Data curation in academic libraries: navigating the AI labyrinth through the FATE principles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31260449Abstract
Introduction. This study examines how academic libraries address the ethical and operational challenges of data curation in an era shaped by artificial intelligence (AI). It focuses on how the FATE principles (fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics) are interpreted and embedded within AI-driven curatorial practices.
Method. A systematic literature review was conducted, analysing fifty-one publications. The review reflexively applied the FATE principles to its own design to ensure methodological integrity, transparency, and reproducibility.
Analysis. Both conceptual and empirical dimensions were examined to identify how each FATE principle is operationalised across AI-enabled data workflows. Comparative analysis assessed the procedural maturity of these principles throughout the data lifecycle.
Results. The findings reveal a marked imbalance: accountability and transparency demonstrate procedural consolidation through documentation and audit mechanisms, whereas fairness and ethics remain conceptually diffuse and empirically underdeveloped. Academic libraries emerge as ethical and algorithmic infrastructures mediating between technological innovation and epistemic justice.
Conclusion. Responsible AI in librarianship requires structural integration of FATE into governance, documentation, and daily curatorial workflows. The proposed FATE Curation Framework embeds ethical checkpoints across the data lifecycle, offering a replicable model for institutional implementation.
References
Aboelmaged, M., Bani-Melhem, S., Al-Hawari, M., & Ahmad, I. (2025). Conversational AI Chatbots in library research: An integrative review and future research agenda. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 57(2), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006231224440
Afjal, M. (2023). ChatGPT and the AI revolution: A comprehensive investigation of its multidimensional impact and potential. Library Hi Tech, 42(1), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-07-2023-0322
Ali, M. Y., & Richardson, J. (2025). AI literacy guidelines and policies for academic libraries: A scoping review. IFLA Journal, 51(3), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352251321192
Asemi, A., Ko, A., & Nowkarizi, M. (2021). Intelligent libraries: A review on expert systems, artificial intelligence, and robot. Library Hi Tech, 39(2), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-02-2020-0038
Ashok, M., Madan, R., Joha, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2022). Ethical framework for Artificial Intelligence and Digital technologies. International Journal of Information Management, 62, paper102433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102433
Black, J. (2024). Can AI Lie? Chabot technologies, the subject, and the importance of lying. Social Science Computer Review, 43(6), 1147-1158. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393241282602
Bu, Y.-Q., Cao, Y.-F., Chang, Z.-Y., Chen, H.-Y., Chen, X.-W., Chen, Y.-Y., Chen, Z.-C., Deng, R., Ding, J., & Fan, Z.-K. (2025). Expert consensus on the ethical requirements for generative AI-assisted academic writing. Chinese Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 41(6), 826–832. https://doi.org/10.13865/j.cnki.cjbmb.2025.06.1272
Buetow, S., & Lovatt, J. (2024). From insight to innovation: Harnessing artificial intelligence for dynamic literature reviews. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(4), 102901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102901
Buitrago-Ciro, J., Campos, E., & Romero, C. (2025). ¿Cómo está transformando la inteligencia artificial la comunicación científica? Desafíos, oportunidades y el papel de los actores involucrados: una revisión de alcance [How is artificial intelligence transforming scholarly communication? Challenges, opportunities, and the role of stakeholders: A scoping review]. Investigacion Bibliotecologica, 39(104), 111-150. https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2025.104.59032
Burns, J., Etherington, C., Cheng-Boivin, O., & Boet, S. (2024). Using an artificial intelligence tool can be as accurate as human assessors in level one screening for a systematic review. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 41(2), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12413
Carabantes, D., González-Geraldo, J., & Jover, G. (2023). ChatGPT could be the reviewer of your next scientific paper. Evidence on the limits of AI-assisted academic reviews. Profesional de la Informacion, 32(5).
Collins, C., Dennehy, D., Conboy, K., & Mikalef, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in information systems research: A systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102383
Heyder, T., Passlack, N., & Posegga, O. (2023). Ethical management of human-AI interaction: Theory development review. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 32(3), 101772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2023.101772
Ibrahim, H., Ahmad, K., & Sallehudin, H. (2025). Impact of organisational, environmental, technological and human factors on cloud computing adoption for university libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 57(2), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006231214570
Khosrawi-Rad, B., Grogorick, L., & Robra-Bissantz, S. (2023). Game-inspired Pedagogical Conversational Agents: A Systematic Literature Review. AIS Transactions On Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2), 146-192. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00187
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review. Learned Publishing, 37(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1570
Laine, J., Minkkinen, M., & Mäntymäki, M. (2024). Ethics-based AI auditing: A systematic literature review on conceptualizations of ethical principles and knowledge contributions to stakeholders. Information & Management, 61(5), 103969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2024.103969
Lee, M., Scheepers, H., Lui, A., & Ngai, E. (2023). The implementation of artificial intelligence in organizations: A systematic literature review. Information & Management, 60(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2023.103816
Li, Q., Li, Y., Zhang, S., Zhou, X., & Pan, Z. (2025). A theoretical framework for human-centered intelligent information services: A systematic review. Information Processing & Management, 62(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103891
Matei, S., Jackson, D., & Bertino, E. (2025). Ethical reasoning in artificial intelligence: A cybersecurity perspective. Information Society, 41(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2024.2429060
Matsieli, M., & Mutula, S. (2025). Generative AI and the Information Society: Ethical reflections from libraries. Information (Switzerland), 16(9), 771. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16090771
Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2023). Fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics (FATE) in artificial intelligence (AI) and higher education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100152
Mitha, S. B., & Omarsaib, M. (2025). Emerging technologies and higher education libraries: A bibliometric analysis of the global literature. Library Hi Tech, 43(2), 1248–1270. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-02-2024-0105
Njiru, D., Mugo, D., & Musyoka, F. (2025). Ethical considerations in AI-based user profiling for knowledge management: A critical review. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 18, 100205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100205
Ofosu-Ampong, K. (2024). Artificial intelligence research: A review on dominant themes, methods, frameworks and future research directions. Telematics and Informatics REPORTS, 14, 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2024.100127
Ramirez, D., Foster, M., Kogut, A., & Xiao, D. (2022). Adherence to systematic review standards: Impact of librarian involvement in Campbell Collaboration’s education reviews. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(5), 102567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102567
Ridley, M. (2025). Human-centered explainable artificial intelligence: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 76(1), 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24889
Romero, M., & Chagua, R. (2025). Quinquenio de la aplicación de la inteligencia artificial en la archivística: una revisión sistemática en revistas académicas [Five-year application of artificial intelligence in archival science: A systematic review in academic journals]. Bid-Textos Universitaris de Biblioteconomia i Documentacio, 54(2), 21 p. https://bid.ub.edu/es/54/horna.htm
Roy, P. (2025). Transforming higher education libraries with data analytics, business intelligence, and business analytics: A review. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006241307028
Scherbakov, D., Hubig, N., Jansari, V., Bakumenko, A., & Lenert, L. (2025). The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: A large language model-assisted systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 32(6), 1071–1086. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf063
Shahzad, K., Khan, S., & Iqbal, A. (2024). Factors influencing the adoption of robotic technologies in academic libraries: A systematic literature review (SLR). Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 57(3), 687-704. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006241231012
Sheikh, A., Malik, A., & Adnan, R. (2025). Evolution of research data management in academic libraries: A review of the literature. Information Development, 41(2), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669231157405
Sparkman, M., & Witt, A. (2025). Claude AI and literature reviews: An experiment in utility and ethical use. Library Trends, 73(3), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2025.a961199
Stige, Å., Zamani, E., Mikalef, P., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) for user experience (UX) design: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Information Technology & People, 37(6), 2324–2352. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2022-0519
Stvilia, B., Pang, Y., Lee, D. J., & Gunaydin, F. (2025). Data quality assurance practices in research data repositories: A systematic literature review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 76(1), 238–261. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24948
Tang, Y. (2025). Cultivating university data culture in the age of artificial intelligence: A conceptual framework and critical reflections. Information Research, 30(iConf), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30iConf47293
Thong, C., Atallah, Z., Islam, S., Lim, W., & Cherukuri, A. (2025). AI-powered tools for doctoral supervision in higher education: A systematic review. Journal Of Information & Knowledge Management, 24(2), 2530001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649225300013
Trigo, A., Stein, N., & Belfo, F. (2024). Strategies to improve fairness in artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review. Education for Information, 40(3), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-240045
Zareef, M., & Jabeen, M. (2025). A systematic review of digital curation services in academic libraries: Navigating policies, skills and challenges. Digital Library Perspectives, 41(3), 518–543. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-10-2024-0158
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nuno Sousa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
