Bedömnings-, dokumentationspraktiker och pedagogiska identiteter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2015.2.1139Keywords:
Identity, Individual Education Plans, Pedagogic Discourse, Performativity, RegulativityAbstract
When competition and an increasing level of marketisation characterises school life, the number of evaluations and the level of control has grown out of proportion. Through comparisons, assessments and ranking systems, also called ‘the terrors of performativity’ according to Ball (2003) commercial agents have gained influence over practices of assessment and documentation within the education system. Increased demands on pupils’ and parents’ participation and a belief that written documentation will lead to better results has caused an extensive use of different web based tools like Unikum. With the point of departure in a collected material of more than a hundred Individual Educations Plans (IEP) where commercial web based tools have been used, we make an analysis with Basil Bernstein’s (1996, 2000) concepts Pedagogic Identity, and Instructional and Regulative discourse in relation to expectations and constructions manifest in the plans. The results show that all four identities are expressed in the plans however, with an emphasis on a neo-liberal identity. We discuss the results in relation to the instructional and regulative discourses. The conclusion is that the tools both shape and determine possible identities and possible discourses in the web based interaction between children, parents and teachers.
References
Asp-Onsjö, Lisa (2006). Åtgärdsprogram – dokument eller verktyg? En fallstudie i en kommun . (Göteborg Studies in Educational sciences, 248). Göteborg: Acta
Ball, Stephen J. (2003). The Teacher’s Soul and the Terrors of Performativity. Journal of Education Policy, (18), 215-228.
Beach, Dennis & Dovemark, Marianne (2007). Education and the Commodity Problem: Ethnographic Investigations of Creativity and Performativity in Swedish Schools. London: Tufnell Press.
Beach, Dennis & Dovemark, Marianne (2009). Making ‘right’ choices? An ethnographic account of creativity, performativity and personalised learning policy, concepts and practices. Oxford Review of Education, 1465-3915, (35). 689-704.
Beach, Dennis & Dovemark, Marianne (2011). Twelve Years of Upper-Secondary Education in Sweden: The Beginnings of a Neo-liberal Policy hegemony. Educational Review. (63), 313-327.
Bernstein, Basil (1990). Class, codes and control. Vol. 4, The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge.
Bernstein, Basil (1996). Pedagogy, Symbolic control and identity: theory, research, critique. London: Taylor and Francis.
Bernstein, Basil (1999). Official knowledge and pedagogic identities, in Frances Christie (Red.), Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness. (ss. 246-261) London: Continuum.
Bernstein, Basil (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic control and identity: theory, research, critique.[Rev.ed.] Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Black, Paul & Wiliam, Dylan (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment. London: School of Education, Kings College.
Black, Paul & Wiliam, Dylan (2009). Developing the Theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. (21), 5-31.
Bouakaz, Laid (2007). Parental involvment in school: what hinders and what promotes parental involvementin an urban school. Malmö Studies in Educational Sciences, 30. Lärarutbildningen, Högskolan i Malmö.
Bourne, Jill (2004). Framing talk. Towards a ’radical visible pedagogy’. I Johan Muller, Brian Davies & Ana Morais (Red). Reading Bernstein. Researching Bernstein. (ss. 61-74). London: Routledge Falmer.
Bourne, Jill (2008). Official pedagogic discourses and the construction of learners’ identities. I Nancy H. Hornberger, (Red.). Encyclopedia of Language and Education. (ss. 798-809). Springer US.
Dovemark, Marianne (2004). Pupil Responsibility in the Context of School Changes in Sweden: market constraints on state policies for a creative education. European Educational Research Journal, (3), 658-673.
Dovemark, Marianne (2013). A school for all? Different worlds: Segregation on the basis of freedom of choice. I Ulf Blossing, Gunn Imsen & Leijf Moos (Red.). The Nordic Education Model: ‘A School for All’ Encounters Neo-Liberal Policy (ss. 173-189). Dordrecht: Springer.
Foucault, Michel (2000). Governmentality. I James. D. Faubion (Red.), Essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984. Power. Vol.3. (ss. 201-222). New York. The New Press.
Forsberg, Lucas (2007). Homework as serious family buisness: power and subjectivity in negotiating about school assignments. British Journal of Sociology of Education, (28), 209-226.
Hattie, John & Timpeley, Helen (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, (77), 81-112.
Hirsh, Åsa (2013). The individual development plan as tool and practice in Swedish compulsory school (Doktorsavhandling). Jönköping: Högskolan för lärande och kommunikation.
Isaksson, Joakim, Lindqvist, Rafael & Bergström, Erik (2007). School problems or individual shortcomings? A study of individual educational plans in Sweden. European Journal of Special Needs Education. (22), 75-91
Jeffrey, Bob & Troman, Geoff (Eds). (2012). Performativity in UK Education. Ethnographic Cases of its Effects, Agency and Reconstructions. Hockley: Tufnell Press.
Lgr 11 (2011). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011. Stockholm: Fritzes
Lingard, Bob, Mills, Martin & Hayes Debra Nola Anne. (2006). Enabling and Aligning Assessment for Learning: some research and policy lessons from Queensland, International Studies in Sociology of Education, (16), 83-102.
Lpo 94 Läroplan för det obligatoriska skolväsendet, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet Stockholm: Fritzes
Lundahl, Christian (2011). Bedömning för lärande. Stockholm: Nordstedts.
Lundahl, Lisbeth, Erixon Arreman, Inger, Holm, Ann Sofie, & Lundström, Ulf (2014). Gymnasiet som marknad. Umeå: Borea.
Mitchell, David, Morton, Missy & Hornby, Garry (2010). Review of the literature on individual education plans. Report to the New Zealand Ministry of Education. Ministry of Education.
Morell Olsson, Eva (2012). Att göra lärandet synligt? Individuella utvecklingsplaner och digital dokumentation (Doktorsavhandling). Umeå universitet. Institutionen för tillämpad utbildningsvetenskap, Interaktiva medier och lärande
Selghed, Bengt (2005). Betygen i skolan. Stockholm: Liber SFS (2010:800). Skollag. Stockholm: Fritzes
Simons, Maarten & Masschelein, Jan (2008). The governmentalization of learning and assemblage of a learning apparatus. Educational Theory, (58), 391-415.
Singh, Parlo (2013). Unlocking pedagogic mazes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education (34), 799-807.
Singh, Parlo, Thomas, Sue & Harris, Jessica (2013). Recontextualising policy discourses: a Bernsteinian perspective on policy interpretation, translation, enactment, Journal of Education Policy, (28), 468-480
Sjöberg, Lena (2015). The Construction of Mathematical Knowledge and Learning in and Through Individual Education Plans. EDUCARE (2015:1), 7-29
Skolinspektionen (2009). Skolinspektionens bedömning av skolors arbete med skriftliga omdömen. Dnr 40-2009:2348 Stockholm: Skolinspektionen.
Skolinspektionen (2012). En skola med tilltro lyfter alla elever. Skolinspektionens erfarenheter och resultat från tillsyn och kvalitetsgranskning 2011. Dnr 40:2012:2991. Stockholm: Skolinspektionen
Skolverket (2005). Allmänna råd. Den individuella utvecklingsplanen Stockholm: Fritzes.
Skolverket (2007). Hur används individuella utvecklingsplaner. En studie efter införandet av nya bestämmelser. Stockholm: Skolverket.
Skolverket (2008). Allmänna råd. Den individuella utvecklingsplanen med skriftliga omdömen. Stockholm: Fritzes
Skolverket (2010). Individuella utvecklingsplaner med skriftliga omdömen i grundskolan – en uppföljning och utvärdering av skolornas arbete. Dnr 71-2009:115. Stockholm: Skolverket.
Skolverket (2013). Allmänna råd. Utvecklingssamtalet och den skriftliga individuella utvecklingsplanen. Stockholm: Skolverket
Tholin, Jörgen (2006). Att kunna klara sig i ökänd natur. En studie av betyg och betygskriterier – historiska betingelser och implementering av ett nytt system. Borås: Institutionen för pedagogik, Högskolan i Borås.
Vallberg Roth, Ann-Christine (2009). Styrning genom bedömning av barn. EDUCARE, (2009:2–3),195–219.
Vallberg Roth, Ann-Christine & Månsson, Annika (2008). Individuella utvecklingsplaner som uttryck för reglerad barndom. Likriktning med variation. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, (13), 81-102.
