Information literacy behind bars: inmates’ information experience during prison rehabilitation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31365394

Keywords:

Information literacy, Relational perspective, Prison rehabilitation, Inmates, Correctional facility

Abstract

Introduction. This study investigates inmates’ information literacy experiences during prison rehabilitation from a relational perspective. It examines how inmates encounter, interpret, evaluate and share information within a correctional facility where information access is restricted and social interaction is institutionally regulated.

Method. This study used an interpretive qualitative design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve inmates participating in rehabilitation programmes in a correctional facility in Central Java, Indonesia.

Analysis. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Coding focused on participants’ accounts of meaning, trust, agency, emotion, responsibility and constraint. Relational information literacy was used as an interpretive lens to explore how information practices were shaped by the prison environment.

Results. Five themes were identified: information as moral and existential re-orientation; learning whom to trust in a constrained information environment; agency through discipline, selectivity and compliance; emotional and embodied labour; and ethical circulation and responsibility.

Conclusion. Information literacy in prison is not limited to accessing or using information sources. It is experienced as a relational, moral, emotional and ethical practice through which inmates navigate constraint, assess trust, regulate action, and participate in rehabilitation.

References

Adi, H. S., Heriyanto, Masrek, M. N., & Falah, F. (2025). Information privilege and ethical use of information: A study of undergraduate students from an information literacy perspective. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103095

Akin, G. (2023). Learning behind the bars: Implications for “learning-for-development.” Journal of Learning for Development, 10(2), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v10i2.677

Badke, W. (2010). Foundations of information literacy: Learning from Paul Zurkowski. Online, 34(1), 48–55. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293703989

Basuki, L., Nahar, S., & Arsyad, J. (2025). Islamic religious guidance and moral transformation: A study of prison rehabilitation in North Sumatera. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 14(4), 1053–1066. https://jurnal.staialhidayahbogor.ac.id/index.php/ei/article/view/9104

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004

Bruce, C. S. (1997). The seven faces of information literacy. Auslib Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239229387

Bruce, C. S. (2008). Informed learning. Association of College and Research Libraries. https://alastore.ala.org/content/informed-learning (Archived by the Internet Archive at https://archive.ph/l3oVe.)

Canning, C., & Buchanan, S. (2019). The information behaviours of maximum security prisoners: Insights into self-protective behaviours and unmet needs. Journal of Documentation, 75(2), 417–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2018-0085

Chandani, J. G., & Wa, W. (2020). Study of information literacy skills behind the prison wall in Sri Lanka. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 67(3), 131–137. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345672696

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Demasson, A., Partridge, H., & Bruce, C. (2016). Information literacy and the serious leisure participant: Variation in the experience of using information to learn. Information Research, 21(2), 1–17. http://www.informationr.net/ir/21-2/paper711.html (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6hn0cSj5s)

Doyle, C. S. (1992). Outcome measures for information literacy within the National Education Goals of 1990. Final report to National Forum on information literacy. Summary of findings. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED351033.pdf

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Heriyanto, Christiani, L., & Rukiyah. (2022). Lecturers’ information literacy experience in remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS ONE, 17(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259954

Hoonaard, W., Becker, H., & Blumer, H. (2008). Sensitizing concepts. In L. M. Given (Ed.). (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vol. 2 pp.812-814). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n422

Limberg, L., Sundin, O., & Talja, S. (2012). Three theoretical perspectives on information literacy. HUMAN IT, 11(2), 93–130. https://humanit.hb.se/article/download/69/51

Quinlan, M. M. (2017). Interpretive research. In J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1–2). Wiley-Blackwell https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0122

Sayyad Abdi, E., Partridge, H., Bruce, C., & Watson, J. (2024). Understanding the information literacy experiences of Australia’s humanitarian migrants. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 56(4), 950–964. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006231180320

Yates, C., & Partridge, H. (2014). Exploring information literacy during a natural disaster: The 2011 Brisbane flood. Library and Information Science, 10, 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1876-056220140000010006

Downloads

Published

2026-10-15

How to Cite

Ashifa, I. N., & Heriyanto. (2026). Information literacy behind bars: inmates’ information experience during prison rehabilitation. Information Research an International Electronic Journal, 31(3), 426–444. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31365394

Issue

Section

Peer-reviewed papers