When digital systems meet human-centred work: a qualitative study of information behaviour
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31ISIC65231Keywords:
Human-centred work, information culture, professional valuesAbstract
Introduction. This study explores how employees engage in information behaviour in professional environments undergoing digital transformation. While digital tools are introduced to support documentation and knowledge sharing, they may disrupt established information practices and professional routines. The study focuses on how individuals negotiate and adapt their information behaviour in response to new documentation tasks, particularly in contexts where interpersonal communication and professional judgment are central.
Method. The study is based on qualitative fieldwork conducted over several months in day care institutions within one municipality in Denmark. Data were collected through observations and informal conversations with managerial staff as they engaged with a newly introduced digital documentation task. Nine observation sessions in total are included in the analysis. Audio recordings were transcribed using the Whisper transcription tool and WhisperX for speaker diarization, processed within a secure, GDPR-compliant research infrastructure.
Analysis. Information behaviour was analysed using a thematic approach and furthermore interpreted through the lens of information culture. This analytical perspective enabled an examination of the values, norms, and practices shaping their everyday engagement with information and digital documentation systems.
Results. The findings show that employees consistently prioritized human-centred and relational work, while digital documentation tasks were often perceived as peripheral and time-consuming. The introduction of the new system conflicted with established information cultures, highlighting uneven digital competencies, uncertainty regarding responsibility, and limited trust in the system. Adapting to the new documentation practices required additional skills, time, and a renegotiation of existing routines.
Conclusion. The study demonstrates that understanding everyday information behaviour is essential for aligning digital documentation initiatives with professional values in relational workplaces. Information culture plays a critical role in shaping how individuals respond to technological change.
References
Becqué, Y. N., Rietjens, J. A., van der Heide, A., & Witkamp, E. (2025). Failed implementation of a nursing intervention to support family caregivers: An evaluation study using Normalization Process Theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81(2), 937-952. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16261
Bhambri, C. G. (2021). Information overload in business organizations and entrepreneurship: An analytical review of the literature. Business Information Review, 38(4), 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/02663821211054975
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Chen, X., & Wei, S. (2019). Enterprise social media use and overload: a curvilinear relationship. Journal of Information Technology, 34(1), 22-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396218802728
Choo, C. W., Bergeron, P., Detlor, B., & Heaton, L. (2008). Information culture and information use: An exploratory study of three organizations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), 792-804. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20797
Cusick, N. A. (2025). Connections between information culture and the successful organization: A secondary school grounded theory case study (Publication No. 32165776) [Doctoral dissertation, Emporia State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
De Groot, K., De Veer, A. J. E., Munster, A. M., Francke, A. L., & Paans, W. (2022). Nursing documentation and its relationship with perceived nursing workload: a mixed-methods study among community nurses. BMC Nursing, 21(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00811-7
Huisman, M., Joye, S., & Biltereyst, D. (2020). To share or not to share: An explorative study of health information non-sharing behaviour among Flemish adults aged fifty and over. Information Research, 25(3), 1, Article 870. https://doi.org/10.47989/IRPAPER870
Kaihlanen, A.-M., Laukka, E., Nadav, J., Närvänen, J., Saukkonen, P., Koivisto, J., & Heponiemi, T. (2023). The effects of digitalisation on health and social care work: a qualitative descriptive study of the perceptions of professionals and managers. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 714. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09730-y
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge.
Meeßen, S. M., Thielsch, M. T., & Hertel, G. (2020). Trust in management information systems (MIS): A theoretical model Zeitschrift fur Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 64(1), 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000306
Meißner, A., & Schnepp, W. (2014). Staff experiences within the implementation of computer-based nursing records in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 14(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-54
Monticelli, A., Zúñiga, F., Huang, J., Osińska, M., Poncin, E., Wellens, N. I., Curreri, N., Corna, L., & Van Grootven, B. (2025). Data quality of resident documentation in long-term care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 26(5), 105531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105531
OECD (2017). Tackling wasteful spending on health. OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266414-en
Oliver, G. (2008). Information culture: exploration of differing values and attitudes to information in organisations. Journal of Documentation, 64(3), 363-385. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810867588
Oliver, G., Cranefield, J., Lilley, S., & Lewellen, M. (2023). Data cultures: A scoping literature review. Information Research an international electronic journal, 28(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.47989/irpaper950
Oliver, G., & Foscarini, F. (2014). Records management and information culture: Tackling the people problem. Facet Publishing.
Pitafi, A. H., Albishri, N., Chotia, V., Islam, N., & Sahore, N. (2025). Transforming agility performance in enterprise information management: the impact of ESM interactivity and communication visibility. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 38(6), 1669-1691. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-01-2025-0015
Sun, Y., Fang, S., Jeyaraj, A., & Zhu, M. (2025). Mitigating perceived overload of communication visibility: the role of ESM policies. Internet Research, 35(1), 448-475. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-10-2022-0803
Widén G., & Steinerova J. (2019). Information culture. In K. Byström, J. Heinström, & I. Ruthven (Eds.) Information at work: Information management in the workplace (pp. 63-79). London: Facet.
Wynen, J., Boon, J., & van Doninck, D. (2025). Information-sharing in a turbulent public sector: Is more always better? Exploring information overload among civil servants during complex workplace changes. Public Management Review, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2025.2538784
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marie Ollerup Sall, Tove Faber Frandsen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
