Why, how, and with what payoff? A critical review of cultural-historical activity theory in work-integrated learning research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64775/ciwil.2026.63573Keywords:
Work-integrated learning, cultural-historical activity theory, contradictionsAbstract
Cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT) has been used extensively in research on learning in workplaces but less so in the related field of work-integrated learning (WIL). The aim of this article is to examine how CHAT is currently used in WIL research and so to address its current use and potential for this field. The research broadly followed a semi-systematic review method to locate 27 articles which examined WIL through a CHAT approach. This critical review examines each article through the lenses of why and how authors have utilized the CHAT methodology. Most selected articles highlight CHAT’s usefulness as providing a systemic, multi-voiced analytic tool which highlights, through identifying tensions and contradictions within the system, impediments and enablements to successful WIL practice. The study concludes that CHAT is well suited to examine the situated and sometimes problematic nature of WIL. However, the authors suggest that more attention could be paid to contradiction analysis and formative interventions, in particular through how they may promote a more critical WIL, in order to gain maximum benefit from the theory.
References
Ajjawi, R., Rees, C., & Monrouxe, L.V. (2015). Learning clinical skills during bedside teaching encounters in general practice: a video-observational study with insights from activity theory. Journal of Workplace Learning, 27(4), 298-314. https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-05-2014-0035
Algers, A., Lindström, B., & Svensson, L. (2016). Work-based learning through negotiated projects–exploring learning at the boundary. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 6(1), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-01-2015-0003
Bal, A. (2016). From intervention to innovation: A cultural-historical approach to the racialization of school discipline. Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education,47(4), 409-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-016-9280-z
Barnett, R. (2004). The purposes of higher education and the changing face of academia. London Review of Education, 2(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1474846042000177483
Bligh, B., & Flood, M. (2015). The change laboratory in higher education: Research-intervention using activity theory. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (pp. 141-168). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2056-375220150000001007
Bligh, B., & Flood, M. (2017). Activity theory in empirical higher education research: choices, uses and values. Tertiary Education and Management, 23, 125-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1284258
Blomsø, S.Ø., Jakhelln, R.E., & Postholm, M.B. (2023). Student teachers’ experience of participating in a research and development project in Norway. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1100336. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1100336
Brown, A., & Diale, B.M. (2017). "You should wear to show what you are": same-sex sexuality student teachers troubling the heteronormative professional identity. Gender Questions, 5(1),1-19. https://doi.org/10.25159/2412-8457/2986
Chye, S., Zhou, M., Koh, C., & Liu, W.C. (2019). Using e-portfolios to facilitate reflection: Insights from an activity theoretical analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.002
Coldham, S., (2011). CETL for Professional Learning from the Workplace: Using activity theory to facilitate curriculum development. Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning, 1(3), 262-272. https://doi.org/10.1108/20423891111179650
Dang, T.K.A. (2017). Exploring contextual factors shaping teacher collaborative learning in a paired-placement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 316-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.008
Daniels, H., Cole, M. & Wertsch, J.V. (2007). Introduction. In Daniels, H., Cole, M. & Wertsch, J.V. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 1-17). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/ccol0521831040
de Feijter, J.M., de Grave, W.S., Dornan, T., Koopmans, R.P., & Scherpbier, A.J. (2011). Students’ perceptions of patient safety during the transition from undergraduate to postgraduate training: an activity theory analysis. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16, 347-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9266-z
Dinh, H. & Sannino, A. (2024). Toward a Diagnostic Toolkit for Intervention in Teachers' Agency During Curriculum Reform: Groundwork for a Change Laboratory in Vietnam. Teaching and Teacher Education 140, 104494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104494
Douglas, A.S. (2012). Creating expansive learning opportunities in schools: the role of school leaders in initial teacher education partnerships. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.633994
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp.19-37). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511812774.003
Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511619847
Engeström, Y., Rantavuori, J. & Kerosuo, H. (2013). Expansive Learning in a Library: Actions, Cycles and Deviations from Instructional Intentions. Vocations and Learning, 6, 81–106.
Engeström, Y., (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity Theoretical Reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316225363.008
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of organizational change management, 24(3), 368-387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111132758
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2021). From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 28(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328
Evans, N., Menaca, A., Andrew, E., Koffman, J., & Harding, R. (2012). Systematic review of the primary research on minority ethnic groups and EOL care in the UK. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 43(2), pp. 261–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.012.
Ferns, S. J., Zegwaard, K. E., Pretti, T. J., & Rowe, A. D. (2025). Defining and designing work-integrated learning curriculum. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(2), 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2399072
Fleming, J., & Zegwaard, K. E. (2018). Methodologies, methods and ethical considerations for conducting research in work-integrated learning. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 19(3), 205-213.
Gillespie, H., McCrystal, E., Reid, H., Conn, R., Kennedy, N., & Dornan, T. (2021). The pen is mightier than the sword. Reinstating patient care as the object of prescribing education. Medical teacher, 43(1), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1795103
Helgevold, N., Næsheim-Bjørkvik, G. & Østrem, S., (2015). Key focus areas and use of tools in mentoring conversations during internship in initial teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 128-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.03.005
Henning, E., Petker, G. & Petersen, N., (2015). University-affiliated schools as sites for research learning in pre-service teacher education. South African Journal of Education, 35(1),1-8. https://doi.org/10.15700/201503070014
Khampirat, B. & McRae, N. (2016). Developing global standards framework and quality integrated models for cooperative and work-integrated education programs. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 17(4), 349-362.
Larsen, D.P., Wesevich, A., Lichtenfeld, J., Artino Jr, A.R., Brydges, R., & Varpio, L. (2017). Tying knots: an activity theory analysis of student learning goals in clinical education. Medical Education, 51(7), 687-698. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13295
Lin, F.F., Del Fabbro, L., Needham, J., Sidwell, D., & Shaw, J. (2021). Supporting culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) undergraduate nursing students undertaking clinical placements in Australia: An exploratory qualitative study of clinical facilitator and CALD student perceptions. Nurse Education Today, 97, 104712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104712
McRae, N. (2016). Exploring conditions for transformative learning in work-integrated education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, Special Issue, 16(2),137-144.
Nguyen, H.T.T. (2020). Learning to teach across the boundary: A cultural historical activity theory perspective on a university-school partnership in Vietnam. Teaching and Teacher Education, 96, 103183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103183
O'Rourke, M., Vesty, G., Magdziarz, S., Mudalige, P., Vitale, C., Bowyer, D., Nair, S. & Soltys, S. (2025). Factors Impacting the Design of Innovative WIL Education. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 19(2), pp.115-134. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v19i2.8781
Page, M., McKenzie, J., Bossuyt, P., Boutron I., Hoffmann, T., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2
Piper, L., Dahlquist, K., & Sunnemark, F. (2023). Learning for utopia: from banal to critical Work-Integrated Learning (WIL). The Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 21(1), 225-259.
Ploettner, J., & Tresserras, E. (2016). An interview with Yrjö Engeström and Annalisa Sannino on activity theory. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning, Language & Literature, 9(4), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.709
Reid, A.M. (2015). The role of the practice trainer as an agent of co-configuration. Studies in Continuing Education, 37(2),170-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037x.2015.1028527
Sannino, A. (2022). Transformative agency as warping: how collectives accomplish change amidst uncertainty. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 30(1), 9-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1805493
Sannino, A. (2023). Problem identification in change laboratories: Workplace learning to eradicate homelessness. In H. Bound, A. Edwards, K. Evans, & A. Chia (Eds), Workplace learning for changing social and economic circumstances (pp. 201-218). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003227946-17
Scahill, J., & Bligh, B. (2025). Conceptual development in higher education sustainability initiatives: Insights from a change laboratory research intervention. Sustainability, 17(9), Article 3968. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093968
Scholtz, D., & Bester, M. (2018). Project-based learning: Panacea for change or old wine in new bottles? South African Journal of Higher Education, 32(6),177-196. https://doi.org/10.20853/32-6-2967
Smith, C. (2012). Evaluating the quality of work-integrated learning curricula: A comprehensive framework. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(2), 247-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.558072
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sorensen, P. (2014). Collaboration, dialogue and expansive learning: The use of paired and multiple placements in the school practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 128-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.08.010
Spante, M., & Egelström, M. (2024). Looking back when moving forward – unpacking history in cultural-historical activity theory-driven change efforts. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 31(3–4), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2025.2470715
Thompson, M., & Schademan, A. (2019). Gaining fluency: Five practices that mediate effective co-teaching between pre-service and mentor teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102903
Virkkunen, J., & Newnham, D. (2013). The Change Laboratory: A Tool for Collaborative Development of Work and Education. Sense Publishers.
Winberg, C., Finn, F., Sheridan, I., Engles-Hills, P., Jacobs, H., & Kent, E. (2022). Enhancing work-integrated learning through South-North collaboration: A comparative contextual analysis. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 23(4), 463-479.
Wiredu, G.O., & Sørensen, C. (2006). The dynamics of control and mobile computing in distributed activities. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 307-319. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000577
Zegwaard, K.E., Pretti, T.J., Rowe, A.D. & Ferns, S.J. (2023). Defining work-integrated learning. In K. Zegwaard & K. Pretti (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of work-integrated learning (pp. 29-48). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003156420-4
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 the authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
