Protesting is Not Everything: Analyzing Twitter Use During Electoral Events in Non-democratic Contexts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v4i4.116Keywords:
Twitter activism, Iran, Networked framing, Election campaignsAbstract
Despite the fact that during political protests, Twitter usage has been substantially studied in various contexts, there are still some significant gaps in our understanding of the ways that this microblogging network is employed in regular political happenings, e.g., elections, particularly in authoritarian countries. As a result, it remains unclear if citizens in non-democratic countries use Twitter to protest at the time of regular political events as the time of uprisings or not. This investigation tries to address this gap by providing some empirical evidence from the Iranian Twittersphere during the 2017 presidential election. Having employed networked framing theory, we combined textual and network analytic approaches to investigate a sample of 10,416 tweets of the most influential users in the retweet (RT) network. Findings demonstrate that Iranian users did not significantly challenge the regime and power relations in Iran. They framed the election in a non-critical way dealing with routine political and election frays and debates. They also preferred to attack politicians rather than discuss contentious and deliberate politics. Thus, this research reveals that Twitter is not always a tool for protesting against non-democratic regimes. At the time of electoral events, it could be used as an ordinary communication platform.
References
Altheide, D. L., & Scheneider, C. J. (2013). Qualitative Media Analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ansari, A. (2012). The role of social media in Iran’s Green Movement (2009- 2012). Global Media Journal - Australian Edition, 6(2).
Azadi, P., & Mesgaran, M. B. (2021). The Clash of Ideologies on Persian Twitter (Issue 10).
Bashir, M. (2012). Framing an online social movement: How do the leadership and participants of the Egyptian 6th of April Youth Movement frame their Facebook activism? International Review of Information Ethics, 18(12), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560041111 [doi]
Baym, N. K., & boyd, d. (2012). Socially Mediated Publicness: An Introduction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705200
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
Bowen, K. (2017). Information Controls in Iran’s 2017 Presidential Election. ASL19. https://asl19.org/en/blog/2017-07-26-information-controls-in-irans-2017-presidential-election.html
boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). Routledge.
Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. Peter Lang.
Bruns, A., & Stieglitz, S. (2013). Towards more systematic Twitter analysis: metrics for tweeting activities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2012.756095
Carafano, J. J. (2009). All a Twitter: How Social Networking Shaped Iran’s Election Protests. In The Heritage Foundation (Vol. 4999, Issue 2300). http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2009/07/all-a-twitter-how-social-networking-shaped-irans-election-protests
Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, Crowds, and Markets. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761942
Ems, L. (2014). Twitter’s place in the tussle: how old power struggles play out on a new stage. Media, Culture & Society, 36(5), 720–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443714529070
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Galarza Molina, R. (2019). Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on Twitter Protests in Mexico about the Ayotzinapa Case. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 235. https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2019.4637
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213
González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A., & Moreno, Y. (2011). The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Scientific Reports, 1, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00197
Guerrero-solé, F. (2018). Interactive Behavior in Political Discussions on Twitter?: Politicians , Media , and Citizens ’ Patterns of Interaction in the 2015 and 2016 Electoral Campaigns in Spain. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118808776
Hopke, J. E. (2015). Hashtagging Politics: Transnational Anti-Fracking Movement Twitter Practices. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115605521
Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2013). Democracy’s Fourth Wave? Digital Media and the Arab Spring. Oxford University Press.
Hwang, S. (2013). The Effect of Twitter Use on Politicians’ Credibility and Attitudes toward Politicians. Journal of Public Relations Research, 25(3), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2013.788445
Jackson, S. J., Baily, M., & Foucault Welles, B. (2020). #HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. MIT Press.
Jiang, M., Leeman, R. W., & Fu, K. (2016). Networked Framing: Chinese Microbloggers’ Framing of the Political Discourse at the 2012 Democratic National Convention. Communication Reports, 29(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2015.1098715
Jungherr, A. (2014). The Logic of Political Coverage on Twitter: Temporal Dynamics and Content. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12087
Jungherr, A. (2017). Twitter Use in Election Campaigns: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
Kelly, J., & Etling, B. (2008). Mapping Iran’s Online Public: Politics and Culture in the Persian Blogosphere. https://cyber.harvard.edu/publications/2008/Mapping_Irans_Online_Public
Kermani, H., & Tafreshi, A. (2022). Walking with Bourdieu into Twitter communities: An analysis of networked publics struggling on power in Iranian Twittersphere. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2021267
Kermani H and Adham M (2021) Mapping Persian Twitter: Networks and mechanism of political communication in Iranian 2017 presidential election. Big Data & Society 8(1). DOI: 10.1177/20539517211025568.
Kermani, Hossein (2020) Political narrating in non-political crises: Narrativity practices on Persian Twitter during the 2017 Kermanshah earthquake, Asian Journal of Communication, Doi: 10.1080/01292986.2020.1817112.
Khazraee, E. (2019). Mapping the political landscape of Persian Twitter: The case of 2013 presidential election. Big Data & Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719835232
KhosraviNik, M. (2017). Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS). In J. Flowerdew & J. Richardson (Eds.), Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 582–596). Routledge.
Kidd, D., & McIntosh, K. (2016). Social Media and Social Movements. Sociology Compass, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12399
Koo, G. Y. (2017). Constructing an Alternative Public Sphere: The Cultural Significance of Social Media in Iran. In Media in the Middle East (pp. 21–43). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65771-4_2
Lecheler, S., de Haan, Y., & Kruikemeier, S. (2020). Introduction to the Special Issue: Meeting the Digital Demand through a Multi-Perspective Methodological Approach. Journalism Studies, 21(7), 857–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1752290
Li, M., Turki, N., Izaguirre, C. R., DeMahy, C., Thibodeaux, B. L., & Gage, T. (2020). Twitter as a tool for social movement: An analysis of feminist activism on social media communities. Journal of Community Psychology, jcop.22324. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22324
Linabary, J. R., Corple, D. J., & Cooky, C. (2020). Feminist activism in digital space: Postfeminist contradictions in #WhyIStayed. New Media and Society, 22(10), 1827–1848. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819884635
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
Marchant, J., Ormson, T., Honari, A., & Sabeti, A. (2018). #iranvotes2017: Analysing the 2017 iranian presidential elections through Telegram, Twitter and Instagram.
Marchant, J., Sabeti, A., Bowen, K., & Kelly, J. (2016). # IranVotes: Political Discourse on Iranian Twitter during the 2016 Parliamentary Elections. https://smallmedia.org.uk/work/iranvotes
Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 138–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212474472
Moghanizadeh, S. (2013). The role of social media in Iran ’ s Green Movement [University of Gothenburg]. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/34206/1/gupea_2077_34206_1.pdf
Moretti, F. (2005). Graphs, maps, trees: Abstract models for a literary history. Verso.
Morozov, E. (2009). Iran: Downside to the “Twitter Revolution.” Dissent, 56(4), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1353/dss.0.0092
Nicholls, T., & Culpepper, P. D. (2020). Computational Identification of Media Frames: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Opportunities. Political Communication, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1812777
Papacharissi, Zizi. (2014). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Papacharissi, Zizi, & De Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x
Peña-López, I., Congosto, M., & Aragón, P. (2014). Spanish Indignados and the evolution of the 15M movement on Twitter: towards networked para-institutions. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 15(1–2), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636204.2014.931678
Penney, J., & Dadas, C. (2014). (Re)Tweeting in the service of protest: Digital composition and circulation in the Occupy Wall Street movement. New Media & Society, 16(1), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813479593
Plotkowiak, T., & Stanoevska-Slabeva, K. (2013). German politicians and their Twitter networks in the Bundestag Election 2009. First Monday, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i5.3816
Pöyhtäri, R., Nelimarkka, M., Nikunen, K., Ojala, M., Pantti, M., & Pääkkönen, J. (2021). Refugee debate and networked framing in the hybrid media environment. International Communication Gazette, 83(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519883520
Rauchfleisch, A., & Metag, J. (2015). The special case of Switzerland?: Swiss politicians on Twitter. May 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815586982
Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. (Shaz). (2021). Microfoundations of Framing: The Interactional Production of Collective Action Frames in the Occupy Movement. Academy of Management Journal, 64(2), 378–408. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.1063
Ruijgrok, K. (2017). From the web to the streets: internet and protests under authoritarian regimes. Democratization, 24(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2016.1223630
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
Small, T. A. (2011). WHAT THE HASHTAG? Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 872–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Yale University Press.
Vergeer, M., & Hermans, L. (2013). Campaigning on Twitter: Microblogging and Online Social Networking as Campaign Tools in the 2010 General Elections in the Netherlands. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(4), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12023
Wojcieszak, M., & Smith, B. (2013). Will politics be tweeted? New media use by Iranian youth in 2011. New Media & Society, 16(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813479594
Wolfsfeld, G., Segev, E., & Sheafer, T. (2013). Social Media and the Arab Spring. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212471716
Wonneberger, A., Hellsten, I. R., & Jacobs, S. H. J. (2020). Hashtag activism and the configuration of counterpublics: Dutch animal welfare debates on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1720770
Zeng, J. (2020). #MeToo as Connective Action: A Study of the Anti-Sexual Violence and Anti-Sexual Harassment Campaign on Chinese Social Media in 2018. Journalism Practice, 14(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1706622
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
