Bridging the gap: Crypto users’ sense-making of a historical market crisis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v6i3.33355Keywords:
Cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, promissory gap, crisis, sense-makingAbstract
The conflict between cryptocurrencies’ ideological promises and their practical reality has recently become a considerable topic of scholarly discussion. It has been framed in terms of the so-called ‘promissory gap’ of cryptocurrencies – a gap that is founded in the contrast between the promises of a ‘trust-free’ system and actual reality. Yet, while crypto’s notion of ‘trust-free’ money has been heavily questioned, there is little research on how users seek to overcome cryptocurrencies’ promissory gap. Contrary to the promises of being ‘trust-free’ by design, this paper demonstrates that struggles for trust and control represent a focal point of the community interactions surrounding crypto. By drawing upon Dervin’s sense-making methodology to conduct interviews with 28 crypto investors, this study examines how social actors attempt to construct ‘bridges’ over a ‘gap-filled’ reality related to the moment of a historical crisis in crypto. The results reveal crypto’s intricate social embeddedness: whilst unequal power dynamics, distrust, and conflicting interests represent primary elements of users’ struggles in the crypto space, users attempt to restore a sense of control by recalling personal motivations and connecting with like-minded people. The paper provides insights into crypto users’ strategies to construct meaning in a highly uncertain environment and contributes to the discussion of crypto as a socially structured phenomenon.
References
Agarwal, N. K. (2012). Making Sense of Sense-Making: Tracing the History and Development of Dervin’s Sense-Making Methodology. http://web.simmons.edu/~agarwal/files/Agarwal-ASIST-History-preconf-2012-author.pdf.
AOIR (2019). Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P. & Pinch, T. (1999). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cohen, S. & McKay, G. (1984). Social Support, Stress and the Buffering Hypothesis: A Theoretical Analysis. In Taylor S. E., Singer, J. E. and Baum, A. (eds.) Handbook of Psychology and Health. Social Psychological Aspects of Health, Vol. IV (1st ed). London: Routledge, 253-267.
Day, A. (2019). “I Was Prepared to Stay Here and Die With My Animals”: Pet Owners, Hurricane Harvey, and the Role of Communication in Disaster Sense-Making. Wayne State University Dissertations. 2216. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/2216
DeFilippi, P., Mannan, M. & Reijers, W. (2020). Blockchain as a Confidence Machine: The Problem of Trust & Challenges of Governance. Technology in Society, 62, 101284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284
Dervin, B. (1983). An Overview of Sense-Making Research: Concepts, Methods, and Results to Date. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dallas, TX, May. [Online]. http://communication.sbs.ohio-state.edu/sense-making/art/artdervin83.html
Dervin, B. (1992). From the Mind’s Eye of The User: The Sense-Making Qualitative-Quantitative Methodology. In Glazier, J. & Powell, R. (eds), Qualitative Research in Information Management, 61--84. Englewood: Libraries Unlimited.
Dervin, B. (2003). Chaos, Order, and Sense-Making: A Proposed Theory for Information Design. In Dervin, B. & Foreman-Wernet, L (with E. Lauterbach) (eds.) Sense-Making Methodology Reader: Selected Writings of Brenda Dervin. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton, 325-340.
Dervin, B. & Foreman-Wernet, L. (2013). Sense-Making Methodology as an Approach to Understanding and Designing for Campaign Audiences. In Rice, R. E. & Atkin, C. K. (eds). Public Communication Campaigns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 147-162.
Dodd, N. (2014). The Social Life of Money. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dodd, N. (2018). The social life of Bitcoin. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(3), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276417746464
Evans, J. (2022). How the Terra-Luna Crash Has Affected Crypto Trading. https://www.raconteur.net/finance/how-the-terra-luna-crash-has-affected-crypto-trading
Griffith, J., Najand, M. & Shen, J. (2020). Emotions in the Stock Market. Journal of Behavioural Finance, 21(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2019.1588275
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and Methodological Bases of Naturalistic Inquiry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 30(4), 233-252.
Hayes, A. (2019). The Socio-Technological Lives of Bitcoin. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(4), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419826218
Hoffman, P. T., Postel-Vinay, G. & Rosenthal, J. L. (2007). Surviving Large Losses. Financial Crises, the Middle Class, and the Development of Capital Markets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Howard, J. (2023). 75+ Incredible Cryptocurrency Statistics. https://explodingtopics.com/blog/cryptocurrency-stats
Janssens, A. C. J. W. & Kraft, P. (2012). Research Conducted Using Data Obtained through Online Communities: Ethical Implications of Methodological Limitations. PLoS Med, 9(10), e1001328. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001328
Jones, E. E. & Harris, V. A. (1967). “The Attribution of Attitudes”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(67)90034-0
Karlstrøm, H. (2014). Do Libertarians Dream of Electric Coins? The Material Embeddedness of Bitcoin. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 15(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2013.870083
Kay, A. C., Whitson, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Compensatory Control: Achieving Order Through the Mind, our Institutions, and the Heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 264-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01649.x
Lehdonvirta, V. (2022). The Politics of Crypto [online]. Crypto Policy Symposium 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWCa9N4Xo8c
Leising, M. (2021). Crypto Is People and Culture. It’s Time the Media Saw It That Way. https://www.coindesk.com/layer2/2021/12/13/crypto-is-people-and-culture-its-time-the-media-saw-it-that-way/
Lustig, C. & Nardi, B. (2015). Algorithmic Authority: the Case of Bitcoin. In Misra S., et al. (eds.) 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, 743–752.
Maddox, A., Sing, S., Adamson, G. & Heather, H. (2017): The Digital Frontier of Research Ethics. A Digital and Face-to-Face Ethnographic Study of Cryptocurrency Use and Financial Inclusion. Conference Paper. ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://ethicalencountershci.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/paper-9-maddox-et-al.pdf
Maddox, A, Singh, S, Horst, H. & Adamson, G. (2016). An Ethnography of Bitcoin: Towards a Future Research Agenda. Australian Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy, 4(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.18080/ajtde.v4n1.49
Mallard, A., Méadel, C. & Musiani, F. (2014). The Paradoxes of Distributed Trust: Peer-to-Peer Architecture and User Confidence in Bitcoin. Journal of Peer Production, 7(10), 1-10. https://hal-mines-paristech.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00985707
Markham, A. (2005): The Methods, Politics, and Ethics of Representation in Online Ethnography. In Denzin, Norman, Lincoln, Yvonna (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., 793-820.
Markham, A. (2020): An “Impact Model” for Ethical Assessment, IRE 3.0 Companion 6.4, Association of Internet Researchers. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
May, T. (1992). The Crypto-Anarchy Manifesto [online]. http://www.activism.net/cypherpunk/crypto-anarchy.html
May, T. (1996). Untraceable Digital Cash, Information Markets, and BlackNet [online]. http://osaka.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/tcmay.htm
Nakamoto, S. (2009). “Bitcoin Open Source Implementation of P2P Currency”, P2P Foundation, 11 February 2009. http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-source
Naumer, C. M., Fisher, K. E. & Dervin, B. (2008). Sense-Making: A Methodological Perspective. Sensemaking Workshop, CHI '08, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference, Italy.
Nickel, P. J. (2015). Design for the Value of Trust. In van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P., and van de Poel, I. (eds.) Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6970-0_21
Nissenbaum, H. (2001). Securing Trust Online: Wisdom or Oxymoron? Boston University Law Review, 81, 635-664.
O’Driscoll, A. (2023). Bitcoin Fraud, Theft, and Security Statistics. https://www.comparitech.com/crypto/bitcoin-statistics-security/
Q.ai., (2022). What Really Happened To LUNA Crypto? https://www.forbes.com/sites/qai/2022/09/20/what-really-happened-to-luna-crypto/?sh=7b2c35aa4ff1
Picione, R. D. L. & Lozzi, U. (2021). Uncertainty as a Constitutive Condition of Human Experience: Paradoxes and Complexity of Sensemaking in the Face of the Crisis and Uncertainty. International Journal of Psychoanalysis and Education, 1(2), 14-53. https://doi.org/10.32111/SAS.2021.1.2.2
Rehak, R. (2019). A Trustless Society? A Political Look at the Blockchain Vision. EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, 60-65.
Sanchez, A. (2022). Luna Crypto Crash Wipes Out Savings of Thousands of Investors, Sparking Fears for Sector. https://english.elpais.com/economy-and-business/2022-05-12/luna-crypto-crash-wipes-out-savings-of-thousands-of-investors-sparking-fears-for-sector.html
Schneider, N. (2022). Cryptoeconomics as a Limitation on Governance. https://osf.io/wzf85?view_only=a10581ae9a804aa197ac39ebbba05766
Schwarzer, R., Hahn, A. & Schröder, H. (1994). Social Integration and Social Support in a Life Crisis: Effects of Macrosocial Change in East Germany. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22(5), 685-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506899
Simmel, G. (1978). The Philosophy of Money (3rd edition). London: Routledge.
Star, S. L. (1999). The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326
Stieglitz, S., Bunker, D., Mirbabaie, M. & Ehnis, C. (2017). Sense-Making in Social Media during Extreme Events. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12193
Swartz, L. (2018) What Was Bitcoin, What Will It Be? The Techno-Economic Imaginaries of a New Money Technology. Cultural Studies, 32(4), 623-650. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1416420
Turner, J. R., Allen, J., Hawamdeh, S. & Mastanamma, G. (2023). The Multifaceted Sensemaking Theory: A Systematic Literature Review and Content Analysis on Sensemaking. Systems, 11(3), 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11030145
Verbeek, P. P. (2016). Toward a Theory of Technological Mediation: A Program for Postphenomenological Research. In Berg, J. K., Friis, O. and Crease, R. C. (eds.) Technoscience and Postphenomenology: The Manhattan Papers. London: Lexington Books.
Vidan, G. & Lehdonvirta, V. (2019). Mine the Gap: Bitcoin and the Maintenance of Trustlessness. New Media & Society, 21(1), 42-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818786220
Woodall, A. & Ringel, S. (2019). Blockchain Archival Discourse: Trust and the Imaginaries of Digital Preservation. New Media & Society, 22(12), 2200-2217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819888756
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Annika Aebli, Fabienne Silberstein-Bamford
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
