amination of Sex Roles in Prehistoric Society. Acts from a workshop held at Ut stein Kloster, Rogaland, 2.–4. November 1979. Stavanger: Arkeologisk Museum.
Binford, L. 1962. Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity 28(2). Pp. 217–25. Binford, L. 1972. An Archaeological Perspective. New York: Seminar Press.
Binford, S. & Binford, L. 1968. New Perspectives in Archaeology. Chicago: Aldine Press. Bogost, I. 2012. Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Brown, B. 2001. Thing Theory. Critical Inquiry 28. Pp. 1–22.
Bryant, L. 2011. The Democracy of Objects. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press. Bryant, L., Srnicek, N. & Harman, G. (Eds). 2011. The Speculative Turn. Continental Materialism and Realism. Melbourne: re.press.
Clarke, D. (Ed.). 1972. Models in Archaeology. London: Methuen.
Clarke, D. 1973. Archaeology: The Loss of Innocence. Antiquity 47. Pp. 6–18.
Coole, D., & Frost, S. 2010. New Materialisms. Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Dur- ham: Duke University Press.
Deetz, J. 1977. In Small Things Forgotten. The Archaeology of Early American Life. New York: Anchor Books.
Domanska, E. 2006. The Return to Things. Archaeologia Polona 44. Pp. 171–185. Domanska, E. 2010. Beyond Anthropocentrism in Historical Studies. Historein 10. Pp. 118–130.
Edgeworth, M. 2012. Follow the Cut, Follow the Rhythm, Follow the Material. With comments from Å. Berggren, A. González-Ruibal, T. Ingold, G. Lucas, R. Skeates, & C. Witmore. Norwegian Archaeological Review 45(1). Pp. 76–114.
Flannery, K. 1982: The Golden Marshalltown. A Parable for the Archaeology of the 1980s. American Anthropologist 84(2). Pp. 265–78.
Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency. An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gjessing, G. 1977. Idéer omkring førhistoriske samfunn. Universitetets Oldsakssam- lings Skrifter, ny rekke, nr. 2. Oslo: Universitetets Oldsakssamling.
González-Ruibal, A., Hernando, A. & Politis, G. 2011. Ontology of the Self and Mate- rial Culture: Arrow-making among the Awá Hunter- Gatherers (Brazil). Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 30(1). Pp. 1–16.
González-Ruibal, A. (Ed.). (forthcoming). Reclaiming Archaeology. Beyond the Tropes of Modernity. London: Routledge (to be published February 2013).
Gräslund, B. 1989. Den arkeologiska teorins uppgift och bruk. Fornvännen 84. Pp. 47–50.
Graves-Brown, P. 2011. Touching from a Distance. Alienation, Abjection, Estrangement and Archaeology. Norwegian Archaeology Review 44(2). Pp. 131–44.
Hamilton, S., Whitehouse, R., Brown, K., Combes, P., Herring, E. & Seager Thomas, M. 2006. Phenomenology in Practice. Towards a Methodology for a “Subjective” Approach. European Journal of Archaeology 9(1). Pp. 31–71.
Harrison, R. 2011. Surface Assemblages. Towards an Archaeology in and of the Pre- sent. With replies from A. Horning, A. González-Ruibal, P. Graves-Brown, I. Rus- sel & W. Rahtje Archaeological Dialogues 18(2). Pp. 141–96.
Hedeager, L. & Oma, K. 1999. Intervju med Lotte Hedeager. Nicolay 1999. Pp. 22–25. Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and Time. New York: Harper and Row.
Heidegger, M. 1966. Discourse on Thinking. Anderson, J. M. & Freund, E. H. (trans.). New York: Harper and Row.
Helskog, K. 1999. The Shore Connection. Cognitive Landscape and Communication with Rock Carvings in Northernmost Europe. Norwegian Archaeological Review 32(2). Pp. 73–94
Hodder, I. (Ed.). 1982a. Structural and Symbolic Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodder I. 1982b. Symbols in Action. Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodder, I. 2002. Archaeological Theory. In: Cunliffe, B., Davies, W. & Renfrew, C. (Eds). Archaeology. The Widening Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hodder, I. 2007. Can We Move On Now? Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17(2). Pp. 213–217.
Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled. An Archaeology of Relationships between Humans and Things. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwells.
Holtorf, C. 2004. Doing Archaeology in Popular Culture. In: Bolin, H. (Ed.). The Inter play of Past and Present. Södertörn Archaeological Studies. Huddinge: Södertörn University College.
Hyenstrand, Å. (Ed.). 1988. Samhällsteori och källmaterial – aktuell arkeologi II. Stock- holm Archaeological Reports 21. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.
Högberg, A. 2009. Lithics in the Scandinavian Late Bronze Age. Sociotechnical Change and Persistence. BAR International Series 1932. Oxford: Archeopress.
Introna, L. D. 2009. Ethics and the Speaking of Things. Theory, Culture and Society 26. Pp. 398–419.
Jensen, J. 1993. Introduction. 25 years of archaeology in Denmark. In: Vass, S., Storgaard, B. & Lund Hansen, U. (Eds). Digging Into the Past. 25 Years of Archaeology in Denmark. Copenhagen: Royal Society of Northern Antiquaries.
Johansen, A. B. 1982. Arkeologiens teori og data. Fornvännen 77. Pp. 212–225. Johnsen, H. & Olsen, B. 1992. Hermeneutics and Archaeology. On the Philosophy of Contextual Archaeology. American Antiquity 57(3). Pp. 419–436.
Kristiansen, K. 1978. Dansk arkæologi – fortid og fremtid. Fortid og Nutid XXVII. Pp. 279–319.
Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer- sity Press.
Latour, B. 1999. Pandora’s Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to ActorNetworkTheory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leone, M. 1982. Some Opinions about Recovering Mind. American Antiquity 47(4). Pp. 742–760.
Malmer, M. 1962. Jungneolithische Studien. Acta Archaeologica Lundensia, Series in 8° No. 2. Lund: CWK Gleerups Förlag
Myhre, B. 1991. Theory in Scandinavian Archaeology since 1960. A view from Nor- way. In: Hodder, I. (Ed.). Archaeological Theory in Europe. The Last Three De cades. London: Routledge.
Näsman, U. 1995. Finns en nordisk tradition i dagens nordiska arkeologi? Nicolay 65/66. Pp. 9–15.
Nordby, C. 2012. Gjemt og glemt? Harpikstetninger fra eldre jernalder – en forsknings- historisk gjennomgang. Viking 75/2012 (in press).
Nordmark, J. 2010a. Face/Off. A Neomaterialist Study of the Face. In: Fahlander, F. & Kjellström, A. (Eds). Making Sense of Things. Archaeologies of Sensory Perception. Stockholm Studies in Archaeology 53. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Nordmark, J. 2010b. Involutions of Materiality. Operationalizing a Neo-materialist Perspective through the Causeways of Ichmul and Yo’okop, Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 17(2). Pp. 132–173.
Olivier, L. 2011. The Dark Abyss of Time. Archaeology and Memory. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Olsen, B. 1987. Arkeologi, tekst, samfunn. Fragmenter til en postprosessuell arkeologi. Stensilserie B, historie/arkeologi 24. Tromsø: University of Tromsø.
Olsen, B. 1990. Språk og retorikk i arkeologien. Fornvännen 85. Pp. 115–119.
Olsen, B. 1991. Metropolises and Satellites in Archaeology: On Power and Asymmetry in Global Archaeological Discourse. In: Preucel, R. W. (Ed.). Processual and Post processual Archaeologies. Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past. Occasional Paper 10. Carbondale, Ill.: Center for Archaeological Investigations.
Olsen, B. 1999. Back to the Eighties? In: Fuglestvedt, I., Gansum, T. & Opedal, A. (Eds). Et hus med mange rom. Vennebok til Bjørn Myhre på 60års dagen. AMS- Rapport 11A, Stavanger: Arkeologisk Museum.
Olsen, B. 2002. Divided We Stand? Some Opinions about Trends and Developments in Scandinavian Archaeology 1970–2000. In: Biehl, P. F., Gramsch, A. & Marciniak, A. (Eds.). Archäologien Europas. Geschichte, Methoden und Theorien. Tübinger Archäologische Taschenbücher 4. Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
Olsen, B. 2003. Material Culture after Text: Re-membering things. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36(2). Pp. 87–104.
Olsen, B. 2010. In Defense of Things. Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects. Lan- ham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Olsen, B. 2012a. The Return of Things and the Savagery of the Archaeological Object. In: Pereira, G. (Ed.). Savage Objects. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional Casa da Moeda (INCM).
Olsen, B. 2012b. Reclaiming Things. An Archaeology of Matter. In: Carlile, P. R., Nicolini, D., Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (Eds). How Matter Matters. Objects, Arti facts and Materiality in Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Olsen, B. 2012c. Symmetrical Archaeology. In: Hodder, I. (Ed.). Archaeological Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Olsen, B., Shanks, M., Webmoor, T. & Witmore, C. 2012. Archaeology. The Discipline of Things. Berkeley: University of California Press, Berkeley.
Olsen, B., Shanks, M. & Witmore, C. n.d. Innocence Regained? Or, Is There a New Consensus in Archaeology? An Alternative Case for Bold Thinking. Paper presented at the Stanford Archaeology Center’s Workshop series, October 2003.
Pearson, M., & Shanks, M. 2001. Theatre/Archaeology. London: Routledge.
Preda, A. 1999. The Turn to Things. Arguments for a Sociological Theory of Things. Sociological Quarterly 40. Pp. 347–366.
Renfrew, C. 2003. Figuring It Out: What Are We? Where Do We Come From? The Parallel Visions of Artists and Archaeologists. London: Thames and Hudson.
Renfrew, C. 2007. Where Did It All Go Wrong? Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17(2). Pp. 220–221.
Renfrew, C., Rowlands, M. J. & Seagraves, B. A. (Eds). 1982. Theory and Explana tion in Archaeology. The Southampton Conference. New York: Academic Press.
Sahlins, M. 1976. Culture and Practical Reasons. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Shanks, M. 1992. Experiencing the Past. London: Routledge.
Shanks, M., & Tilley, C. 1987a. Reconstructing Archaeology. Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shanks, M. & Tilley, C. 1987. Social Theory in Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press. Shennan, S. 1986. Towards a Critical Archaeology? Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 52. Pp. 327–338.
Shennan, S. 2007. Evolving Ideas. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17(2). Pp. 220–221.
Solli, B. 2011. Some Reflections on Heritage and Archaeology in the Anthropocene. With Replies from M. Burström, E. Domanska, M. Edgeworth, A. González-Ruibal, C. Holtorf, G. Lucas, T. Østigaard, L. Smith & C. Witmore. Norwegian Archaeol ogy Review 44(1). Pp. 40–88.
Tallgren, A .M. 1937. The Method of Prehistoric Archaeology. Antiquity 11. Pp. 152–161. Thomas, J. 1996. Time, Culture and Identity. An Interpretive Archaeology. London: Routledge.
Tilley, C. 1994. A Phenomenology of Landscape. London: Berg.
Tilley, C. 2004. The Materiality of Stone. Explorations in Landscape Phenomeno logy. Oxford: Berg.
Tomášková, S. 2007. Post-processual Archaeologies. Through a Stained Glass (Not Darkly). Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17(2). Pp. 213–217.
Trentman, F. 2009. Materiality in the Future of History. Things, Practices, and Politics. Journal of British Studies 48. Pp. 283–307.
Pétursdóttir, Þ. 2012. Small Things Forgotten Now Included, or What Else Do Things Deserve? International Journal of Historical Archaeology 16 (published online 4 August).
Pétursdóttir, Þ. Forthcoming (2013). Concrete Matters. Ruins of Modernity and the Things Called Heritage. Journal of Social Archaeology 13(1).
Webmoor, T. 2012. An Archaeological Metaphysics of Care. On the Isotopy of the Past(s), Epistemography and Our Heritage Ecologies. In: Fortenberry, B. & Mc- Atackney, L. (Eds). Modern Materials. Proceedings from the Contemporary and Historical Archaeology in Theory Conference 2009. Oxford: British Archaeologi- cal Reports.
Witmore, C. 2012. The Realities of the Past. In: Fortenberry, B. & McAtackney, L. (Eds). Modern Materials. Proceedings from the Contemporary and Historical Archaeo logy in Theory Conference 2009. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.
Witmore, C. Forthcoming (2013). The New Materialisms. Archaeological Dialogues. Vol. 20.
Wolfe, C. 2010. What is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors contributing to Current Swedish Archaeology retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to the Swedish Archaeological Society. Read the journal's full Copyright- and Licensing Policy.
