Information places: myth, affect, and gaps in information retrieval modelling

Abstract

Introduction: This article contributes to theory building for information theory through a critical-historical approach to the ancient Simonides story, a foundational myth of human memory. By examining the Simonides myth, which details orality-based memory practices, the study identifies underemphasized aspects of memory in the social transitions to literacy.

Method: A critical-historical approach is used to examine the contemporary relevance of this influential memory myth in relation to information theory research and emerging technologies.

Analysis: The analysis highlights how users' affective and contextual experiences provide valuable information for designing information systems that deliver more precise and relevant results.

Results: The article argues that modeling the context of a user’s affective experience enhances the effectiveness of information systems. It introduces and refines key concepts, including informational economy, judgement, symbol-affect, and informational alibi.

Conclusions: The author suggests further refinement and application of the concepts of informational economy, judgement, symbol-affect, and informational alibi to improve the design of information retrieval systems, emphasizing their potential to align systems more closely with embodied experience.