Commending a freedman
Virtues and masculinities in the recommendation letters of Cicero and Pliny the Younger
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30549/opathrom-14-18Keywords:
Roman freedmen, Pliny the Younger, Cicero, virtues, gender, hegemonic masculinity, recommendation lettersAbstract
This article explores Roman freedmen’s masculine positions expressed as virtues, qualities, and ideals in the recommendation letters of Cicero and Pliny the Younger. It discusses whether there were specific freedman virtues, qualities, and ideals and what consequences their existence or absence had for freedmen’s constructions of masculinity. A critical close reading of the texts is applied, combined with theories of masculinity, where hegemonic masculinity is a key concept. It is concluded that there were no virtues or qualities that were specific or exclusive to freedmen. A distinct set of virtues for freedmen did not exist in Late Republican and Early Imperial Rome, since much the same behaviour and qualities are seen as manly and desirable for freedmen as for freeborn male citizens of high birth. However, freedmen cannot comply with the hegemonic masculinity in full, since they cannot embody the Roman masculine ideal of the vir bonus and cannot be associated with the Roman cardinal virtue virtus, which was central in the construction of masculinity in the Roman world. This illustrates the complex Roman gender discourse and, on the whole, the social complexity of Roman society.
Downloads
References
Alston, R. 1998. ‘Arms and the man. Soldiers, masculinity and power in Republican and Imperial Rome’, in When men were men. Masculinity, power and identity in Classical antiquity, eds. L. Foxhall & J. Salmon, London & New York, 205–223. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203759417-18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203759417-18
Barrow, R.J. 2018. Gender, identity and the body in Greek and Roman sculpture, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139600439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139600439
Bartsch, S. 2006. The mirror of the self. Sexuality, self-knowledge, and the gaze in the Early Roman Empire, Chicago. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226377308.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226377308.001.0001
Blänsdorf, J. 2001. ‘Zum Thema der Sklaverei in Ciceros Briefen’, in Fünfzig Jahre Forschungen zur antiken Sklaverei an der Mainzer Akademie 1950–2000, eds. H. Bellen & H. Heinen, Stuttgart, 447–456.
Borg, B.E. 2012. ‘The face of the social climber. Roman freedmen and elite ideology’, in Free at last. The impact of freed slaves on the Roman Empire, eds. S. Bell & T. Ramsby, London & New York, 25–49. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472555687.ch-001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472555687.ch-001
Bradley, K. 1984. Slaves and masters in the Roman Empire. A study in social control, Brussels.
Bradley, K. 1994. Slavery and society at Rome, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815386
Clarke, J.R. 2003. Art in the lives of ordinary Romans. Visual representation and non-elite viewers in Italy, 100 B.C.–A.D. 315, Berkeley.
Connell, R.W. 1987. Gender and power, Cambridge.
Connell, R.W. 1995. Masculinities, Berkeley & Los Angeles.
Connell, R.W. & J.W. Messerschmidt 2005. ‘Hegemonic masculinity. Rethinking the concept’, Gender and Society 19:4, 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639
Connolly, J. 1998. ‘Mastering corruption. Constructions of identity in Roman oratory’, in Women and slaves in Greco-Roman culture. Differential equations, eds. S.R. Joshel & S. Murnaghan, London & New York, 130–151. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203983164-13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203983164-13
Connolly, J. 2007. ‘Virile tongues. Rhetoric and masculinity’, in A companion to Roman rhetoric, eds. W. Dominik & J. Hall, Malden, Massachusetts, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996485.ch7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996485.ch7
Corbeill, A. 1997. ‘Dining deviants in Roman political invective’, in Roman sexualities, eds. J.P. Hallett & M.B. Skinner, Princeton, 99–128. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv15r57dd.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691219547-006
Cotton, H. 1986. ‘The role of Cicero’s letters of recommendation: Iustitia versus gratia?’, Hermes 114, 443–460.
Cugusi, P. 1983. Evoluzione e forme dell’epistolografia Latina nella tarda repubblica e nei primi due secoli dell’impero con cenni sull’epistolografia preciceroniana, Rome.
D’Arms, J.H. 1981. Commerce and social standing in ancient Rome, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674331198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674331198
Davenport, C. 2019. A history of the Roman equestrian order, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139506403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139506403
Demetriou, D.Z. 2001. ‘Connell’s concept of masculinity. A critique’, Theory and Society 30, 337–361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017596718715
Deniaux, E. 1993. Clientèles et pouvoir à l’époque de Cicéron (CÉFR, 182), Paris & Rome.
Deslauriers, M. 2003. ‘Aristotle on andreia, divine and sub-human virtues’, in Andreia. Studies in manliness and courage in Classical antiquity, eds. R.M. Rosen & I. Sluiter, Leiden & Boston, 187–211. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047400738_011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047400738_011
Dover, K.J. 1978. Greek homosexuality, London.
Duff, A.M. 1928. Freedmen in the Early Roman Empire, Oxford.
Edwards, C. 1993. The politics of immorality in ancient Rome, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511518553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511518553
Edwards, C. 1997. ‘Unspeakable professions. Public performance and prostitution in ancient Rome’, in Roman sexualities, eds. J.P. Hallett & M.B. Skinner, Princeton, 66–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv15r57dd.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691219547-005
Edwards, C. 2007. Death in ancient Rome, New Haven & London.
Edwards, C. 2019. Seneca. Selected letters, Cambridge.
Fabre, G. 1981. Libertus. Recherches sur les rapports patron-affranchi à la fin de la république romaine (CÉFR, 50), Rome.
Flohr, M. 2017. ‘Constructing occupational identities in the Roman world’, in Work, labour, and professions in the Roman world, eds. K. Verboven & C. Laes, Leiden & Boston, 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004331686_009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004331686_009
Foucault, M. 1985. The history of sexuality 2. The use of pleasure, transl. R. Hurley, New York.
Foxhall, L. 2013. Studying gender in Classical antiquity, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511980084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980084
Foxhall, L. & J. Salmon, eds. 1998a. Thinking men. Masculinity and its self-representation in the Classical tradition, London & New York.
Foxhall, L. & J. Salmon, eds. 1998b. When men were men. Masculinity, power and identity in Classical antiquity, London & New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203759417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203759417
Fredrick, D. 2002. ‘Mapping penetrability in Late Republican and Early Imperial Rome’, in The Roman gaze. Vision, power, and the body, ed. D. Fredrick, Baltimore & London, 236–264.
Gamberini, F. 1983. Stylistic theory and practice in the younger Pliny, Hildesheim.
Garnsey, P. 1980. ‘Non-slave labour in the Roman world’, in Non-slave labour in the Greco-Roman world, ed. P. Garnsey, Cambridge, 34–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1r07g4w.9
George, M. 2006. ‘Social identity and the dignity of work in freedmen’s reliefs’, in The art of citizens, soldiers and freedmen in the Roman world (BAR-IS, 1526), eds. E. D’Ambra & G.P.R. Metraux, Oxford, 19–29.
Gleason, M.W. 1995. Making men. Sophists and self-presentation in ancient Rome, Princeton. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36zpx4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187570
Gonzalès, A. 2003. Pline le Jeune. Esclaves et affrancis à Rome. Index thématique des références à l’esclavage et à la dépendance 9, Paris. https://doi.org/10.3406/ista.2003.2600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/ista.2003.2600
Green, F.M. 2015. ‘Witnesses and participants in the shadows. The sexual lives of enslaved women and boys’, Helios 42:1, 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1353/hel.2015.0009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hel.2015.0009
Griffin, B. 2018. ‘Hegemonic masculinity as a historical problem’, Gender & History 30:2, 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.12363 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.12363
Gunderson, E. 2000. Staging masculinity. The rhetoric of performance in the Roman world, Ann Arbor. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23054
Hagelin, L. 2010. Imperial freedmen and Roman society. A study on the social standing of imperial freedmen as expressed in literary and epigraphic sources in the Early Roman Empire, Ph.D. thesis, Uppsala University.
Hagelin, L. 2019. ‘Roman freedmen and virtus. Constructing masculinity in the public sphere’, in Family lives. Aspects of life and death in ancient families (Acta Hyperborea, 15), eds. K.B. Johannsen & J. Hjarl Petersen, Copenhagen, 191–205.
Hagelin, L. 2020. ‘Homo inter homines sum. The importance of age for freedmen’s construction of masculinity in Late Republican and Early Imperial Rome’, Eugesta. Journal of Gender Studies in Antiquity 10, 117–143. https://eugesta-revue.univ-lille.fr/en/issues/issue-10-2020/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.54563/eugesta.226
Hall, S. 20132. ‘The spectacle of the other’, in Representation, eds. S. Hall, J. Evans & S. Nixon, London, 215–271.
Halperin, D.M. 1990. One hundred years of homosexuality and other essays on Greek love, London & New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203430583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203430583
Harlow, M. 2004. ‘Clothes maketh the man. Power dressing and elite masculinity in the later Roman world’, in Gender in the early medieval world. East and West, 300–900, eds. L. Brubaker & J.M.H. Smith, Cambridge, 44–69.
Hellegouarc’h, J. 1963. Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la république, Paris.
Hemelrijk, E.A. 2004. ‘Masculinity and femininity in the Laudatio Turiae’, CQ 54:1, 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/cq/54.1.185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cq/54.1.185
Hutchinson, G.O. 1998. Cicero’s correspondence. A literary study, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198150664.001.0001
Huttunen, P. 1974. The social strata in the Imperial city of Rome. A quantitative study of the social representation in the epitaphs published in the Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum VI, Oulu.
Joshel, S. 1992. Work, identity and legal status at Rome. A study of the occupational inscriptions, London.
Kamen, D. & S. Levin-Richardson 2014. ‘Revisiting Roman sexuality. Agency and the conceptualization of penetrated males’, in Sex in antiquity. Exploring gender and sexuality in the ancient world, eds. M. Masterson, N. Sorkin Rabinowitz & J. Robson, London & New York, 449–460.
Kampen, N.B. 1981. Image and status. Roman working women in Ostia, Berlin.
Kimmel, M.S. 1990. ‘After fifteen years. The impact of the sociology of masculinity on the masculinity of sociology’, in Men, masculinities and social theory, eds. J. Hearn & D. Morgan, London, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315762272-16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315762272-16
Kimmel, M.S. 1994. ‘Masculinity as homophobia. Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity’, in Theorizing masculinities, eds. H. Brod & M. Kaufman, London, 119–141. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243627.n7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243627.n7
Kinsey, T.E. 1971. M. Tulli Ciceronis Pro P. Quinctio Oratio, Sydney.
Laird, M. 2006. ‘Private memory and public interest. Municipal identity in Imperial Italy’, in The art of citizens, soldiers and freedmen in the Roman world, eds. E. D’Ambra & G.P.R. Metraux (BAR-IS, 1526), Oxford, 31–43.
Leach, E.W. 2006. ‘Freedmen and immortality in the tomb of the Haterii’, in The art of citizens, soldiers and freedmen in the Roman world, eds. E. D’Ambra & G.P.R. Metraux (BAR-IS, 1526), Oxford, 1–18.
Lendon, J.E. 1997. Empire of honour. The art of government in the Roman world, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198150794.001.0001
Lloyd, G. 1984. Man of reason. ‘Male’ and ‘female’ in Western philosophy, London.
MacLean, R. 2018. Freed slaves and Roman Imperial culture. Social integration and the transformation of values, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316534144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316534144
Marchesi, I. 2005. ‘Traces of a freed language. Horace, Petronius and the rhetoric of fable’, ClAnt 24:2, 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1525/ca.2005.24.2.307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/ca.2005.24.2.307
McDonnell, M. 2003. ‘Roman men and Greek virtue’, in Andreia. Studies in manliness and courage in Classical antiquity, eds. R.M. Rosen & I. Sluiter, Leiden & Boston, 235–261. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047400738_013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047400738_013
McDonnell, M. 2006. Roman manliness. Virtus and the Roman Republic, Cambridge.
Meiggs, R. 1960. Roman Ostia, Oxford.
Messerschmidt, J.W. 2012. ‘Engendering gendered knowledge. Assessing the academic appropriation of hegemonic masculinity’, Men and Masculinities 15:1, 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184x11428384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X11428384
Messerschmidt, J.W. 2018. Hegemonic masculinity. Formulation, reformulation and amplification, Lanham.
Mouritsen, H. 2011. The freedman in the Roman world, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975639
Mouritsen, H. 2013. ‘Slavery and manumission in the Roman elite. A study of the columbaria of the Volusii and the Statilii’, in Roman slavery and material culture, ed. M. George, London, 43–68. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442660991-004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442660991-004
Nelsestuen, G.A. 2014. ‘Overseeing res publica. The rector as vilicus in De Re Publica 5’, ClAnt 33:1, 130–173. https://doi.org/10.1525/ca.2014.33.1.130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/CA.2014.33.1.130
Olson, K. 2014. ‘Masculinity, appearance, and sexuality. Dandies in Roman antiquity’, Journal of the History of Sexuality 23:2, 182–205. https://doi.org/10.7560/jhs23202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7560/JHS23202
Olson, K. 2017. Masculinity and dress in Roman antiquity, London & New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315678887 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315678887
Parker, H.N. 1997. ‘The teratogenic grid’, in Roman sexualities, eds. J.P. Hallett & M.B. Skinner, Princeton, 47–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv15r57dd.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691219547-004
Pavis d’Escurac, H. 1992. ‘Pline le Jeune et les lettres de recommendation’, in La mobilité sociale dans le monde romain, ed. E. Frézouls, Strasbourg, 55–69.
Petersen, A. 1998. Unmasking the masculine. Men and identity in a sceptical age, London.
Petersen, L.H. 2006. The freedman in Roman art and art history, Cambridge.
Richlin, A. 1983. The garden of Priapus. Sexuality and aggression in Roman humor, New Haven & London.
Richlin, A. 1991. ‘Zeus and Metis. Foucault, feminism, classics’, Helios 18, 160–180.
Richlin, A. 1993. ‘Not before homosexuality. The materiality of the cinaedus and the Roman law against love between men’, Journal of the History of Sexuality 3:4, 523–573.
Richlin, A. 1997a. ‘Gender and rhetoric. Producing manhood in the schools’, in Roman eloquence. Rhetoric in society and literature, ed. W.J. Dominik, London & New York, 90–110.
Richlin, A. 1997b. ‘Towards a history of body history’, in Inventing ancient culture. Historicism, periodization, and the ancient world, eds. M. Golden & P. Toohey, London & New York, 16–35.
Roda, S. 1986. ‘Polifunzionalità della lettera commendaticia: teoria e prassi nell’epistolario Simmachiano’, in Colloque Genevois sur Symmaque à l’occasion du mille six centième anniversaire du conflit de l’autel de la Victoire, ed. F. Paschoud, Paris.
Saller, R.P. 1982. Personal patronage under the Early Empire, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511583612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511583612
Santoro L’Hoir, F. 1992. The rhetoric of gender terms. ‘Man’, ‘woman’, and the portrayal of character in Latin prose (Mnemosyne suppl., 120), Leiden. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004329164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004329164_009
Shackleton Bailey, D.R. 1999. Cicero. Letters to Atticus (Loeb Classical Library, 7), Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.4159/dlcl.marcus_tullius_cicero-letters_atticus.1999 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-letters_atticus.1999
Sherwin-White, A.N. 1966. The letters of Pliny. A historical and social commentary, Oxford.
Skinner, M.B. 1979. ‘Parasites and strange bedfellows. A study in Catullus’ political imagery’, Ramus 8:2, 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0048671x00003891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048671X00003891
Skinner, M.B. 1997. ‘Introduction. Quod multo fit aliter in Graecia…’, in Roman sexualities, eds. J.P. Hallett & M.B. Skinner, Princeton, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv15r57dd.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv15r57dd.4
Stewart, M.E. 2016. The soldier’s life. Martial virtues and manly romanitas in the Early Byzantine Empire, Leeds.
Thraede, K. 1970. Grundzüge griechisch-römischer Brieftopik (Zetemata, 48), Munich.
Treggiari, S. 1969. Roman freedmen during the Late Republic, Oxford.
Treggiari, S. 1980. ‘Urban labour in Rome. Mercennarii and tabernarii’, in Non-slave labour in the Greco-Roman world, ed. P. Garnsey, Cambridge, 48–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1r07g4w.10
Verboven, K. 2012. ‘The freedman economy of Roman Italy’, in Free at last. The impact of freed slaves on the Roman Empire, eds. S. Bell & T. Ramsby, London & New York, 88–109. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472555687.ch-004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472555687.ch-004
Vermote, K. 2016, ‘The macula servitutis of Roman freedmen. Neque enim aboletur turpitudo, quae postea intermissa est?’, RBPhil 94:1, 131–164. https://doi.org/10.3406/rbph.2016.8877 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/rbph.2016.8877
Vout, C. 2007. Power and eroticism in Imperial Rome, Cambridge.
Walters, J. 1993. ‘No more than a boy. The shifting construction of masculinity from ancient Greece to the Middle Ages’, Gender & History 5:1, 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0424.1993.tb00161.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0424.1993.tb00161.x
Walters, J. 1997. ‘Invading the Roman body. Manliness and impenetrability in Roman thought’, in Roman sexualities, eds. J.P. Hallett & M.B. Skinner, Princeton, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv15r57dd.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691219547-003
Walters, J. 1998. ‘Making a spectacle. Deviant men, invective, and pleasure’, Arethusa 31:3, 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1353/are.1998.0019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/are.1998.0019
Watson, A. 1987. Roman slave law, Baltimore.
White, P. 2018. ‘Senatorial epistolography from Cicero to Sidonius. Emergence of a genre’, BICS 61:2, 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-5370.12078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-5370.12078
Whitehead, S. 2002. Men and masculinities. Key themes and new directions, Cambridge.
Whitehead, S. 2007. ‘Manhood’, in International encyclopedia of men and masculinities, eds. M. Flood, J.K. Gardiner, B. Pease & K. Pringle, London & New York, 380.
Williams, C.A. 20102. Roman homosexuality, Oxford.
Williams, C.A. 2014. ‘The language of gender. Lexical semantics and the Latin vocabulary of unmanly men’, in Sex in antiquity. Exploring gender and sexuality in the ancient world, eds. M. Masterson, N. Sorkin Rabinowitz & J. Robson, London, 461–481.
Williams, W.G. 1965. Cicero. The letters to his friends (Loeb Classical Library), Cambridge.
Williams, W. 1990. Correspondence with Trajan from Bithynia (Epistles X), Warminster. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1228hd6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1228hd6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Swedish Institutes at Athens and Rome, and the authors.Volumes 16–18 (2023–2025): All text is published with immediate open access under the Creative Commons license CC BY 4.0. All images are used with permission from the rights holders, credited in the captions, and explicitly excluded from the CC BY license.
Copyright: Swedish Institutes at Athens and Rome, and the authors.
Volumes 1–15 (2008–2022): These issues were made openly available as PDFs six months after the printed edition was published. No Creative Commons license applies to these volumes.
Copyright: Swedish Institutes at Athens and Rome, and the authors.
