Archive workers’ information needs and how their expert knowledge influences information searching and collection curation: an interview study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30357579Keywords:
Archives, Information seeking, Information searching, Curation, Post-colonial perspective, User study, Archivists, Archival intelligence, Artefactual literacyAbstract
Introduction. The paper makes a call for research on archive workers, including archivists as archive users, and reports indicative findings of a study of archive workers’ information searching and curation of cultural heritage archives. The study is part of a European research project concerning user access to digital cultural heritage archives, from a post-colonial perspective.
Method. We have conducted semi-structured interviews with five archive workers who work as scholars, as archive curators, and as mediators of archive content. All interviews were conducted in English, online, and were audio-recorded and transcribed.
Analysis. The study explores three research questions: 1) what characterises the archive workers’ information needs?; 2) how does the archive workers’ expert knowledge influence their information searching?; and 3) how does the archive workers’ domain knowledge, in the form of post-colonial knowledge, influence the curation? The interview data are analysed by use of a qualitative thematic analysis method.
Results. The archive workers’ information needs are characterised by topic, domain, and purpose. Further, the needs are work-related and illustrated by searching for their own research projects, intermediary searches on behalf of users, and searching as part of collection curation. They make use of numerous types of expert knowledge (collection knowledge, archival intelligence, artefactual literacy, and post-colonial domain knowledge) that influence their information searching and curation. Additionally, curation and information searching are affected by the quality of metadata, stemming from the colonizers’ perspective.
Conclusions. This paper contributes novel insights about archive workers’ information seeking behaviour, their handling of different types of information needs, user mediation, and collection curation, based on post-colonial knowledge and hence supports the call for future research on this topic.
References
Agostinho, D. (2019). Archival encounters: rethinking access and care in digital colonial archives. Archival Science, 19(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09312-0
Allison-Bunnell, J., Yakel, E. & Hauck, J. (2011). Researchers at work: assessing needs for content and presentation of archival materials. Journal of Archival Organization, 9(2), 67–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2011.598400
Baines, J. (2023). Establishing special collections literacy for undergraduate students: an investigation into benefits and barriers of access. Archives and Records, 44(1), 8–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2022.2149481
Borlund, P. & Pharo, N. (2019). A need for information on information needs. Information Research, 24(4). http://informationr.net/ir/24-4/colis/colis1908.html
Borlund, P., Pharo, N. & Liu, Y.-H. (2023). Scholars’ searching for audio-visual information in archives. VIEW Journal of European Television History and Culture, 12(24). https://doi.org/10.18146/view.302
Borlund, P., Pharo, N. & Liu, Y.-H. (2024). Information searching in cultural heritage archives: a user study. Journal of Documentation, 80(4), 978–1002. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2023-0120
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Caswell, M. (2011). ‘Thank you very much, now give them back’: cultural property and the fight over the Iraqi Baath Party records. The American Archivist, 74(1), 211–240. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.4185u8574mu84041
Cushing, A. L. & Osti, G. (2022). “So how do we balance all of these needs?”: how the concept of AI technology impacts digital archival expertise. Journal of Documentation, 79(7), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-08-2022-0170
Daga, E., Asprino, L., Damiano, R., Daquino, M., Agudo, B. D., Gangemi, A., Kuflik, T., Lieto, A., Maguire, M., Marras, A. M., Pandiani, D. M., Mulholland, P., Peroni, S., Pescarin, S. & Wecker, A. (2022). Integrating citizen experiences in cultural heritage archives: requirements, state of the art, and challenges. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 15(1), 11:1-11:35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3477599
Daines, J. G. I., Kopp, M. G. & Skeem, D. M. (2022). Bridging the gap: competencies for teaching with primary sources. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 22(4), 855–878. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2022.0045
Duff, W. & Fox, A. (2006). ‘You’re a guide rather than an expert’: archival reference from an archivist’s point of view. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 27(2), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810601075943
Duff, W., Ho, J., Sato, C., Aton, H., Deziak, P. & Regehr, C. (2024). Redefining archival reference: relationship-based Reference1. The American Archivist, 87(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.17723/2327-9702-87.1.107
Duff, W. M. & Johnson, C. A. (2002). Accidentally found on purpose: information-seeking behavior of historians in archives. The Library Quarterly, 72(4), 472–496. https://doi.org/10.1086/lq.72.4.40039793
Duff, W. & Yakel, E. (2017). Archival interaction. In H. MacNeil & T. Eastwood (Eds.), Currents of archival thinking (2nd Edition, pp. 193–223). Libraries Unlimited.
Duff, W., Yakel, E. & Tibbo, H. (2013). Archival reference knowledge. The American Archivist, 76(1), 68–94. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.76.1.x9792xp27140285g
Garcia, P., Lueck, J. & Yakel, E. (2019). The Pedagogical promise of primary sources: research trends, persistent gaps, and new directions. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(2), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.01.004
Gilliland, A. J. & McKemmish, S. (2014). The role of participatory archives in furthering human rights, reconciliation and recovery. Atlanti, 24, 78–88. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/346521tf
Goodman, S. K. (1993). Information needs for management decision-making. Records Management Quarterly, 27(4), 12.
Hauck, J. & Robinson, M. (2018). Of primary importance: applying the new literacy guidelines. Reference Services Review, 46(2), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-03-2018-0025
Hjørland, B. (2008). What is knowledge organization (KO)? Knowledge Organization, 35(2–3), 86–101.
Huang, T., Sun, L. & Zhou, Q. (2023). Archival literacy framework for the public: a Delphi and analytical hierarchy process study. Library & Information Science Research, 45(2), 101236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2023.101236
Hughes-Watkins, L. (2018). Moving toward a reparative archive: a roadmap for a holistic approach to disrupting homogenous histories in academic repositories and creating inclusive spaces for marginalized voices. Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies, 5(1). https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/jcas/vol5/iss1/6
Huvila, I. (2008). Participatory archive: towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management. Archival Science, 8(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-008-9071-0
Huvila, I. (2015). Another wood between the worlds? Regimes of worth and the making of meanings in the work of archivists. The Information Society, 31(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2015.998103
Huvila, I. (2024). Regimes of participation: theorising participatory archives from the outset of archivists’ views on archival institutions and user participation in Scandinavia. Information Research an International Electronic Journal, 29(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir291539
Ingwersen, P. (1986). Cognitive analysis and the role of the intermediary in information retrieval. In R. Davies (Ed.), Intelligent Information Systems (pp. 206–237). Horwood.
Ingwersen, P. (1996). Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: elements of a cognitive ir theory. Journal of Documentation, 52(1), 3–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026960
Ingwersen, P. (2000). Users in context. Proceedings of the Third European Summer-School on Lectures on Information Retrieval-Revised Lectures, 157–178. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=646171.678749
Ingwersen, P. & Kaae, S. (1980). User-librarian negotiations and information search procedures in public libraries: analysis of verbal protocols, final research report. Royal School of Librarianship.
Jeurgens, C. & Karabinos, M. (2020). Paradoxes of curating colonial memory. Archival Science, 20(3), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09334-z
Johnson, A. (2008). Users, use and context: supporting interaction between users and digital archives. In L. Craven (Ed.), What are archives?: cultural and theoretical perspectives: a reader (pp. 145–166). Ashgate.
Khanal, N. (2012). The lens of postcolonial theory in LIS research and practice [Ph.D., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1562193712/abstract/E0A18E87C9FD4E17PQ/1
Kirkegaard, B. & Borlund, P. (2008). Characteristics of information needs for television broadcasts of scholars and students in media studies. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Interaction in Context, 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/1414694.1414720
Kirkegaard Lunn, B. (2009). User needs in television archive access: acquiring knowledge necessary for system design. Journal of Digital Information, 10(6). https://jodi-ojs-tdl.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/685
Langa, L. A., Weber, C. S. & Connaway, L. S. (2023). Pop-up survey: findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project. OCLC. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5qp9z6tb
Mitchell, E. T. (2013). Metadata Developments in Libraries and Other Cultural Heritage Institutions. Library Technology Reports, 49(5), 5–10.
Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o. (1986). Decolonising the mind: the politics of language in African literature. James Currey.
Olson, H. A. (2000). Difference, culture and change: the untapped potential of LCSH. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 29(1–2), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v29n01_04
Rhee, H. L. (2015). Reflections on archival user studies. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 54(4), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.54n4.29
Shilton, K. & Srinivasan, R. (2007). Participatory appraisal and arrangement for multicultural archival collections. Archivaria, 87–101. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13129
Simon, N. (2016). The art of relevance. Museum 2.0.
Sutherland, T. & Purcell, A. (2021). A weapon and a tool: decolonizing description and embracing redescription as liberatory archival praxis. The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion, 5(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.33137/ijidi.v5i1.34669
Tanaka, K. (2021). Teaching with primary sources: looking at the support needs of instructors. Research Report. In ITHAKA S+R. ITHAKA S+R. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.314912
Taylor, R. S. (1962). The process of asking questions. American Documentation, 13(4), 391–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090130405
Taylor, R. S. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College & Research Libraries, 29(3), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.3.251
Tibbo, H. R. (1995). Interviewing techniques for remote reference: electronic versus traditional environments. The American Archivist, 58(3), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.58.3.61625250t016287r
Vilar, P. & Šauperl, A. (2017). Archivists about students as archives users. Information Research, 22(1). https://informationr.net/ir/22-1/colis/colis1617.html
Vlachidis, A., Antoniou, A., Bikakis, A. & Terras, M. (2021). Semantic metadata enrichment and data augmentation of small museum collections following the FAIR principles. In K. Golub & Y.-H. Liu (Eds.), Information and Knowledge Organisation in Digital Humanities (pp. 106–129). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003131816-11
Wang, Y.-Y. & Lin, C. (2022). Artefactual literacy-related abilities for historians’ effective seeking and use of primary resources. Information Research, 27(Special issue). https://doi.org/10.47989/irisic2211
Weber, C. S., Carbajal, I. A., Langa, L. A., Connaway, L. S., Doyle, B., Brannon, B. & Proffitt, M. (2023). User interviews: findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project. OCLC. https://doi.org/10.25333/xq53-yv76
Welland, S. (2022). Created, intended, articulated and projected: four perceptions of purpose around the archival document for expert users. Archives & Manuscripts, 50(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.37683/asa.v50.10919
Wersig, G. (1971). Information, Kommunikation, Dokumentation: ein Beitrag zur Orientierung der Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft. Verl. Dokumentation.
White, H. (2018). Decolonizing the way libraries organize. IFLA Proceedings. https://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/2221/
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., Santos, L. B. da S., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016, March 15). The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship [Comments and Opinion]. Scientific Data. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007145
Yakel, E. & Torres, D. (2003). AI: archival intelligence and user expertise. The American Archivist, 66(1), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.66.1.q022h85pn51n5800
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nils Pharo, Pia Borlund, Ying-Hsang Liu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
