Digital transformation and research infrastructures
Promises and challenges of data-driven research in a Swedish context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v7i148805Keywords:
Digital transformation, digital humanities, surveillance culture, data-driven research, research ethicsAbstract
Society is transforming due to changes in demographics, the environment, and technology, and thus faces multiple challenges. In this context, data coordination and access, collectively referred to as the digital transformation, are key to addressing anticipated societal tensions.
This interview-based qualitative study focuses on how researchers responsible for large-scale population-based research infrastructure view the opportunities and dilemmas in play in the intersection between data and personal privacy. The objective is to look beyond the glossy formulations of official strategy documents to see how the digital transformation (more specifically, data-driven research) is perceived from the active researcher’s point of view, and what the intellectual negotiation process is like. What is of interest here is how the accessibility of register data is legitimized, and what developments and significant changes are simultaneously taking place. The research questions are:
1) How does the research community acknowledge the tensions and dilemmas between the possible risks and harms of large-scale, data-driven, population-based research, and its potential benefits?
2) How are the accessibility and coordination of research data justified and discussed by the research community, given the risks and potential, in relation to political and societal goals and policies?
With the contemporary Swedish research context as a point of departure, these research questions are addressed based on policy documents about digitalization, and on interviews with researchers.References
Åm, H., Solbu, G., & Sørensen, K. H. (2021). The imagined scientist of science governance. Social Studies of Science, 51(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720962573
Andreassen, R., Kaun, A., & Nikunen, K. (2021). Fostering the data welfare state: A Nordic perspective on datafication. Nordicom Review, 42(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0051
Bennesved, P. (2024). Surveillance, integrity and metadata in the information age The legacy of Sweden’s ICT commission, 1994–2003. Lychnos: Årsbok för idé- och lärdomshistoria, 105–129. https://doi.org/10.48202/26116.
Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., Pinch, T. J. (2012). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2012). CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Cocq, C.; Gelfgren, S.; Samuelsson, L.; Enbom, J. (2020) Online Surveillance in a Swedish Context: Between acceptance and resistance. Nordicom Review, 41(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0022
Couldry, N. & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Cambridge: Polity.
Delhey, J. & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review. 21(4). 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jci022
van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafiction, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and secular belief. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
European Commission. (2019) Orientations towards the first strategic plan for Horizon Europe. Accessed 10 Feb. 2021 from https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2019-12/ec_rtd_orientations-he-strategic-plan_122019.pdf
Forgó, N., Hänold, S., van den Hoven, J., Krügel, T., Lishchuk, I., Mahieu, R., Monreale, A., Pedreschi, D., Pratesi, F., & van Putten, D. (2020). An ethico-legal framework for social data science. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 11(4), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-020-00211-7
Frank, F. (2020). When an Entire Country is a Cohort. Science 287, 2398-2399. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.287.5462.2398
Future of Life Institute. (2023, 22 mars). Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter, Accessed 2 Feb. 2024 from https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31(8). 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
Gerber, N., Gerber, P. & Volkamer, M. (2018), Explaining the privacy paradox: A systematic review of literature investigating privacy attitude and behavior. Computers & Security, (77). 226-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2018.04.002
Gläser J, Laudel G. Governing Science: How Science Policy Shapes Research Content. European Journal of Sociology. 2016;57(1):117-168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975616000047
Government Offices of Sweden (2011). IT i människans tjänst—en digital agenda för Sverige (dnr N2011/342/ITP). See https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/kommittedirektiv/2012/06/dir.-201261.
Government Offices of Sweden (2014). Unik kunskap genom registerforskning [Unique knowledge through register research]. (SOU 2014:45). Accessed 3 Dec. 2021 from https://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/2e42baeaa76e4e918dd852f2a3e43fca/unik-kunskap-genom-registerforskning-sou-201445
Government Offices of Sweden. (2016). Digitaliseringens transformerande kraft—vägval för framtiden [The transforming power of digitalization—choosing a path for the future] (SOU 2016:89). Accessed 15 Feb. from https://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/f7d07b214e2c459eb5757cea206e6701/sou-2016_89_webb.pdf
Government Offices of Sweden (2017) För ett hållbart digitaliserat Sverige—En digitaliseringsstrategi [For a sustainable digitalized Sweden: A digitalization strategy]. Accessed 8 Aug. 2023 from https://www.regeringen.se/49adea/contentassets/5429e024be6847fc907b786ab954228f/digitaliseringsstrategin_slutlig_170518-2.pdf
Government Offices of Sweden (2018). Rätt att forska: Långsiktig reglering av forskningsdatabaser [Right to research: Long-term regulation of research databases]. (SOU 2018:36). Accessed 3 Dec. 2021 from https://www.regeringen.se/49c0cd/contentassets/2570b2abef8c48f084bbddb48ed2300b/sou-2018_36_webb.pdf
Government Offices of Sweden (2020) Forskning, frihet, framtid—kunskap och innovation för Sverige [Research, freedom, future—knowledge and innovation for Sweden]. Prop. 2020/21:60. Accessed 23 May 2023. https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/proposition/2020/12/forskning-frihet-framtid--kunskap-och-innovation-for-sverige/
Government Offices of Sweden (2021). Regeringsuppdrag att föreslå ett strategiskt program för digital strukturomvandling. Accessed 3 Dec. 2021 from https://www.regeringen.se/48e3a9/contentassets/d9408f8eee6342b2b4aba3c52072dfcb/uppdrag-att-foresla-utformning-av-ett-strategiskt-program-for-att-mota-och-leda-i-den-digitala-strukturomvandlingen.pdf
Government Offices of Sweden (2023). Uppdrag till forskningsfinansiärerna att inkomma med analyser som underlag till regeringens forskningspolitik. (Dnr U2023/01317) Accessed 15 Feb. 2024 from https://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/5eee3b9b4a32457ea9a5fae3cf2e0bbc/uppdrag-till-forskningsfinansiarerna-att-inkomma-med-analyser-till-regeringens-forsknings--och-innovationspolitik.pdf
Gray, A. (2002). Research practice for cultural studies: Ethnographic methods and lived cultures. London: Sage.
Hine, C. (2021). Evaluating the prospects for university-based ethical governance in artificial intelligence and data-driven innovation. Research Ethics Review, 17(4), 464–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211022790
Holm, P., Jarrick A., Scott D. (2015). Humanities World Report. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jack, R. E., Crivelli, C., & Wheatley, T. (2018). Data-driven methods to diversify knowledge of human psychology. Trends in cognitive sciences, 22(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.10.002
Kokolakis, S. (2017), Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & Security, (64), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002
Lehtiniemi, T., & Ruckenstein, M. (2019). The social imaginaries of data activism. Big Data & Society, 6(1), Article 2053951718821146. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718821146
Lucchi, N. (2023). ChatGPT: A Case Study on Copyright Challenges for Generative Artificial Intelligence Systems. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2023.59
Lusher, S. J., McGuire, R., van Schaik, R. C., Nicholson, C. D., & de Vlieg, J. (2014). Data-driven medicinal chemistry in the era of big data. Drug Discovery Today, 19(7), 859–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2013.12.004
Lyon, D. (2017). Surveillance culture: Engagement, exposure, and ethics in digital modernity. International Journal of Communication. 11, 824–842. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5527
Lyon, D. (2018). The culture of surveillance: Watching as a way of life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Miller, H. J., & Goodchild, M. F. (2015). Data-driven geography. GeoJournal, 80(4), 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9602-6
Norberg, P. A., Horne, D. R., & Horne, D. A. (2007). The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41, 100–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x
OECD. (2019). Going Digital: Shaping Policies, Improving Lives. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter. Accessed 4 April 2023 from https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments
Pappalardo, Grossi, V., & Pedreschi, D. (2021). Introduction to the special issue on social mining and big data ecosystem for open, responsible data science. International journal of data science and analytics, 11(4), 261–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-021-00253-5
Reutter, L. & Åm, H. (2024) Constructing the data economy: tracing expectations of value creation in policy documents, Critical Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2023.2300436
Riessman, C.K. (2007). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. London: Sage.
Sadowski, J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549
Samuelson, P. (2023) Generative AI meets copyright. Science 381,158-161. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adi0656
Samuelsson, L., Cocq, C., Gelfgren, S., Enbom, J. (2023). Everyday Life in the Culture of Surveillance. Nordicom, University of Gothenburg. https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855732
Swedish Research Council (2018). The Swedish Research Council´s guide to research infrastructure 2018. Accessed 3 Dec. 2023 from https://www.vr.se/download/18.7f26360d16642e3af996ff/1555326273381/Vetenskapsraadets-guide-infrastrukturen-2018_VR_2018.pdf
Swedish Research Council (2020). Samordning av öppen tillgång till forskningsdata: Statusrapport i Vetenskapsrådets uppdrag—summering av arbetet 2017–2019 och fortsatt arbete [Coordination of open access to research data: Status report on the Swedish Research Council’s mission—summary of work 2017–2019 and continued work.]. Accessed 3 Dec. 2023 from https://www.vr.se/download/18.47291b121711f04ce6e3bb/1585815456838/Samordning%20av%20oppen%20tillgang%20till%20forskningsdata_VR_2020.pdf
Swedish Research Council. (2022). Vetenskapsrådets samordningsuppdrag om öppen tillgång till forskningsdata 2022 [The Swedish Research Council’s coordination assignment on open access to research data]. Accessed 15 Feb. 2024 from https://www.vr.se/download/18.72c4495e17f44b64443b03a/1647009787100/Samordningsuppdrag%20om%20%C3%B6ppen%20tillg%C3%A5ng%20till%20forskningsdata%20VR%202022.pdf.
Swedish Research Council (2023). The Swedish Research Council´s guide to research infrastructure 2023. Accessed 15 Feb. 2024 from https://www.vr.se/download/18.14f2b85918c8ae70d9922c20/1704736135760/Guide%20to%20research%20infrastructure%202023.pdf
Swedish Research Council (2024). Forskning och innovation för ett hållbart och säkert samhälle Gemensamt underlag till regeringens forsknings- och innovationspolitik från Energimyndigheten, Formas, Forte, Rymdstyrelsen, Vetenskapsrådet och Vinnova. [Research and innovation for a sustainable and safe society. Common basis for the government’s research and innovation policy] Accessed 15 feb 2024 from https://www.vr.se/download/18.1e171f1718bcc1830fea98/1699964201384/Forskning%20och%20innovation%20f%C3%B6r%20ett%20h%C3%A5llbart%20och%20s%C3%A4kert%20samh%C3%A4lle-2023.pdf
Sønderskov, K. M., & Dinesen. P. T. (2016). Trusting the state, trusting each other? The effect of institutional trust on social trust.” Political behavior 38(1). 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9322-8
Tupasela, A., Snell, K., & Tarkkala, H. (2020). The Nordic data imaginary. Big Data & Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720907107
UNDP. (2019). Future forward: UNDP digital strategy. Accessed 10 Feb. 2021 from https://digitalstrategy.undp.org/documents/UNDP-digital-strategy-2019.pdf
Vey, K., Fandel-Meyer, T., Zipp, J. S., & Schneider, C. (2017). Learning & Development in Times of Digital Transformation: Facilitating a Culture of Change and Innovation. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC), 10(1). 22–32. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v10i1.6334
Vinnova, Vetenskapsrådet, DIGG & PTS. (2021). Regeringsuppdrag att föreslå ett strategiskt program för digital strukturomvandling: Slutredovisning [Government mandate to propose a strategic program for digital structural transformation: Final report] https://www.vinnova.se/contentassets/b6f628d9450642068ce283db0f16381d/rapport-ru-kraftsamling-for-digital-strukturomvandling.pdf
Zmerli, S., Newton, K., & Montero, J. R. (2007). Trust in people, confidence in political institutions, and satisfaction with democracy. In Citizenship and involvement in European democracies: A comparative analysis. Eds. J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero, & A. Westholm. New York: Routledge.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: Public Affairs.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Stefan Gelfgren, Coppélie Cocq
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
