‘Ugh, it’s a difficult topic’: Positionality statements as information use in information and library science research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31iConf64148Keywords:
Information use, Diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging, Postionality statements, Qualitative researchAbstract
Introduction. The effects of information use remain understudied. We fill a key gap in the literature by conducting an empirical study of positionality statement use in information and library science (ILS) research. We analyse why information and library scientists endorse or object to these statements.
Method. Using Qualtrics software, we conducted an international online survey of information and library scientists. Our instrument included demographic data, closed-ended questions, Likert-type items, and open-ended questions.
Analysis. We conducted both quantitative and qualitative analyses on the data, which related to 213 respondents. Our quantitative analysis employed the statistical package SPSS, while qualitative analysis employed NVivo software.
Results. Quantitative findings showed significant correlations between variables. Qualitative findings demonstrated that participants valued positionality but felt profound ambivalence concerning positionality statement use. They registered 10 strengths and 12 weaknesses of this information use.
Conclusion(s). We offer both recommendations for practice and questions for further research. Further emphasis on raising awareness of positionality and developing both educational tools and best practices for using positionality statements is urgent. Also needed is more scholarly exploration of the effects of information use.
References
American Psychological Association. (2025). Equity, diversity, and inclusion toolkit for journal editors. https://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/equity-diversity-inclusion-toolkit-journal-editors.pdf
Anderson, E. (2020). Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. In E. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/feminism-epistemology/
Barker, C. (2012). Positionality. In C. Barker, The SAGE Dictionary of Cultural Studies. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221280.n185
Beck, C. T. (2024). Perspectives on Positionality Statements in Scholarly Discourse. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 53(6), 581–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2024.09.010
Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
Bourke, B. (2014). Positionality: Reflecting on the Research Process. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1026
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bukamal, H. (2022). Deconstructing insider–outsider researcher positionality. British Journal of Special Education, 49(3), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12426
Chin, M., Beckwith, V., Levy, B., Gulati, S., Macam, A., Saxena, T., & Suwarningsih, D. (2022). Navigating researcher positionality in comparative and international education research: Perspectives from emerging researchers. International Education Journal, 21(2), 21–36.
Cousin, G. (2010). Positioning Positionality. In M. Savin-Baden & C. Major (Eds.), New Approaches to Qualitative Research: Wisdom and Uncertainty (pp. 9–18). Taylor & Francis.
Curran, M., & Randall, A. (2021). Positionality Statements. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/pb-assets/assets/14756811/Positionality-Statements-1621354517813.pdf
Davis, G., & Khonach, T. (2020). The Paradox of Positionality: Avoiding, Embracing, or Resisting Feminist Accountability. Fat Studies, 9(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/21604851.2019.1628604
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Fifth). SAGE.
Dryden-Peterson, S. (2020). Transitions: Researchers’ Positionality and Malleability of Site and Self over Time. Harvard Educational Review, 90(1), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-90.1.127
Folkes, L. (2023). Moving beyond ‘shopping list’ positionality: Using kitchen table reflexivity and in/visible tools to develop reflexive qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 23(5), 1301–1318. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941221098922
Gani, J. K., & Khan, R. M. (2024). Positionality Statements as a Function of Coloniality: Interrogating Reflexive Methodologies. International Studies Quarterly, 68(2), sqae038. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae038
Given, L. M., Case, D. O., & Willson, R. (2023). Looking for Information: Examining Research on How People Engage with Information (5th ed). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor.
Grasswick, H. (2018). Feminist Social Epistemology. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/
Holmes, A. G. (2020). Researcher Positionality—A Consideration of Its Influence and Place in Qualitative Research—A New Researcher Guide. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232
Htong Kham, S. (2024). Outsider From Within, Insider From Without: Negotiating Researcher Positionality in Comparative Social Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 16094069241254004. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241254004
Jadallah, C. C. (2025). Positionality, relationality, place, and land: Considerations for ethical research with communities. Qualitative Research, 25(1), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941241246174
Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158
Kari, J. (2010). Diversity in the conceptions of information use. Information Research, 15(3). https://informationr.net/ir/15-3/colis7/colis709.html
King, K. A. (2024). Promises and perils of positionality statements. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190524000035
Lu, H., & Hodge, W. A. (2019). Toward multi-dimensional and developmental notion of researcher positionality. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00029
Massoud, M. F. (2022). The price of positionality: Assessing the benefits and burdens of self‐identification in research methods. Journal of Law and Society, 49(S1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12372
Merton, R. (1972). Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 9–47.
Oltmann, S. M., Wagner, T., & Martell, A. (2024). The People behind the Research: How Three Researchers Utilized Their Diverse Positionality to Study LGBTQ + Archives. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 803–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1106
Olukiun, O., Mkandawire, E., Antilla, J., Alfaifa, F., Weitzel, J., Scheer, V., Olukotun, M., & Mkandawire-Valhmu, L. (2021). An Analysis of Reflections on Researcher Positionality. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4613
Oswald, F. (2024). Positionality statements should not force us to ‘out’ ourselves. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(2), 185–185. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01812-5
Pascoe, K. M. (2022). Reflections on a Systematic Literature Review: Questioning the (In)visibility of Researcher Positionality. Social Work Research, 46(2), 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svac006
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3 ed). Sage Publications.
Pickard, A. J. (Ed.). (2017). Research methods in information (2. ed). Facet.
Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635
Ríos, C. D. L., & Patel, L. (2023). Positions, positionality, and relationality in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2023.2268036
Rowe, W. (2014). Positionality. In D. Coghlan & M. Brydon-Miller, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research. SAGE Publications.
Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2023). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003377986
Savolainen, J., Casey, P. J., McBrayer, J. P., & Schwerdtle, P. N. (2023). Positionality and Its Problems: Questioning the Value of Reflexivity Statements in Research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(6), 1331–1338. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221144988
Savolainen, R. (2009). Information use and information processing: Comparison of conceptualizations. Journal of Documentation, 65(2), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410910937570
Secules, S., McCall, C., Mejia, J. A., Beebe, C., Masters, A. S., L. Sánchez‐Peña, M., & Svyantek, M. (2021). Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20377
Sibbald, K. R., Phelan, S. K., Beagan, B. L., & Pride, T. M. (2025). Positioning Positionality and Reflecting on Reflexivity: Moving From Performance to Practice. Qualitative Health Research, 10497323241309230. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241309230
Todd, R. J. (1999). Back to our beginnings: Information utilization, Bertram Brookes, and the fundamental equation of information science. Information Processing & Management, 35(6), 851–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00030-8
Wilson, C., Janes, G., & Williams, J. (2022). Identity, positionality, and reflexivity: Relevance and application to research paramedics. British Paramedic Journal, 7(2), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2022.09.7.2.43
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alex H. Poole, Ashley Todd-Diaz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
