Use of Administrative Data for Management and Development of Norwegian Child Welfare Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.57067Keywords:
administrative data, child welfare services, municipal differences, service quality improvement, NorwayAbstract
This study explores the utilization of administrative data by child welfare managers across various municipalities in Norway, focusing on the types of data used, methodologies employed, and the perceived strengths and weaknesses of these practices. A qualitative interview study was conducted with 16 leaders from eight different municipalities. Participants included chief municipal executives, heads of health and social services, and Child Welfare Services (CWS) managers. Data collection involved semi-structured interviews focusing on the management and use of administrative data in CWS. Thematic analysis was employed to identify key themes related to data use and its impact on services. The study found diverse practices in the use of administrative data, with variations influenced by municipal size and resources. Larger municipalities tended to use data for strategic planning and quality improvement, while smaller municipalities focused on operational management and compliance. Strengths of data usage included enhanced monitoring, user-centred approaches, and systematic quality improvements. The findings highlight the potential of administrative data to improve CWS but underscore the need for better data management practices and capabilities, particularly in smaller municipalities. Enhancing data integration, investing in data quality, and developing targeted training programs for data analysis could improve the effectiveness of data-driven practices.
Downloads
References
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
Barne-, ungdoms- og familiedirektoratet. (2017). Operativ ledelse i barnevernet: Beskrivelse av krav og forventninger. Barne-, ungdoms- og familiedirektoratet. URL https://bibliotek.bufdir.no/BUF/101/Operativ_ledelse_i_barnevernet.pdf
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Child Welfare Act. (2021). Lov om barnevern (barnevernsloven). https://lovdata.no
Child Welfare Panel. (2011). Barnevernspanelets rapport. Ministry of Children and Families. https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/bld/barnevern/2011/barnevernpanelets_rapport.pdf
Davey, C., Hart, D., La Valle, I., et al. (2022). Evaluation of the effectiveness of local authority support on sector improvement. University of Sussex. https://hdl.handle.net/10779/uos.23309027.v1
Djupvik, A. R., Pithouse, A., Myklebust, V., Rees, A., Ekeland, T.-J., & Brookfield, C. (2019). New public management and practitioner autonomy in children’s services in Norway and Wales. European Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2019.1693338
Ebsen, F. (2018). Decision-making in social work. Nordic Social Work Research, 8(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2018.1426547
English, D. J., Brandford, C. C., & Coghlan, L. (2000). Data-based organizational change: The use of administrative data to improve child welfare programs and policy. Child Welfare, 499–515. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45400232
Fluke, J. D., Edwards, M., Kutzler, P., Kuna, J., & Tooman, G. (2000). Safety, permanency, and in-home services: Applying administrative data. Child Welfare, 573–595. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45400236
Fluke, J. D., López, M. L., Benbenishty, R., Knorth, E. J., & Baumann, D. J. (Eds.). (2020). Decision-making and judgment in child welfare and protection. Oxford University Press.
Gotvassli, K. A., & Moe, T. (2019). Bridging the gap: The role of leadership in professional judgement in child protection services. Nordic Social Work Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2019.1694057
Heisig, P. (2009). Harmonization of knowledge management—Comparing 160 KM frameworks around the globe. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(4), 4–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910971798
Hill, S. (2025). What does knowledge management in public administrations look like in practice? Development of KM criteria on the basis of case study reviews (Discussion Paper No. 93). Deutsches Forschungsinstitut für öffentliche Verwaltung.
Hislop, D., Bosua, R., & Helms, R. (2018). Knowledge management in organizations (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Huerta-Chávez, I. A., & Figueroa-Ochoa, E. B. (2023). Knowledge management in the public sector. Journal of Public Economy, 7, 28–45. https://doi.org/10.35429/JPE.2023.12.7.28.45
Hyslop, I. (2018). Neoliberalism and social work identity. European Journal of Social Work, 21(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1255927
Jud, A., Neelakantan, L., Rajter, M. et al. The Nature and Scope of Reported Child Maltreatment in Euro-CAN Countries: Current Evidence and Future Opportunities. Int. Journal on Child Malt. 7, 387–408 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-024-00194-z
Kassa, G. M., & Ning, Y. (2023). Roles of knowledge management in public sectors. Heliyon, 9(9), e19501.
Klausen, K. K. (2020). Verden vendt på hovedet: Decentralt offentligt lederskab. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
Laihonen, H., Kork, A. A., & Sinervo, L. M. (2024). Advancing public sector knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 22(3), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2023.2187719
Ministry of Children and Families. (2021). Prop. 133 L (2020–2021). https://www.regjeringen.no
Moe, T., & Gotvassli, K. A. (2023). Ledelse og utvikling av barnevernet som lærende organisasjon. In T. Moe & Ø. Kvello (Eds.), Barnevernledelse for framtiden (pp. 226–227). Fagbokforlaget.
Munro, E. (2010). The Munro Review of Child Protection: Part one. Department for Education.
Munro, E. (2011). The Munro Review of Child Protection: Final report. Department for Education.
Newell, S. (2015). Managing knowledge and managing knowledge work. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.12
Noordegraaf, M. (2016). Reconfiguring professional work. Administration & Society, 48(7), 783–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713509242
NOU 2023:7. (2023). Trygg barndom, sikker fremtid. https://www.regjeringen.no
O'Leary, D. & Lyons, O. (2023) Exploring the potential of administrative data for understanding and advancing child protection and family support policy, practice and research in Ireland, Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies: Vol. 22: Iss. 1, Article 5.
https://doi.org/10.21427/HNQJ-BA69
Olsvik, B. S., & Saus, M. (2022). Lederskjønnets utfordringer i kommunalt barnevern. Tidsskriftet Norges Barnevern, 99(4), 220–240. https://doi.org/10.18261/tnb.99.4.5
Olsvik, B. S., & Solstad, E. (2024). Leadership of child welfare managers in Norway. Child Care in Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2024.2351365
Pedersen, S., et al. (2022). Evaluering av barnevernsreformen. Menon Economics.
Raudla, R., Mohr, Z., & Douglas, J. W. (2023). Which managerial reforms facilitate public sector innovation? Public Administration, 102(2), 771–788. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12951
Reiter, R., & Klenk, T. (2018). The manifold meanings of ‘Post-New Public Management’- a systematic review. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318759736
Sanders, R., Jackson, S., & Thomas, N. (1996). The balance of prevention, investigation, and treatment in the management of child protection services. Child abuse & neglect, 20(10), 899–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(96)00079-8
Shanks, E., Lundström, T., & Wiklund, S. (2015). Middle managers in social work: Professional Identity and Management in a Marketised Welfare State. British Journal of Social Work, 45(6), 1871–1887. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu061
Shlonsky, A., & Mildon, R. (2017). Assessment and decision making to improve outcomes in child protection. Beyond the risk paradigm in child protection. London: Palgrave, 111-129.
Statistics Norway. (2024). Child welfare statistics. https://www.ssb.no
Tellesbø, O., Meland, E., & Jullum, H. (2024). Etter EMD-dommene. Tidsskrift for familierett, 22(4), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.18261/fab.22.4.3
Statens helsetilsyn. (2022). Oppsummering av landsomfattende tilsyn med barnevernets arbeid med undersøkelser 2020–2021: Det handler om ledelse (Rapport 2/2022). Statens helsetilsyn. https://www.helsetilsynet.no/publikasjoner/rapport-fra-helsetilsynet/2022/oppsummering-av-landsomfattende-tilsyn-med-barnevernets-arbeid-med-undersokelser-20202021-det-handler-om-ledelse/
Trocmé, N., Esposito, T., Fallon, B., Chabot, M., & Delaye, A. (2019). Building research capacity in child welfare in Canada: Advantages and challenges in working with administrative data. In Re-visioning public health approaches for protecting children (pp. 433-454). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Tham, P. & Strömberg, A. (2020). The iron cage of leadership—The role of first-line managers in child welfare. The British Journal of Social Work, 50(2), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz156
Vargas, M., & García, L. G. (2025). Public knowledge management: Myth or sustainable innovation? Journal of Management and Human Resources, 3(2), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16750065
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Svein Arild Vis, Torill Moe, Bodil Olsvik, Heidi Linnerud, Gro Sannes, Erik Skjeggestad, Marina Snipsøyr Sletten, Tone Strømolt

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration agree to publish their articles under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This means means articles are free for anybody to read and download, and to copy and disseminate for non-commercial purposes as long as appropriate credit is given, a link is provided to the license, and any changes made are clearly indicated. Authors retain copyright of their work.



