Utopian and Dystopian Sociotechnical Imaginaries of Big Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v5i4.180Keywords:
big data, data, he European Commission, feminism, sociotechnical imaginaries, VOSViewerAbstract
Data feminism, a way of thinking about and “doing” data utilizing feminist tools and perspectives, has emerged in recent years as a part of a critical discourse surrounding datafication. The aim of this study is to analyze and identify shared perceptions of big data as expressed in a corpus of scholarly writings published in the domain of data studies and data feminism. We analyzed a set of 44 scholarly texts engaging in feminism concerned with the concept of big data. For the purpose of this article, we refer to this set of texts as data feminism and examine how authors frame and describe big data. We compare future visions in data feminist material with policies by the European Commission and explore what tensions arise among them. Furthermore, we explore and delineate social and political alternatives that emerge from data feminist texts. Both corpora describe futures inclusive of big data and imagine possible positive outcomes from different perspectives and with different ideas of the current role of big data. We found that sociotechnical imaginaries of big data within the data feminist corpus are considerably richer and more nuanced than those of the European Commission. In the data feminist corpus, big data is described as a multiplicity of things and often implicated in perpetuating power imbalances and large societal issues. The European Commission corpus employs the perspective of “data as a resource” to be exploited.
References
Agostinho, D. (2019). The optical unconscious of Big Data. Big Data and Society 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719826859
Azarian, R. (2011). Potentials and Limitations of Comparative Method in Social Science. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 1(4), 113–125. https://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol._1_No._4;_April_2011/15.pdf
Baucom, E. (2018). An exploration into archival descriptions of LGBTQ materials. The American Archivist 81(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081-81.1.65
Beaulieu, A. & Leonelli, S. (2022). Data and Society: A Critical Introduction. London: Sage.
Benjamin, R., (2020). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim Code.
Cambridge, UK: MA Polity.
Bogers, L., Niederer, S., Bardelli, F., & De Gaetano, C. (2020). Confronting bias in the online representation of pregnancy. Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 26(5- 6), 1037–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520938606
Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018, January). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency (pp. 77-91). PMLR.
boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for Big Data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society 15(5), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Bucher, T. (2017). The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society 20(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086
Burgelman, J. C., Osimo, D., & Bogdanowicz, M. (2010). Science 2.0 (change will happen….). First Monday 15(7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i7.2961
Carbin, M. and Edenheim S. (2013). The intersectional turn in feminist theory: A dream of a common language? European Journal of Women’s Studies 20(3), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506813484723
Chen, H., Chiang, R. H. L., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly 36(4), 1165–1188. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703503
Cheney-Lippold, J. (2019). We are data: algorithms and the making of our digital selves. Paperback edition. New York: New York University Press.
Cooky, C., Linabary, J. R., & Corple, D. J. (2018). Navigating Big Data dilemmas: Feminist holistic reflexivity in social media research. Big Data and Society 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718807731
Corple, D. J., & Linabary, J. R. (2020). From data points to people: feminist situated ethics in online big data research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 23(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1649832
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Cruz, T. M. (2020). Perils of data-driven equity: Safety-net care and big data’s elusive grasp on health inequality. Big Data and Society 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720928097
Culkin, S.J. (1968). A Churchman's Guide to Marshall McLuhan. Religious Education 63(6), 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034408680630609
Daniels, J. (2015). The trouble with white feminism: Whiteness, Digital Feminism and the Intersectional Internet. In Umoja Noble, S., & Tynes, S.M. (eds) The Intersectional Internet. New York: Peter Lang. 41-60. Retrieved on 19 February 2023 from https://archive.org/details/intersectionalin0000unse/page/n3/mode/2up
Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory 9(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364
Diaz Martinez, C., Diaz Garcia, P. and Navarro Sustaeta, P. (2020). Hidden Gender Bias in Big Data as Revealed by Neural Networks: Man is to Woman as Work is to Mother? Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas 172, 41–60. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.172.41
Dionne, E. (2019). Algorithmic Mediation, the Digital Era, and Healthcare Practices: A Feminist New Materialist Analysis. Global Media Communication, Canadian Edition 11(2), 49–65. http://gmj-canadianedition.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/05_Dionne- Volume-11-issue-2-Final-.pdf
D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020a). Data feminism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020b). Seven intersectional feminist principles for equitable and actionable COVID-19 data. Big Data and Society 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720942544
Drabinski, E. (2013). Queering the Catalog: Queer Theory and the Politics of Correction. Library Quarterly 83(2), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1086/669547
Dubrofsky, R. E., & Magnet, S. E. (2015). Feminist Surveillance Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Eubanks, V. (2019). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: Picador.
European Commission (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions: A European strategy for data. COM/2020/66. Retrieved on 19 February 2023 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0066
European Commission (2022a). Shaping Europe’s digital future: A European Strategy for data. Retrieved on 19 February 2023 from https://digital- strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/strategy-data
European Commission (2022b). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on harmonised rules on fair access to and use of data (Data Act). COM/2022/68. Retrieved on 19 February 2023 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52022PC0068
Favaretto, M. F., De Clercq, E., & Elger, S. E. (2019). Big Data and discrimination: perils, promises and solutions. A systematic review. Journal of Big Data 6, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0177-4
Foucault, M. (1988). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Random House.
Foucault Welles, M. (2014). On minorities and outliers: The case for making Big Data small. Big Data & Society 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714540613
Gieseking, J. J. (2018). Size Matters to Lesbians, Too: Queer Feminist Interventions into the Scale of Big Data. The Professional Geographer 70(1), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2017.1326084
Gregory, A., & Halff, G. (2020). The damage done by big data-driven public relations. Public Relations Review 46(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101902
Guay, R. and Birch, K. (2022). A comparative analysis of data governance: Socio-technical imaginaries of digital personal data in the USA and EU (2008–2016). Big Data and Society 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221112925
Guha, R. V. (2021, April 21). Data Commons: Making sustainability data accessible. [Blog Post] Google. Retrieved on 19 February 2023 from https://blog.google/outreach- initiatives/sustainability/data-commons-sustainability/
Harding, S. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of the partial. Feminist Studies 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
Hoffmann, A. L. (2020). Terms of inclusion: Data, discourse, violence. New Media & Society 23(12), 3539–3556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820958725
Hong, R. (2016). Soft skills and hard numbers: Gender discourse in human resources. Big Data & Society 3(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716674237
hooks, b. (2000). Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics. London: Pluto Press.
Huffer, L. (2013). Are the Lips a Grave? A Queer Feminist on the Ethics of Sex. New York: Columbia University Press.
Intel. (2021, February 2). Intel and Google Cloud Team with All of Us Research Program. [Press Release] Retrieved on 19 February 2023 from https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/newsroom/news/all-us-research- program.html#gs.ypgaqv
Jasanoff, S. (2015). Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (eds). Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2015). Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
S., Kim, S. -H., & Sperling, S. (2007). Sociotechnical imaginaries and science and technology policy: a cross-national comparison. [National Science Foundation Research Project Proposal]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Retrieved on 19 February 2023 from https://stsprogram.org/admin/files/imaginaries/NSF-imaginaries-proposal.pdf
Kitchin, R. (2014). Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481
Knight Steele, C. (2021). Digital Black Feminism. New York: NYU Press.
Larrondo, A., Morales-i-Gras, J., & Orbegozo-Terradillos, J. (2019). Feminist hashtag activism in Spain: measuring the degree of politicisation of online discourse on #YoSíTeCreo, #HermanaYoSíTeCreo, #Cuéntalo y #NoEstásSola. Communication and Society 32(4), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1558/003.32.4.207-221
Leurs, K. (2017). Feminist Data Studies: Using Digital Methods for Ethical, Reflexive and Situated Socio-Cultural Research. Feminist Review 115(1), 130–154. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-017-0043-1
Levenda, A. M., Ritcher, J., Miller, T., & Fisher, E. (2019). Regional sociotechnical imaginaries and the governance of energy innovations. Futures 109, 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.03.001
Levina, M., & Hasinoff, A. A. (2016). The Silicon Valley Ethos: Tech Industry Products, Discourses, and Practices. Television and New Media 18(6), 489–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476416680454
Lindh, M., & Nolin, J. (2017). GAFA speaks: Metaphors in the promotion of cloud technology. Journal of Documentation 73(1), 160-180. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2016-0039
Love, A. (2018). Digital black feminism. In Parry, D.C., Johnson, C.W., & Fullagar, S. (eds) Digital Dilemmas: Transforming Gender Identities and Power Relations in Everyday Life. London: Palgrave MacMillan. 53–71.
Luka, M. E. and Millette, M. (2018). (Re)framing Big Data: Activating Situated Knowledges and a Feminist Ethics of Care in Social Media Research. Social Media + Society 4(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118768297
Lupton, D. (2020). ‘Not the real me’: Social imaginaries of personal data profiling. Cultural Sociology 15(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975520939779
Lykke, N. (2020). Transversal Dialogues on Intersectionality, Social Feminism and Epistemologies of Ignorance. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 28(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2019.1708786
Mager, A. (2016). Search engine imaginary: Visions and values in the co-production of search technology and Europe. Social Studies of Science 47(2), 240–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716671433
Mager, A., & Katzenbach, C. (2020). Future Imaginaries in the Making and Governing of Digital Technology: Multiple, Contested, Commodified. New Media & Society 23(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820929321
Markham, A. (2020). The limits of the imaginary: Challenges to intervening in future speculations of memory, data, and algorithms. New Media & Society 23(2), 382–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820929322
Mayer-Schoenberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big Data. A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. London, UK: John Murray Press.
McNamee, R. (2019). Zucked: Waking Up to the Facebook Catastrophe. New York: Penguin. McQuillan, D. (2016). Algorithmic paranoia and the convivial alternative. Big Data & Society 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716671340
Michailidou, M. (2018). Feminist methodologies for the study of digital worlds. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics 14(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.14.1.19_1
Milan, S., & Trere, E. (2019). Big Data from the South(s): Beyond Data Universalism.
Television & New Media 20(4), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/152747641983773
Nakamura, L. (2013). Cybertypes: Race, ethnicity, and identity on the Internet. Routledge.
Nelhans, G., & Nolin, J. (2022). Anti-transparency within the EU shift towards Open Science. Science and Public Policy 49(6), 928–941. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac039
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.
Odumosu, T. (2020). The Crying Child: On Colonial Archives, Digitization, and Ethics of Care in the Cultural Commons. Current Anthropology 61(22), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1086/710062
Onouha, M. (2016) The library of missing datasets. [Mixed media installation]. Retrieved 19 February 2023 from: https://mimionuoha.com/the-library-of-missing-datasets
O’Neil, C. (2017). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. London: Penguin.
Perez, C. C. (2019). Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. New York: Abrams Press.
Rieder, G. (2018). Tracing Big Data imaginaries through public policy: The case of the European Commission. In Rudinow Sætnan, A., Schneider, I., & Green, N. (eds) The Politics and Policies of Big Data. London, UK: Routledge. 89–109. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315231938
Ruberg, B., & Reilos, S. (2020). Data for queer lives: How LGBTQ gender and sexuality identities challenge norms of demographics. Big Data & Society 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720933286
Saariketo, M. (2014). Imagining Alternative Agency in Techno-Society: Outlining the Basis of Critical Technology Education. In Kramp, L., Carpentier, N., Hepp, A., Tomani? Trivundža, I., Niemenin, H., Kunelius, R., Olsson, T., Sundin, E., & Kilborn, R. (eds) Media Practice and Everyday Agency in Europe. Bremen, DE: edition lumière. 129–137. http://www.researchingcommunication.eu/book9chapters/C06_Krotz1314.pdf
Saariketo, M. (2020). Subversive imagination and possibilities of critical agency in the landscapes of code? Selected Papers of #AoIR2020: The 21st Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers. Dublin, Ireland, 28–31 October 2020. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11323
Sadowski, J., & Bendor, R. (2018). Selling Smartness: Corporate Narratives and the Smart City as a Sociotechnical Imaginary. Science, Technology, & Human Values 44(3), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1177(0162243918806061
Sandeep, M. (2017). Socio-technical imaginaries of a data-driven city: Ethnographic vignettes from Delhi. The Fiberculture Journal 29. https://doi.org/10.15307/fcj.29.217.2017
Secundo, G., Del Vecchio, P., Dumay, J., & Passiante, G. (2017). Intellectual capital in the age of Big Data: Establishing a research agenda. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(2), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-10-2016-0097
Snapp, S. D., Russel, S. T., Arredondo, M., & Skiba, R. (2016). A Right to Disclose: LGBTQ Youth Representation in Data, Science, and Policy. In Horn, S.S., Ruck, M.D., & L.S.Liben (eds) Equity and Justice in Developmental Science: Theoretical and Methodological Issues 50, 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2015.11.005
Suárez-Gonzalo, S. (2019). Personal data are political: A feminist view on privacy and big data. Recerca: Revista de Pensament I Analisi 24(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.6035/Recerca.2019.24.2.9
Sörum, N., & Fuentes, C. (2022). How sociotechnical imaginaries shape consumers’ experiences of and responses to commercial data collection practices. Consumption Markets & Culture 26(1), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2022.2124977
Van Oost, E. (2000). Making the computer masculine: The historical roots of gendered representations. In Balka, E. & R. Smith (eds) Women, Work and Computerization: Charting a Course for the Future. The International Federation for Information Processing 44. Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35509-2_2
Taylor, C. (2004). Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Terras, M. & Nyhan, J. (2016). Father Busa’s Female Punch Card Operatives. In Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016. Matthew K. Gold and Lauren F. Klein, Editors. Berkeley: University of California Press, Journals & Digital Publishing Division.
Thompson, T. L. (2020). Data-bodies and data activism: Presencing women in digital heritage research. Big Data & Society 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720965613
Vaitla, B., Verhulst, S., Bengtsson, L., Gonzalez, M. C., Furst-Nichols, R., & Pryor, E. C. (2020). The promise and perils of big gender data. Nature Medicine 26(19), 17–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0712-z
van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society 12(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
Van Eck, N., & Waltman, J. (2011). Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsletter 7(3), 50–54. https://www.issi-society.org/media/1131/newsletter27.pdf
Wajcman, J. (2004). TechnoFeminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Ward, J. S., & Baker, A. (2019). Undefined by data: A survey of Big Data definitions. ArXiv, abs/1309.5821. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.5821.pdf
Weinberg, L. (2017). Rethinking Privacy: A Feminist Approach to Privacy Rights after Snowden. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 12(3), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.258
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Profile Books.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hana Marčetić, Jan Nolin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
