Authenticity, performativity, and contextuality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31ISIC65294Keywords:
Philosophy of Information, Documentation, Agency, Exo-Authenticity, Emo-AuthenticityAbstract
Introduction. What does authenticity mean in an era of disruptive technological change, decaying public trust, and cultural contestation? In response, this philosophical investigation reframes authenticity through the lenses of performativity and contextuality.
Method. Conceptual analysis is undertaken to comparatively examine multidisciplinary definitions, implicit ontological assumptions, and emergent theoretical intersections between authenticity, performativity, and contextuality.
Analysis. Investigating authenticity through the lenses of performativity and contextuality positions the designation of authentic as an act undertaken by empowered agents to perceive, evince, or assess the cultural authority of knowledge conveyed through documents (i.e., records, events, experiences) within a co-constructed context.
Results. The synthesised documentalist view of authenticity, as a context-mediated performance, reframes the status of authentic as an intersubjective assessment of identity-relevance around and about documents, rather than as an innate or static informational quality within documents. Hence, two emergent forms of authenticity are proposed to account for the social experience and internal affect of information, respectively: Exo-Authenticity (i.e. information being authentic), and Emo-Authenticity (i.e. information feeling authentic).
Conclusion. Guiding questions about authenticity are posed to suggest future critical research directions within library and information science (LIS), emphasising epistemic vigilance toward when, where, why, and for whom concerns around authenticity matter.
References
Agarwal, N. K. (2022). Exploring context in information behavior: Seeker, situation, surroundings, and shared identities. Springer Nature.
Austin, J.L. (1963). Performative-Constative. In Charles E. Caton, Philosophy and Ordinary Language (pp. 22-54). University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Austin, J.L. (1979). TRUTH. In J.O. Urmson and G.J. Warnock (Eds.), J.L. Austin Philosophical Papers (3rd Edition) (pp. 117-133). Oxford University Press.
Baker, Z. G., Tou, R. Y., Bryan, J. L., & Knee, C. R. (2017). Authenticity and well-being: Exploring positivity and negativity in interactions as a mediator. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 235-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.018
Belhassen, Y., & Caton, K. (2006). Authenticity matters. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(3), 853-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2006.03.009
Buckland, M. (2017). Document theory. Knowledge Organization, 45(5), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-5-425
Buckland, M., & de Fremery, W. (2024). Relevance, works and context engineering. Proceedings from the Document Academy, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.35492/docam/11/2/5
Butler, J. (2010). Performative agency. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2010.494117
Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and commoditization in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 15(3), 371-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(88)90028-X
Dey, A. K. (2001). Understanding and using context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 5(1), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007790170019
De Bruyckere, P., & Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Measuring teacher authenticity: Criteria students use in their perception of teacher authenticity. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1354573. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1354573
de Fremery, W., & Buckland, M. K. (2022a). Context, relevance, and labor. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(9), 1268–1278. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24631
de Fremery, W., & Buckland, M. K. (2022b). Copy theory. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(3), 407-418. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24558
de Fremery, W., & Buckland, M. K. (2024). Relevance and creativity–a linear model. Journal of Documentation, 80(4), 882-897. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2023-0023
DeLyser, D. (1999). Authenticity on the ground: Engaging the past in a California ghost town. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89, 602–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00164
Doležel, L. (1980). Truth and authenticity in narrative. Poetics Today, 1(3), 7. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772407
Erickson, R. J. (1995). The importance of authenticity for self and society. Symbolic Interaction, 18(2), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1995.18.2.121
Furner, J. (2019). The ontology of documents, revisited. Proceedings from the Document Academy, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.35492/docam/6/1/1
Gable, E., & Handler, R. (1996). After authenticity at an American heritage site. American Anthropologist, 98(3), 568–578. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1996.98.3.02a00100
Gorichanaz, T. (2019). Conceptualizing self-documentation. Online Information Review, 43(7), 1352-1361. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2018-0129
Hauser, E. (2025). Facts in the machine: Systems of record and the performance of sociotechnical truth. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 76(2), 447-459. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24820
Hauser, E. (2023). Making-to-be: Documents, facta, and material-discursive Agency. Proceedings from the Document Academy, 10(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.35492/docam/10/2/3
Hauser, E., & Tennis, J. T. (2019). Episemantics: Aboutness as aroundness. Knowledge Organization, 46(8), 590–595. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2019-8-590
Handler, R. (1986). Authenticity. Anthropology today, 2(1), 2-4. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3032899
Hjørland, B. (2003). Arguments for epistemology in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(8), 805–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10274
Jerome, P. (2008). An introduction to authenticity in preservation. APT bulletin, 39(2/3), 3-7. https://www.apti.org/assets/docs/JeromePamela-39-2-3.pdf
Kidd, J. (2011). Performing the knowing archive: Heritage performance and authenticity. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 17(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.524003
Lee, C. A. (2011). A framework for contextual information in digital collections. Journal of Documentation, 67(1), 96–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111105470
Lee, S., Sung, B., Phau, I., & Lim, A. (2019). Communicating authenticity in packaging of Korean cosmetics. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 48, 202-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.02.011
Newman, G. E. (2019). The psychology of authenticity. Review of General Psychology, 23(1), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000158
Newman, G. E., & Smith, R. K. (2016). Kinds of authenticity. Philosophy Compass, 11(10), 609-618. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12343
MacNeil, H. M., & Mak, B. (2007). Constructions of authenticity. Library Trends, 56(1), 26-52. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.2007.0054
Modrow, S., & Youngman, T. (2023). Theorizing cultural heritage informatics as the intersection of heritage, memory, and information. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 666-671. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.836
Rubridge, S. (1995). Does authenticity matter? The case for and against authenticity in the performing arts. In P. Campbell (Ed.), Analysing performance: interpretations, issues, ideologies. (219–233). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Ruthven, I. (2021). Resonance and the experience of relevance. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(5), 554-569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24424
Ruthven, I. (2025). In search of existential authenticity: Information behaviors during a time of personal transformation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.70019
Scannell, P. (2001). Authenticity and experience. Discourse Studies, 3(4), 405-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445601003004005
Silverman, H. (2015). Heritage and authenticity. In The Palgrave handbook of contemporary heritage research (pp. 69-88). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/9781137293565_5
Slater, K. (2025). Against AI: Critical refusal in the library. Library Trends, 73(4), 588-608. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/968497
Starr, S. S. (2008). Authenticity: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum, 43(2), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2008.00096.x
Tarski, A. (1944). Semantic conception of truth. Philosophy and phenomenological research 4(1944). https://doi.org/10.2307/2102968
Tatsuki, D. (2006). What is authenticity. The language teacher, 16(5), 17-21. https://pansig.org/publications/pansig/2006/HTML/Tatsuki.htm
Taylor, H. A. (1995). “Heritage” revisited: Documents as artifacts in the context of museums and material culture. Archivaria, 8–19. https://www.archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12094
The NARA document on authenticity (1994). Retrieved from https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/publications/2020-05/convern8_06_thenaradocu_ing.pdf
Tou, R. Y., Baker, Z. G., Hadden, B. W., & Lin, Y. C. (2015). The real me: Authenticity, interpersonal goals, and conflict tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 189-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.033
Urry, J. (1995). How societies remember the past. The Sociological Review, 43(1_suppl), 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1995.tb03424.x
Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). What is authenticity?. Discourse Studies, 3(4), 392-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445601003004003
Wagner, T. L., & Blewer, A. (2019). “The word real is no longer real”: Deepfakes, gender, and the challenges of ai-altered video. Open Information Science, 3(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2019-0003
Youngman, T., Modrow, S., Smith, M., & Patin, B. (2022). Epistemicide on the record: Theorizing commemorative injustice and reimagining interdisciplinary discourses in cultural information studies. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 358-367. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.759
Youngman, T., Appedu, S., Tacheva, Z., & Patin, B. (2023). Flashing the hazard lights: Interrogating discourses of disruptive algorithmic technologies in LIS education. In Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference, 2023. https://doi.org/10.21900/j.alise.2023.1327
Youngman, T., & Patin, B. (2024). Fallacy as foundation of post-truth knowledge and knowing in LIS. In Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference. https://doi.org/10.21900/j.alise.2024.1696
Youngman, T. D. (2025). The monumental challenges of pastmaking [Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University]. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/2133/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tyler Youngman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
