Challenges of Assessment in Ethics – Teachers’ reflections when assessing National Tests
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2015.2.1131Keywords:
assessment, ethics, national tests, religious education, thinkaloud studyAbstract
The aim of this article is to identify and discuss challenges in assessing pupils’ knowledge in Ethics. The background of the study is the development of the knowledge field Ethics, a part of Religious Education (RE) in Sweden which in the sixties went from being a Christian school subject to a pluralistic and non-confessional one. The knowledge field Ethics is, in this school context, marked by vagueness, due partly to its indistinct frames and partly to a duality in the aims represented in the directives of the curriculum. Methodologically, data was produced through a think-aloud study where six teachers assessed pupil-responses in Ethics within the National Test for RE. The teachers’ ongoing assessments were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed in a qualitative text analysis that focused on different kinds of challenges that the teachers experienced. Since this kind of study has not been conducted before, the analyses were explorative and, rather than being theory guided, were guided by the aim and the research question of the study. The findings show three groups of challenges related to the assessment processes. The first group of challenges concerns interpretations of the assessment instructions, the second regards competing ideas about what students should be given credit for during assessment in Ethics and the third is about being positioned between the pupils’ need for good grades and the task of differentiating between students. The discussion distinguishes between general challenges in assessment and challenges related to Ethics and its partly unclear character in the RE school context. In such a situation when the construction of a knowledge field is vague, the influence of national tests can be assumed to be considerable and the need for research regarding different conceptions of ethical competence is therefore urgent.
References
Algotsson, Karl-Göran (1975). Från katekestvång till religionsfrihet: debatten om religionsundervisningen i skolan under 1900-talet. Diss. Uppsala. Uppsala Universitet.
Allal, Linda (2013). Teachers’ professional judgement in assessment: A cognitive act and socially situated practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(1), 20-34.
Almers, Ellen (2009). Handlingskompetens för hållbar utveckling: tre berättelser om vägen dit. Jönköping: Högskolan för lärande och kommunikation.
Bergling, Kurt (1982). Moralutveckling: bedömning av rätt och orätt från barndom till vuxen ålder. Stockholm: LiberFörlag.
Blaylock, Lat (2000). Issues in Achievement and Assessment in Religious Education in England: Which Way Should We Turn?, British Journal of Religious Education, 23(1), 45-58, DOI: 10.1080/0141620000230106
Brown, Margaret, McCallum, Bet, Taggart, Brenda & Gipps Caroline. (1997). The Validity of National Testing at Age 11: The teacher’s view, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 4:2, 271-294, DOI: 10.1080/0969594970040205
Charters, Elizabeth (2003). The Use of Think-aloud Methods in Qualitative Research. An introduction to Think-aloud Methods. Brock Education, 12(2), 68-82.
Connolly, Stephen, Klenowski, Val, Wyatt-Smith, Claire (2012). Moderation and consistency of teacher judgement: Teachers’ views. British Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 593-614.
Crisp, Victoria (2010). Judging the grade: Exploring the judgement processes involved in examination grading decisions. Evaluation & Research in Education, 23(1), 19-35.
Franck, Olof (2013a). Etisk litteracitet - om filosofiska förutsättningar för att utveckla ämnesdidaktiska perspektiv med hänsyn till kursplanen i religionskunskap (Lgr11). In Anders Marner & Hans Örtegren, (Red), KLÄM. Konferenstexter om Lärande, Ämnesdidaktik och Mediebruk (s. 178-197). Umeå: Umeå universitet.
Franck, Olof (2013b). Kunskapskrav och bedömning. In Olof Franck, Magnus Hermansson Adler & Inger Björneloo, Samhällsämnenas didaktik F-åk 3 (s. 127-136). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Gipps, Caroline, McCallum, Bet, Brown, Margaret (1996). Models of teacher assessment among primary school teachers in England. The Curriculum Journal, 7(2), 167-183. DOI: 10.1080/0958517960070204
Grant, Lynne, Matemba, Yonah H (2013). Problems of assessment in religious and moral education: The Scottish case. Journal of Beliefs & Values: Studies in religion & Education, 34(1), 1-13.
Jones, Tiffany Mary (2009). Framing the framework: discourses in Australia’s national values education policy. Educational Research For Policy & Practice, 8(1), 35-57.
Klapp Lekholm, Alli (2010). Lärares betygsättningspraktik. Forskning om undervisning och lärande, 3/2010, 20-29.
Lindskog, Annika (2013). Nationellt bedömningsstöd i religionskunskap. I Falkevall, Björn. Att undervisa religionskunskap - en ämnesdidaktisk introduktion. (s. 162- 169). Stockholm: Liber.
Lundgrén-Laine, Heljä, Salanterä, Sanna (2010). Think-Aloud Technique and Protocol Analysis in Clinical Decision-Making Research. Qualitative Health Research, 20(4), 565-575.
Løgstrup, Knud Ejler (1994). Det etiska kravet. Göteborg: Daidalos.
Osbeck, Christina (2004). Värdegrund i skolan. Uppdrag, elevperspektiv och didaktiska reflektioner. I Gunnel Colnerud & Solveig Hägglund (Red.), Etiska lärare – moraliska barn. Forskning kring värdefrågor i skolans praktik (s. 9-27). Linköping: Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för beteendevetenskap.
Osbeck, Christina (2013). Social Studies – A part of a Context Constructing Central RE Knowledge in Sweden. In Geir Skeie, Judith Everington, Ina ter Avest, Siebrem Miedema. Exploring Context in Religious Education research, (s. 147-169). Münster: Waxmann.
Olivestam, Carl-Eber (2012). Religionsdidaktik – om perspektiv, teori och praktik i religionsundervisning. Stockholm: Remus.
Radnor, Hilary A, Poulson, Louise, Turner-Bisset, Rosie.(1995). Assessment and teacher professionalism. The Curriculum Journal, 6(3), 325-342.
Rinne, Ilona. (2013). Att bedöma och bemöta. Nordic Studies in Education, 33(3), 171-186.
Sadler, Royce D (1985). The origins and functions of evaluative criteria. Educational Theory, 35(3), 285-297.
Sadler, Royce D (1987) Specifying and Promulgating Achievement Standards, Oxford Review of Education, 13:2, 191-209, DOI:10.1080/0305498870130207
Sadler, Royce D (2009) Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 159-179, DOI:10.1080/02602930801956059
Selander, Sven-Åke (1993). Undervisa i religionskunskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Skolverket (2013a). Ämnesprov läsår 2012/2013, Bedömningsanvisningar, Religionskunskap, Årskurs 9. Stockholm: Skolverket. [WWW dokument]. URL http://www.sobedömning.se/npsoportal/laddaner.html (2014-12-18).
Skolverket (2013b). Ämnesprov läsår 2012/2013, Bedömningsanvisningar, Religionskunskap, Årskurs 6. Stockholm: Skolverket. [WWW dokument]. URL http://www.sobedömning.se/npsoportal/laddaner.html (2014-12-18).
Skolverket (2013c). Ämnesprov läsår 2012/2013, Delprov A, Årskurs 6. Stockholm: Skolverket. [WWW dokument]. URL http://www.sobedömning.se/npsoportal/laddaner.html (2014-12-18).
Skolverket (2013d). Ämnesprov läsår 2012/2013, Delprov A, Årskurs 9. Stockholm: Skolverket. [WWW dokument]. URL http://www.sobedömning.se/npsoportal/laddaner.html (2014-12-18).
Smaill, Esther (2013). Moderating New Zealand’s National Standards: teacher learning and assessment outcomes, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(3), 250-265, DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2012.696241
Swedish National Agency for Education (2011). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the leisure-time centre. Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Education.
Taylor, Monica (1994). Overview of values education in 26 European countries. In Monica Taylor (Ed.), Values education in Europe: A comparative overview of a survey of 26 countries in 1993 (pp. 1–66). Dundee: Scottish Consultative Council on the Curriculum.
Thornberg, Robert (2004). Grupprocesser och social påverkan: socialpsykologi med fokus på skolan. Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för beteendevetenskap, Vol. 237.
Tillson, John (2011). In Favour of Ethics Education, Against Religious Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(4), 675-688.
Van der Schaaf, Marieke, Baartman, Liesbeth, Prins, Frans (2012). Exploring the role of assessment criteria during teachers’ collaborative judgement processes of students’ portfolios. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(7), 847-860.
Wilson, John (2000). Methodology and Moral Education. Oxford Review of Education, 26(2), 255-62.
Wyatt-Smith, Claire, Klenowski, Val (2013). Explicit, latent and metacriteria: types of criteria at play in professional judgement practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(1), 35-52.
