Artificial intelligence in libraries: a systematic review of upskilling, challenges, and future research directions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31iConf64267Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, AI literacy, Upskilling, Information literacy, LibrariesAbstract
Introduction. Libraries, as trusted institutions, are positioned to advance AI literacy for both staff and patrons. This study investigates how AI literacy has been conceptualised and implemented in libraries and examines the challenges these institutions face in AI upskilling and integrating AI into their services.
Method. A systematic literature review using PRISMA guidelines to identify peer-reviewed articles and practitioner reports on AI upskilling in libraries.
Analysis. Fourteen articles published between 2021 and 2025 were examined, spanning academic, public, and school libraries. Both thematic and comparative analysis were used to synthesise findings.
Results. Findings reveal significant variation in definitions of AI literacy, sectoral differences in focus (staff training in academic libraries, patron programs in public libraries, early digital citizenship in schools), and recurring challenges including cost, vendor dependence, staff anxieties, and lack of outcome evaluation. Geographic patterns show Asia leading in empirical studies, while Western literature is largely conceptual.
Conclusion. To remain relevant, libraries must move beyond fragmented, vendor-driven initiatives toward clearer definitions, equity-centered approaches, and scalable, evidence-based models that empower both staff and patrons in an AI-driven era.
References
Ali, M. Y., Naeem, S. B., & Bhatti, R. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Pakistani university library services. Library Hi Tech News, 38(8), https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-10-2021-0065
Affelt, A. (2023). And the library community. Computers in Libraries, 43(10), 34–40.
Ali, M. Y., Naeem, S. B., & Bhatti, R. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Pakistani university library services. Library Hi Tech News, 38(8), 12–15.
Bélanger, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence: Considerations for library public service delivery. International Information & Library Review, 57(2), 193–199.
Breeding, M. (2025). 2025 Library systems report. SRRT Newsletter Social Responsibilities Round Table, 228, 16–27.
Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1435–1443.
Enis, M. (2024). AI and the public. Library Journal, 149(11), 42–44.
Fruehauf, E., Beman-Cavallaro, A., & Schmidt, L. (2024). Developing a foundation for the informational needs of generative AI users through the means of established interdisciplinary relationships. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(3), 102876.
Grimes, N. D., & Porter, W. (2024). Closing the Digital Divide through digital equity: The role of libraries and librarians. Public Library Quarterly, 43(3), 307–338.
Gültekin, V., & Kavak, A. (2025). An assessment of artificial intelligence anxieties of academic librarians in Türkiye. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51(3), 103058.
Huang, Y., Cox, A. M., & Cox, J. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in academic library strategy in the United Kingdom and the Mainland of China. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(6), 102772.
Juchnevič, L. (2014). Library roles in changing society. Social Transformations in Contemporary Society, 2, 120–130.
Kettani, D., Moulin, B., & Barbosa, L. S. (2025). Digital Divide (2.0): The shadow of AI technology.
Krastios, M., Sacks, D., & Rubio, M. (2025). America’s AI action plan.
Li, D. (2024). Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in public and private libraries of China: Determinants, challenges, and perceived benefits. El Profesional de La Información, 33(4), 1–12.
Limwichitr, S. (2024). Academic Library 4.0 and beyond: Investigating adaptation of academic libraries in Thailand towards a 4.0 landscape. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(2), 102857.
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualising AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041.
Ong, C. M., & Slater, K. (2024). AI literacy in libraries: Informing, engaging, empowering. Public Libraries, 63(3), 34–43.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71).
Ridley, M., & Pawlick-Potts, D. (2021). Algorithmic literacy and the role for libraries. Information Technology & Libraries, 40(2), 1–15.
Rubio, J. (2024). The role of libraries in navigating an AI-empowered future. Public Libraries, 63(3), 44–52.
Seales, D. (2024). Adventures with AI in the school library. Computers in Libraries, 44(7), 30–34.
Twomey, B., Johnson, A., & Estes, C. (2024). It takes a village: A distributed training model for AI-based chatbots. Information Technology & Libraries, 43(3), 1–8.
Wang, C., Boerman, S., Kroon, A., Möller, J., & de Vreese, C. (2024). The artificial intelligence divide: Who is the most vulnerable? New Media & Society, 27(7), 3867–3889.
Wu, Y., Lin, Y., Liu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2025). A survey on the current status of AI literacy lectures in China’s university libraries under the AIGC background. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51(5), 103111.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Erezi Ogbo-Gebhardt , Agnes G. Pearcy , Joseph B. Wiggins , Yerika Jimenez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
