Bibliographic records reveal trends in Chinese history scholarship: Evidence from Library of Congress metadata

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31iConf64266

Abstract

Introduction. Books are key research outputs in the humanities, but often poorly indexed in scholarly databases. This paper presents a preliminary analysis of metadata in the Library of Congress (LC) to analyse scholarship on Chinese history.

Method. We extracted metadata of all 18,564 books on Chinese history from LC published in three major regions, Greater China, the U.S., and Europe, and mapped chronological information of each book onto historical periods.

Analysis. We conducted quantitative analysis on the information to understand the general publication trends of books on Chinese history and their historical period representation, both the overall patterns and the similarities and differences within the three regions.

Results. Two major surges appear in Greater China and U.S. publications, with Greater China leading since the 1980s and the U.S. surpassing Europe by the 1960s. Later periods attract more exclusive attention, while earlier periods are often embedded in multi-dynastic narratives in Western scholarship, though U.S. research has recently diversified.

Conclusion. This study pioneers the use of bibliographic records to analyse Chinese historiography, offering a complement to scholarship focused on canonical works and highlighting the value of library metadata for quantitative humanities research. We share our dataset and code at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Code-for-Analysis-of-Chinese-History-Collection-in-the-Library-of-Congress-Catalog6BC2.

References

Birge, B. (2013). Yuan studies in North America: Historical overview, contributions, and current trends. In H. Zhang, Z. Xue, S. Jiang, & G. L. Lugar (Eds.), A scholarly review of Chinese studies in North America (pp. 54–78). Association for Asian Studies, Inc.

Burrows, T., & Verhoeven, D. (2014, June 2). Digital scholarship in the humanities and creative arts: The HuNI virtual laboratory. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2014/6/digital-scholarship-in-the-humanities-and-creative-arts-the-huni-virtual-laboratoryChennault, C. L., & Pearce, S. (2013). History and society of early medieval China. In H. Zhang, Z. Xue, S. Jiang, & G. L. Lugar (Eds.), A scholarly review of Chinese studies in North America (pp. 11–22). Association for Asian Studies, Inc.

De Weerdt, H. (2013). Song studies. In H. Zhang, Z. Xue, S. Jiang, & G. L. Lugar (Eds.), A scholarly review of Chinese studies in North America (pp. 23–53). Association for Asian Studies, Inc.

Delgado-Quirós, L., & Ortega, J. L. (2025). Research entity information and coverage in eight free access scholarly databases. Online Information Review.

Library of Congress. (2025). MARC 21 Format for Bibliographic Data. Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/

Library of Congress Cataloging Distribution Service. (2019). Books all: MDS Connect dataset, 24 MARC Distribution Services (data set) books all. Library of Congress. Cataloging Distribution Service. https://www.loc.gov/item/2020445551

Li, K., Dobreski, B., & Busch, M. (2025). How are library cataloguing metadata used differently over time: a large-scale quantitative analysis of the Library of Congress catalog. Journal of Documentation, 81(2), 385–402.

Lo, W. Y. W. (2016). The concept of greater China in higher education: adoptions, dynamics, and implications. Comparative Education, 52(1), 26–43.

Lu, Y (2010). Xifang Tang shi yanjiu gaiguan [An Overview of Western Scholarship on Tang History]. In H. Zhang, Z. Xue, & S. Jiang (Eds.), Beimei Zhongguoxue—Yanjiu gaishu yu wenxian ziyuan [Chinese studies in North America—Research and resources] (pp. 83–110). Zhonghua shuju.

Maleki, A. (2022). OCLC library holdings: Assessing availability of academic books in libraries in print and electronic compared to citations and altmetrics. Scientometrics, 127(2), 991–1020.

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-0151765-5

Mordell, D. (2019). Critical Questions for Archives as (Big) Data. Archivaria 87, 140-161. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/724731.

Moretti, F. (2000). Conjectures on world literature. New Left Review, 1, 54–68.

Moretti, F. (2013). Distant reading. Verso.

Padilla, T., Allen, L., Frost, H., Potvin, S., Russey Roke, E., & Varner, S. (2019). Always already computational: Collections as data—Final report. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3152935

Perry, E. J. (2013). Studying Chinese politics: Farewell to revolution? In H. Zhang, Z. Xue, S. Jiang, & G. L. Lugar (Eds.), A scholarly review of Chinese studies in North America (pp. 264–291). Association for Asian Studies, Inc.

White, H. D., & Zuccala, A. A. (2018). Libcitations, WorldCat, cultural impact, and fame. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(12), 1502–1512.

Xu, Z. (2010). Xu [Introduction]. In H. Zhang, Z. Xue, & S. Jiang (Eds.), Beimei Zhongguoxue—Yanjiu gaishu yu wenxian ziyuan [Chinese studies in North America: A scholarly review and bibliographic resources] (pp. 1–7). Zhonghua shuju.

Zhang, H., Xue, Z., & Jiang, S. (Eds.). (2010). Beimei Zhongguoxue—Yanjiu gaishu yu wenxian ziyuan [Chinese studies in North America—Research and resources]. Zhonghua shuju.

Zhang, H., Xue, Z., Jiang, S., & Lugar, G. L. (Eds.). (2013). A scholarly review of Chinese studies in North America. Association for Asian Studies, Inc.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-20

How to Cite

Li, K., Shang, W., & Han, Y. (2026). Bibliographic records reveal trends in Chinese history scholarship: Evidence from Library of Congress metadata. Information Research an International Electronic Journal, 31(iConf), 1751–1760. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31iConf64266

Issue

Section

Conference proceedings