Assessing and Measuring: On Quality in Development-led Archaeology

Authors

  • Carolina Andersson The Swedish National Heritage Board
  • Agneta Lagerlöf The Swedish National Heritage Board
  • Eva Skyllberg The Swedish National Heritage Board

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2010.01

Keywords:

the development-led archaeological system, Heritage Conservation Act, KML

Abstract

The concept of quality has become the subject of inten- sive discussion in almost all aspects of society in recent years and development-led archaeology is no exception. Results showing a lack of quality have been observed both in countries which choose to use systems based on competitive tendering and in those where development- led archaeology is conducted solely by official institu- tions. In this article the authors discuss the essential elements for achieving good quality in development- led archaeology as required by the Swedish Heritage Act. They also discuss how Swedish development-led archaeology can be enhanced and what is needed to achieve and maintain quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

APPAG 2003. The Current State of Archaeology in the United Kingdom. First Report of the All-Party Parliamentary Archaeology Group. London. (www.sal.org.uk)

Demoule, J. P. 2007. Scientific quality control and the general organization of French archaeology. In: Willems, W. & Van den Dries, M. (Eds). Pp. 135–147. Quality Management in Archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow.

Doyle, I. 2008. “Archaeological Research in Ireland: Recent Developments”. Con- ference paper in EAA session Models of Delivering Research in Development- led Archaeology. EAA 14th Annual Meeting. Malta 16–21 September 2008. Abstracts book. Pp. 171. Valletta: University of Malta.

EAA 2005. European Association of Archaeologists, Conference session Quality assurance in archaeology.

EAA 2008. European Association of Archaeologists, Conference session From the Cradle to the Horizon: the Valletta Convention and the Future of European Archaeology.

Expert Advisory Committee, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Lo- cal Government Dublin 2008. Review of Archaeological Policy and Practice. Dublin.

European Treaty Series No.143. European Convention on the Protection of the Ar- chaeological Heritage (Revised) Valletta, 16.1.1992. Council of Europe.

Gábor, V. 2008. “Archaeology and Development: Who Will Bite the Dust? Looking for a Working Model of Archaeology in Hungary”. Conference paper in EAA session Models of Delivering Research in Development-led Archaeology. EAA 14th Annual Meeting. Malta 16–21 September 2008. Abstracts book. P. 172. Valletta: University of Malta.

Hinton, P. & Jennings, D. 2007. Quality management of archaeology in Great Brit- ain: present practice and future challenges. In: Willems, W. & Van den Dries, M. (Eds). Pp. 100–112. Quality Management in Archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow.

KML. Lag (1988:950) om kulturminnen m.m. (SFS 1988:950). The Heritage Con- servation Act (1988:950).

KRFS 2007:2. Riksantikvarieämbetets föreskrifter och allmänna råd avseende verk- ställigheten av 2 kap. 10–13 §§ lagen (1988:950) om kulturminnen m.m. (www. raa.se)

Lüth, F. 2008. Discussion report. Council of Europe, Committee on Culture, Science and Education, Conference on Rescue Archaeology. Paris.

Länsstyrelsen Södermanlands län 2009. Samverkan ger styrka! Redovisning av upp- drag 39 i 2009 års regleringsbrev 1 juni 2009. Rapport nr 2009:1. Stockholm: Länsstyrelsen Södermanlands län.

Nationalencyklopedin n.d. (www.ne.se).

Oliver, A. 2009. International evaluation of knowledge development in connection with archaeological investigation activities under the new Danish Museum Act 2002. Unpublished Report.

Pearce, M. 2008. “Grey Literature: The Philosopher’s Stone?”. Conference paper in EAA session Models of Delivering Research in Development-led Archaeology. EAA 14th Annual Meeting. Malta 16–21 September 2008. Abstracts book. Pp. 170–171. Valletta: University of Malta.

Riksantikvarieämbetet 2004. Uppdragsarkeologi 2003 och 2004. Uppgifter om den uppdragsarkeologiska verksamheten och länsstyrelsens handläggning av ärenden enligt 2 kap. 11–14 §§ KML under åren 2003 och 2004. Stockholm: Riksantikvarieämbetet.

Riksantikvarieämbetet 2008. Tillämpning av 2–4 kap. Lagen (1988:950) om kul- turminnen m.m. Statistik gällande 2007. Rapport från Riksantikvarieämbetet 2008:6. Stockholm: Riksantikvarieämbetet.

Riksantikvarieämbetet 2010. Dokumentation från Riksantikvarieämbetets konfer- ens om kvalitet i uppdragsarkeologin 23–24 november 2009. Stockholm: Riks- antikvarieämbetet.

SOU 2005:80. Uppdragsarkeologi i tiden. Betänkande av Uppdragsarkeologiutred- ningen.

University College Dublin and Heritage Council 2006. Archaeology 2020. Reposi- tioning Irish Archaeology in the Knowledge Society. A realistic achievable per- spective. Dublin.

Van den Dries, M & Willems, W. 2007. Quality Assurance in Archaeology, the Dutch Perspective. In: Willems, W. & Van den Dries, M. (Eds). Quality Management in Archaeology. Pp. 50–65. Oxford: Oxbow.

Wetterberg, O. 2008. Utredning angående uppdragsarkeologin. Unpublished Re- port. Göteborg.

Willems, W.J.H. & Brandt, R.W. 2004. Dutch Archaeology Quality Standard. Haag: Rijksinspectie voor de Archeologie.

Willems, W. & van den Dries, M. 2007. The origins and development of quality assurance in archaeology. In: Willems, W. & Van den Dries, M. (Eds). Quality Management in Archaeology. Pp. 1–12. Oxford: Oxbow.

Downloads

Published

2010-12-28

How to Cite

Andersson, C., Lagerlöf, A. and Skyllberg, E. (2010) “Assessing and Measuring: On Quality in Development-led Archaeology”, Current Swedish Archaeology, 18(1), pp. 11–28. doi: 10.37718/CSA.2010.01.

Issue

Section

Keynote