The Public Administration of Public Art: Situated Practices in Swedish Municipalities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.39139Keywords:
situated practice, public art, Grounded theory, municipalities, SwedenAbstract
Even though states support and administer public art programs all over the world, the public administration of public art is a close to non-existent topic in the public administration research literature. This article provides some first steps towards a scholarly engagement with public art in the field of public administration through a practice-centred grounded theory-inspired investigation into the situated everyday practices of public administration of public art in Swedish municipalities. The results evince that difficult challenges regarding artistic integrity, democratic influence and political accountability rarely emerge in pure form, but rather tend to appear on the stage of administrative everyday work entangled in mundane bureaucratic processes relating to public procurement laws, accounting rules and budgeting routines. It is therefore important to investigate the administration of public art as an ongoing world of practice in which action is always contextually and situationally specific.
Downloads
References
Ashworth, R. E., McDermott, A. M., & Currie, G. (2019). Theorizing from Qualitative Research in Public Administration: Plurality through a Combination of Rigor and Richness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(2), 318-333. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy057
Balfe, J. H., & Wyszomirski, M. J. (1986). Public art and public policy. Journal of Arts Management and Law, 15(4), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07335113.1986.9942166
Belfiore, E. (2004). Auditing culture: the subsidised cultural sector in the New Public Management. International journal of cultural policy, 10(2), 183-202.
Bille Hansen, T. (1995). Measuring the value of culture. International journal of cultural policy, 1(2), 309-322.
Blomgren, R. (2012). Autonomy or democratic cultural policy: that is the question. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 18(5), 519-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2012.708861
Bornemark, J. & Svenaeus, F. (Eds.) (2009). Vad är praktisk kunskap?. Huddinge: Södertörns högskola.
Bornemark, J. (2019). Att forska med skrivande praktiker: vägar och paradoxer. In M. Gunnarson (Ed.), Att utforska praktisk kunskap: undersökande, prövande och avtäckande metoder. Huddinge: Södertörns högskola, 59-88.
Bryant A. (2017). Grounded theory and grounded theorizing: Pragmatism in research practice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199922604.001.0001
Cartiere, C. & Tan, L. (eds.) (2020). The Routledge companion to art in the public realm. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429450471
Cartiere, C. & Willis, S. (eds.) (2008). The practice of public art. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203926673
Cartiere, C. & Zebracki, M. (eds.) (2016). The everyday practice of public art: art, space, and social inclusion. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315737881
Cederberg, C., Fuglseth, K. & Van der Zande, E. (Eds.) (2023). Exploring practical knowledge: life-world studies of professionals in education and research. Leiden: Brill.
Charmaz K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
Corley K. G. (2015). A commentary on “what grounded theory is…”: Engaging a phenomenon from the perspective of those living it. Organizational Research Methods, 18(4), 600–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115574747
Dubin, S. C. (1985). The politics of public art. Urban Life, 14(3), 274-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912416850140030
Duelund, P. (ed.) (2003). The Nordic cultural model. Copenhagen: Nordic Cultural Institute.
Durrer, V., Miller, T. & O'Brien, D. (Eds.) (2018). The Routledge handbook of global cultural policy. London: Routledge.
Durrer, V., Gilmore, A., & Stevenson, D. (2019). Arts councils, policy-making and “the local”. Cultural trends, 28(4), 317-331.
Elías, M. V. (2022). Practice as lived experience: the missing link in public administration research. Public Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.37808/paq.46.1.
Feldman, M., & Worline, M. (2016). The practicality of practice theory. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(2), 304-324. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2014.0356
Finkelpearl, T. (2000). Dialogues in public art. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2399.001.0001
Fock, N. (2006). Dialogue Seminar as a Tool: Experience from Combitech Systems AB. In Göranzon, B. & Hammarén, M. & Ennals R. (Eds.) Dialogue, Skill & Tacit Knowledge, Hoboken: John Wiley, 87-109.
Frederickson, H. G., K. B. Smith, C. W. Larimer, and M. J. Licari. (2015). The public administration theory primer. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494369
Fuglseth, K. (2023). Practical knowledge as an academic study of its own? A methodological approach. In C. Cederberg, K. Fuglseth, & E. van der Zande (Eds.), Exploring practical knowledge: Life-world studies of professionals in education and research. Leiden: Brill, 7–24.
Giardina, E., & Rizzo, I. (1994). Regulation in the cultural sector. In A. Peacock & I. Rizzo (Eds.), Cultural economics and cultural policies. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 125-142.
Gilmore, A., Glow, H., & Johanson, K. (2017). Accounting for quality: Arts evaluation, public value and the case of “culture counts”. Cultural Trends, 26(4), 282-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2017.1382761
Glaser, B.G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: issues and discussions. Mill Valley, Calif.: Sociology Press.
Göranzon, B. & Hammarén, M. (2006). The Methodology of the Dialogue Seminar. In Göranzon, B. & Hammarén, M. & Ennals R. (Eds.) Dialogue, Skill & Tacit Knowledge, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 239-263.
Gray, C. (2007). Commodification and instrumentality in cultural policy. International journal of cultural policy, 13(2), 203-215.
Gray, C. (2010). Analysing cultural policy: incorrigibly plural or ontologically incompatible?. International journal of cultural policy, 16(2), 215-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630902935160
Gunnarsson, M. (2019). Inledning. In M. Gunnarson (Ed.), Att utforska praktisk kunskap: undersökande, prövande och avtäckande metoder. Huddinge: Södertörns högskola, 7-22.
Hafer, J. A. (2022). Developing the theory of pragmatic public management through classic grounded theory methodology. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(4): 627-640. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab050
Hall, T., & Robertson, I. (2001). Public Art and Urban Regeneration: advocacy, claims and critical debates. Landscape Research, 26(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390120024457
Harding, T. (2022). Culture wars? The (re) politicization of Swedish cultural policy. Cultural Trends, 31(2), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2021.1971932
Harding, T. (2023). Country profile: Sweden. Compendium of Cultural Policies and Trends, 20th edition. Bonn: Association of the Compendium of Cultural Policies and Trends.
Haugsevje, Å. D., Hylland, O. M., & Stavrum, H. (2016). Kultur for å delta-Når kulturpolitiske idealer skal realiseres i praktisk kulturarbeid. Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidsskrift, 19(1), 78-97.
Henningsen, E., & Røyseng, S. (2025). Cultural policy, politicians and the logic of appropriateness. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 1-14.
Hunting, D. (2005). Public art policy: Examining an emerging discipline. Perspectives in Public Affairs, 2.
Jakonen, O., & Sokka, S. (2023). “We have no politics involved in state subsidies!” Civil servants as political actors within the system of cultural administration. Nordisk Kulturpolitisk Tidsskrift, 26(2), 105-125.
Jakonen, O., Renko, V., & Harding, T. (2025). Challenging the Nordic model? The cultural policies of populist parties in Finland and Sweden. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 31(1), 16-35.
Johannisson, J. (2006). Det lokala möter världen: kulturpolitiskt förändringsarbete i 1990-talets Göteborg. Diss. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet, 2006.
Johannisson, J. (2009). A Sense of Place? Tracing a spatial approach to cultural policy. In M. Pyykkönen, N. Simanainen, & S. Sokka (Eds.), What about cultural policy? Interdisciplinary perspectives on culture and politics (pp. 173–192). Helsinki: Minerva, 173-192.
Johannisson, J. (2010). Making geography matter in cultural policy research: The case of regional cultural policy in Sweden. In J. P. Singh (Ed.), International cultural policies and power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 127-139.
Kangas, A., & Vestheim, G. (2010). Institutionalism, cultural institutions and cultural policy in the Nordic countries. Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidsskrift, 13(2), 267-284.
Kann-Rasmussen, N. (2024). Reframing instrumentality: from new public management to new public governance. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 30(5), 583-596.
Karlholm, D. (2023). Art Work in Public Time. In H Nilsson (ed.) Renegotiations: The role of public art in the new millennium. Huddinge: Södertörn University, 73-97.
Karlsson, D. (2003). En chimär av endräkt: ideologiska dimensioner i kommunal kulturpolitik. Diss. Göteborg : Univ., 2003. Göteborg.
Knight, C.K. & Senie, H. (eds.) (2016). A companion to public art. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118475331
Konstnärsnämnden (2020). 1% för konstnärlig gestaltning av offentlig miljö: en komparativ studie av enprocentregeln i kommuner och regioner 2012 och 2018. Stockholm: Konstnärsnämnden.
KRO (2021). Konstbranschen i siffror 2021. Stockholm: Konstnärernas Riksorganisation.
KRO (2025). Utsikt från ateljéerna. Rapport 2: Gestaltningsuppdrag. Stockholm: Konstnärernas Riksorganisation.
Kwon, M. (2002). One place after another: site-specific art and locational identity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5138.001.0001
Larsen, H., Kann-Rasmussen, N., & Rivano Eckerdal, J. (2022). Contemporary Scandinavian LAMs and legitimacy. In C. Hvenegaard Rasmussen, K. Rydbeck, & H. Larsen (Eds.), Libraries, Archives, and Museums in Transition: Changes, Challenges, and Convergence in a Scandinavian Perspective. London: Routledge, 173–186.
Larsson, T., & Svenson, P. (2001). Cultural policy in Sweden. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 31(1), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632920109599580
Lewandowska, K., & Smolarska, Z. (2020). Artistic quality and consensus decision-making: On reviewing panels in the performing arts. International Journal of media & cultural politics, 16(2), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp_00022_1
Lindqvist, K. (2019). Dilemmas and paradoxes of regional cultural policy implementation: Governance modes, discretion, and policy outcome. Administration & Society, 51(1), 63-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715621944
Lindsköld, L. & Ejgod Hansen, L. (2024). Comparative Nordic cultural policy research. Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidsskrift, 27(1), 5-7.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Makri, C., & Neely, A. (2021). Grounded theory: A guide for exploratory studies in management research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940692110136
Mangset, P. (2009). The arm’s length principle and the art funding system: A comparative approach. In M. Pyykkönen, N. Simanainen, & S. Sokka (Eds.), What about cultural policy? Interdisciplinary perspectives on culture and politics. Helsinki: Minerva, 273-297.
Mangset, P., Kangas, A., Skot‐Hansen, D., & Vestheim, G. (2008). Nordic cultural policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 14(1).
Mankin, L. D. (2002). The administration of public art on state university campuses. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 32(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632920209597334
Matthews, T., & Gadaloff, S. (2022). Public art for placemaking and urban renewal: Insights from three regional Australian cities. Cities, 127, 103747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103747
Mulcahy, K.V. (2017). Public culture, cultural identity, cultural policy: comparative perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nilsson, H. (2023a). Public art: an attempt to navigate. In H Nilsson (ed.) Renegotiations: The role of public art in the new millennium. Huddinge: Södertörn University, 22-53.
Nilsson, H. (2023b). Renegotiations: The role of public art in the new millennium. Huddinge: Södertörn University.
O'Brien, D. (2014). Cultural policy: management, value and modernity in the creative industries. London: Routledge.
Paquette, J., & Beauregard, D. (2018). Cultural policy in political science research. In V. Durrer, T. Miller, & D. O’Brien (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Global Cultural Policy. London: Routledge, 19–32.
Paquette, J., & Redaelli, E. (2015). Cultural policy as conventional public policy. In J. Paquette & E. Redaelli, Arts management and cultural policy research (pp. 58–76). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137460929_6
Plaza, B., Tironi, M., & Haarich, S. N. (2009). Bilbao's art scene and the “Guggenheim effect” revisited. European Planning Studies, 17(11), 1711-1729. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903230806
Renko, V., Johannisson, J., Kangas, A., & Blomgren, R. (2022). Pursuing decentralisation: regional cultural policies in Finland and Sweden. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 28(3), 342-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2021.1941915
Schuermans, N., Loopmans, M. P., & Vandenabeele, J. (2012). Public space, public art and public pedagogy. Social & Cultural Geography, 13(7), 675-682. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2012.728007
Schwarz, E. (2019). Den ständige nybörjaren: Om reflektion och praktisk kunskap. In M. Gunnarson (Ed.), Att utforska praktisk kunskap: undersökande, prövande och avtäckande metoder. Huddinge: Södertörns högskola, 113–158.
Senie, H. F. (2003). Responsible criticism: evaluating public art. Sculpture 22(10), 44-49.
Sharp, J., Pollock, V., & Paddison, R. (2005). Just art for a just city: Public art and social inclusion in urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5/6), 1001-1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500106963
Sitas, R. (2023). ‘Policies aren’t pieces of paper’: Tussles and tactics in action-oriented and agile cultural policy research. In V. Durrer, A. Gilmore, L. Jancovich, & D. Stevenson (Eds.), Cultural policy is local: Understanding cultural policy as situated practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 239-263.
Skot-Hansen, D. (1999). Kultur til tiden - strategier i den lokale kulturpolitik. Nordisk Kulturpolitisk Tidskrift 2(1), 7–27.
Smith, Z. A. (2014). Public Art for Management: The Stages of Public Art Development around the World. International Journal of Management and Computing Sciences 4(2), 10.
Statens Konstråd & Trafikverket (2017). Kronotopia Tävling 2: Haga och Korsvägen 2017. Juryns samlade utlåtande för konstnärlig gestaltning av stadsomvandlingsprojektet Västlänken. Stockholm: Public Art Agency Sweden.
Stenström, E. (2008). What turn will cultural policy take? The renewal of the Swedish model. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 14(1), 25-35.
Strauss, A.L. & Corbin, J.M. (eds.) (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Swedberg, R. (2012). Theorizing in sociology and social science: Turning to the context of discovery. Theory and society, 41, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-011-9161-5
Taylor, A. (1997). ‘Arm’s length but hands on’. Mapping the new governance: the department of national heritage and cultural politics in Britain. Public Administration, 75(3), 441-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00069
Throsby, D. (2003). Determining the value of cultural goods: How much (or how little) does contingent valuation tell us?. Journal of cultural economics, 27(3), 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026353905772
Throsby, C.D. (2010). The economics of cultural policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vestheim, G. (1994). Instrumental Cultural Policy in Scandinavian Countries: A Critical Historical Perspective. The European Journal of Cultural Policy, 1(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286639409357969
Vestheim, G. (2009). The autonomy of culture and the arts: From the early bourgeois era to late modern “runaway world.” In M. Pyykkönen, N. Simanainen, & S. Sokka (Eds.), What about cultural policy? Interdisciplinary perspectives on culture and politics. Helsinki: Minerva, 31–54.
Wagenaar, H. (2004). “Knowing” the rules: Administrative work as practice. Public administration review, 64(6), 643-656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00412.x
Zacka, B. (2022). Political theory rediscovers public administration. Annual Review of Political Science, 25(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-125131
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jonathan Metzger, Catharina Gabrielsson, Eva Arnqvist, Anna Wignell, Per Hasselberg
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration agree to publish their articles under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This means means articles are free for anybody to read and download, and to copy and disseminate for non-commercial purposes as long as appropriate credit is given, a link is provided to the license, and any changes made are clearly indicated. Authors retain copyright of their work.
