Work-integrated learning for social sustainability
insights from the Nordic textile industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64775/ciwil.2025.56997Keywords:
Boundary crossing, Collaboration , Social sustainability , Supply chain , Textile industry , Work-integrated learningAbstract
This paper explores how small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the Nordic textile industry engage in collaboration and learning to address social sustainability in the context of complex global supply chains and emerging regulatory frameworks, such as the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). Drawing on theories of work-integrated learning (WIL), collaboration, and boundary crossing, the study conceptualizes social sustainability as a dynamic and relational practice shaped through interaction among diverse actors. Using a qualitative case study approach, the paper analyzes interviews with stakeholders from Nordic textile SMEs, industry associations, and NGOs. The findings show that collaboration—internally and externally—is essential for building capacity, navigating regulatory demands, and fostering situated learning. Shared tools such as certifications, supplier manuals, and legal frameworks function as boundary objects that support coordination and mutual understanding across organizational and sectoral boundaries. The study proposes a model of work-integrated learning for sustainable development, illustrating how boundary crossing around shared artefacts enables collaborative learning and knowledge creation. Time, trust, and territory are identified as key preconditions for these processes, highlighting how SMEs can move beyond compliance and engage in continuous learning to strengthen their social sustainability efforts.
References
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435
Amiri, S. E., Heikkilä, J., & Moshtari, M. (2024). Supplier relationship management approaches for diffusing social sustainability in supply chains: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Procurement Management, 21(5), 1-22. DOI: 10.1504/IJPM.2024.143634
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
Björck, V., & Willermark, S. (2024). Where is the ‘WIL’ in Work-Integrated Learning Research? Studies in Continuing Education 46(3), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2024.2378718
Blomqvist, K., & Levy, J. (2006). Collaboration capability – A focal concept in knowledge creation and collaborative innovation in networks. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMCP.2006.009645
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chatzipanagiotou, N., Mirijamdotter, A., & Mörtberg, C. (2025). Work-integrated learning in managers’ cooperative work practices. The Learning Organization, 32(1), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-12-2022-0157
Dempere, J., Udjo, E., & Mattos, P. (2024). The entrepreneurial Impact of the European Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence. Administrative Sciences, 14(10), 266. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14100
De Neve, G. (2014). Fordism, flexible specialization and CSR: How Indian garment workers critique neoliberal labour regimes. Ethnography, 15(2), 184-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138112463801
Edwards, M., Stubbs, W., & Starik, M. (2018). How do B Corps interact with their stakeholders to scale up their B-impact? In Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018(1), 10476. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2018.10476
Espínola, M. P., Mason, T., Rebagliati, S., & Kumar, V. K. (2025). Opportunities & challenges in EU due diligence policy implementation for the textile sector. ERA Forum: Journal of the Academy of European Law, 25(4), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-024-00816-6
Ethical Trade Sweden (2025). EU-kommissionens Omnibus-förslag: Vad innebär det för företags hållbarhetsarbete? Retrieved March 7, 2025 from https://etisverige.se/aktuellt/eu-kommissionens-omnibus/
European Commission (2003). Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (2003/361/EC). L 124, pp.36–41. Retrieved March 7, 2025 from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reco/2003/361/oj
European Commission. (2024). Directive on corporate sustainability due diligence (Directive 2024/1760). Retrieved February 2, 2025 from: https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/doing-business-eu/sustainability-due-diligence-responsible-business/corporate-sustainability-due-diligence_en
European Commission (n.d.). Corporate sustainability due diligence. Retrieved February 2, 2025, from https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/doing-business-eu/
Fernández-Stark, K., Bamber, P., & Couto, V. (2022). Analysis of the textile and clothing industry global value chains (IDB-TN-02624). Inter-American Development Bank. Retrieved March 15, 2025 from: https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Analysis-of-the-Textile-and-Clothing-Industry-Global-Value-Chains.pdf
Fleming, J., McLachlan, K., & Pretti, T. J. (2018). Successful work-integrated learning relationships: A framework for sustainability. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 19(4), 321-335.
Gellerstedt, M., Johansson, K. & Winman, T. (2015). Work Integrated Learning - a Marriage Between Academia and Working Life. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 13(6), 39-40.
Govindan, K., Shaw, M., & Majumdar, A. (2021). Social sustainability tensions in multi-tier supply chain: A systematic literature review towards conceptual framework development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123075
Harjoto, M., Laksmana, I., & Yang, Y. (2018). Why do companies obtain the B corporation certification? Social Responsibility Journal, 15(5), 621–639. https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-07-2018-0170
Hedenus, F., Persson, M., & Sprei, F. (2022). Sustainable development - nuances and perspectives. Second edition. Studentlitteratur AB.
Henriksson, H., & Grunewald, E. W. (2020). Sustainability Leadership. In Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42291-2
Jakubik, M. (2008). Experiencing collaborative knowledge creation processes. The Learning Organization, 15(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470810842475
Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9168
Kazadi, K., Lievens, A., & Mahr, D. (2016). Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 525-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.009
Köksal, D., Strähle, J., Müller, M., & Freise, M. (2017). Social Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Textile and Apparel Industry—A Literature Review. Sustainability, 9(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/su901
Koplin, J., Seuring, S., Mesterharm, M., (2007). Incorporating sustainability into supply management in the automotive industryethe case of the volkswagen Ag. J. Clean. Prod. 15(11), DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.06.004
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2017). Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 2: Context, research questions and designs. European Journal of General Practice, 23(1), 274-279. DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375090
Kourula, A., Pisani, N., & Kolk, A. (2017). Corporate sustainability and inclusive development: highlights from international business and management research. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 24, 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.003
Mani, V., Agarwal, R., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., Childe, S.J., (2016). Social sustainability in the supply chain: construct development and measurement validation. Ecol. Indicat. 71, 270-279 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.036
Marshall, D., McCarthy, L., McGrath, P., & Claudy, M. (2015). Going above and beyond how sustainability culture and entrepreneurial orientation drive social sustainability supply chain practice adoption. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 20(4), 434-454. DOI: 10.1108/SCM-08-2014-0267
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., & Miles, G. (2000). TheFuture.org. Long Range Planning, 33(3), 300–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(00)00032-7
Mohajeri, B., Kauranen, I., Nyberg, T., Ilen, E., Nelson, M., & Xiong, G. (2020). Improving sustainability in the value chain of the apparel industry empowered with social manufacturing. 2020 15th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), 2020 15th IEEE Conference On, 235–240. https://doi-org/10.1109/ICIEA48937.2020.9248189
Muñoz, D. R. (2025). The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD): Everything, everywhere, all at once? University of Genoa EUSFiL Law Research Working Paper Series (1). University of Genoa.
Nakamba, C.C., Chan, P.W., Sharmina, M., (2017). How does social sustainability feature in studies of supply chain management? A review and research agenda. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 22(6), 522-541. doi:10.1108/SCM-12-2016-0436
Nicole, S. J., Lada, S., Ansar, R., Abdul Adis, A.-A., Fook, L. M., & Chekima, B. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and strategic management: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 14(17), 10526. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710526
Nordic Council of Ministers (2023). The Nordic Region – a sustainable and integrated region? Status Report for Our Vision 2030. TemaNord 2023:502. https://pub.norden.org/temanord2023-502
Norström, L., & Hattinger, M. (2016). Efforts at the Boundaries: Social Media Use in Swedish Municipalities. In International Conference on Electronic Participation (pp. 123-137). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45074-2_10
Oonk, C., Gulikers, J., Brok, P. D., & Mulder, M. (2022). Stimulating boundary crossing learning in a multi- stakeholder learning environment for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(8), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-04-2021-0156
Permatasari, P., & Gunawan, J. (2023). Sustainability policies for small medium enterprises: WHO are the actors? Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 9, 100122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100122
Pedersen, E. R. G., & Andersen, K. R. (2023). Greenwashing: a broken business model. Journal of Business Models, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.54337/jbm.v11i2.7352
Sancha, C., Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., (2016). Achieving a socially responsible supply chain through assessment and collaboration. J. Clean. Prod. 112, 1934-1947. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.117
Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2005). Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organization science, 16(5), 491-508. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0175
Setyaningsih, S., Widjojo, R., & Kelle, P. (2024). Challenges and opportunities in sustainability reporting: a focus on small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2298215
Shaw, M., Majumdar, A., & Govindan, K. (2022). Barriers of social sustainability: an improved interpretive structural model of Indian textile and clothing supply chain. Sustainable Development, 30(6), 1616– 1633. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2331
Shaw, M., Majumdar, A., & Govindan, K. (2024). How are the barriers of social sustainability perceived in a multi-tier supply chain? A case of textile and clothing industry. Operations Management Research 17(1), 91-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00406-8
Smit, L., Bright, C., McCorquodale, R., Bauer, M., Deringer, H., Breinbauer, D. B., Torres-Cortés, F., Alleweldt, F., Kara, S., Salinier, C., Tobed, H. T., & Heasman, L. (2020a). Study on due diligence requirements through the supply chain: FINAL REPORT. EU Publications. https://doi.org/10.2838/39830
Smit, L., Holly, G., McCorquodale, R., & Neely, S. (2020b). Human rights due diligence in global supply chains: evidence of corporate practices to inform a legal standard. The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(6), 945–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1799196
Star, S. L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In Distributed artificial intelligence (pp. 37-54). Morgan Kaufmann.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
Sunnemark, L., Sunnemark, F., Dahlquist, K., Gahnström, E., Assmo, P., & Piper, L. (2024). Bridging theory and practice through Work-Integrated Learning (WIL): Critical perspectives on the conceptualisations of WIL at a university in Sweden. Critical Studies in Education, 65(4), 403-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2023.2294462
Terwindt, C., & Armstrong, A. (2019). Oversight and accountability in the social auditing industry: The role of social compliance initiatives. International Labour Review, 158(2), 245-272.
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
Thorisdottir, T. S., Johannsdottir, L., Pedersen, E. R. G., & Niinimäki, K. (2024). Social, environmental, and economic value in sustainable fashion business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 442, 141091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141091
Vallo Hult, H., Smidt, H., Carlén, U., Johansson, K., Fredriksson Larsson, U., Påsse, M., Tano, I., Linder, J., & Lundh Snis, U. (2024). A quality enhancement framework as support for work-integrated learning (WIL) in working life. 17th Annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. In ICERI2024 Proceedings (pp. 10002-10008). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2024.2515
Vazquez-Brust, D., Souza Piao, R., de Sousa de Melo, M. F., Yaryd, R. T., & Carvalho, M. M. (2020). The governance of collaboration for sustainable development: Exploring the “black box”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120260
Veltman, M. E., Van Keulen, J., & Voogt, J. M. (2019). Design principles for addressing wicked problems through boundary crossing in higher professional education. Journal of Education and Work, 32(2), 135–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2019.1610165
Veenbrink, M. (2024). Synergies between the CSDDD and EU competition law: a toxic relationship? Market and Competition Law Review, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2024.17488
Wilhelm, M. (2024). Mandatory due diligence legislation: a paradigm shift for the governance of sustainability in global value chains? Journal of International Business Policy, 7, 459–465. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-024-00193-4
Wood, D. J., & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 139-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391272001
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Misheelt Gankhuyag, Livia Norström, Julia Zetterström
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
