Evaluation, Framing and Power

Authors

  • Øyunn Syrstad Høydal Oslo Business School, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v25i3-4.7093

Keywords:

evaluation, framing, power, evidence-based policymaking, PISA

Abstract

The concept of framing implies that policy issues can be viewed from different perspectives. The choice of perspective influences the way societal phenomena are understood and the solutions to the perceived problems, as well as the perspectives focused on when evaluating these solutions. Framing thus involves power, and framing in relation to evaluation involves the power to influence production of public knowledge and, subsequently, policy decisions informed by this evidence. While the role of framing in policymaking seems to be a topic of increasing academic interest, thus far evaluation literature has not reflected this trend. Evaluation still tends to be perceived as an objective external voice, providing the political–administrative system with neutral evidence. This paper challenges this dominant image of evaluation and seeks to contribute to clarifying the complex relationship between framing, evaluation and power.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Øyunn Syrstad Høydal, Oslo Business School, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway

Øyunn Syrstad Høydal is a sociologist, holding a postdoc position at Oslo Business School, OsloMet. In her current project she is investigating the relationship between policy, evidence, values and institutional framing in the digitalization of the Norwegian 1-13 school. She has previously studied the use of evaluations in public policy.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-15

How to Cite

Syrstad Høydal, Øyunn. (2021). Evaluation, Framing and Power. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 25(3/4), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v25i3-4.7093

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.