In Things we Trust: Hybridity and the Borders of Categorization in Archaeology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2011.11Keywords:
house urns, postcolonial theory, materialityAbstract
The aim of the article is to question essentialist con- structions of archaeological cultures with the help of Homi K. Bhabha’s concept of hybridity. Using house urns found in central and northern Europe as a case study, Bhabha’s hybridity concept is presented and discussed as an alternative to traditional archaeolog- ical concepts of cultural interpretation. Hybridity, which is also a key concept in postcolonial theory, offers an alternative key to the interpretation of cul- ture and suggests that no culture should be seen as static and homogeneous. The common understanding of house urns is therefore informed and challenged by the concept of hybridity, its alternative construction of culture and alternative ways to understand arte- facts. Inspired by the concept of hybridity, I argue that house urns deserve much broader interpretations than as mere manifestations of cultural difference or cultural belonging.
Downloads
References
Andreeff, A. 2007. Gotlandic Picture Stones, Hybridity and Material Culture. In: Cor- nell, P. & Fahlander, F. (Eds). Encounters, Materialities, Confrontations: Archae- ologies of Social Space and Interaction. Pp. 242–258. Newcastle: Cambridge Schol- ars Press.
Arwidsson, G. 1952. Husurnan från Ansarvde i Tofta. Gotländskt Arkiv. Pp. 16–37. Bhabha, H. K. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
Bradley, R. 2002. Death and the Regeneration of Life: A New Interpretation of House Urns in Northern Europe. Antiguity. Vol. 76. Pp. 372–377.
Bradley, R. 2005. Ritual and Domestic Life in Prehistoric Europe. London: Routledge.
Bradley, R. Skoglund, P. & Wehlin, J. 2010. Imaginary Vessels in the Late Bronze Age of Gotland and South Scandinavia: Ship Settings, Rock Carvings and Decorated Metalwork. Current Swedish Archaeology. Vol. 18. Pp. 79–103
Fabian, J. 2000. Out of our Minds: Reason and Madness in the Exploration of Central Africa: The Ad. E. Jensen Lectures at the Frobenius Institut, University of Frank- furt. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fahlander, F. 2007. Third Space Encounters: Hybridity, Mimicry and Interstitial Prac- tice. In: Cornell, P. & Fahlander, F. (Eds). Encounters, Materialities, Confronta- tions: Archaeologies of Social Space and Interaction. Pp. 15–41. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press
Fanon, F. 1967. Black Skin, White Masks. New York: Grove Press.
Gosden, C. 2001. Postcolonial Archaeology: Issues of Culture, Identity and Knowledge. In: Hodder, I. (Ed.). Archaeological Theory Today. Pp. 241–261. Cambridge: Polity.
Hall, S. 1990. Cultural Identity and Diaspora. In: Rutherford, J. (Ed.). Identity: Com- munity, Culture, Difference. Pp. 222–237. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Hansson, H. 1927. Gotlands bronsålder. Kungl. Vitterhets Historiska och Antikvitets Akademiens Handlingar 37, 1.
Harrison, R. 2002. Archaeology and the Colonial Encounter: Kimberly Spearpoints, Cultural Identity and Masculinity in the North of Australia. Journal of Social Ar- chaeology. Vol. 2. Pp. 352–377.
Jakobsson, M. & Källén, A. 2009. A Hobbling Marriage: On the Relationship Between the Collections and the Societal Mission of the Museum of National Antiquities in Stockholm. Current Swedish Archaeology. Vol. 17. Pp. 151–164.
Kaliff, A. 1997. Grav och kultplats: eskatologiska föreställningar under yngre bron- sålder och äldre järnålder i Östergötland. Dissertation. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Karlenby, L. 2010. Pottery in the Well – The Significance of Late Neolithic/Early Bronze Age Decorated Pottery in East Sweden. In: Martinsson-Wallin, H. (Ed.). Baltic Pre- historic Interactions and Transformations: the Neolithic to the Bronze Age. Pp. 141–152. Visby: Gotland University Press.
Liebmann, M. & Rizvi, U. Z. 2008. Archaeology and the Postcolonial Critique. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Libmann, M. 2008. Postcolonial Cultural Affiliation: Essentialism, Hybridity, and NAGPRA. In: Liebmann, M. & Rizvi, U. Z. (Eds). Archaeology and the Postcolo- nial Critique. Pp. 73–90. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Lightfoot, K.G., Martinez, A. & Schiff, A.M. 1998. Daily Practice and Material Culture in Pluralistic Social Settings. American Antiguity. Vol. 63. Pp. 199–222.
Loomba, Ania. 2005. Kolonialism/Postkolonialism: En introduktion till ett forskn- ingsfält. Stockholm: Tankekraft.
Lydon, J. & Rizvi, U. Z. 2010. Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Oldeberg, A. 1958. Några Gotländska husurnor. Fornvännen. Vol. 2. Pp. 1–16. Pattersson, T. C. 2008. A Brief History of Postcolonial Theory and Implications for
Archaeology. In: Liebmann, M. & Rizvi, U. Z. (Eds). Archaeology and the Postcolonial Critique. Pp. 21–34. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Sabatini, S. 2007. House Urns: Study of a Late Bronze Age Trans-cultural Phenomenon. Dissertation, Department of Archaeology. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
Soterup, J.B . 1845. Udsigt over Urner, Gravar og jordfundne Kar fra Nordens Hede- nold. Annaler for Nordisk Oldkyndlighed. Pp. 317–367.
Stjernquist, B. 1961. Simris. 2, Bronze Age Problems in the Light of the Simris Exca- vation. Lund.
Stoler, G.J. 1989. Rethinking Colonial Categories: European Communities and the Bounderies of Rule. Comparative Studies in Society and History. Vol 31. Pp. 134– 161.
Young, R. 1995. Colonial Desire. London: Routledge.
Van Dommelen, P. 2006. Colonial Matters, Material Culture and Postcolonial The- ory in Colonial Situations. In: Tilley, C. (Ed.). Handbook of Material Culture. Pp. 104–124. London: SAGE.
Van Dommelen, P. 2011. Postcolonial Archaeologies Between Discourse and Practice. World Archaeology. Vol. 43(1). Pp. 1–6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors contributing to Current Swedish Archaeology retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to the Swedish Archaeological Society. Read the journal's full Copyright- and Licensing Policy.
