Inclusive media and information literacy (IMIL): Building a framework for an age of preparedness and responsibilisation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31iConf64178Keywords:
Information literacy, Vulnerable groups, Information crisis, Securitisation, InclusionAbstract
Introduction. In policy and political debate, media and information literacy (MIL) is increasingly framed as a civic responsibility and a strategic response to the contemporary ‘information crisis’, marked by disinformation and digital insecurity. This positions MIL as essential to democratic resilience and national security but risks excluding individuals who lack the resources or capacities to meet these demands.
Method. This paper develops a conceptual framework for critically and constructively analysing the consequences of placing the responsibility of correct information handling on individuals in times of crises and securitisation. Four theoretical building blocks – critical media and information literacy; critical pedagogy; disability studies, and theories of resilience – are used to construct the framework inclusive media and information literacy.
Results. The framework presented will allow for an expansion of current MIL research on digital inequalities by bringing together and explicitly highlighting power relations, institutional framings, and the situated agency of vulnerable groups in times of information crisis and heightened preparedness.
Conclusion(s). The paper emphasizes the practical relevance of the framework for popular education and public libraries, which increasingly support MIL and democratic resilience as part of the civil defence.
References
Bawden, D. (2008). ‘Origins and concepts of digital literacy’. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices, 17–32.
Biesta, G. (2011). Learning Democracy in School and Society: Education, Lifelong Learning, and the Politics of Citizenship. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Bylund, C. (2022). Anakrona livsvillkor: en studie av funktionalitet, möjligheter och begär i den föränderliga svenska välfärdsstaten. Institutionen för kultur- och medievetenskaper, Umeå universitet.
Carlsson, H. & Engström, L. (2025). Navigating exceptionalism. The role of public libraries in times of crisis and war rhetoric. Information Research, 30(Colis2025), 1–14.
Carlsson, U. (ed.) (2019). Understanding media and information literacy (MIL) in the digital age: a question of democracy. Göteborg: Department of Journalism, Media and Communication (JMG), University of Gothenburg, UNESCO.
Casselden, B. (2023). Not like riding a bike: How public libraries facilitate older people’s digital inclusion during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(3), 704–718.
Chadwick, D. et al. (2022). Digital inclusion and participation of people with intellectual disabilities during COVID‐19: A rapid review and international bricolage. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 19(3), 242–256.
Dobson, S. et al. (2024). Learning Inclusion in a Digital Age: Belonging and Finding a Voice with the Disadvantaged. Springer Nature Singapore.
Drabinski, E., & Tewell, E. (2019). Critical information literacy. In R. Hobbs & P. Mihailidis (Eds.), The international encyclopaedia of media literacy. John Wiley & Sons.
Elmborg, J. (2006). Critical information literacy: implications for instructional practice. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(2), 192-199.
Engström, L., & Olsson Dahlquist, L. (2020). The will to activate library users and the making of citizens: How different rationalities influence the notion of participation in a library context. Library Quarterly, 90(3), 314–331.
Egard, H., & Hansson, K. (2021). The digital society comes sneaking in. An emerging field and its disabling barriers. Disability & Society, 38(5), 761–775.
Forsman, M. (2019). ‘Rebalancing MIL. The revised Swedish curriculum and the emerging media citizen in a new media ecology’. In Carlsson, U. (ed.). Understanding media and information literacy (MIL) in the digital age: a question of democracy. Göteborg: Department of Journalism, Media and Communication (JMG), University of Gothenburg, UNESCO,149–156.
Freire, P. (1970/2005). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum. Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of Freedom: Ethics, Democracy, and Civic Courage. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Giroux, H. A. (2011). On Critical Pedagogy. New York: Bloomsbury.
Goodly, D. (2017) Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. (2nd ed.) Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Goldstein, S. (ed.) (2020). Informed societies: why information literacy matters for citizenship, participation, and democracy. London: Facet Publishing.
Grove, K. (2018). Resilience. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Haider, J. & Sundin, O. (2022). Paradoxes of media and information literacy: the crisis of information. London: Routledge.
Haider, J & Sundin, O. (2019). ‘How Do You Trust? On infrastructural meaning-making and the need for self-reflection’. In Carlsson, U. (ed.) Understanding media and information literacy (MIL) in the digital age: a question of democracy. Göteborg: Department of Journalism, Media and Communication (JMG), University of Gothenburg, UNESCO, 107–112.
Harpur, P.D. (2017). Discrimination, copyright, and equality: Opening the E-book for the print-disabled, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hicks, A. (2022). A difference that matters: Disability activism, scholarship, and community. Journal of Information Literacy, 16(1), 1–3.
Johansson, S., Gulliksen, J., & Gustavsson, C. (2021). Disability digital divide: the use of the internet, smartphones, computers, and tablets among people with disabilities in Sweden. Universal Access in the Information Society, 20, 105–120.
Johnston, J., Mierzecka, A., Tóth, M., Paul, M., Kisilowska-Szurmińska, M., Khosrowjerdi, M., Vårheim, A., Rydbeck, K., Jochumsen, H., Hvenegaard Rasmussen, C., Pálsdóttir, Á., Olson, A., Skare, R., & Mathiasson, M. H. (2024). Public libraries’ role in supporting Ukrainian refugees: A focus on Hungary and Poland. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 0(0).
Katz, A. S. et al. (2020). Vagueness, power, and public health: use of ‘vulnerable’ in public health literature. Critical Public Health, 30(5), 601–611.
King, H., Crossley, S., & Smith, R. (2021). Responsibility, resilience, and symbolic power. Sociological Review, 69(5), 920–936.
Lupien, P., & Rourke, L. (2021). (Mis)information, information literacy, and democracy: Paths for pedagogy to foster informed citizenship. Journal of Information Literacy, 15(3), 56-.
Martens, H., & Hobbs, R. (2015). How Media Literacy Supports Civic Engagement in a Digital Age. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(2), 120–137.
McCosker, A. et al. (2023). Accounting for diversity in older adults’ digital inclusion and literacy: the impact of a national intervention. Ageing and Society, 43(11), 2629–2649.
Mihailidis, P. et al. (2021). Do media literacies approach equity and justice? The Journal of Media Literacy Education, 13(2), 1–14.
Mihailidis, P., & Viotty, S. (2017). Spreadable Spectacle in Digital Culture: Civic Expression, Fake News, and the Role of Media Literacies in ‘Post-Fact’ Society. The American Behavioral Scientist (Beverly Hills), 61(4), 441–454.
Mihailidis, P., & Thevenin, B. (2013). Media Literacy as a Core Competency for Engaged Citizenship in Participatory Democracy. The American Behavioral Scientist (Beverly Hills), 57(11), 1611–1622.
Molenaar, J., & Van Praag, L. (2022). Migrants as ‘vulnerable groups’ in the COVID-19 pandemic: A critical discourse analysis of a taken-for-granted label in academic literature. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 2.
Norris, F. H. et al. (2008). Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1–2), 127–150.
Olsson Dahlquist, L. (2019). Folkbildning för delaktighet: en studie om bibliotekets demokratiska uppdrag i en digital samtid. Lund: Lunds universitet.
O’Grady, N., & Shaw, D. (2023). Resilience, responsibility, and state abandon: The changing role of the government in emergencies. Political Geography, 100.
Pamment, J. & Tsurtsumia, D. (2025). Beyond Operation Doppelgänger: A Capability Assessment of the Social Design Agency. Psychological Defence Agency/Lund University: MPF REPORT SERIES 8/2025.
Randalls, S., & Simon, S. (2017). Making resilience strange. In The Routledge Handbook of International Resilience. Routledge.
Smit, A., Swart, J., & Broersma, M. (2024). Bypassing digital literacy: Marginalized citizens’ tactics for participation and inclusion in digital societies. New Media & Society 0(0).
Stjernholm, L. (2024). Inclusive preparedness: Intellectual disability and disaster risk reduction. Lund: Lunds universitet/Lunds Tekniska Högskola.
Tsatsou, P. (2022). Vulnerable people’s digital inclusion: intersectionality patterns and associated lessons. Information, Communication & Society, 25(10), 1475–1494.
UNESCO (2026). Media and information literacy. Available [02-01-2026]: https://www.unesco.org/en/media-information-literacy?hub=750
van den Hoonaard, W.C. (2020). ‘Vulnerability’ as a Concept Captive in Its Own Prison. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham.
Winogrodzka, D., Trąbka, A., & Pietrusińska, M. J. (2024). ‘It’s about mindset’. How do young migrants in Poland build their resilience? Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies, 50(12), 2858–2878.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hanna Carlsson, Lisa Engström, Lisa Olsson Dahlquist
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
