Reflective Writing on an ESL Writing Course
Accessing Metacognition to Inform Curriculum Design and Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2021.1.4Keywords:
metacognition, ESL, academic writing, curriculum design, assessment, reflective writingAbstract
Research shows that student reflective writing is a valuable window into student learning, particularly student metacognition; however, our knowledge of the challenges of accessing metacognition to inform curriculum design and assessment practices in the ESL (English as a Second Language) context is less robust. This paper reports two qualitative studies of student reflective writing on an ESL writing course within a teacher education programme. The studies investigate how student metacognition manifests itself in reflective papers and how mapping student metacognition can inform evidence-based curriculum design and assessment. The data comes from several iterations of an ESL writing course and is analysed using directed and conventional content analyses. Our results expose a complex relation between metacognition, curriculum design and assessment practices: 1) unless scaffolded by the curriculum design to use precise terminology, students resort to expressing their understanding of the course content in terms of everyday, vernacular language and 2) student reflective writing not only provides a more nuanced picture of their learning than the final course grades but is invaluable for developing scaffolding and assessment practices. Based on our results, we recommend integrating structured reflection as part of the regular curricula to gauge ESL student metacognition and monitor more precisely their uptake of course content.
References
Anson, I. G., & Anson, C. M. (2017). Assessing peer and instructor response to writing: A corpus analysis from an expert survey. Assessing Writing, 33, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.001
Balgopal, M. M., & Montplaisir, L. M. (2011). Meaning making: What reflective essays reveal about biology students’ conceptions about natural selection. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 39(2), 137–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9120-y
Bokser, J. A., Brown, S., Chaden, C., Moore, M., Cleary, M. N., Reed, S., Wozniak, K. (2016). Finding common ground: Identifying and eliciting metacognition in e-portfolios across contexts. International Journal of EPortfolio, 6(1), 33–44.
Chekwa, E., McFadden, M., Divine, A., & Dorius, T. (2014). Metacognition: Transforming learning experience. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 71–74.
Colthorpe, K., Sharifirad, T., Ainscough, L., Anderson, S., & Zimbardi, K. (2018). Prompting undergraduate students’ metacognition of learning: Implementing “meta-learning” assessment tasks in the biomedical sciences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1334872
Cowan, J. (2014). Noteworthy matters for attention in reflective journal writing. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413514647
Elbow, P., & Belanoff, P. (1986). Portfolios as a substitute for proficiency examinations. College Composition and Communication, 37(3), 336–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/358050
Farahian, M., & Avarzamani, F. (2018). The impact of portfolio on EFL learners’ metacognition and writing performance. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1450918. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1450918
Fernsten, L. A., & Reda, M. (2011). Helping students meet the challenges of academic writing. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.507306
Ferris, D. (2008). Response to student writing: implications for second language students. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohostcom.proxy.mau.se/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat05074a&AN=malmo.b2156605&lang=sv&site=eds-live
Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009
Finnegan, D., Kauppinen, A., & Wärnsby, A. (2015). Automated Feedback in a Blended Learning Environment: Student Experience and Development. In T. Guasch & M. Deane (Eds.), Learning and Teaching Writing Online (pp. 31-45). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004290846_004
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
Gibson, A., Kitto, K., & Bruza, P. (2016). Towards the discovery of learner metacognition from reflective writing. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 22–48. https://doi.org /10.18608/jla.2016.32.3
Granville, S., & Dison, L. (2005). Thinking about thinking: Integrating self-reflection into an academic literacy course. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(2), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.009
Granville, S., & Dison, L. (2009). Making connections through reflection: writing and feedback in an academic literacy programme. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 27(1), 53-63. http://doi.org/10.2989/SALALS.2009.27.1.5.753
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
Kolln, M. (1996). Rhetorical grammar: A modification lesson. The English Journal, 85(7), 25-31.
Lew, D. N. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011a). Writing to learn: Can reflection journals be used to promote self-reflection and learning? Higher Education Research & Development, 30(4), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.512627
Lew, D. N. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011b). Self-reflection and academic performance: Is there a relationship? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(4), 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9298-z
Lozano Velandia, S. A. (2015). Goal-setting and self-reflection to enhance learners’ interaction in an ESP context. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 8(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2015.8.2.4
McDonald, J., & Cater-Steel, A. (Eds). (2017). Implementing Communities of Practice in Higher Education: Dreamers and Schemers. Springer: Singapore.
Melzer, D. (2014). The connected curriculum: Designing a vertical transfer writing curriculum. WAC Journal, 25, 78–91.
Moon, J. (2007). Critical thinking: An exploration of theory and practice (1st ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203944882
Norton, L. S., Owens, T., & Clark, L. (2004). Analysing metalearning in first-year undergraduates through their reflective discussions and writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(4), 423–441.
Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(83)90018-8
Parrott, H. M., & Cherry, E. (2015). Process memos: Facilitating dialogues about writing between students and instructors. Teaching Sociology, 43(2), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X14557440
Peacock, S., & Cowan, J. (2016). From presences to linked influences within communities of inquiry. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5), 267–283.
Ramage, J. D., Bean, J. C., & Johnson, J. (2009). The Allyn & Bacon Guide to Writing (5th ed.). New York:Pearson Longman.
Raphael, T. E., Englert, C. S., & Kirschner, B. W. (1989). Students’ metacognitive knowledge about writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 23(4), 343–379.
Reid, E. S. (2009). Teaching writing teachers writing: Difficulty, exploration, and critical reflection. College Composition and Communication, 61(2), 197–221.
Scharff, L., Draeger, J., Verpoorten, D., Devlin, M., Dvorakova, L. S., Lodge, J. M., & Smith, S. (2017). Exploring metacognition as support for learning transfer. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.1.6
Steyn, C., Davies, C., & Sambo, A. (2019). Eliciting student feedback for course development: The application of a qualitative course evaluation tool among business research students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1466266
Taras, M. (2008). Issues of power and equity in two models of self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/0.1080/13562510701794076
Vaughan, N. D., Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2013). Teaching in Blended Learning Environments: Creating and Sustaining Communities of Inquiry. Edmonton, AB: AU Press.
Vetenskapsrådet. (2017). God forskningssed. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
Wärnsby, A., Kauppinen, A., Aull, L., Leijen, D., & Moxley, J. (2018). Affective language in student peer reviews: Exploring data from three institutional contexts. Journal of Academic Writing, 8(1), 28–53. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v8i1.429
Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 79-101.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Anna Wärnsby, Asko Kauppinen, Damian Finnegan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
