ChatGPT across generations: understanding continued use intention of generative AI technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31141281Keywords:
Generative AI, Artificial intelligence, Older adults, ChatGPTAbstract
Introduction. OpenAI's ChatGPT has revolutionised how people search, organise, and create information in work and daily life. This paper explores how different age groups adopt, use, and sustain their use of ChatGPT and other AI generative technologies.
Method. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of 323 U.S. users of generative AI chatbots to examine individual and collective adoption experiences. Using generational cohort theory, we explored intentions for continued use and the influence of chatbots’ conversational ability, personalisation, social influence, trust, and satisfaction across generations.
Analysis. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple regression were used to analyse the collected data.
Results. Trust, social influence, and personalisation significantly affected users’ intention to continue using generative AI chatbots. Significant differences across generations were observed in social influence and conversational ability. Baby Boomers exhibited the lowest levels of social influence but the highest levels of engagement with chatbots’ conversational ability.
Conclusions. Baby Boomers (born 1946–1964) are an obscure but enthusiastic cohort among the users of generative AI technologies. Libraries, archives, and museums, among other institutions, should target outreach campaigns at older users, emphasising the potential of AI chatbots to assist users and improve everyday tasks.
References
Abu Salim, T., El Barachi, M., Onyia, O. P., & Mathew, S. S. (2021). Effects of smart city service channel and user characteristics on user satisfaction and continuance intention. Information Technology & People, 34(1), 147–177.
Baek, T. H., & Kim, M. (2023). Is ChatGPT scary good? How user motivations affect creepiness and trust in generative artificial intelligence. Telematics and Informatics, 83, 102030.
Baek, C., Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2024). “ChatGPT seems too good to be true”: College students’ use and perceptions of generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100294.
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38(1), 92–113.
Bansal, G., Chamola, V., Hussain, A., Guizani, M., & Niyato, D. (2024). Transforming conversations with AI—A comprehensive study of ChatGPT. Cognitive Computation, 1–24.
Beldona, S. (2005). Cohort analysis of online travel information search behavior: 1995–2000. Journal of Travel Research, 44(2), 135–142.
Brandtzaeg, P. B., & Følstad, A. (2017). Why people use chatbots. In Internet Science: 4th International Conference, INSCI 2017 (pp. 377–392).
Brewer, R. N. (2022). “If Alexa knew the state I was in, it would cry”: Older adults’ perspectives of voice assistants for health. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts (pp. 1–8).
Camilleri, M. A. (2024). Factors affecting performance expectancy and intentions to use ChatGPT: Using SmartPLS to advance an information technology acceptance framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, 123247.
Çera, E., Ndreca, P., Çera, G., Asamoah, C. A., & Matošková, J. (2024). Does generation cohort matter for teleworking? Diving into challenges and advantages of teleworking concerning Gen Y and Gen Z. Journal of East-West Business, 30(2), 219–247.
Chang, C.-C., Hung, S.-W., Cheng, M.-J., & Wu, C.-Y. (2015). Exploring the intention to continue using social networking sites: The case of Facebook. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 95, 48–56.
Chatterjee, S., Sarker, S., & Valacich, J. S. (2015). The behavioral roots of information systems security: Exploring key factors related to unethical IT use. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(4), 49–87.
Chen, S. C., Chen, H. H., & Chen, M. F. (2009). Determinants of satisfaction and continuance intention towards self-service technologies. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(9), 1248–1263.
Choudhury, A., & Shamszare, H. (2023). Investigating the impact of user trust on the adoption and use of ChatGPT: Survey analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e47184.
Csibi, S., Griffiths, M. D., Demetrovics, Z., & Szabo, A. (2021). Analysis of problematic smartphone use across different age groups within the ‘components model of addiction’. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 19, 616–631.
Dilleen, G., Claffey, E., Foley, A., & Doolin, K. (2023). Investigating knowledge dissemination and social media use in the farming network to build trust in smart farming technology adoption. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(8), 1754–1765.
Draxler, F., Buschek, D., Tavast, M., Hämäläinen, P., Schmidt, A., Kulshrestha, J., & Welsch, R. (2023). Gender, age, and technology education influence the adoption and appropriation of LLMs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06556.
Eger, L., Komárková, L., Egerová, D., & Mičík, M. (2021). The effect of COVID-19 on consumer shopping behaviour: Generational cohort perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 102542.
Ewers, K. (2021). We need to talk…Acceptance of digital voice assistants among millennials and older people. PQDT-Global.
Friemel, J., Foraita, R., Günther, K., Heibeck, M., Günther, F., Pflueger, M., Pohlabeln, H., Behrens, T., Bullerdiek, J., & Nimzyk, R. (2016). Pretreatment oral hygiene habits and survival of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. BMC Oral Health, 16, 1–9.
Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. W. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. Organizations and Communication Technology, 117(1), 140.
Graf-Vlachy, L., Buhtz, K., & König, A. (2018). Social influence in technology adoption: Taking stock and moving forward. Management Review Quarterly, 68, 37–76.
Gu, W., Bao, P., Hao, W., & Kim, J. (2019). Empirical examination of intention to continue to use smart home services. Sustainability, 11(19), 5213.
Harahap, M. A. K., Junianto, P., Astutik, W. S., Risdwiyanto, A., & Ausat, A. M. A. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in building personalization in business services. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 12(1), 1212–1219.
Hooda, A., Gupta, P., Jeyaraj, A., Giannakis, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). The effects of trust on behavioral intention and use behavior within e-government contexts. International Journal of Information Management, 67, 102553.
Hsiao, K.-L., & Chen, C.-C. (2022). What drives continuance intention to use a food-ordering chatbot? An examination of trust and satisfaction. Library Hi Tech, 40(4), 929–946.
Jo, H. (2023). Decoding the ChatGPT mystery: A comprehensive exploration of factors driving AI language model adoption. Information Development, 02666669231202764.
Ju, B., & Stewart, B. (2024). Empowering users with ChatGPT and similar large-language models (LLMs): Everyday information needs, motivations, and gratification. In Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2024.
Karadal, H., & Abubakar, A. M. (2021). Internet of things skills and needs satisfaction: Do generational cohorts' variations matter? Online Information Review, 45(5), 898–911.
Lee, C., & Coughlin, J. F. (2015). PERSPECTIVE: Older adults' adoption of technology: An integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 747–759.
Liao, L., Yang, G. H., & Shah, C. (2023). Proactive conversational agents in the post-ChatGPT world. In Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.
Liu, Y.-L., Yan, W., Hu, B., Li, Z., & Lai, Y. L. (2022). Effects of personalization and source expertise on users’ health beliefs and usage intention toward health chatbots: Evidence from an online experiment. Digital Health, 8, 20552076221129718.
Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173–191.
McClain, C. (2023, March 26). Americans’ use of ChatGPT is ticking up, but few trust its election information. Pew Research Center.
McKercher, B. (2023). Age or generation? Understanding behaviour differences. Annals of Tourism Research, 103, 103656.
Nordheim, C. B., Følstad, A., & Bjørkli, C. A. (2019). An initial model of trust in chatbots for customer service—Findings from a questionnaire study. Interacting with Computers, 31(3), 317–335.
Oksa, R., Saari, T., Kaakinen, M., & Oksanen, A. (2021). The motivations for and well-being implications of social media use at work among millennials and members of former generations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 803.
Park, E., & Gelles-Watnick, R. (2023). Most Americans haven’t used ChatGPT; few think it will have a major impact on their job. Pew Research Center, 28.
Pelau, C., Dabija, D.-C., & Ene, I. (2021). What makes an AI device human-like? The role of interaction quality, empathy, and perceived psychological anthropomorphic characteristics in the acceptance of artificial intelligence in the service industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106855.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
Regan, P. M., FitzGerald, G., & Balint, P. (2016). Generational views of information privacy. In Privacy and Security in the Digital Age (pp. 81–99). Routledge.
Salloum, S., Al Marzouqi, A., Alderbashi, K. Y., Shwedeh, F., Aburayya, A., Al Saidat, M. R., & Al-Maroof, R. S. (2023). Sustainability model for the continuous intention to use metaverse technology in higher education: A case study from Oman. Sustainability, 15(6), 5257.
Schewe, C. D., & Meredith, G. (2004). Segmenting global markets by generational cohorts: Determining motivations by age. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 4(1), 51–63.
Shen, X.-L., Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2013). Perceived critical mass and collective intention in social media-supported small group communication. International Journal of Information Management, 33(5), 707–715.
Song, S., Zhao, Y. C., Yao, X., Ba, Z., & Zhu, Q. (2021). Short video apps as a health information source: An investigation of affordances, user experience, and users’ intention to continue the use of TikTok. Internet Research, 31(6), 2120–2142.
Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 101565.
Tsai, H.-T., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2014). Contribution behavior in virtual communities: Cognitive, emotional, and social influences. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 143–164.
Vannoy, S. A., & Palvia, P. (2010). The social influence model of technology adoption. Communications of the ACM, 53(6), 149–153.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
Volkom, M. V., Stapley, J. C., & Amaturo, V. (2014). Revisiting the digital divide: Generational differences in technology use in everyday life. North American Journal of Psychology, 16(3).
WHO. (2024). Aging and health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health.
Weinberg, J., Freese, J., & McElhattan, D. (2014). Comparing data characteristics and results of an online factorial survey between a population-based and a crowdsource-recruited sample. Sociological Science, 1, 292–310.
Wolf, V., & Maier, C. (2024). ChatGPT usage in everyday life: A motivation-theoretic mixed-methods study. International Journal of Information Management, 79, 102821.
Workman, M. (2014). New media and the changing face of information technology use: The importance of task pursuit, social influence, and experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 111–117.
Wu, C.-G., & Ho, J. C. (2022). The influences of technological characteristics and user beliefs on customers' perceptions of live chat usage in mobile banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(1), 68–86.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Boryung Ju, Brenton Stewart, Sunyoung Park
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
