The use of generative AI tools for students’ research support within higher education institutions' libraries: a systematic literature review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31263101

Keywords:

Generative AI, Research support, Higher education, Academic libraries, Information literacy, Digital literacy

Abstract

Introduction. The growth of the knowledge economy has led to the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in society, bringing opportunities and challenges in higher education. This study investigates the use of generative AI (genAI) tools for students’ research support within academic libraries and identifies emerging trends and research themes in the literature.

Method.  The PRISMA guidelines were applied to the Web of Science database to collect relevant publications: seventy-one publications were selected for analysis from 256 identified items. 

Analysis. We used VOSViewer software to analyse the seventy-one publications. The keyword analysis through VOSViewer allowed the identification of the research hotspots and the research focus areas.

Results. The reviewed publications covered eighteen research areas, highlighting the interdisciplinary nature of generative AI. Three research clusters representing three research areas were identified using VOSViewer. First, generative AI is reshaping the learning experiences of students in higher education; secondly, the role of academic libraries is evolving to accommodate changes brought forth by such tools; and thirdly, ChatGPT and other chatbots are being used to improve reference services for students.

Conclusion. This study highlights key trends, identifies research gaps, and suggests future directions for using generative AI tools within academic libraries to support students in their research activities, which could be extended into information literacy programmes.

References

Abba, T. (2024). Use of artificial intelligence technologies in rendering library services: an empirical evidence from university libraries in Africa. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, 34(1), 23–35. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ajlais.v34i1.2

Adetayo, A. J. (2023). Artificial intelligence chatbots in academic libraries: the rise of ChatGPT. Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0007

Aigner, E., Greenspon, J., & Rodrik, D. (2025). The global distribution of authorship in economics journals. World Development, 189, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.106926

Amini, L., Chen, C., Cox, D., Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2020). Experiences and insights for collaborative industry academic research in artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 41(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v41i1.5201

Asim, M., Arif, M., Rafiq, M., & Ahmad, R. (2023). Investigating applications of artificial intelligence in university libraries of Pakistan: an empirical study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102803

Bidgoli, H. (2021). MIS 10. Cengage.

Bordas, A., Le Masson, P., Thomas, M., & Weil, B. (2024). What is generative in generative artificial intelligence? A design-based perspective. Research in Engineering Design, 35(4), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-024-00441-x

Carroll, A. J., & Borycz, J. (2024). Integrating large language models and generative artificial intelligence tools into information literacy instruction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102899

Chaudhuri, J., & Terrones, L. (2024). Reshaping academic library information literacy programs in the advent of ChatGPT and other generative ai technologies. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2024.2400132

Crawford, J., Allen, K. A., Pani, B., & Cowling, M. (2024). When artificial intelligence substitutes humans in higher education: the cost of loneliness, student success, and retention. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2326956

Cox, C., & Tzoc, E. (2023). ChatGPT implications for academic libraries. College and Research Libraries, 84(3), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.84.3.99

Dempere, J., Modugu, K., Hesham, A., & Ramasamy, L. K. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936

Deschenes, A., & McMahon, M. (2024). A survey on student use of generative AI chatbots for academic research. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 19(2), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30512

Dogru, T., Line, N., Hanks, L., Acikgoz, F., Abbott, J., Bakir, S., Berbekova, A., Bilgihan, A., Iskender, A., Kizildag, M., Lee, M., Lee, W., McGinley, S., Mody, M., Onder, I., Ozdemir, O., & Suess, C. (2024). The implications of generative artificial intelligence in academic research and higher education in tourism and hospitality. Tourism Economics, 30(5), 1083–1094. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1177/13548166231204065

Dube, T. V., & Jacobs, L. (2023). Academic library services extension during the COVID-19 pandemic: considerations in higher education institutions in the Gauteng Province, South Africa. Library Management, 44(1/2), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-04-2022-0039

Epstein, M., & Draxler, B. (2020). Collaborative assessment of an academic library and writing center partnership: embedded writing and research tutors for first-year students. College and Research Libraries, 81(3), 509–537. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.3.509

Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., & Zschech, P. (2024). Generative AI. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00834-7

Ganjavi, C., Eppler, M., O’Brien, D., Ramacciotti, L. S., Ghauri, M. S., Anderson, I., Choi, J., Dwyer, D., Stephens, C., Shi, V., Ebert, M., Derby, M., Yazdi, B., & Cacciamani, G. E. (2024). ChatGPT and large language models (LLMs) awareness and use. A prospective cross-sectional survey of U.S. medical students. PLOS Digital Health, 3(9), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000596

Gopee, N., & Deane, M. (2013). Strategies for successful academic writing — institutional and non-institutional support for students. Nurse Education Today, 33(12), 1624–1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.004

Harisanty, D., Anna, N. E. V., Putri, T. E., Firdaus, A. A., & Noor Azizi, N. A. (2024a). Leaders, practitioners and scientists’ awareness of artificial intelligence in libraries: a pilot study. Library Hi Tech, 42(3), 809–825. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-10-2021-0356

Huang, Y. H. (2024). Exploring the implementation of artificial intelligence applications among academic libraries in Taiwan. Library Hi Tech, 42(3), 885–905. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-03-2022-0159

Iorliam, A., & Ingio, J. A. (2024). A comparative analysis of generative artificial intelligence tools for natural language processing. Journal of Computing Theories and Applications, 1(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.62411/jcta.9447

Jarrah, A. M., Wardat, Y., & Fidalgo, P. (2023). Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: what does the literature say? Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13572

Kautonen, H. (2024). Research libraries’ diverse orientations to an algorithmic future. Bibliothek Forschung Und Praxis, 48(3), 723–732. https://doi.org/10.1515/bfp-2024-0058

Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – a systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009

Law, D. D., Hales, K., & Busenbark, D. (2020). Student success: A literature review of faculty to student mentoring. Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence, 4(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.15142/38x2-n847

Li, J., Zong, H., Wu, E., Wu, R., Peng, Z., Zhao, J., Yang, L., Xie, H., & Shen, B. (2024). Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance the writing of English academic papers by non-native English-speaking medical students - the educational application of ChatGPT. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05738-y

Liang, W., Liu, S., & Zhao, C. (2021). Impact of student-supervisor relationship on postgraduate students’ subjective well-being: A study based on longitudinal data in China. Higher Education, 82(2), 273–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00644-w

Lomness, A., Lacey, S., Brobbel, A., & Freeman, T. (2021). Seizing the opportunity: collaborative creation of academic integrity and information literacy LMS modules for undergraduate chemistry. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102328

Lozano, A., & Blanco Fontao, C. (2023). Is the education system prepared for the irruption of artificial intelligence? A study on the perceptions of students of primary education degree from a dual perspective: Current pupils and future teachers. Education Sciences, 13(7), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070733

Mainardes, E. W., Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2010). An exploratory research on the stakeholders of a university. Journal of Management and Strategy, 1(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v1n1p76

Mannheimer, S., Bond, N., Young, S. W. H., Kettler, H. S., Marcus, A., Slipher, S. K., Clark, J. A., Shorish, Y., Rossmann, D., & Sheehey, B. (2024). Responsible AI practice in libraries and archives. Information Technology and Libraries, 43(3), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.5860/ital.v43i3.17245

Maphosa, M., Khoza, L., Tlomatsana, C., & Pitjo, W. (2026). Exploring postgraduate students’ use and perceptions of generative AI as a research support tool: A South African case. In A. Gerber & A. W. Pillay (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence Research ( pp. 437–451). Springer. (CCIS,volume 2784) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-11733-5_27

Maphosa, V., & Maphosa, M. (2021). The trajectory of artificial intelligence research in higher education: a bibliometric analysis and visualisation. In S. Pudaruth and U. Singh, (Eds.) 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Computing and Data Communication Systems (icABCD), Durban, South Africa. (pp. 1–7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icABCD51485.2021.9519368

Maphosa, V., & Maphosa, M. (2023a). Adoption of educational fourth industrial revolution tools pre and post-COVID-19 and the emergence of ChatGPT. In Reimagining Education - the Rrole of E-learning, Creativity, and Technology in the Post-Pandemic Era (pp. 1–13). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1001612

Maphosa, V., & Maphosa, M. (2023b). Artificial intelligence in higher education: a bibliometric analysis and topic modeling approach. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 37(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2023.2261730

Mitra, A., Mohanty, S. P., & Kougianos, E. (2024). The world of generative AI: deepfakes and large language models. ArXiv [9 pp.] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.04373v1

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1006–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005

Ocholla, D. N., & Ocholla, L. (2020). Readiness of academic libraries in South Africa to research, teaching and learning support in the fourth industrial revolution. Library Management, 41(6/7), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-04-2020-0067

Okunlaya, R. O., Syed Abdullah, N., & Alias, R. A. (2022). Artificial intelligence (AI) library services innovative conceptual framework for the digital transformation of university education. Library Hi Tech, 40(6), 1869–1892. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-07-2021-0242

Panda, S. K., Bhatt, A., & Satapathy, A. (2024). ChatGPT and its role in academic libraries: a discussion. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 30(4), 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2024.2381510

Pierre–Robertson, P. (2023). #SuperLibrarian – The evolving role of librarians in technology spaces. Digital Library Perspectives, 39(4), 620–627. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-04-2023-0026

Pinto, M., Garcia-Marco, J., Caballero, D., Manso, R., Uribe, A., & Gomez, C. (2024). Assessing information, media and data literacy in academic libraries: approaches and challenges in the research literature on the topic. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102920

Rodriguez, S., & Mune, C. (2022). Uncoding library Chatbots: deploying a new virtual reference tool at the San Jose State University library. Reference Services Review, 50(3/4), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-05-2022-0020

Rowland, D. R. (2023). Two frameworks to guide discussions around levels of acceptable use of generative AI in student academic research and writing. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 17(1), 31–61. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/915/435435577

Sekli, G., Godo, A., & Véliz, J. (2024). Generative AI solutions for faculty and students: A review of literature and roadmap for future research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 23, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.28945/5304

Sherif, A., & Ravindra, A. (2018). Apache spark deep learning cookbook. Packt.

Wang, P. (2019). On defining artificial intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 10(2), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.2478/jagi-2019-0002

Wang, S., Sun, Z., & Chen, Y. (2023). Effects of higher education institutes’ artificial intelligence capability on students’ self-efficacy, creativity and learning performance. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 4919–4939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11338-4

Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7

Published

2026-05-15

How to Cite

Maphosa, M., & Tlomatsana, C. (2026). The use of generative AI tools for students’ research support within higher education institutions’ libraries: a systematic literature review. Information Research an International Electronic Journal, 31(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31263101