Does artificial intelligence harm labour? Investigating the limitations of incident trackers as evidence for policymaking

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30iConf47296

Keywords:

AI, Labor, Knowledge Organization, Incident Trackers, Evidence, Policymaking

Abstract

Introduction. From the point of view of public policy, artificial intelligence (AI) is an emerging technology with as-yet-unknown risks. AI incident trackers collect harms and risks to inform policymaking. We investigate how labour is represented in two popular AI incident trackers. Our goal is to understand how well the knowledge organization of these incident trackers reveals labour-related risks for AI in the workplace, with a focus on how AI is impacting and expected to impact workers within the United States.

Data and Analysis. We search for and analyse labour-related incidents in two AI incident trackers, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's AI incidents monitor (OECD AIM) and the AI incident database (AIID) from the responsible AI collaborative.

Results. The OECD AIM database categorised workers as stakeholders for 600 incidents with 6,744 associated news reports. From the AIID, we constructed a set of 57 labour-related incidents.

Discussion and Conclusions. The AI incident trackers do not facilitate ready retrieval of labour-related incidents: they used limited existing labour-related terminology. AI incident trackers' reliance on news reports risks overrepresenting some sectors and depends on the news reports' framing of the evidence.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-11

How to Cite

Ledford, T. D. (2025). Does artificial intelligence harm labour? Investigating the limitations of incident trackers as evidence for policymaking. Information Research an International Electronic Journal, 30(iConf), 486–499. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30iConf47296

Issue

Section

Peer-reviewed papers

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.