What is digital activism anyway? Social constructions of the “digital” in contemporary activism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v3i3.44Keywords:
digital activism, digitality, digital dualism, networks, hybridity, engagement ladderAbstract
In recent decades, digital activism has received a lot of scholarly and journalistic attention. Even so, there remains no firm consensus on its precise definition and scope. This paper addresses this conceptual haziness and contends that there are analytical issues and conceptual implications in the openness of the term and its description as digital, as 'digitality' is neither the sole nor the primary feature along which activism has changed. Drawing on extant practices of digital activism and conceptual approaches to its scope, the paper aims to (1) critically discuss & highlight a range of conceptual obscurities in digital activism scholarship, (2) provide a glimpse into the concept’s evolution, and, through these (3) suggest that the term (incl. synonyms) suffers from myriad conceptual and epistemological fallacies: omissions of the concept’s complexity (e.g. hybridity, rhizomatism, multi- mediality), implications of digital dualism and therefore potentially technological determinism, and the invitation of stigma, luddite sentiment, and other social constructions of the technologies to which the term is attached.
References
Adi, A., & Miah, A. (2011). Open Source Protest: Human Rights, Online Activism and the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games. In S. Cottle, L. Lester, & S. Cottle (Eds.), Transnational Protest and the Media (pp. 213-224). New York: Peter Lang.
Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D. (Eds.). (2001). Networks and Netwars - the Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy. Santa Monica: RAND.
Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders. New York: Free Press.
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Penguin.
Beutz Land, M. (2009). Networked Activism. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 22(2), 205-243.
Breindl, Y. (2010). Critique of the Democratic Potentialities of the Internet: A Review of Current Theory and Practice. Triplec, 8(1), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v8i1.159
Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C. (2012). Collective Action in Organizations: Interaction and Engagement in an Era of Technological Change. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15(4), 365-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00340.x
Briones, R. L., Janoske, M., & Madden, S. (2016). Hashtag Activism at Its Best? A Comparative Analysis of Nonprofit Social Media Use for Mobilizing Online Action. In M. Zavattaro & T. A. Bryer (Eds.), Social Media for Government. Theory and Practice (pp. 159-182). New York: Routledge.
Bruns, A. & Burgess, J. (2015). Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics. In N. Rambukkana (Ed.), Hashtag publics: The power and politics of discursive networks (pp. 13-27). Digital Formations, Volume 103. New York: Peter Lang.
Brunsting, S., & Postmes, T. (2002). Social movement participation in the digital age: predicting offline and online action. Small Group Research, 33(5), 525-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649602237169
Brunton, F., & Nissenbaum, H. (2015). Obfuscation: A user's guide for privacy and protest. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.
Brunton, F., & Nissenbaum, H. (2011). Vernacular resistance to data collection and analysis: A political theory of obfuscation. First Monday, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i5.3493
Carty, V. (2010). New information communication technologies and grassroots mobilization. Information, Communication & Society, 13(2), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180902915658
Carty, V., & Onyett, J. (2006). Protest, Cyberactivism and New Social Movements: The Reemergence of the Peace Movement Post 9/11. Social Movement Studies, 5(3), 229-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830600991586
Carty, V., & Reynoso Barron, F.G. (2019). Social Movements and New Technology: The Dynamics of Cyber Activism in the Digital Age. In B. Berberoglu (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Social Movements, Revolution, and Social Transformation (pp. 373-397). Cham: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92354-3_16
Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society (2 ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 238-266. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/46
Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chadwick, A. (2014). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Public Administration, 92(4), 1106-1114.
Chadwick, A. (2014). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. European Journal of Communication, 29(4), 516–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323114533046
Chadwick, A. (2007). Digital Network Repertoires and Organizational Hybridity. Political Communication, 24(3), 283-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701471666
Cullum, B. (2010). Devices: The Power of Mobile Phones. In M. Joyce (Ed.), Digital Activism Decoded - the New Mechanics of Change (pp. 47-70). New York: Idebate Press.
Dahlberg-Grundberg, M. (2015). Technology as movement: on hybrid organizational types and the mutual constitution of movement identity and technological infrastructure in digital activism. Convergence, 22(5), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856515577921
Dartnell, M. Y. (2011). Insurgency Online: Web Activism and Global Conflict. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Earl, J., Kimport, K., Prieto, G., Rush, C., & Reynoso, K. (2010). Changing the world one webpage at a time: conceptualising and explaining internet activism. Mobilization, 15(4), 425-446. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.15.4.w03123213lh37042
Foust, C. R., & Hoyt, K. D. (2018). Social movement 2.0: Integrating and assessing scholarship on social media and movement. Review of Communication, 18(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2017.1411970
George, J. J., & Leidner, D. E. (2019). From clicktivism to hacktivism: Understanding digital activism. Information and Organization, 29(3), 100249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.04.001
Gerbaudo, P. (2017). From Cyber-Autonomism to Cyber-Populism: An Ideological History of Digital Activism. TripleC, 15(2), 477-489.
Gerbaudo, P. (2015). Protest avatars as memetic signifiers: political profile pictures and the construction of collective identity on social media in the 2011 protest wave. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 916-929. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043316
Gladwell, M. (2010, October 4). Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not be Tweeted. The New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/10/04/small-change-3
Gurak, L. J., & Logie, J. (2003). Internet Protests, from Text to Web. In M. McCaughey & M. D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice (pp. 25-46). New York: Routledge.
Halupka, M. (2018). The legitimisation of clicktivism. Australian Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2017.1416586
Halupka, M. (2014). Clicktivism: A systematic heuristic. Policy & Internet, 6(2), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI355
Hands, J. (2011). @ is for Activism - Dissent, Resistance and Rebellion in a Digital Culture. London: Pluto Press.
Hern, A. (2018, January 23). ‘Never get high on your own supply’ – why social media bosses don’t use social media. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/
media/2018/jan/23/never-get-high-on-your-own-supply-why-social-media-bosses-dont-use-social-media [Accessed 26.05.2021]
Hintz, A. (2012). Challenges to freedom of expression in the digital world: lessons from WikiLeaks and the Arab Spring. ESSACHESS Journal for Communication Studies, 1(9), 83-105.
Hwang, T. (2010). Digital Transforms Activism: The Web Ecology Perspective. In M. Joyce (Ed.), Digital Activism Decoded - the New Mechanics of Change (pp. 119-136). New York: Idebate Press.
Jordan, T. (2002). Activism!: Direct Action, Hacktivism and the Future of Society. London: Reaktion.
Jordan, T., & Taylor, P. (2004). Hacktivism and cyberwars: Rebels with a Cause?. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203490037
Joyce, M. (Ed.). (2010). Digital Activism Decoded - the New Mechanics of Change. New York: Idebate Press.
Jurgenson, N. (2012). When Atoms Meet Bits: Social Media, the Mobile Web and Augmented Revolution. Future Internet, 4(1), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4010083
Kahn, R., & Kellner, D. (2004). New Media and Internet Activism: From the 'Battle of Seattle' to Blogging. New Media & Society, 6(1), 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804039908
Kang, J. (2017). Internet activism transforming street politics: South Korea’s 2008 ‘Mad Cow’protests and new democratic sensibilities. Media, Culture & Society, 39(5), 750-761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717709444
Karatzogianni, A. (2015). Firebrand Waves of Digital Activism 1994-2014 – The Rise and Spread of Hacktivism and Cyberconflict. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Karpf, D. (2010a). Online Political Mobilization from the Advocacy Group’s Perspective: Looking Beyond Clicktivism. Policy & Internet, 2(4), 7-41. https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1098
Karpf, D. (2010b). Measuring the Success of Digital Campaigns. In M. Joyce (Ed.), Digital Activism Decoded - the New Mechanics of Change (pp. 151-164). New York: Idebate Press.
Kaun, A., & Uldam, J. (2018). Digital activism: After the hype. New Media & Society, 20(6), 2099–2106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731924.
Kavada, A. (2010). Activism Transforms Digital: The Social Movement Perspective. In M. Joyce (Ed.), Digital Activism Decoded - the New Mechanics of Change (pp. 101-118). New York: Idebate Press.
Kavada, A. (2005). Exploring the role of the internet in the 'movement for alternative globalization': The case of the Paris 2003 European Social Forum. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 2(1), 72-95. https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.9
Lievrouw, L. A. (2011). Alternative and Activist New Media. Digital Media and Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lindgren, S., Dahlberg-Grundberg, M., & Johansson, A. (2014). Hybrid Media Culture: An Introduction. In S. Lindgren (Ed.), Hybrid Media Culture: Sensing Place in a World of Flows (pp. 1-15). Abingdon: Routledge.
Lupton, D. (2014). Digital Sociology. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315776880
Madianou, M. (2015). Polymedia and ethnography: Understanding the social in social media. Social Media + Society, 1(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115578675
Madison, N., & Klang, M. (2020). The Case for Digital Activism: Refuting the Fallacies of Slacktivism. Journal of Digital Social Research, 2(2), 28-47. https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v2i2.25
Mattoni, A. (2017). A situated understanding of digital technologies in social movements. Media ecology and media practice approaches. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 494-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1311250.
McCafferty, D. (2011). Activism vs. slacktivism. Communications of the ACM, 54(12), 17-19. https://doi.org/10.1145/2043174.2043182
McCaughey, M., & Ayers, M. D. (Eds.). (2003). Cyberactivism - Online Activism in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
McLaine, S. (2003). Ethnic Online Communities: Between Profit and Purpose. In M. McCaughey, & M. D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice (pp. 233-254). New York: Routledge.
Meikle, G. (2010). Intercreativity: Mapping Online Activism. In J. Hunsinger, L. Klastrup & M. Allen (Eds.), International Handbook of Internet Research (pp. 363-377). Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9789-8_22
Mercea, D., Iannelli, L., & Loader, B. D. (2016). Protest communication ecologies. Information, Communication & Society, 19:(3), 279-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109701
Mercea, D. (2011). Digital prefigurative participation: The entwinement of online communication and offline participation in protest events. New Media & Society, 14(1), 153 –169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811429103
Miller, V. (2017). Phatic culture and the status quo: reconsidering the purpose of social media activism. Convergence, 23(3), 251-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856515592512
Morozov, E. (2009). Iran: downside to the "Twitter revolution". Dissent, 56(4), 10-14.
Murdoch, S. (2010). Destructive Activism: The Double-Edged Sword of Digital Tactics. In M. Joyce (Ed.), Digital Activism Decoded - the New Mechanics of Change (pp. 137-147). New York: Idebate Press.
Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Ng, E., & Toupin, S. (2013). Feminist and queer practices in the online and offline activism of Occupy: a case study at Occupy Wall Street. Networking Knowledge, 6(3), 90-114.
Nielsen, R. K. (2010). Digital Politics as Usual. In M. Joyce (Ed.), Digital Activism Decoded - the New Mechanics of Change (pp. 181-196). New York: Idebate Press.
Özkula, S. M. (2021). The problem of history in digital activism: Ideological narratives in digital activism literature. First Monday, 26(8). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i8.10597
Paloque-Bergès, C. & Schafer, V. (2019). ARPANET (1969–2019). Internet Histories, 3(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2018.1560921.
Peters, M. A., & Besley, T. (2019). Weinstein, sexual predation, and ‘Rape Culture’: Public pedagogies and Hashtag Internet activism. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(5), 458-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1427850.
Polletta, F. (2013). Participatory Democracy in the New Millenium. Contemporary Sociology, 42(1), 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306112468718b
Postill, J. (2011). Localizing the Internet - an Anthropological Account. Anthropology of Media. Vol. 5. New York: Berghahn Books.
Rambukkana, N. (2015). Hashtag publics: The power and politics of discursive networks. Digital Formations Volume 103. New York: Peter Lang.
Rauchfleisch, A., & Schäfer, M. S. (2015). Multiple public spheres of Weibo: a typology of forms and potentials of online public spheres in China. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.940364.
Rheingold, H. (2003). Smart mobs. Sociétés, (1), 75-87.
Reilly, P., & Vicari, S. (2021). Organizational Hashtags During Times of Crisis: Analyzing the Broadcasting and Gatekeeping Dynamics of# PorteOuverte During the November 2015 Paris Terror Attacks. Social Media+ Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121995788.
Reilly, P. (2015). Every little helps? YouTube, sousveillance and the ‘antiTesco’ riot in Stokes Croft. New Media & Society, 17(5), 755–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813512195
Sassen, S. (2002). Towards a sociology of information technology. Current Sociology, 50(3), 365-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392102050003005
Shulman, S. W. (2009). The Case Against Mass E-mails: Perverse Incentives and Low Quality Public Participation in U.S. Federal Rulemaking. Policy & Internet, 1(1), 23-53. https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1010
Silver, D. (2003). Epilogue: Current directions and future questions. In M. McCaughey & M. D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice (pp. 279-290). New York: Routledge.
Stein, L., Notley, T., & Davis, S. (2012). Transnational networking and capacity building for communication activism. Global Media Journal: Australian Edition, 6(2).
Tang, L. (2013). The politics of flies: mocking news in Chinese cyberspace. Chinese Journal of Communication, 6(4), 482-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2013.844190.
Tatarchevskiy, T. (2011). The 'popular' culture of internet activism. New Media & Society, 13(2), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810372785
Ting, T. (2020). From ‘be water’ to ‘be fire’: nascent smart mob and networked protests in Hong Kong. Social Movement Studies, 19(3), 362-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1727736.
Treré, E. (2019). Hybrid Media Activism: Ecologies, Imaginaries, Algorithms. Abingdon/ New York: Routledge.
Treré, E., & Mattoni, E. (2016). Media ecologies and protest movements: main perspectives and key lessons. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 290-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109699.
Tufekci, Z. (2013). “Not This One”: Social Movements, the Attention Economy, and Microcelebrity Networked Activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 848 –870. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479369
Uldam, J. (2013). Activism and the Online Mediation Opportunity Structure: Attempts to Impact Global Climate Change Policies. Policy & Internet, 5(1), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.22
Vegh, S. (2003). Classifying Forms of Online Activism: The Case of Cyberprotests against the World Bank. In M. McCaughey & M. D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice (pp. 71-96). New York: Routledge.
Waterston, J. (2019, March 18). Social media addiction should be seen as a disease, MPs say. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/mar/18/
social-media-addiction-should-be-seen-as-disease-mps-say
White, M. (2010, August 12). Clicktivism is Ruining Leftist Activism. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/aug/12/clicktivism-ruining-leftist-activism
Wolfsfeld, G., Segev, E., & Sheafer, T. (2013). Social Media and the Arab Spring: Politics Comes First. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212471716
Yang, G. (2018). (Un) civil society in digital China| Demobilizing the emotions of online activism in China: A civilizing process. International Journal of Communication, 12, 1945–1965. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5313
Yang, G. (2009). Online Activism. Journal of Democracy, 20(3), 33-36. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0094
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
