Defining the ‘good’ in educational TikTok videos: Authenticity, literacies, and digital enlightenment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31iConf64152

Keywords:

TikTok, Short form video, Information literacy, Authenticity, Pedagogy

Abstract

Introduction. This study examines what makes an educational TikTok video ‘good’ from the perspective of learners who actively use the platform. While prior work highlights design principles and instructional strategies, little research investigates how learners themselves define effectiveness in short-form digital video.

Method. Using grounded theory, the team conducted semi-structured Zoom interviews with 27 TikTok users who had learned something new on the platform within the past two years. Participants, recruited through snowball sampling, represented diverse demographics and topical interests. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed through open, axial, and selective coding.

Analysis. Six interdependent domains shaped participants’ evaluations: Content and Engagement, Delivery and Pedagogy, Affective Qualities, Social and Community, Credibility and Trust, and Platform Affordances.

Results. Participants defined good educational videos as those that integrate clarity, authenticity, community interaction, and intentional use of TikTok’s features. Videos stand out when they balance entertainment with pedagogy, build trust through authentic delivery, and act as gateways to deeper exploration.

Conclusion. The study offers a sociotechnical framework that bridges cognitive, affective, social, and technological dimensions of learning, presenting implications for educators, librarians, and creators designing effective video-based instruction.

References

Ai-Dung, T., & Woei, H. (2022). The effects of microlearning: A scoping review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(2), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10045-2

Arriagada, A., & Ibáñez, F. (2020). You need at least one picture daily, if you’re not dead: Content creators and platform evolution in the social media ecology. Social Media + Society, 6(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120944624

Avella, H. (2023). TikTok ≠ therapy: Mediating mental health and algorithmic mood disorders. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231234567

hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.

Booth, K. M., & Trauth, E. M. (2019). Moving beyond text: How teens evaluate video-based high stakes health information via social media. In iConference 2019 Proceedings.

Brooks, G., & Drenten, J. (2021). Influencer celebrification: How social media influencers acquire celebrity capital. Journal of Advertising, 50(5), 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1880340

Dai, J., Wani, S., Hajiyeva, N., & Booth, K. M. (2025). Taming TikTok: How BIPOC individuals perceive and interact with algorithmically generated content. In iConference 2025 Proceedings.

David, X. Z., Kathleen, M. M., & Jeffrey, F. S. (2021). TikTok and dermatology: An opportunity for public health engagement. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 85(1), 195–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.067

De Gagne, J. C., Park, H. K., Hall, K., Woodward, A., Yamane, S., & Kim, S. S. (2019). Microlearning in health professions education: Scoping review. JMIR Medical Education, 5(2), e13997. https://doi.org/10.2196/13997

Ding, N., Xu, X., & Lewis, E. (2023). Short instructional videos for the TikTok generation. Journal of Education for Business, 98(4), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2022.2093449

Fiallos, A., Fiallos, F., & Figueroa, S. (2021). TikTok and education: Discovering knowledge through learning videos. In Eighth International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (pp. 245–250). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG51294.2021.9531025

Fletcher, K., Kazmi, M., Ingram, J., Aljundi, A. A., Thomas, H., Booth, K., & Haimson, O. L. (2024). Doc on the Tok: How BIPOC college students perceive healthcare professionals’ social media content. In iConference 2024 Proceedings. https://hdl.handle.net/2142/122841

Fowler, L. R., Schoen, L., Smith, H. S., & Morain, S. R. (2022). Sex education on TikTok: A content analysis of themes. Health Promotion Practice, 23(5), 739–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399211031536

Graefen, B., Emeakoroha, U., Qasmieh, S., & Fazal, N. (2023). The impact of TikTok on pharmacy education: Enhancing drug information mastery through video learning. Archives of Pharmacy Practice, 14(4), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.51847/GJXdvZJz7N

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.

Johnson, T. P. (2014). Snowball sampling: Introduction. In Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat05720

Khan, Y. (2022). TikTok as a learning tool for archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 10(4), 452–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2022.28

Khadijah, M., Nordin, N., & Aziz, A. (2020). Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(COVID19-S4), S27–S31. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2785

Lampe, N. M. (2023). Teaching with TikTok in online sociology of sex and gender courses. Teaching Sociology, 51(4), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X231159091

Ling, Z., Zhang, X., & Chen, Q. (2022). Academia’s responses to crisis: A bibliometric analysis of literature on online learning in higher education during COVID-19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 620–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13192

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

McCashin, D., & Murphy, C. (2023). Using TikTok for public and youth mental health: A systematic review and content analysis. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 28(2), 276–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045221140807

Sánchez, J., Monroe, C., William, L., Aguilar, F., Karolczak, I., Torres, J., & Zaidi, F. (2024). Towards a methodological framework for categorizing informal learning content in TikTok. In J. Cohen & G. Solano (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1902–1907). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/224230/

Scolari, C. (2018). Transmedia literacy: Participatory culture, skills and informal learning across media. Routledge.

Stavros, N. (2018). Mobile-based micro-learning and assessment: Impact on learning performance and motivation of high school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12247

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Yosi, F., Mutiara, H., & Suci, H. (2022). Effect of using TikTok as learning media on academic achievement of pharmacy students. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2645(1), 020005. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0103087

Zembylas, M. (2007). Emotional capital and education: Theoretical insights from Bourdieu. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(4), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00390.x

Zhang, J., & West, R. (2020). Designing microlearning instruction for professional development through a competency-based approach. TechTrends, 64(2), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00463-7

Downloads

Published

2026-03-20

How to Cite

Sánchez, J., Booth, K., & Karolczak, I. (2026). Defining the ‘good’ in educational TikTok videos: Authenticity, literacies, and digital enlightenment. Information Research an International Electronic Journal, 31(iConf), 510–523. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31iConf64152

Issue

Section

Conference proceedings

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.