Modelling user trust in chatbots: the role of anthropomorphic cues and social responses in information services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31261439Keywords:
Chatbot, User trust, Anthropomorphism, Social presence, Parasocial interaction, CASA paradigm, Human-AI interactionAbstract
Introduction. Chatbots, as an emerging form of information technology, are increasingly integrated into information services worldwide, yet how their anthropomorphic design features shape users’ psychosocial responses remains underexplored. This study builds on the Computers Are Social Actors (CASA) paradigm and examines the effects of chatbots’ anthropomorphic cues on users’ perceived social presence, parasocial interaction, and trust in chatbots.
Method. A between-subjects experiment was conducted with 195 participants randomly assigned to interact with either a human-like or a machine-like chatbot.
Analysis. The data were analysed using SPSS and AMOS. The main analyses included reliability and validity testing, descriptive and correlation analyses, and mediation analysis conducted with the PROCESS macro.
Results. Participants in the human-like chatbot group reported higher levels of social presence. Anthropomorphism significantly affected social presence, which in turn indirectly contributed to trust. Social presence served as a key mediator linking anthropomorphism to trust, whereas parasocial interaction did not demonstrate a significant effect.
Conclusion. These findings extend the applicability of the CASA paradigm in human-AI interaction and offer implications for improving user experience, optimising chatbot effectiveness, and guiding human-centred information system design. This study also underscores the importance of fostering responsible and ethical use of chatbot technologies.
References
Banks, J., & Bowman, N. D. (2016). Avatars are (sometimes) people too: Linguistic indicators of parasocial and social ties in player–avatar relationships. New Media & Society, 18(7), 1257–1276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814554898
Beldad, A., Hegner, S., & Hoppen, J. (2016). The effect of virtual sales agent (VSA) gender–product gender congruence on product advice credibility, trust in VSA and online vendor, and purchase intention. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.046
Bergner, A. S., Hildebrand, C., & Häubl, G. (2023). Machine talk: How verbal embodiment in conversational AI shapes consumer–brand relationships. Journal of Consumer Research, 50(4), 742–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucad014
Bickmore, T. W., & Picard, R. W. (2005). Establishing and maintaining long-term human–computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(2), 293–327. https://doi.org/10.1145/1067860.1067867
Bilquise, G., Ibrahim, S., & Shaalan, K. (2022). Emotionally intelligent chatbots: A systematic literature review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022(1), 9601630. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9601630
Biocca, F. (1997). The cyborg’s dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2), JCMC324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00070.x
Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 12(5), 456–480. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270
Blut, M., Wang, C., Wünderlich, N. V., & Brock, C. (2021). Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: A meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49, 632–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00762-y
Chaves, A. P., & Gerosa, M. A. (2021). How should my chatbot interact? A survey on social characteristics in human–chatbot interaction design. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(8), 729–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1841438
Chen, Q. Q., & Park, H. J. (2021). How anthropomorphism affects trust in intelligent personal assistants. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(12), 2722–2737. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-12-2020-0761
Chen, X., Hyun, S. S., & Lee, T. J. (2022). The effects of parasocial interaction, authenticity, and self‐congruity on the formation of consumer trust in online travel agencies. International Journal of Tourism Research, 24(4), 563-576. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2522
Cheng, X., Zhang, X., Cohen, J., & Mou, J. (2022). Human vs. AI: Understanding the impact of anthropomorphism on consumer response to chatbots from the perspective of trust and relationship norms. Information Processing & Management, 59(3), 102940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102940
Chiang, A. H., Trimi, S., & Lo, Y. J. (2022). Emotion and service quality of anthropomorphic robots. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 177, 121550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121550
Choi, Y. K., Miracle, G. E., & Biocca, F. (2001). The effects of anthropomorphic agents on advertising effectiveness and the mediating role of presence. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2001.10722055
Choi, B. M., Jang, S. J., & Kang, H. M. (2022). Effect of anthropomorphism level of digital human banker speech on user experience: Focusing on social presence, affinity, trust, perceived intelligence, and usefulness. The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (JCCT), 8(4), 469–476. https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2022.8.4.469
Choi, J. H., & Noh, G. Y. (2022). AI chatbot’s anthropomorphic effects on parasocial interaction with AI chatbot: The mediating effects of perceived homophily and social presence. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 24(4), 521–549. https://doi.org/10.16914/kjapr.2022.24.4.521
Choudhury, A., & Shamszare, H. (2023). Investigating the impact of user trust on the adoption and use of ChatGPT: survey analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e47184. https://doi.org/10.2196/47184
Dang, J., & Liu, L. (2023). Do lonely people seek robot companionship? A comparative examination of the loneliness–robot anthropomorphism link in the United States and China. Computers in Human Behavior, 141, 107637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107637
De Visser, E. J., Monfort, S. S., McKendrick, R., Smith, M. A., McKnight, P. E., Krueger, F., & Parasuraman, R. (2016). Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22(3), 331. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000092
Deng, Z., Benckendorff, P., & Wang, J. (2022). From interaction to relationship: Rethinking parasocial phenomena in travel live streaming. Tourism Management, 93, 104583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104583
Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T., & Rosaen, S. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063
Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
Eyssel, F., & Hegel, F. (2012). (S)he’s got the look: Gender stereotyping of robots. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(9), 2213–2230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00937.x
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods, 41(4), 1149-1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-507
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (Eds.). (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson.
Handarkho, Y. D. (2021). Understanding mobile payment continuance usage in physical store through social impact theory and trust transfer. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 33(4), 1071-1087. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-01-2020-0018
Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2007). Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 65(8), 689–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.018
Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M. (2015). Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors, 57(3), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814547570
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09923-7_7
Hussain, S., Ameri Sianaki, O., & Ababneh, N. (2019). A survey on conversational agents/chatbots classification and design techniques. In Workshops of the International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (pp. 946–956). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15035-8_93
iMarc Group. (2023). Chatbot market size, share, growth, report 2024–2032. iMarc Group. Retrieved from https://www.imarcgroup.com/chatbot-market
Jin, S. A. A. (2010). Parasocial interaction with an avatar in second life: A typology of the self and an empirical test of the mediating role of social presence. Presence, 19(4), 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00001
Jin, S. V., Ryu, E., & Muqaddam, A. (2021). I trust what she’s# endorsing on Instagram: Moderating effects of parasocial interaction and social presence in fashion influencer marketing. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 25(4), 665–681. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmm-04-2020-0059
Ju, B., Stewart, J. B., & Park, S. (2026). ChatGPT across generations: understanding continued use intention of generative AI technology. Information Research an international electronic journal, 31(1), 114-132. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31141281
Kang, H., & Kim, K. J. (2022). Does humanisation or machinisation make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 129, 107152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107152
Kim, J., & Song, H. (2016). Celebrity’s self-disclosure on Twitter and parasocial relationships: A mediating role of social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 570–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.083
Kim, K. J., Park, E., & Sundar, S. S. (2013). Caregiving role in human–robot interaction: A study of the mediating effects of perceived benefit and social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1799–1806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.009
Kim, Y., & Sundar, S. S. (2012). Anthropomorphism of computers: Is it mindful or mindless? Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.006
Konijn, E. A., Utz, S., Tanis, M., & Barnes, S. B. (2008). Parasocial interactions and paracommunication with new media characters. In Mediated interpersonal communication (pp. 191–213). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203926864-18
Konya-Baumbach, E., Biller, M., & von Janda, S. (2023). Someone out there? A study on the social presence of anthropomorphised chatbots. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107513
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & van Buuren, H. (2004). Determining sociability, social space, and social presence in (a) synchronous collaborative groups. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493104323024429
Labrecque, L. I., Markos, E., & Milne, G. R. (2011). Online personal branding: Processes, challenges, and implications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2010.09.002
Lee, J. G., Kim, K. J., Lee, S., & Shin, D. H. (2015). Can autonomous vehicles be safe and trustworthy? Effects of appearance and autonomy of unmanned driving systems. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 31(10), 682–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1070547
Lee, K. M., Park, N., & Song, H. (2005). Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature? Effects of a robot’s long-term cognitive developments on its social presence and people’s social responses toward it. Human Communication Research, 31(4), 538–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00882.x
Lee, M., & Park, J. S. (2022). Do parasocial relationships and the quality of communication with AI shopping chatbots determine middle-aged women consumers’ continuance usage intentions? Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 21(4), 842–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2043
Li, D., Browne, G. J., & Wetherbe, J. C. (2006). Why do internet users stick with a specific website? A relationship perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(4), 105–141. https://doi.org/10.2753/jec1086-4415100404
Li, M., & Wang, R. (2023). Chatbots in e-commerce: The effect of chatbot language style on customers’ continuance usage intention and attitude toward brand. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 71, 103209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103209
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organisational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199288496.003.0004
Minato, T., Shimada, M., Itakura, S., Lee, K., & Ishiguro, H. (2005). Does gaze reveal the human likeness of an android? In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Development and Learning (pp. 106–111). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/devlrn.2005.1490953
Munnukka, J., Talvitie-Lamberg, K., & Maity, D. (2022). Anthropomorphism and social presence in human–virtual service assistant interactions: The role of dialogue length and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 135, 107343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107343
Nadroo, Z. M., Islam, J. U., & Naqshbandi, M. A. (2025). Parasocial interaction in marketing domain: Offering insights through a systematic literature review. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 49(4), e70079. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70079
Nordheim, C. B., Følstad, A., & Bjørkli, C. A. (2019). An initial model of trust in chatbots for customer service—Findings from a questionnaire study. Interacting with Computers, 31(3), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwz022
Nowak, K. L., & Biocca, F. (2003). The effect of agency and anthropomorphism on users’ sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 12(5), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761289
Nowak, K. L., & Rauh, C. (2005). The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily, and attraction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00308.x
Oh, C. S., Bailenson, J. N., & Welch, G. F. (2018). A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 409295. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00114
Peng, C., Zhang, S., Wen, F., & Liu, K. (2024). How loneliness leads to the conversational AI usage intention: The roles of anthropomorphic interface and parasocial interaction. Current Psychology, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06809-5
Perse, E. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1989). Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. Communication Research, 16(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365089016001003
Qi, T., Liu, H., & Huang, Z. (2025). An assistant or a friend? The role of parasocial relationship in human–computer interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 167, 108625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108625
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people. Cambridge University Press.
Rubin, A. M., & Step, M. M. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(4), 635–654. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4404_7
Rubin, A. M. (2009). Uses-and-gratifications perspective on media effects. In Media effects (pp. 181–200). Routledge.
Schultze, U., & Brooks, J. A. M. (2019). An interactional view of social presence: Making the virtual other “real.” Information Systems Journal, 29(3), 707–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12230
Seymour, W., & van Kleek, M. (2021). Exploring interactions between trust, anthropomorphism, and relationship development in voice assistants. Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479515
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
Stein, J. P., Liebers, N., & Faiss, M. (2022). Feeling better… but also less lonely? An experimental comparison of how parasocial and social relationships affect people’s well-being. Mass Communication and Society, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2022.2127369
Tan, S. M., & Liew, T. W. (2022). Multi‐chatbot or Single‐chatbot? The effects of M‐Commerce chatbot interface on source credibility, social presence, trust, and purchase intention. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022(1), 2501538. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2501538
Thomaz, F., Salge, C., Karahanna, E., & Hulland, J. (2020). Learning from the dark web: Leveraging conversational agents in the era of hyper-privacy to enhance marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00704-3
Tian, Q., & Hoffner, C. A. (2010). Parasocial interaction with liked, neutral, and disliked characters on a popular TV series. Mass Communication and Society, 13(3), 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430903296051
Tsai, W. H. S., Liu, Y., & Chuan, C. H. (2021). How chatbots’ social presence communication enhances consumer engagement: The mediating role of parasocial interaction and dialogue. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 460–482. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrim-12-2019-0200
Tukachinsky, R., Walter, N., & Saucier, C. J. (2020). Antecedents and effects of parasocial relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 70(6), 868–894. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa034
Uzunoğlu, E., & Kip, S. M. (2014). Brand communication through digital influencers: Leveraging blogger engagement. International Journal of Information Management, 34(5), 592–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.04.007
Van Doorn, J., Mende, M., Noble, S. M., Hulland, J., Ostrom, A. L., Grewal, D., & Petersen, J. A. (2017). Domo arigato Mr Roboto: Emergence of automated social presence in organisational frontlines and customers’ service experiences. Journal of Service Research, 20(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670516679272
Wasike, B. (2025). Me, myself, and the influencer: Examining how parasocial interaction and self-congruence with social media influencers affects news media trust. New Media & Society, 14614448251373020. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251373020
Xie, Q., & Feng, Y. (2023). How to strategically disclose sponsored content on Instagram? The synergy effects of two types of sponsorship disclosures in influencer marketing. International Journal of Advertising, 42(2), 317-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2022.2071393
Xie, Y., Zhu, K., Zhou, P., & Liang, C. (2023). How does anthropomorphism improve human–AI interaction satisfaction: A dual-path model. Computers in Human Behavior, 148, 107878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107878
Xu, Y., & Jiang, T. (2025). The effects of anthropomorphic framing on senior news consumers’ attitudes towards health AI systems: a mediation of psychological distance. Information Research an international electronic journal, 30(iConf), 1039-1048. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30iConf47128
Yen, C., & Chiang, M. C. (2021). Trust me, if you can: A study on the factors that influence consumers’ purchase intention triggered by chatbots based on brain image evidence and self-reported assessments. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(11), 1177–1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2020.1743362
Youn, S., & Jin, S. V. (2021). In AI we trust?” The effects of parasocial interaction and technopian versus luddite ideological views on chatbot-based customer relationship management in the emerging “feeling economy. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106721
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jueming Li, Sanghee Kweon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
