Passioner, värden och kontradiktioner: Tre röster om läsfrämjandets hinder och möjligheter

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63310/edu.2025.4.55625

Keywords:

Litteraturdidaktik, Läsfrämjande, Läsningens värde, Science- and Technology Studies, matters of care, Läsindustriella komplexet

Abstract

In an ongoing research project, we examine reading promotion work in Sweden, where reading is framed as being in crisis, and where different actors offer solutions for this. This article centres on three prominent and influential reading promoters in Sweden. The purpose is to highlight some of the passions, values, and contradictions that characterize discourses on reading and reading promotion. The theoretical and methodological framework draws on concepts from Science and Technology Studies. We investigate the following research questions: What values are attributed to reading? What passions, threats, and contradictions emerge within the networks that these reading promoters participate in? Our findings show that the informants are driven by strong passions and values that are both deeply personal and oriented toward society. They identify the absence of reading role models, along with digitization and social media, as significant threats. The reading-promotion networks that the informants initiate and/or participate in differ significantly in terms of magnitude and complexity. They consist of both human and non-human actors, and foster a shared belief in the fundamental importance of reading, while also exposing discursive cracks and contradictions.

References

Althusser, L. (1976). Filosofi från proletär klasståndpunkt. Cavefors.

Alvesson, M. (2011). Interpreting Interviews. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268353

Andersson, J. (2015). Med läsning som mål. Om metoder och forskning på det läsfrämjande området. Statens kulturråd.

Anker, E. S. & Felski, R. (2017). Critique and Postcritique. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822373049

Balling, G. (2016). What is a Reading Experience? The Development of a Theoretical and Empirical Understanding. I: P. M. Rothbauer, K. I. Skjerdingstad, L. McKechnie & K. Oterholm (red.), Plotting the Reading Experience. Theory, Practice, Politics. (37–53). Wilfrid Laurier Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51644/9781771121743-005

Barton, D. (2007). Literacy. An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language. Blackwell.

Felski, R. (2017). Being Diplomatic: On ANT and Literary Studies. Presentation på ANT across the Disciplines-conference, SDU, Odense, Denmark, September 21.

Forslid, T., Ohlsson, A., Rydbeck, K., Skjerdingstad, K.I., Steenberg, M. & Tangerås, T.M. (2022). Shared Reading i Skandinavia: forskning og praksis. ABM-media AS.

Fredriksen, A. (2014). Assembling Value(s). What a focus on the distributed agency of assemblages can contribute to the study of value. LCSW Working Paper Series, 7.

Graff, H. J. (1979). The Literacy Myth. Literacy and Social Structure in the Nineteenth Century City. Academic Press.

Hamilton, M. (2012). Literacy and the politics of representation. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203107966

Haraway, D. (2008). Apor, cyborger och kvinnor. Symposion.

Hedemark, Å. & Jonsson, E. (2021). Läsning för framtidens samhällsmedborgare: en studie av dåtidens och nutidens svenska kulturpolitiska debatter om barns läsning. Nordisk Kulturpolitisk Tidskrift, 24(2), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2000-8325-2021-02-03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2000-8325-2021-02-03

Hedemark, Åse, & Lindberg, J. (2018). Babies, Bodies, and Books—Librarians' Work for Early Literacy. Library Trends 66(4), 422-441. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.2018.0011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2018.0011

Jameson, Fredric (1981). The Political Unconscious. Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Methuen.

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture. Where Old and New Media Collide. New York University Press.

Johns, A. (2023). The Science of Reading. Information, Media, and Mind in Modern America. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226821498.001.0001

Kirsebom, L. (2024). “Vi har alltså lärare som inte fått lära sig hur man undervisar i läsning”. Sydsvenskan 240122.

Kulturrådet (2024). Att främja läsning för barn och unga. Vad säger forskning om läsfrämjande för och med unga i unga i områden med socioekonomiska utmaningar. Statens kulturråd.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2004). Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/421123

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001

Law, J. (2004). After Method. Mess in Social Science Research. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203481141

Leijnse, E. (2024). Forskare: Så gör den svenska skolan fel. Sydsvenskan 240110.

Levine, C. (2015). Forms. Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691160627.001.0001

Lindsköld, L., Hedemark, Å. & Lundh A. (2020). Constructing the Desirable Reader in Swedish Contemporary Literature Policy. Culture Unbound. Journal of Current Cultural Research, 12(2), 256–274. http://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.20200527c DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.20200527c

Lundström, S. & Olin-Scheller, C. (2010). Narrativ kompetens. En förutsättning i multimodala textuniversum? Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap, 40(3–4), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.54797/tfl.v40i3-4.11926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54797/tfl.v40i3-4.11926

Läsrörelsen (2020). Våra tjugo första läsår. Läsrörelsen 2000–2020. https://www.lasrorelsen.nu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Läsrörelsens-första-20-år_2000-2020.pdf. Hämtat 240616.

Microsoft (2022). Nu avtäcks det förhistoriska maktcentrumet Uppåkra i Minecraft”. https://news.microsoft.com/sv-se/2022/10/27/nu-avtacks-det-forhistoriska-maktcentrumet-uppakra-i-minecraft/. Hämtat 240228.

Nordenstam, A. & Olin-Scheller, C. (2022). Lättläst: bokmarknad, ungdomslitteratur, skola. Gidlunds förlag.

Persson, M. (2007). Varför läsa litteratur? Om litteraturundervisningen efter den kulturella vändningen. Studentlitteratur.

Persson, M. (2012). Den goda boken. Samtida föreställningar om litteratur och läsning. Studentlitteratur.

Persson, M. (2024). Passionerad läsning. Texter om litteratur, kritik och känslor. Carlssons Bokförlag.

Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of Care. Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. University of Minnesota Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2753906700002096

Reslegård, E. & Reslegård, M. (2011). Sagans kraft. E-post till författarna.

Smith, B. H. (2009). Värde/värdering. I: A. Mortensen (red.), Litteraturens värden. Brutus Östlings bokförlag Symposion.

Sundström Sjödin, E. (2017). Tracing reading to the dark side: Investigating the policy producing reading and readers in detention homes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(6), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1306486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1306486

Sundström Sjödin, E. (2019a). Where is the Critical in Literacy? Tracing performances of reading, readers and non-readers in educational practice, Örebro Studies in Education, 59, Örebro Studies in Educational Science with an emphasis on Didactics, 18.

Sundström Sjödin, E. (2019b). Creating the Valuable. Reading as a Matter of Health and Successful Parenthood. Discourse. Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40 (1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1549703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1549703

Sundström Sjödin, E. & Wahlström, N. (2021). Reading in the wing chair. The shaping of teaching and reading bodies in the transactional performativity of materialities. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53:9, 920–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1814739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1814739

Sundström Sjödin, E., Persson, M. & Pettersson, D. (2024). Läsning, ekologi och siffror. Sanningspraktiker hos en läsfrämjande aktör. Språk och litteratur: En omöjlig eller skön förening? SMDI-15. Studia Rhetorica Lundensia nr. 8.

Published

2025-09-26

How to Cite

Persson, M., & Sundström Sjödin, E. (2025). Passioner, värden och kontradiktioner: Tre röster om läsfrämjandets hinder och möjligheter. Educare, (4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.63310/edu.2025.4.55625

Issue

Section

Articles