Editorial - The challenge of authenticity in scholarly publishing

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30360065

Keywords:

editorial

Abstract

Scholarly literature has traditionally been the bread and butter of researchers as they build upon existing research with their inquiries. As researchers searching databases, we trust that the literature we explore meets academic standards of research rigour and ethics. However, not all research meets the high standards researchers take for granted.

References

McIntosh, L. D. (2021, March 17). Imposters and impersonators in preprints: How do we trust authors in open science? The Scholarly Kitchen. (Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20250801155158/https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2021/03/17/imposters-and-impersonators-in-preprints-how-do-we-trust-authors-in-open-science/)

Retraction Watch. (2025, May). Top 10 most highly cited retracted papers. (Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20250801155312/https://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-leaderboard/top-10-most-highly-cited-retracted-papers/)

Published

2025-10-15

How to Cite

Fulton, C. (2025). Editorial - The challenge of authenticity in scholarly publishing. Information Research an International Electronic Journal, 30(3), i-ii. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30360065

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.