Spreading Sankofa
Addressing digital epistemicide through LIS education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v6i3.33238Keywords:
Digital Epistemicide, Sankofa Intervention, Epistemicide, Epistemic Injustice, NeutralityAbstract
Epistemicide is the devaluing, silencing, or annihilation of knowledge and encompasses systematic knowledge destruction enacted through accumulation of epistemic injustices. Considering prior epistemicide research in LIS––in conjunction with critical, historical, and philosophical perspectives of technology––this paper examines how epistemicide occurs by and through digital technologies, constituting what we call digital epistemicide. The social, cultural, and historical epistemic injustices enabled through technology––and the proliferation of epistemic injustices in digital worlds––demands a theorization of how epistemicide occurs in digital contexts. By considering elements of power, domination, and control in relation to digital technologies, we contribute to a critically informed meta-language for describing digital epistemicide. With concern and care for the next generation of library and information professionals, we call for an enactment of Sankofa Interventions. These include everyday dialogues, practices, policies, actions, or critical reflections that engage with historical narratives from the past, absent from discourses of the present, in a manner that emulates the notion of Sankofa. The enactment of Sankofa interventions to mitigate digital epistemicide, such as reparative storytelling and other critical digital pedagogical practices, requires both ongoing attention to digitizing records that have been left behind and likewise ensuring that digital worlds are well maintained to support the preservation and sharing of knowledge.
References
Alcoff, L. (1991). The problem of speaking for others. Cultural critique, (20), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354221
Assmann, A. (2015). The burning of books as an assault on cultural memory. What do we lose when we lose a library? Proceedings of the conference held at the KU Leuven 9-11 September 2015, pp. 85-96.
Bell, S. A. (2020). The informatics of domination and the necessity for feminist vigilance toward digital technology. In P. Sotirin, V.L. Bergvall, and D.L. Shoos (Eds.), Feminist Vigilance (pp.23-42). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59793-1_2
Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new jim code. Social forces.
Budd, J. (2022). The Library as Forum in the Social Media Age. Rowman & Littlefield.
Burgess, J., & Fowler, G. (2022). Opposing Epistemicide as First Principle: Redeeming Social Epistemology in LIS Education. In Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference. https://doi.org/10.21900/j.alise.2022.1065
Chang, H. (2011). The Persistence of Epistemic Objects Through Scientific Change. Erkenntnis, 75(3), 413–429. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41476731
Cooke, N.A. (2016), "Counter-Storytelling in the LIS Curriculum", Perspectives on Libraries as Institutions of Human Rights and Social Justice (Advances in Librarianship, Vol. 41), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0065-283020160000041014
Cooke, N. A. (2018). Creating Mirrors and Doors in the Curriculum: Diversifying and Re-Envisioning the MLS. In J. Percell, L. C. Sarin, P. T. Jaeger, & J. Carlo Bertot (Eds.), Re-envisioning the MLS: Perspectives on the Future of Library and Information Science Education (Vol. 44B, pp. 27–48). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0065-28302018000044B003
Cummings, S., Dhewa, C., Kemboi, G., & Young, S. (2023). Doing epistemic justice in sustainable development: Applying the philosophical concept of epistemic injustice to the real world. Sustainable Development, 31(3), 1965-1977. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2497
Davidson, L. J. (2019). When Testimony Isn’t Enough: Implicit Bias Research as Epistemic Exclusion. In B.R. Sherman and S. Goguen (Eds.), Overcoming epistemic injustice: Social and psychological perspectives (pp. 269-284). Rowman & Littlefield International.
DeMello, M. (2014). Inked: Tattoos and Body Art around the World [2 volumes]. ABC-CLIO.
de Sousa Santos, B. (2015). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.
Dotson, K. (2011), Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing. Hypatia, 26(2), 236-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x
Dotson, K. (2012). A cautionary tale: On limiting epistemic oppression. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 33(1), 24-47. https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.33.1.0024
D'ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data feminism. MIT press.
Drabinski, E. (2019). What is Critical About Critical Librarianship? Publications and Research. https://academicworks.cuny.edu /gc_pubs/537
Fanon, F. (2015). On National Culture. In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory: A Reader (pp. 36-52). Routledge. (Original work published 1994) (Reprinted from The Wretched of the Earth. trans. Constance Farrington, pp. 166-7, 168-71, 172-5, 178-83, 187-99, by Frantz Fanon, 1967, Penguin: Harmondsworth)
Florini, S. (2019). Beyond hashtags: Racial politics and black digital networks. New York University Press.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
Friedrich, M. (2018). The birth of the archive: A history of knowledge. University of Michigan Press.
Gibson, A.N., Chancellor, R.L., Cooke, N.A., Park Dahlen, S., Lee, S.A. and Shorish, Y.L. (2017). Libraries on the frontlines: neutrality and social justice. Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion, 36(8), 751-766. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-11-2016-0100
Haraway, D. (1991) A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology and Socialist-Feminism in the 1980s. In Nicholson, L. (ed.), Feminism/Post-Modernism (pp. 190-233). Routledge: New York.
Hookway, C. (2010). Some varieties of epistemic injustice: Reflections on Fricker. Episteme, 7(2), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2010.0005
Hughes, T. (1994). Technological Momentum. In Marx, L. and Smith, M. R. (eds.), Does Technology Drive History: The Dilemma of Technological Determinism (pp. 101-113). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
Jacobs, N., & Cooper, R. (2018). Living in digital worlds: designing the digital public space. Routledge.
Jaeger, P. T., & Burnett, G. (2010). Information worlds: Behavior, technology, and social context in the age of the Internet. Routledge.
Jimenez, A., Vannini, S., & Cox, A. (2022). A holistic decolonial lens for library and information studies. Journal of Documentation, 79(1), 224-244. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2021-0205
Joerges, B. (1990). Images of Technology in Sociology: Computer as Butterfly and Bat. Technology and Culture, 31(2), 203-227. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.1990.0047
Jones, F. (2019). Reclaiming our space: How Black feminists are changing the world from the tweets to the streets. Beacon Press.
Kincheloe, J. L. (2008). Critical pedagogy primer (Vol. 1). Peter Lang.
Knox, E. (2014). " The Books Will Still Be in the Library": Narrow Definitions of Censorship in the Discourse of Challengers. Library Trends, 62(4), 740-749. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2014.0020
Knox, E. J. (2019). Silencing Stories. The international journal of information, diversity, & inclusion, 3(2), 24-39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48645178
Knuth, R. (2003). Libricide: The Regime-Sponsored Destruction of Books and Libraries in the Twentieth Century. Praeger: Westport, CT.
Knuth, R. (2006). Burning books and levelling libraries: Extremist violence and cultural destruction. Praeger: Westport, CT.
Lankes, R.D. (2020). Never neutral, never alone. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 61(3), 383-388. https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis.61.3.2020-0007
Lerner, F. (2011). The story of libraries: From the invention of writing to the computer age (2nd Ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Leung, S. Y., & López-McKnight, J. R. (Eds.). (2021). Knowledge Justice: Disrupting Library and Information Studies through Critical Race Theory. MIT Press.
McDowell, K., Cooke, N., Del Negro, J., Patin, B., & Tenney, C. (2021). Storytelling and/as Resilience. Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference. https://hdl.handle.net/2142/110953
McDowell, K., & Cooke, N. A. (2022). Social Justice Storytelling: A Pedagogical Imperative. The Library Quarterly, 92(4), 355-378, https://hdl.handle.net/2142/115098
McKinnon, R. (2019). Gaslighting as epistemic violence: "allies," mobbing, and complex posttraumatic stress disorder, including a case study of harassment of transgender women in sport. In B.R. Sherman and S. Goguen (Eds.), Overcoming epistemic injustice: Social and psychological perspectives (pp. 285-302). Rowman & Littlefield International.
Mehra, B. (2021). Social Justice Design and Implementation: Innovative Pedagogies to Transform LIS Education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 62(4), 460-476. https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis-62-4-2020-0094
Mehra, B. (2022). Toward an impact-driven framework to operationalize social justice and implement ICT4D in the field of information. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24693
Mohanty, C.T. (1988). Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Feminist Review, 30(1), 65-88.
Murray, S. (2020). Statement of Recommitment. Alabama Department of Archives and History. https://www.scribd.com/document/466721133/Archives-History-Statement of Recommitment
Noble, S.U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (n.d.). Neutrality. Retrieved January 11, 2022, from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/neutrality
Oliphant, T. (2021). Emerging (information) realities and epistemic injustice. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(8), 951-962. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24461
Orlikowski, W., & Iacono, S. (2001). Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700
Paraskeva, J. M. (2016). Curriculum epistemicide: Towards an itinerant curriculum theory. Routledge.
Patin, B., Sebastian, M., Yeon, J., & Bertolini, D. (2020). Toward epistemic justice: An approach for conceptualizing epistemicide in the information professions. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), e242. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.242
Patin, B., Sebastian, M., Yeon, J., Bertolini, D., & Grimm, A. (2021a). Interrupting epistemicide: A practical framework for naming, identifying, and ending epistemic injustice in the information professions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(10), 1306-1318. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24479
Patin, B., Sebastian, M., Yeon, J., Bertolini, D., & Grimm, A. (2021b). The Mis-Education of the Librarian: Addressing curricular injustice in the LIS classroom through social justice pedagogy. In B. Mehra (Ed.), Social justice design and implementation in library and information science. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003129219
Patin, B., & Youngman, T. (2022). The Sankofa Intervention: Combatting the Epistemicide of Parasitic Omission Through Civil Rights Literacy in Community Information Contexts. Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference. https://doi.org/10.21900/j.alise.2022.1067
Pinch, T.J. and Bijker, W.E. (1987). The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. In Bijker, Hughes & Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (pp. 17-50). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004
Pohlhaus, G. (2012). Relational knowing and epistemic injustice: Toward a theory of wilful hermeneutical ignorance. Hypatia, 27(4), 715-735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01222.x
Pohlhaus, G. (2020). Gaslighting and Echoing, or Why Collective Epistemic Resistance is not a “Witch Hunt”. Hypatia, 35(4), 674-686. https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2020.29
Rapchak, M. (2021). Introducing Critical Librarianship to Information Professionals: Using Critical Pedagogy and Critical Information Literacy in an LIS Graduate Course. Communications in Information Literacy, 15(1), 140-157. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2021.15.1.8
Risam, R. (2018). New digital worlds: Postcolonial digital humanities in theory, praxis, and pedagogy. Northwestern University Press.
Russell, S. and Williams, R. (2002). Social shaping of technology: frameworks, findings, and implications for policy with glossary of social shaping concepts. In Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy: Concepts, Spaces and Tools (pp. 37-131). Edward Elgar: Cheltenham. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313728731_Social_shaping_of_technology_Fra meworks_findings_and_implications_for_policy
Sebastian, M., Youngman, T., & Patin, B. (2022). Know Better: Combatting Epistemicide by Addressing the Ethics of Neutrality in LIS. Journal of Information Ethics, 31(2), 70-82. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/know-better-combatting-epistemicide-addressing/docview/2756262329/se-2
Scott, D., & Saunders, L. (2021). Neutrality in public libraries: How are we defining one of our core values?. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 53(1), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000620935501
Shohat, E., Stam, R. (1994). From Eurocentrism to Polycentrism. In Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the Media (pp.13-54). Routledge.
Smith, M. and Patin, B. (In Production). Giving Voice through Reparative Storytelling: Correcting Racist Epistemic Injustices in LIS. Library Quarterly.
Spivak, G. C. (2023) Can the subaltern speak?. In Imperialism (pp. 171-219). Routledge.
Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. (1989) Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
Sutherland, T. (2017) Archival amnesty: In search of Black American transitional and restorative justice. Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies, 1(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.42
The Spirituals Project (2010, Feb. 19). “African Tradition, Proverbs, and Sankofa.” University of Denver. https://web.archive.org/web/20110420131901/http:/ctl.du.edu/spirituals/literature/sankofa.cfm
Wajcman, J. (2000). Reflections on gender and technology studies: in what state is the art?. Social studies of science, 30(3), 447-464. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631200030003005
White, L. (1940) Technology and Invention in the Middle Ages. Speculum, 15(2), 141-159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2849046
Yeon, J., Smith, M., Youngman, T., & Patin, B. (2023). Epistemicide Beyond Borders: Addressing Epistemic Injustice in Global Library and Information Settings through Critical International Librarianship. The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion, 7(1/2). https://doi.org/10.33137/ijidi.v7i1/2.39251
Youngman, T., Modrow, S., Smith, M., & Patin, B. (2022). Epistemicide on the record: Theorizing commemorative injustice and reimagining interdisciplinary discourses in cultural information studies. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 358-367. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.759
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tyler Youngman, Beth Patin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
