Social [Media] Distancing: on Digital Espionage, Ethnographic Method, and Ethics ‘in the Field’
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v4i4.48Keywords:
social distancing, social media, digital ethnography, ethics, fieldwork, ethnographic methodsAbstract
This article examines the role of digital ethnographic methods in an emerging research landscape struck by COVID-19, whereby more traditional anthropological methods have been rendered impossible due to social distancing restrictions. It argues that while anthropology has long privileged physical proximity and presence as a central tenet of ethnographic method, digital methods can also afford a certain sense of social distance, which in fact can be beneficial to the research process. It draws upon experiences of conducting fifteen months of fieldwork both online and offline amongst marginalised groups in Cuba and its diaspora in Miami to reveal the ways in which digital distance can level the relationship between researcher and researched, and ultimately lead to a more ethical way of carrying out fieldwork amongst vulnerable communities.
References
Amit, V. (2000). Introduction: Constructing the Field. In Constructing the Field: Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World (pp. 1-18). London: Routledge.
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bell, K. (2013). Doing Qualitative Fieldwork in Cuba: Social Research in Politically Sensitive Locations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(2), 109-124.
Bengtsson, S. (2014). Faraway, So Close! Proximity and Distance in Ethnography Online. Media, Culture and Society, 36(6), 862-877.
Bhabha, H. (1994). The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge.
Bluteau, J. M. (2021). Legitimising Digital Anthropology through Immersive Cohabitation: Becoming an Observing Participant in a Blended Digital Landscape. Ethnography, 22(2), 267-285.
Boellstorff, T., et al. (2012). Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Borneman, J., & Masco, J. (2015). Anthropology and the Security State. American Anthropologist, 117(4), 781-785.
boyd, d. (2011). Social Networked Sites as Networked Publics: Affordance, Dynamics, and Implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture (pp. 39-58). New York: Routledge.
Brah, A. (2005). Cartographies of Diaspora: Contesting Identities. London: Routledge.
Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2009). Digital Diasporas: Identity and Transnational Engagement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caputo, V. (2003). At 'Home' and 'Away': Reconfiguring the Field for Late Twentieth-Century Anthropology. In V. Amit (Ed.), Constructing the Field: Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World (pp. 19-31). London: Routledge.
Cearns, J. (2018). Competitive Hardship: Ethnographic Guilt and Early-Career Pressure to Conduct ‘Authentic’ Fieldwork. The New Ethnographer. Retrieved 5 December 2019 from https://thenewethnographer.com/the-new-ethnographer/2018/04/22/competitive-hardship-ethnographic-guilt-and-early-career-pressure-to-conduct-authentic-fieldwork
Chakravarty, A. (2012). “Partially Trusting” Field Relationships Opportunities and Constraints of Fieldwork in Rwanda’s Postconflict Setting. Field Methods, 24(3), 251-271.
Christensen, M., et al. (Eds.). (2011). Online Territories: Globalization, Mediated Practice and Social Space. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Costa, E. (2018). Affordances-in-Practice: An Ethnographic Critique of Social Media Logic and Context Collapse. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3641-3656.
de Zwart, M., et al. (2010, 2010). ‘I Like, Stalk Them on Facebook’: Teachers’ ‘Privacy’ and the Risks of Social Networking Sites. 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society,
Driscoll, J., & Schuster, C. (2018). Spies Like Us. Ethnography, 19(3), 411-430.
Faubion, J. D. (2017). The Ethics of Fieldwork as an Ethics of Connectivity, or the Good Anthropologist (Isn’t What She Used to Be). In J. D. Faubion & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Fieldwork Is Not What It Used to Be (pp. 145-164). Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Ferguson, J. (2019). Rightful Shares and the Claims of Presence: Distributive Politics Beyond Labor and Citizenship. Association of Social Anthropology Conference: Anthropological Perspectives on Global Challenges, Norwich.
Gokah, T. (2006). The Naïve Researcher: Doing Social Research in Africa. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(1), 61-73.
Günel, G., et al. (2020). A Manifesto for Patchwork Ethnography. Cultural Anthropology. Retrieved 20 January 2021, from https://culanth.org/fieldsights/a-manifesto-for-patchwork-ethnography
Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1997). Discipline and Practice: ‘The Field’ as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology. In Locations, Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science (pp. 1-46). Berkeley, LA and London: University of California Press.
Hastrup, K., & Hervik, P. (1994). Social Experience and Anthropological Knowledge. London: Routledge.
Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. London: Bloomsbury Academic Press.
Hjorth, L., et al. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography. London: Routledge.
Jensen, J. F., et al. (Eds.). (2002). Virtual Space: Spatiality in Virtual Inhabited 3d Worlds. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.
Kearney, M. (1995). The Local and the Global: The Anthropology of Globalization and Transnationalism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24(1), 547-565.
Kuklick, H. (1991). The Savage Within: The Social History of British Anthropology, 1885-1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leurs, K. (2015). Digital Passages: Migrant Youth 2.0: Diaspora, Gender and Youth Cultural Intersections. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Madianou, M. (2016). Ambient Co-Presence: Transnational Family Practices in Polymedia Environments. Global Networks, 16(2), 183-201.
Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (Eds.). (2012). Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. London: Routledge.
Malkki, L. H. (2007). Tradition and Improvisation in Ethnographic Field Research. In A. Cerwonka & L. H. Malkki (Eds.), Improvising Theory: Process and Temporality in Ethnographic Fieldwork (pp. 162-188). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117.
Markham, A. N., et al. (2018). Ethics as Methods: Doing Ethics in the Era of Big Data Research—Introduction. Social Media+ Society, 4(3), 1-9.
Miller, D., et al. (2016). How the World Changed Social Media. London: UCL Press.
Miller, D., & Horst, H. A. (Eds.). (2012). Digital Anthropology. New York: Berg.
Miller, D., & Sinanan, J. (2014). Webcam. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Okley, J. (1992). Anthropology and Autobiography Participatory Experience and Embodied Knowledge. In J. Okley & H. Callaway (Eds.), Anthropology and Autobiography (pp. 13-40). London: Routledge.
Olwig, K. F., & Hastrup, K. (1997). Siting Culture: The Shifting Anthropological Object. Psychology Press.
Ong, A. (1999). Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality. Durham: Duke University Press.
Pink, S. (2003). 'Informants' Who Come 'Home'. In V. Amit (Ed.), Constructing the Field: Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World (pp. 96-119). London: Routledge.
Pollard, A. (2009). Field of Screams: Difficulty and Ethnographic Fieldwork. Anthropology Matters, 11(2), 1-24.
Sanjek, R., & Tratner, S. W. (Eds.). (2016). Efieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology in the Digital World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Schroeder, R. (2010). Being There Together: Social Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sundén, J. (2012). Desires at Play: On Closeness and Epistemological Uncertainty. Games and Culture, 7(2), 164-184.
Walton, S. (2018). Remote Ethnography, Virtual Presence: Exploring Digital-Visual Methods for Anthropological Research on the Web. In C. Costa & J. Condie (Eds.), Doing Research in and on the Digital (pp. 116-133). London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
